Connect with us

Detroit, MI

Q&A: Robert Cramer, head of Detroit bus system, wants to rebuild trust with riders

Published

on

Q&A: Robert Cramer, head of Detroit bus system, wants to rebuild trust with riders


Robert Cramer took the helm of the Detroit Department of Transportation in early January. The former head of the agency that oversaw the Detroit People Mover, Cramer now is in charge of a system with more than four dozen routes, nearly 300 buses and more than 5,000 bus stops.

Creating a safe and reliable bus system is his main goal for DDOT, and he understands that achieving that goal depends on a lot of moving parts and also rebuilding trust with riders. He and others believe DDOT is making progress and there is data to back up that assertion. Cramer spoke with Detroit News reporter Louis Aguilar about his new role and the importance of public transit in Detroit.

Question: Could I just ask the basic question — why did you want this job?

Answer: I thought this was a great opportunity, because I think there really is an incredible chance to make a big difference. As part of what makes me, you know, get up and come to work every day through my transit career, is that you get a chance to impact — hopefully for good, sometimes not so good, depending on how you do — tens of thousands of people every day.

Advertisement

DDOT has been around in one form or another for over 100 years. Certainly, there’s a lot of pride in honoring, in joining, that kind of organization. Being part of the city of Detroit team is something that I was excited about.  At the People Mover, I had kind of got a taste of it, as the People Mover is an ancillary organization. It’s not a city department, but (I) got a good flavor there, just as a professional working with the team members of the city, the council members and their staffs every day. It’s clear that all of those people all want the city to move forward and be the best they can for the residents every day. This wasn’t a hard choice.

Q: You’ve had a career in transit. I’m just curious what drives a person to be passionate about transit, mass transit, especially in Detroit?

A: So, my background is in planning and transportation planning and GIS mapping. I’ve always kind of had that interest in in transportation, especially from a planning and community impact perspective. I started my career in the private sector doing planning and transportation plans and stuff with contracts with MDOT (Michigan Department of Transportation), with counties, cities, even in other states. I got a good feel for how transportation can really impact people, businesses, people of all ages, communities can really be affected for good or for bad with transportation. And I had an opportunity to go to SMART (Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation) and work. I started there in the grants department, which is really helping find money for different projects. And from there, I worked my way up. The more and more I worked in it, the more you really get a sense for how it impacts people. It’s pretty unique. There’s a lot of different pieces that make the bus go, so to speak.

I don’t think I’ve told this story before, but my grandfather grew up in the east side of Detroit, and I’ve got over 20 cousins. But I was one that was always kind of willing to go on whatever adventure he wanted to go on. I remember he could name every church steeple and how many parishioners were there, you know, just by seeing a little piece of it as we would drive around the city. He would always say that what the city really needs is better mass transit. Like, I don’t know how he got to that, but he would say that. I do think about that from time to time. It’s not something when you’re growing up, you’re like, “Well, I really want to, you know, be in charge for transit agency.” But it’s something that is very rewarding.

Q: I’m sure you’re aware how often young people and others who care about the economic progress of the city bring up their concerns about mass transit. Mass transit is something they see lacking. I don’t know what your impression is about that, about how much you can change that, or how much you think you can change that?

Advertisement

A: Change the impression, yeah, well; providing more reliable service is a way to get there. The overarching vision, message, guiding principles, is we want to provide safe and reliable service that thinks about making the customer experience the best it can be. Regardless of whether our schedule says there’s one bus that’s coming every day or whether we have a bus that’s coming every five minutes, those are still the same principles you can use. For us to make progress, we have to rebuild the trust and reliability that people see in the system, so that we’re moving from — and I don’t know if we’re exactly this point right now — but we’re in that neighborhood of “How much longer until I can save up enough money to not have to rely on the bus?”

We don’t move out of that, that layer of the atmosphere, into “Hey, this is really an attractive, reliable alternative.” But maybe it only goes half the places I want to go, so they’re kind of moving into that realm of “OK, well, when I need it, and it goes where I need to go, now I can count on it.” Now you can build on top of that — where are places we can ramp up service? Are there new connections we can make? Can we have better coordination with SMART or with the People Mover or with other services so that now we’re adding, we’re moving up to that next tier, and eventually, if you keep building in that way, then now you get to a higher quality transit system. That’s the only way, really, to convince people. There’s nothing I can say where they’re going to say, “Oh, yeah, you’re right. It’s not a problem.”

Q: So, one of the goals is to expand service, add more routes and buses?

A: Short answer is yes. The question is, how much? If you’re sticking to the values of safe, reliable service with a good customer experience, we want to make sure that we don’t get to the point where the schedule is more than we can deliver. So that’s how we’re going to decide how we go, right? The City Council could say tomorrow we’re going to triple the budget of DDOT. But that doesn’t mean anything, unless we can magically triple the number of buses and triple the number of drivers that are hired.

The attractiveness of DDOT and of transit as a whole is to start with: the service is safe and that you can rely on it. Meaning, if it says it’s going to be there, it’s going to be there, and if it’s not going to be there, we find a way to let people know that. We’re going to keep pushing for this and this is high on the mayor’s priority list. All the council members I’ve talked to, all want us to put out as much service as we can. I think you’ll see that that’s what we’re going to do each quarter; each quarter is when we have our service adjustments. Each quarter, we’re going to be moving up at steps that we believe we can keep maintaining the reliability while continuing to ramp up the overall service.

Advertisement

Q: Do you have a goal, like a percentage of whatever service reliability, like 80% of on time?

A: The industry average is 80% on time performance. Right now we’re really close. I think last week we were at 78%. Also, we look at pullouts, so that’s making sure the buses we need to leave the terminal are out on the road, because if they’re not on the road, they’re certainly not providing the service. Last week, we were at 98% pullouts, meaning they got out on time with a driver that’s in the bus. So those are the things that we track. There’s also about 3,000 other things that we track, all trying to help us inform. You know, are there adjustments we can make to the schedule? Are there adjustments we can make to the routing, to the way buses have different pieces of work lined up? There’s lots of variables that you can adjust that can impact performance. One thing I was really excited about coming to DDOT, is they do have a lot of data. They have put effort into making sure that it’s quality data and that they have it in ways where it can be really analyzed and manipulated. That can help inform our decision.

Q: On your website, it shows that since March 2024 more than a million people have used DDOT every month. That seems a considerable jump compared to the previous months that’s on the website. Why the increase?

A: It’s important to put in context. Our ridership is still not all the way back to where it was pre-pandemic. This is kind of the same thing we were dealing with the People Mover, like we celebrated having one million rides on the People Mover last year, and that was with three months closed. So it was worth a milestone, worth celebrating. But pre-pandemic, most years we had over 2 million rides.

Advertisement

So, what you’re seeing, which is a marked increase from last year, means that we are making progress, not only with the service on the street, but also the reliability that makes people want to use it. If it’s not reliable, then people will do everything they can to find another alternative, or maybe they won’t have a job, they won’t go to the doctor, all that sort of thing. It’s reflective of the progress we’re making. But it’s it is not mission accomplished. Next year, you should be asking me the same question.

Q: So last year, we did report that one-third of DDOT buses were routinely out of service due to repairs. The mayor said at the time that represents about 96 of the department’s 292-bus fleet. Can you give an update on those figures and any context you want to provide with that?

A: The 96 that was reported in August had a lot of different layers to it. Some of those are, you know, there’s coaches. If they’re in a major crash, then that’s something that needs to be sent to an outside vendor. There certain tasks that rely on outside vendors. Sometimes we have to wait for a specialized part. Sometimes it’s a quick fix. So, within those 96 on any given day, there’s some that need more work and there’s some that need less work. The severity, whether it’s something down for a day or longer than that — that changes. There’s a lot that goes into that number. I’d say that’s a fair estimate.

Q: What is the percentage of your funding from federal sources?

A: The way that transit funding works is kind of complex. The federal funding that would be most impactful to DDOT’s operations is that it funds a high portion of our capital projects. So, all those buses we talked about; the hydrogen, the battery electric, and the hybrids, those are all federally funded with a state match. If that funding were to go away, then we don’t have the funding to replace that cycle of buses.

Advertisement

Q: I hear mass transit fans often say we should have had a subway. Do you think the region would be better off if we invested in subways long ago?

A: That’s a hypothetical enough question that I can say yes. I think the region would have benefited from having a subway, just because, I think that it’s something that drives economic development, it drives land use and growth. The more we can do to connect different neighborhoods and different communities is always going to be a win.

Q: What is the most common complaint you heard so far about DDOT from people who ride the bus?

A: To be honest, most of what I’ve heard in my little bit over a month is really appreciation and recognition that DDOT is moving in a positive direction. DDOT has really put a lot of effort into engaging the community, talking with advocates group, listening to City Council and their staffs, the Mayor’s Office, public partners, and most importantly, to just riders in general. Most of what we hear is, yes, we would like more, but we see that this is really improving, and we appreciate that. Again, that’s kind of what drives all of the staff at DDOT.

Q: How often do you take the bus?

Advertisement

A: Not as often as I’m about to. I used to ride SMART to work every day.

laguilar@detroitnews.com



Source link

Detroit, MI

Archdiocese of Detroit’s list of parishes chosen for halted Masses grows

Published

on

Archdiocese of Detroit’s list of parishes chosen for halted Masses grows


play

The list of churches targeted for the possible stoppage of weekend Masses has grown to at least 58 parishes across southeast Michigan, according to the latest proposed models the Archdiocese of Detroit had released as part of its major restructuring process through Friday. 

At least 22 parishes under the first round of proposed models wouldn’t hold weekend Mass. The archdiocese has been divided into 15 planning areas, or geographic areas, and three or four models are being proposed for each planning area, said the Rev. Mario Amore, executive director of parish renewal for the Archdiocese of Detroit.

Advertisement

The archdiocese has been holding listening sessions with parishioners this spring as part of its restructuring plan to get reactions.

The models have different proposed groupings of parishes, in which a grouping would share a pastor and potentially other priests. In some cases, selected churches in the grouping would no longer hold Sunday Mass.

Advertisement

The Archdiocese of Detroit released on May 22 and this past week the model proposals for another five planning areas, including areas of Macomb County, Oakland County and Detroit. Around 36 more parishes would no longer hold Mass in the future under the latest proposals.

Bunches of churches in Detroit would be affected, while four parishes in Troy and three parishes in Clinton Township wouldn’t have Saturday Vigil Mass or Sunday Mass under each of the proposed models presented for their planning areas.

Archdiocese of Detroit spokesperson Holly Fournier said the archdiocese has heard a wide range of reactions about the proposed models, which is “understandable given how personal parish life is for people.”

“Some pastors and parishioners are hopeful about opportunities for stronger collaboration and renewed ministry, while others are experiencing more uncertainty and concern, especially in places where one or more models suggest a parish might no longer host weekend Masses in the future,” she said.

Fournier emphasized that the models are “draft models” and aren’t final decisions.

Advertisement

The models for the final six planning areas will be released in June, according to the restructuring website.

The models are part of the archdiocese’s biggest restructuring plan in years. Announced last fall, Archbishop Edward Weisenburger said the archdiocese can’t maintain the roughly 200 existing parish buildings it has and is working to “right-size” the archdiocese, along with its personnel and financial resources. 

These are the latest affected parishes in Detroit, Oakland and Macomb counties

Fournier said the draft models were developed by priests earlier this year and are being presented in listening sessions as proposals “meant to spark broader consultation with the faithful.” Each parish in the archdiocese is holding listening sessions this spring or early summer.

In other dioceses that have undergone restructuring processes like the Archdiocese of Detroit’s, as many as 20-40% of the initial models were changed as a result of parishioner feedback, Fournier said.

Advertisement

“That is why it is so important for Catholics to attend their parish listening sessions to view these models and provide their honest feedback, so informed adjustments can be made where necessary,” she said in an email.

One of the most heavily affected groupings is Planning Area 1, which includes west Detroit. Ten of its 13 parishes would not have Saturday Vigil Mass or Sunday Mass in at least one of the model plans. They include Christ the King, Presentation/Our Lady of Victory, SS. Peter and Paul (Jesuit), SS. Peter and Paul (Westside), St. Charles Lwanga Church, St. Mary of Redford, St. Moses the Black Parish, St. Peter Claver Parish, St. Scholastica and St. Suzanne-Our Lady Gate of Heaven, all of which are in Detroit.

Planning Area 9, which includes southeastern Oakland County, has between 15 and 19 parishes, depending on the model. Ten of the parishes wouldn’t hold weekend Mass in at least one of the models. Four of them are in Troy.

They include St. Lucy in Troy, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton in Troy, Christ Our Light in Troy, St. Thomas More in Troy, St. Owen in Bloomfield Township, Our Lady of La Salette in Berkley, Our Mother of Perpetual Help in Oak Park, St. Justin-St. Mary Magdalen in Hazel Park, St. Vincent Ferrer in Madison Heights and Divine Providence in Southfield.

Advertisement

Planning Area 10, which includes all of northern Oakland County and parts of western Oakland County, has 19 to 22 parishes, depending on the model. Seven would stop holding weekend Mass in at least one of the models, including St. Benedict in Waterford Township, St. Thomas More in Troy, Sacred Heart in Auburn Hills, St. John Fisher Chapel University Parish in Auburn Hills, St. Perpetua in Waterford Township, St. Rita in Holly and Prince of Peace in West Bloomfield Township.

Planning Area 12, which includes parts of southern and eastern Macomb County, has 16 parishes. Four Warren parishes and three Clinton Township parishes would stop holding Mass under the draft models.

St. Louise de Marillac in Warren wouldn’t hold Saturday Vigil or Sunday Mass in two of the three draft models presented by the archdiocese. Six other parishes would not hold weekend Mass in only one of the models, including St. Louis in Clinton Township, San Francesco in Clinton Township, St. Ronald in Clinton Township, St. Martin de Porres in Warren, St. Faustina in Warren and St. Mark in Warren.

Planning Area 13, which includes areas of central and northern Macomb County and a parish in Troy, has 14 or 16 parishes, depending on the draft model. Three parishes in the planning area wouldn’t have weekend Mass under at least one of the models: St. Jane Frances de Chantal in Sterling Heights, St. Matthias in Sterling Heights and SS. John and Paul in Washington Township.

Amore said that if a church stops holding Sunday Mass, parishioners are encouraged to worship at other churches in their “pastorate,” which is a grouping of parishes overseen by a pastor. In the long term, the church building might close, or other sacramental celebrations might take place there, such as weddings and baptisms, he said.

Advertisement

The parish’s buildings could also be repurposed for other uses, such as religious education classes.

Fournier said the proposed models are meant to “foster discussion and discernment.”

“We encourage Catholics to stay engaged in the process, share their feedback honestly, and remember that the goal is not simply organizational change, but ensuring vibrant Catholic communities for future generations,” she said.

asnabes@detroitnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

Sunda New Asian brings bold flavors to Detroit

Published

on

Sunda New Asian brings bold flavors to Detroit


Modern Southeast Asian cuisine joins the Detroit food scene

Detroit’s dining scene just got even more flavorful with the opening of Sunda New Asian, bringing modern Southeast Asian cuisine to the city.

Restaurant owner Billy Dec joins the show to share what guests can expect from the new hotspot, from bold dishes and incredible cocktails to an energetic atmosphere.

Watch the video above to see what’s cooking up at Sunda New Asian.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Detroit, MI

What Lions’ offseason moves might indicate about 2026 season

Published

on

What Lions’ offseason moves might indicate about 2026 season


play

By this point in the offseason, it’s well documented who the Detroit Lions have added, as well as who they’ve lost.

Former Carolina Panthers center Cade Mays was the prize of free agency. He’ll replace Graham Glasgow in the middle of Detroit’s offensive line. Clemson’s Blake Miller, selected 17th overall in April’s draft, is poised to quickly take over at the tackle spot opposite Penei Sewell, stepping in for Taylor Decker. The pass rush was overhauled across from Aidan Hutchinson, with Ahmed Hassanein and Tyler Lacy being the only other edge defenders still on the roster from last season.

Advertisement

Today, we’ll try to take our analysis a step further, identifying a few patterns within Detroit’s offseason approach and exploring what those acquisitions, retentions and departures mean for a Lions team looking to bounce back and reemerge as a title contender in 2026.

Emphasis on interior pass rush

Detroit’s offense had its own share of issues throughout 2025. But what the defense produced down the stretch with the season on the line failed to meet reasonable expectations. Opponents averaged 28.1 points and 382.1 yards per game from Weeks 12-18, a stretch that resulted in four losses. Pinning all of Detroit’s defensive woes on one factor would be foolish (and you can’t ignore the role injuries played), but an inconsistent, at best, pass rush certainly didn’t help. The Lions owned the third-slowest time to pressure (2.86 seconds) in the NFL last season, according to Next Gen Stats.

Aside from the retooling opposite Hutchinson, the Lions also seemingly put an emphasis on acquiring interior defensive linemen who can get after the passer. Levi Onwuzurike is back after his contract tolled last season — Josh Paschal, a run-defending lineman who also had his contract tolled but was released in March, wasn’t afforded the same opportunity — and the Lions spent a couple of late-round draft picks on Texas Tech’s Skyler Gill-Howard and Tennessee’s Tyre West. Both players were drafted because of the flashes they’ve shown as pass rushers, particularly Gill-Howard, whose win rate in 2025 (14.4%) ranked 10th out of the 512 FBS interior defenders who rushed the passer on at least 100 snaps, according to Pro Football Focus.

More nickel?

Copying the Super Bowl champions isn’t always wise — every team’s personnel has its own set of skills — but it’s striking how much Detroit’s defense differed from that of the Seattle Seahawks, who rode their defense on the way to winning the franchise’s second title. The Lions led the league in use of base defense (three linebackers) last season, deploying those packages for 657 plays, according to Next Gen Stats. The Seahawks were last, with 66 plays. It was the opposite for use of nickel defense (five defensive backs), with the Seahawks leading the league (815) and the Lions at 32nd (355). Of course, Seattle is unique, given head coach Mike Macdonald’s defensive system and nickelback Nick Emmanwori’s immediate impact as a rookie.

Advertisement

The Lions won’t overhaul their entire scheme in one offseason, but it’s difficult to see their moves in totality and not come away thinking they could lean more on nickel packages in 2026. Alex Anzalone, one of the league’s better linebackers against the pass, allowed the Lions to play base defense as much as they did, as he was comfortable in coverage. He’s now with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Lions added a number of viable options to play nickelback next season, including veterans Christian Izien Jr. and Roger McCreary, as well as fifth-round rookie Keith Abney II (Arizona State).

Youth movement up front

Assuming the starting five, from left to right, winds up being Sewell, Christian Mahogany, Mays, Tate Ratledge and Miller, Detroit’s offensive line will have an average age of 25.2 next season. That’s down from 2025 (27.8) and 2024 (29.8). In no way does the influx of youth indicate surefire success, but the Lions would certainly be set up for sustained success if each of the five projected starters reach their ceilings. The offensive line could be even younger if 2025 fifth-rounder Miles Frazier, who is 11 months younger than Mahogany, wins the starting job at left guard. Juice Scruggs, another contender at left guard, is nine months older than Mahogany. Ben Bartch, 27, is the veteran option.

Whether Mays continues ascending at center will be key to Detroit’s success in 2026. He’s only started 20 games at the position over his four seasons in the NFL, and all of those starts have come within the last two years. He showed week-to-week growth in his 12 starts in 2025, enough for the Lions to commit $25 million ($14 million guaranteed) to him over the next three years. Mays surrendered 13 pressures last season and didn’t allow sack, according to PFF.

rsilva@detroitnews.com

Advertisement

@rich_silva18



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending