Lifestyle
New book explores the real-life KGB spy program that inspired 'The Americans'
DAVE DAVIES, HOST:
This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies. The FX TV series “The Americans” portrayed a seemingly ordinary couple raising two children in a suburb of Washington, D.C., except that Mom and Dad were actually Soviet spies working on long-term assignment for the KGB. In this scene, the couple, played by Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell, are talking after learning that their new neighbor is an FBI counterintelligence agent. The husband’s telling his wife maybe it’s time to give up their ruse and defect to the U.S. government.
(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, “THE AMERICANS”)
MATTHEW RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) We just get relocated, take the good life, and be happy.
KERI RUSSELL: (As Elizabeth Jennings) Are you joking? Is this a joke?
RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) No.
RUSSELL: (As Elizabeth Jennings) You want to betray our country.
RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) Well, after everything we’ve done, I don’t think it’s such a betrayal.
RUSSELL: (As Elizabeth Jennings) Defecting to America?
RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) America’s not so bad. We’ve been here a long time. What’s so bad about it, you know? The electricity works all the time. Food’s pretty, great. Closet space…
RUSSELL: (As Elizabeth Jennings) Is that what you care about?
RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) No, I care about everything.
RUSSELL: (As Elizabeth Jennings) Not the motherland.
RHYS: (As Phillip Jennings) I do, but our family comes first.
DAVIES: The series, which earned a host of honors, including two Peabody Awards, was fiction. But our guest today, investigative reporter Shaun Walker, has written a new book about the real-life espionage program that inspired it. Among others, Walker interviewed two members of the family the show was partly based on – brothers who had no idea their parents were Soviet agents, born in Russia until the day when the boys were 16 and 20, that the FBI raided their home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and arrested their parents. We’ll hear more on that later.
From the beginning of the Soviet Union, Walker writes, its leaders put enormous effort into training spies in the language and culture of targeted foreign countries and sent them on missions that could last for decades. The book explores the agents’ efforts at espionage, but also the emotional strains they endured living a lie for so long. The program largely fell apart with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but Walker says it’s been revived in Russia under Vladimir Putin.
Shaun Walker is an international correspondent for The Guardian. He reported from Moscow for more than a decade and is the author of “The Long Hangover: Putin’s New Russia And The Ghosts Of The Past.” He currently divides his time among Warsaw, Kyiv and London. His new book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” Well, Shaun Walker, welcome back to FRESH AIR.
You know, so many countries spy on each other, and one typical technique that is used is to give their agents cover when they go to another country by having them employed as a diplomat at the embassy or as a businessperson traveling in the host country. This practice you write about is very different. How common is this idea of training agents to impersonate an ordinary citizen and embed in another country?
SHAUN WALKER: Well, it’s great to be back talking to you again, Dave. And yeah, I mean, the Soviet and then Russian illegals program, it does have some similarities with spying programs that a lot of countries use, but it’s really something quite unique. And that was sort of what kind of got me obsessed with the program over the last years when I’ve been researching this book, because I just felt that, like, somehow understanding the illegals and understanding the way this extraordinary program evolved from right at the beginning of the Soviet Union, through the Cold War, through the collapse of the Soviet Union, and up to now.
At all these moments – there were so many moments in this program where you just think, OK, this doesn’t quite make sense anymore to do this, to train these people for years, to spend, you know, one-on-one, really intensive training for years on end until you have an operative that’s ready to be sent out into another country and pose as someone with no links at all to Russia. There’s pretty much no other intelligence service that does that in this kind of scale.
DAVIES: You know, you write that the roots of this program date back to the beginnings of the Soviet Union, really before the Russian Revolution. So what were Lenin and, you know, his compatriots doing that led to this kind of espionage?
WALKER: So Lenin was the head of the Bolsheviks, and the Bolsheviks, at this point, before the revolution, were a kind of close-knit conspiratorial underground group, fighting the czar. Some of them were inside Russia, some of them were in exile. And Lenin developed this concept that, on the one hand, they were going to organize openly inside Russia. They would send people to the Parliament. They would work through trade unions. These would be the legal workers. But they’d also have illegals, who would do clandestine organization. They would often live in disguise. They would be trying to keep one step ahead of the czar’s secret police.
And these illegals, they often had fake foreign identities. They lived under false documents. They had code names. They wrote each other letters in invisible ink. Basically, they used a lot of spy craft. And so when Lenin and the Bolsheviks take over after the October Revolution in 1917, they readapt a lot of the spy craft for their brand new intelligence service. And it’s that heritage of the Bolsheviks as an underground clandestine organization that really kind of informs this idea of sending illegals out into the field.
DAVIES: In the 1920s and ’30s, when the new Soviet Union had a lot of international enemies, it ended up with a lot of these embedded spies, so-called illegals in the field. But things changed when there were these purges instituted by Joseph Stalin, the dictator of the Soviet Union, in which many people in many aspects of Soviet society, particularly government, were accused of disloyalty and tortured and forced to make public confessions. This happened to the illegals, too. Why did Stalin target those who presumably were among the most loyal of his followers?
WALKER: Yeah. I mean, so the logic of the purges was such that even the most loyal people were subject to suspicion, and everybody was desperate to show they were more loyal than everybody else. A key feature of the purges was accusing people of having links with foreign intelligence services. So essentially, spying for the enemies of the Soviet Union to bring down the Soviet state. And of course, the illegals here were kind of first in the firing line because, unlike your factory director in Siberia or your train worker in the Urals, who might be accused of working for German or Japanese intelligence – and it’s fanciful – here were people who were traveling all through the world. They were posing as capitalists. They had all kinds of links. And so suspicion, when it was so ubiquitous, naturally fell on them very quickly.
And so what you see is that these people who, you know, in the case of someone like Dmitri Bystrolyotov, he had spent years posing as a Hungarian, as a Brit, as different brands of capitalists, and he hadn’t been uncovered in the West. He comes back to the Soviet Union, and he’s accused that this whole career when he was working for Moscow, was all a sham. He actually – there’s another layer to his cover, and the whole time he was this secret enemy spy. Now, this is ridiculous, but to get him to admit to this, there are weeks, months of interrogations, violence, torture, until eventually, he feels his life slipping away from him, and he agrees to sign whatever they put in front of him just to make it stop.
DAVIES: And ends up with a very long prison term.
WALKER: Yeah. I mean, in some ways, luckily for him, he managed to hold out long enough that by the time he signs, the real peak is winding down. He doesn’t get shot, like many of the other illegals, but he does end up with 20 years in the gulag, which completely breaks him.
DAVIES: You know, I think one of the most interesting points of this description is when he is being repeatedly tortured, beaten and tortured by this operative who is trying to get him to sign a statement making this false admission that he had betrayed his country, and at some point, he realizes what his interrogator is going through. Tell us about this.
WALKER: Yeah. I mean, the – it’s a really extraordinary scene. And actually, the – Dmitri’s description of his interrogations, it’s some of the most interesting and evocative writing about the purges that I’ve ever seen. And yeah, there’s this moment where the guy who’s been in charge of his torture, suddenly – it sort of suddenly dawns on him this life that Dmitri had had in the West – wearing nice suits, going out to bars, traveling, having money. And he just looks at him and he says, you know, so you mean to say you could have just run off somewhere with all this money, and you could have lived in luxury until the end of your life? But you chose to come back here and face a bullet. I mean, what an idiot. And he starts beating Dmitri, like, why on earth did you come back here? And I think there’s this moment where Dmitri sort of sees – there’s a little bit of – the kind of curtain of the theater raises a bit, and he sees this guy as maybe someone who’s also a bit of a victim of this crazy system, even though he’s the torturer and Dmitri is the tortured.
DAVIES: We’re going to take a break here. Let me reintroduce you. We are speaking with Shaun Walker. He’s an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” We’ll continue our conversation in just a moment. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF NATHAN BARR’S “THE AMERICANS MAIN TITLE THEME”)
DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we’re speaking with Shaun Walker, an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is about a program run by the Soviet Union, and later by Russia, to train intelligence agents to learn the language and customs of a foreign country and then go there in missions that could last for decades, posing as ordinary citizens. His book is called “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.”
I want to move to the postwar era when, you know, Germany was defeated, and it was clear to the Soviet leaders that their greatest rival would be the United States. They refer to it as the main enemy, right? So a new crop of these sleeper agents, these illegals, were trained and dispatched to the United States, typically going through Canada. They go to Canada, and then they eventually make their way to the U.S. One difficulty was that this life was hard on these agents – mostly single men – and would lead them to make mistakes or abandon their missions. You want to give us an example of this? You cite some of this in the book.
WALKER: Yeah. So you have a few of these early postwar spies, illegals, who are sent out to the U.S. And yeah, as you say, it’s very hard on them. There’s one – the one case that springs to mind is a chap called Yevgeni Brik (ph). So he arrives in Canada with the ultimate goal of getting to the U.S., and he’s supposed to spend a bit of time in Canada brushing up on what the KGB called the legend of the spy – so his backstory, basically. So he would go around several Canadian towns. He would visit the places where, supposedly, he had grown up, and he would sort of get himself a nice cache of stories that he’d be able to tell about these places.
But he shows up, and in one of the first places he stays in in Winnipeg, he’s in a guesthouse. And he’s missing his wife, who’s back in Moscow. His family is in Moscow. Of course, he has absolutely no links. He’s not allowed to contact them and not even allowed to contact the local Soviet Embassy. And so, rather lonely, he starts drinking in this guesthouse. He meets the daughter of the guesthouse owner, decides that he’s in love with her and, basically, at the first opportunity, sort of spills the whole story – who he is, what his training was, what his mission is. She’s absolutely horrified and persuades him to go to the police and confess everything. This story, much later, ends with Brik going back to Moscow and being arrested because the Soviets had realized that he talked to the Canadians.
But yeah, there’s a whole bunch of these stories where illegals would sort of get drunk. They would confess. They would defect. And the whole idea of this program is that they have to be on a very long leash, that the Soviets can’t be watching them from the embassy because they can’t have any links. So it becomes a real problem of, what do you do? How do you send these people out and make sure that they’re loyal when you have no oversight?
DAVIES: Another issue was – and this is fascinating – that a lot of these agents had advanced education in the Soviet Union, but they couldn’t carry their degrees with them. So they would often get trained in blue-collar employment and then be sent to, you know, the United States, in many cases, often through Canada, and then given instructions that were pretty unrealistic, right? There was this guy who adopted the name Rudy Herrmann – right? – who was – he was a delivery man. And what was his instruction?
WALKER: So he was actually a cameraman, Rudy Herrmann.
DAVIES: Cameraman. That’s right. OK.
WALKER: Yeah. So Rudy Herrmann, exactly as you said – I mean, he had this wonderful degree from Charles University in Prague. He was an incredibly clever guy. And he was posing brilliantly as a right-wing German. But he was very, very good at the job. But the problem was he didn’t have any German or American qualifications. So he was very resourceful guy. He learned how to be a cameraman. He got a good job at CBC, Canadian Broadcasting. Then he moved to New York.
He was doing very well. Like, he was making movies for IBM, doing all kinds of interesting stuff. But the KGB really wanted him to penetrate decision-making circles in Washington, D.C., and they particularly were interested in the Hudson Institute, which they were sure was a kind of front for the CIA. And Rudy Herrmann kept saying to his handlers, like, how do you expect me to do this? Like, I don’t have a degree. And they would just sort of say, well, do the best you can. And, yeah, I mean, it’s sort of emblematic of the way that as the decades go on, it gets harder and harder to do this job. The missions are longer and longer. The psychological strain is more and more. And the espionage results, with some exceptions, seem to get fewer and fewer.
DAVIES: Right. Well, I want to talk about the couple that – we mentioned this earlier – that actually were – partly inspired the TV series “The Americans.” This was a couple that came from the Soviet Union to Canada, and eventually to the United States, and stayed for a long, long time. Their names were Andrey Bezrukov and Elena Vavilova, right? They were actually recruited as college students from a university in Siberia – right? – where they were both in school.
WALKER: Yeah, that’s right. So by the time you get to the early 1980s, which was when they were starting their university in Tomsk – yeah, all these people that we were talking about at the beginning, the Dmitri Bystrolyotov characters who had already traveled the world and spoke many languages – they were long gone. The Soviet Union was quite a closed, quite a paranoid society. Anyone who actually had traveled would be a magnet for suspicion.
So instead, what they’re doing is they’re looking for very, very talented young students who come from what would be considered politically reliable families who are clearly clever, have an aptitude for languages. And they have spotters in universities all across the Soviet Union to look for these ideal candidates. They get short lists. They start interviewing them. They wouldn’t – they – at this early stage, they won’t even tell them, you know, we’re considering you might become an illegal spy. They just start to have conversations once a week. And eventually, they sort of whittle it down to a short list of really promising candidates, which Andrey and Elena were both on.
DAVIES: Tell us what their training was like – this is really interesting – when they decided they are going to be sent to a foreign country to embed as an – so-called illegal.
WALKER: Yeah. So the early-stage training will happen when they’re still at university. That will be personality tests and just sort of checking they’re compatible. And then they were sent – when it was decided that they really could be illegals, then they were sent on to the full training course. And by the early 1980s, this would last four or five years. It would be entirely one-on-one or, in the case of couples like Andrey and Elena, one-on-two.
They would have – they would – and one of the things that runs through the program – so they would never – it wouldn’t be that they would go in the morning to their, you know, training room at KGB headquarters and attend classes for the day. So they would never set foot inside a KGB building. They would never see any of their trainers in KGB uniform. They wouldn’t even know the real names of most of their trainers. This was all done in safe houses, secret apartments across Moscow. So you would go to one for your language classes. You’d go to another one for your etiquette classes. You would sit – so if you have a Canadian cover, you would sit in an apartment for hours on end reading Canadian schoolbooks year by year, so you would imbibe the things you would have imbibed if you really had been to Canadian school.
And then you’d have a whole set of tests for loyalty because, you know, the – almost nobody – the illegals, in fact, are the only Soviet citizens who are allowed to travel freely, and the KGB is very worried about kind of how to do this. I mean, how – it’s such a paradoxical situation that you have to shape these sort of virtuoso, maverick spies who are going to go out in the field and lie to absolutely everyone about everything, including their own children. But at the same time, without any oversight, you have to make sure they stay slavishly loyal to you.
And I think in all of the stories I heard from different people about the training, it – I mean, it almost sounds a bit like an induction into a cult. I mean, they’re really trying to break you. They’re trying to show you that they’re watching all the time. They will engineer different situations, fake arrests where you’ll be sort of, you know, pressured. And if you finally break and say, listen, there’s been a terrible mistake. I work for the KGB. Please call my handlers – that’s it. You’ll be kicked off the program. So just endless tests to make sure that you have what it takes for this, like, really quite intense psychological endurance that it’s going to be to live abroad for these years. And then it’s only after you’ve kind of passed all of those tests and learned how to look for surveillance, learned how to receive the messages in code – all of this stuff is incredibly time-consuming. Finally, after four or five years, they’re ready to go.
DAVIES: We need to take another break here. Let me reintroduce you. We are speaking with Shaun Walker. He is an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” He’ll be back to talk more after this short break. I’m Dave Davies, and this is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF BLACKOUT & STEFON HARRIS’ “UNTIL”)
DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. We’re speaking with Shaun Walker, international correspondent for The Guardian. He reported from Moscow for more than a decade. And he has a new book about a unique espionage program operated by intelligence services of the Soviet Union, in which agents were trained in the language and customs of a target country and then sent there to pose as citizens for missions that would last for years. In some cases, spy couples would raise families in their adopted country, keeping their true identities from their own children. Walker’s book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” When we left off, Walker was talking about Andrey Bezrukov and Elena Vavilova, a married couple recruited from their college in Siberia and trained for years to be sent on a mission to embed in the United States.
So they had two sons, Timothy and Alexander, who, as far as they knew, were Canadian, right? And the couple were making their way to the United States when, to their shock, the Soviet Union was changing rapidly. You know, Gorbachev was opening up the society. And in 1989, the Berlin Wall falls, and the satellite states around the Soviet Union are demanding independence. And this couple, who are known as Don Heathfield and Ann Foley, are in a motel room in Buffalo in 1991. And what do they see on CNN?
WALKER: Yeah. They turn on the TV, and they see the Soviet flag being lowered over the Kremlin for the final time. They see President Bush talking about the collapse of the Soviet Union, the fact that the U.S. has won the Cold War. And here they are, sitting in this cold motel room a few years after their deployment. They’ve had this intense training. They’ve sworn an oath to defend the motherland, and now the motherland doesn’t exist.
DAVIES: Right. So all of these agents that are all around – in 1991, I guess, the KGB is disbanded, right? So the instructions stop coming, the money stops coming, and they have to decide what they’re going to do. What do all these agents that are around there, the so-called illegals, do? I guess they took different courses.
WALKER: Yeah, many – I mean, it’s – it was a really kind of individual moment. So some of them decided to come home, see – be with their families. Others had a look at this choice and decided not to come home. They – you know, maybe – in the way that Andrey and Elena tell it, they were always patriotic and they were just waiting for Russia to kind of come back, to – OK, to get back off its knees and they could spy again. I think the reality was probably a little bit more complicated.
I think for a lot of these people, they looked, and they saw, OK, well, we’ve started building a life in the West. We’ve got quite a comfortable life. We’ve made solid foundations. This is what we’ve spent years training to do. We have kids who were born in the West. So we can either stay here, see what happens – maybe Russia and the U.S. will become friends, but then, OK, we don’t need to be spies. We’ll just live this other life that we’ve created for ourselves. Or we could go back to the Soviet Union, which is in chaos, where there’s economic turmoil, where it’s uncertain what will happen, where it’s – also, at this stage, it’s uncertain, I mean, will there be trials for top people in the KGB?
Suddenly, this – the work they were doing that was seen as sort of patriotic, wonderful work, maybe it’s not going to be viewed like that in the new Russia. So some of them maybe just decide to wait and see. Perhaps they’ll come back into the fold if and when there is a renewed demand for spying. Or maybe they will just start their new lives in their cover identities, and no one will ever know that once upon a time, they were from Siberia.
DAVIES: All right. Well, we’ll see what happens to this couple after we take a break here. Let me reintroduce you. We’re speaking to Shaun Walker. He’s an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” We’ll continue our conversation after this break. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF HOWARD FISHMAN SONG, “DIRTY”)
DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we’re speaking with Shaun Walker, an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is about a program operated by the Soviet Union – and later Russia – to train spies to learn the language and culture of a target state and then embed there for decades. His book is called “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.”
So the Russian government begins to revive the program under Vladimir Putin, And so once again, they are now filing reports on things they’re observing in the United States. Unfortunately for them, the FBI got on to them, in part because a Russian agent who knew all about this, who was right in the middle of this program, flipped and started providing information. And in 2010, the FBI swooped in and arrested them. Tell us what happened that day in Cambridge.
WALKER: Yeah. So after this nearly quarter of a century of living in these cover identities, they’re very comfortable. They’ve got the two kids. They think that everything is going very well. But of course, as with all spies, you’re only ever one turncoat, one defector, away from being exposed. And for some years, they’d actually – every move had been tracked by the FBI. And this was a day – the FBI had been tracking illegals across the United States. There was about 10 of them, and this was the – finally the time. The defector wanted to be exfiltrated. They needed to round them up. And this was the day, in June 2010, that it was decided it was going to happen.
So across the U.S., coordinated raids and arrests. And it’s actually Tim, the older son – it’s his 20th birthday. There’s a knock at the door. Everyone thinks it must be somebody come to wish him happy birthday. It’s actually the FBI, who put Andrey and Elena – Don and Ann – into separate cars, drive them away. And Tim and Alex, the two sons, are left there kind of asking, you know, what on earth is going on? And they’re basically told, well, your parents have been arrested for being agents of a foreign government. And it’s only a few days later that they will start to hear the full details and, even then, not really believe it.
DAVIES: Now, what’s fascinating about this is that at the time that this arrest happens – I mean, the boys have never been told anything about their true identities. As far as they know, they’re all Canadians. And their grandparents live so far away, they never see them. There’re various excuses for that. The family had been planning – they had traveled a lot, but they’d been planning a trip to Moscow. They’d been all over Europe, but never to Russia. And so they had visas to go there. The couple are taken to an American court where they have to admit their guilt. And you wrote a fascinating story because you talked to the two boys in 2018 and wrote the story in The Guardian. But as I – if I have this right, the sons, who were taken to a hotel by the FBI, didn’t really know what to think about any of this, and they have a brief conversation with their mom in court. She’s still wearing an orange jumpsuit from prison, right? What is that conversation like?
WALKER: Yeah. So she tells them, you should fly to Moscow. And they do. And this is like – I mean, this is one of these kind of slightly confusing moments here. So what on earth was this trip that they were going to do to Moscow that summer? In their telling, this was just going to be an ordinary tourist trip. You know, they’d traveled all over the place. One of the kids had said, oh, let’s – what about Russia? We’ve never been there. They were going to go. They were going to stay in character the whole time as Canadians, Americans and leave again.
Now, of course, I’m a little bit suspicious about this. I do wonder if, you know, we had that story decades earlier of the illegal trying to recruit his son as a second generation, maybe this was a trip where they were going to reveal – they’d decided it was time – and see if their children would join their mission. The FBI have suggested they believe that might be the case. Parents and the children fully deny it. I think we’ll never know the truth of that. But, yeah, I think at the moment when your mom tells you, (laughter) what I think you should do is fly to Moscow, I guess that’s the moment where you realize, OK, looks like this is true.
So these poor kids, they fly off to Moscow. Their parents arrive a couple of days later in a spy swap. They swapped on the tarmac at Vienna Airport, and they arrive back in Moscow. And yeah, and the – one of – the younger brother said to me that the moment he realized it was all true was when one of these – one of the people who met them at the airport, and they introduced themselves as, you know, we’re friends of your parents. We work with them. And they showed the two brothers pictures of their parents in KGB uniforms, which had been taken just before they were sent off to the – to Canada back in the late 1980s. And Alex said, you know, this was the moment where I realized it was all true.
So they have this, I mean, unimaginable sort of family summit back in Moscow. They meet grandparents they didn’t know they had, or at least they thought they were living somewhere in remote Canada rather than in Siberia. They’re taken to the Bolshoi Theatre. They have these long discussions with their parents about, you know, what on earth has just happened. And they’re given Russian passports with new names. They can’t even pronounce their names properly. And, yeah, it was meeting the two of them – it was actually back in 2016, when I wrote a story about them and their battle to have their Canadian citizenship restored, that was the sort of first impulse for me – this crazy, twisted family story that sort of set me on this path of getting obsessed with the illegals over the years.
DAVIES: Yeah. It is a fascinating story. I mean, suddenly their lives are turned upside down, these boys. The couple stays in Russia. You know, they hadn’t been there in decades. What were their lives like? Are they – are you still in touch with them? Are they comfortable with it? You did speak with Elena, right?
WALKER: I spoke with Elena a couple of times, yeah, a few years ago. We’re not – we haven’t been in touch a lot recently. I think context has changed a bit since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. I – you know, I used to go to Russia very regularly. I’m now on a blacklist, so I can’t visit. But, yeah, I mean, they were essentially – I mean, what’s fascinating about them – so with earlier illegals, who achieved an awful lot, they were often, as we discussed, sent to the gulag, shot. Some of them were disgraced because they were caught. And despite having, you know, given years of their lives to this program, what you see with Andrei and Elena is sort of the opposite. I mean, they definitely did a very impressive job to integrate so well and live many years undercover.
But because of this defector, for 10 years, the FBI knew exactly what they were doing. So essentially, their value as espionage agents was pretty much zero. But that’s slightly glossed over or rather fully glossed over when it comes to the sort of modern Russian telling of their story. And, of course, now under Putin, there is a really big focus on finding patriotic stories on nationalist mythmaking. And the illegals are perfect for this. These people who sacrificed everything, they – you know, they lived abroad for years. They gave everything for the motherland. And that’s now their position in Russian society.
So they came back. They were given a very nice apartment. They were both given quite lucrative jobs in state-controlled companies. They met with Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin and sang songs together. And then, you know, they’re introduced on chat shows as legendary spies, and they will give the talking points. Well, more Andrei, actually. Andrei will often be on chat shows, giving the talking points of the day about Russia’s war in Ukraine or how the evil West is trying to bring down Moscow. So they fit quite nicely into this system. What they say to each other in their quieter moments in the evenings, I don’t know.
DAVIES: And what about the two boys, Timothy and Alexander? Do you know where they live, what they do, how they regard their parents?
WALKER: So I think it was very difficult for them, particularly I think Alex, the younger son. They had both found ways to live outside Russia, but they were struggling with getting visas. You know, I know Alex had been applying to various schools in Europe and then not – had not been able to get visas. And I think with their parents, it was not an easy conversation. But they somehow – you know, they felt they’d had a loving childhood. They felt their parents had been very good to them in many ways, and they tried to find a way, I think, to sort of sidestep this big deception. And, you know, I guess there are ways in which with all of these families – and it was the same talking to Peter Herrmann, the guy whose father tried to recruit him. In many ways, these – the dilemmas these kids face and these families face are similar to a lot of families. You know, there might be a secret affair or a secret past history that parents don’t want to talk about. You have the dilemmas of immigrant parents coming to a new country, and, you know, they want their children to integrate, but they also don’t want to lose them to the new culture. And Illegals had all these same dilemmas, but they were just heightened 10 times over by this kind of extraordinary secret that they had a second life as Soviet citizens.
DAVIES: You spent more than a decade reporting in Russia. You mentioned earlier that you’re on a blacklist, which prevents you from traveling there now. How did that happen? What got you there?
WALKER: While I’d love to say it was a phenomenal journalistic scoop that infuriated Vladimir Putin, but it was basically early on in the full-scale war in the summer of 2022, I think the Brits must have put sanctions on a certain number of Russians, and as the Russians love to do, they put reciprocal sanctions on whoever’s sanctioning them. If you sanction me, I’m going to sanction you back. So they released a list of about 50 British journalists, politicians, analysts, all kinds of people. My claim to fame is I was No. 1 on the list, but there was also every other journalist for The Guardian who’d reported from Ukraine, pretty much was on this list.
And, yeah, and actually, most of the – what was frustrating about is most of the people on this list were not people who were ever going to Russia, so they get to sort of very proudly put on their biographies that, you know, I’ve been banned by the Kremlin whereas, yeah, I mean, I was last there a few months before the war started, the full-scale war started. I was continuing to go back. I’m obviously – you know, it’s really quite sad and depressing to see what’s happened to the country, but I would – it doesn’t feel a good feeling to not be able to go after I spent so many years reporting from there.
DAVIES: Well, Shaun Walker, we’ll look forward to more of your reporting. Thanks so much for speaking with us.
WALKER: Thank you very much for having me.
DAVIES: Shaun Walker is an international correspondent for The Guardian. His new book is “The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies And Their Century-Long Mission To Infiltrate The West.” Coming up, jazz historian Kevin Whitehead pays tribute to the versatile tenor saxophonist Gene Ammons, born a hundred years ago this week. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF CHARLES MINGUS’ “SELF-PORTRAIT IN THREE COLORS”)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts may vary. Transcript text may be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Lifestyle
Rob Reiner said he was ‘never, ever too busy’ for his son
Rob Reiner at the Cannes film festival in 2022.
Andreas Rentz/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Andreas Rentz/Getty Images
When Rob Reiner spoke with Fresh Air in September to promote Spinal Tap II: The End Continues, Terry Gross asked him about Being Charlie, a 2015 film he collaborated on with his son Nick Reiner. The film was a semiautobiographical story of addiction and homelessness, based on Nick’s own experiences.
Nick Reiner was arrested Sunday evening after Rob and Michele Reiner were found dead inside their California home.


The father character in Being Charlie feels a lot of tension between his own career aspirations and his son’s addiction — but Reiner said that wasn’t how it was for him and Nick.
“I was never, ever too busy,” Reiner told Fresh Air. “I mean, if anything, I was the other way, you know, I was more hands-on and trying to do whatever I thought I could do to help. I’m sure I made mistakes and, you know, I’ve talked about that with him since.”
At the time, Reiner said he believed Nick was doing well. “He’s been great … hasn’t been doing drugs for over six years,” Reiner said. “He’s in a really good place.”

Reiner starred in the 1970s sitcom, All in the Family and directed Stand By Me, The Princess Bride, When Harry Met Sally and A Few Good Men. Spinal Tap II: The End Continues is a sequel to his groundbreaking 1984 mockumentary This Is Spinal Tap.
“After 15 years of not working together, we came back and started looking at this and seeing if we could come up with an idea, and we started schnadling right away,” Reiner recalled. “It was like falling right back in with friends that you hadn’t talked to in a long time. It’s like jazz musicians, you just fall in and do what you do.”
Below are some more highlights from that interview.
Interview Highlights
Carl Reiner (left) and Rob Reiner together in 2017.
Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for TCM
hide caption
toggle caption
Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for TCM
On looking up to his dad, director Carl Reiner, and growing up surrounded by comedy legends
When I was a little boy, my parents said that I came up to them and I said, “I want to change my name.” I was about 8 years old … They were all, “My god, this poor kid. He’s worried about being in the shadow of this famous guy and living up to all this.” And they say, “Well, what do you want to change your name to?” And I said, “Carl.” I loved him so much, I just wanted to be like him and I wanted to do what he did and I just looked up to him so much. …
[When] I was 19 … I was sitting with him in the backyard and he said to me, “I’m not worried about you. You’re gonna be great at whatever you do.” He lives in my head all the time. I had two great guides in my life. I had my dad, and then Norman Lear was like a second father. They’re both gone, but they’re with me always. …
There’s a picture in my office of all the writers who wrote for Sid Caesar and [Your] Show of Shows over the nine years, I guess, that they were on. And, when you look at that picture, you’re basically looking at everything you ever laughed at in the first half of the 20th century. I mean there’s Mel Brooks, there’s my dad, there is Neil Simon, there is Woody Allen, there is Larry Gelbart, Joe Stein who wrote Fiddler on the Roof, Aaron Ruben who created The Andy Griffith Show. Anything you ever laughed at is represented by those people. So these are the people I look up to, and these are people that were around me as a kid growing up.
YouTube
On directing the famous diner scene in When Harry Met Sally
We knew we were gonna do a scene where Meg [Ryan] was gonna fake an orgasm in an incongruous place like a deli, and Billy [Crystal] came up with the line, “I’ll have what she’s having.” … I said, we need to find somebody, an older Jewish woman, who could deliver that line, which would seem incongruous. I thought of my mother because my mother had done a couple of little [movie] things … So I asked her if she wanted to do it and she said sure. I said, “Now listen mom, hopefully that’ll be the topper of the scene. It’ll get the big laugh, and if it doesn’t, I may have to cut it out.” … She said, “That’s fine. I just want to spend the day with you. I’ll go to Katz’s. I’ll get a hot dog.” …
When we did the scene the first couple of times through Meg was kind of tepid about it. She didn’t give it her all. … She was nervous. She’s in front of the crew and there’s extras and people. … And at one point, I get in there and I said, “Meg, let me show you what I meant.” And I sat opposite Billy, and I’m acting it out, and I’m pounding the table and I’m going, “Yes, yes, yes!” … I turned to Billy and I say, “This is embarrassing … I just had an orgasm in front of my mother.” But then Meg came in and she did it obviously way better than I could do it.
On differentiating himself from his father with Stand By Me (1986)
I never said specifically I want to be a film director. I never said that. And I never really thought that way. I just knew I wanted to act, direct, and do things, be in the world that he was in. And it wasn’t until I did Stand By Me that I really started to feel very separate and apart from my father. Because the first film I did was, This Is Spinal Tap, which is a satire. And my father had trafficked in satire with Sid Caesar for many years. And then the second film I did was a film called The Sure Thing, which was a romantic comedy for young people, and my father had done romantic comedy. The [Dick] Van Dyke Show is a romantic comedy, a series.
But when I did Stand By Me, it was the one that was closest to me because … I felt that my father didn’t love me or understand me, and it was the character of Gordie that expressed those things. And the film was a combination of nostalgia, emotion and a lot of humor. And it was a real reflection of my personality. It was an extension, really, of my sensibility. And when it became successful, I said, oh, OK. I can go in the direction that I want to go in and not feel like I have to mirror everything my father’s done up till then.
On starting his own production company (Castle Rock) and how the business has changed
We started it so I could have some kind of autonomy because I knew that the kinds of films I wanted to make people didn’t wanna make. I mean, I very famously went and talked to Dawn Steel, who was the head of Paramount at the time. … And she says to me, “What do you wanna make? What’s your next film?” And I said, “Well, you know, I got a film, but I don’t think you’re going to want to do it.” … I’m going to make a movie out of The Princess Bride. And she said, “Anything but that.” So I knew that I needed to have some way of financing my own films, which I did for the longest time. …
It’s tough now. And it’s beyond corporate. I mean, it used to be there was “show” and “business.” They were equal — the size of the word “show” and “business.” Now, you can barely see the word “show,” and it’s all “business.” And the only things that they look at [are] how many followers, how many likes, what the algorithms are. They’re not thinking about telling a story. … I still wanna tell stories. And I’m sure there’s a lot of young filmmakers — even Scorsese is still doing it, older ones too — that wanna tell a story. And I think people still wanna hear stories and they wanna see stories.

Lifestyle
Executive Memo | How to Cut Costs While Investing for the Future
Lifestyle
Remembering Rob Reiner, who made movies for people who love them
Rob Reiner at his office in Beverly Hills, Calif., in July 1998.
Reed Saxon/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Reed Saxon/AP
Maybe an appreciation of Rob Reiner as a director should start with When Harry Met Sally…, which helped lay the foundation for a romantic comedy boom that lasted for at least 15 years. Wait — no, it should start with Stand By Me, a coming-of-age story that captured a painfully brief moment in the lives of kids. It could start with This Is Spinal Tap, one of the first popular mockumentaries, which has influenced film and television ever since. Or, since awards are important, maybe it should start with Misery, which made Kathy Bates famous and won her an Oscar. How about The American President, which was the proto-West Wing, very much the source material for a TV show that later won 26 Emmys?


On the other hand, maybe in the end, it’s all about catchphrases, so maybe it should be A Few Good Men because of “You can’t handle the truth!” or The Princess Bride because of “My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die.” Maybe it’s as simple as that: What, of the words you helped bring them, will people pass back and forth to each other like they’re showing off trading cards when they hear you’re gone?
There is plenty to praise about Reiner’s work within the four corners of the screen. He had a tremendous touch with comic timing, so that every punchline got maximum punch. He had a splendid sense of atmosphere, as with the cozy, autumnal New York of When Harry Met Sally…, and the fairytale castles of The Princess Bride. He could direct what was absurdist and silly, like Spinal Tap. He could direct what was grand and thundering, like A Few Good Men. He could direct what was chatty and genial, like Michael Douglas’ staff in The American President discussing whether or not he could get out of the presidential limo to spontaneously buy a woman flowers.
But to fully appreciate what Rob Reiner made in his career, you have to look outside the films themselves and respect the attachments so many people have to them. These were not just popular movies and they weren’t just good movies; these were an awful lot of people’s favorite movies. They were movies people attached to their personalities like patches on a jacket, giving them something to talk about with strangers and something to obsess over with friends. And he didn’t just do this once; he did it repeatedly.
Quotability is often treated as separate from artfulness, but creating an indelible scene people attach themselves to instantly is just another way the filmmakers’ humanity resonates with the audience’s. Mike Schur said something once about running Parks and Recreation that I think about a lot. Talking about one particularly silly scene, he said it didn’t really justify its place in the final version, except that everybody loved it: And if everybody loves it, you leave it in. I would suspect that Rob Reiner was also a fan of leaving something in if everybody loved it. That kind of respect for what people like and what they laugh at is how you get to be that kind of director.
The relationships people have with scenes from Rob Reiner movies are not easy to create. You can market the heck out of a movie, you can pull all the levers you have, and you can capitalize on every advantage you can come up with. But you can’t make anybody absorb “baby fishmouth” or “as you wish”; you can’t make anybody say “these go to 11” every time they see the number 11 anywhere. You can’t buy that for any amount of money. It’s magical how much you can’t; it’s kind of beautiful how much you can’t. Box office and streaming numbers might be phony or manipulated or fleeting, but when the thing hits, people attach to it or they don’t.
My own example is The Sure Thing, Reiner’s goodhearted 1985 road trip romantic comedy, essentially an updated It Happened One Night starring John Cusack and Daphne Zuniga. It follows a mismatched pair of college students headed for California: She wants to reunite with her dullard boyfriend, while he wants to hook up with a blonde he has been assured by his dirtbag friend (played by a young, very much hair-having Anthony Edwards!) is a “sure thing.” But of course, the two of them are forced to spend all this time together, and … well, you can imagine.
This movie knocked me over when I was 14, because I hadn’t spent much time with romantic comedies yet, and it was like finding precisely the kind of song you will want to listen to forever, and so it became special to me. I studied it, really, I got to know what I liked about it, and I looked for that particular hit of sharp sweetness again and again. In fact, if forced to identify a single legacy for Rob Reiner, I might argue that he’s one of the great American directors of romance, and his films call to the genre’s long history in so many ways, often outside the story and the dialogue. (One of the best subtle jokes in all of romantic comedy is in The American President, when President Andrew Shepherd, played by Michael Douglas, dances with Sydney Wade, played by Annette Bening, to “I Have Dreamed,” a very pretty song from the musical … The King and I. That’s what you get for knowing your famous love stories.)
Rob Reiner’s work as a director, especially in those early films, wasn’t just good to watch. It was good to love, and to talk about and remember. Good to quote from and good to put on your lists of desert island movies and comfort watches. And it will continue to be those things.

-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa3 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Minnesota1 week agoTwo Minnesota carriers shut down, idling 200 drivers