Connect with us

Lifestyle

A Stradivarius violin could sell for a record sum at auction. Is it worth the hype?

Published

on

A Stradivarius violin could sell for a record sum at auction. Is it worth the hype?

The Joachim-Ma Stradivarius violin is on display at Sotheby’s in New York City on Monday.

Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images

This week, a violin made by famed Italian luthier Antonio Stradivari could become the most expensive musical instrument ever sold at auction.

Sotheby’s is estimating that a Stradivarius made in 1714 could fetch $12 million to $18 million on Friday. The upper end of that range could beat the previous record of $15.9 million, set by another Stradivarius in 2011.

There’s plenty of hype around these instruments, and plenty of people who downplay it.

Advertisement

But for many violin players and restorers, Strads are incomparable to even the best modern violins.

“It’s not just what the audience hears on a sort of ‘taste test,’” between an old and modern instrument, says violinist Joshua Bell, speaking to NPR before a concert. “It’s what it does to the player. A Stradivari is like being a painter and having access to thousands of colors to paint from rather than dozens of colors.”

Bell says the 300-year-old violins offer subtle “sound colors” not found elsewhere.

“I can’t explain it, but it’s kind of the overtones and the way once you get to know the instrument, you can find these tonal varieties that are very difficult to find in a modern instrument,” he says. “It’s not just for the name. It’s something very, very special that it does to the player.”

Bell has owned a 1713 Stradivarius for over two decades. (Hear it in his 2016 Tiny Desk concert with Jeremy Denk.)

Advertisement

Christopher Reuning, an expert on violins and owner of Reuning & Son Violins in Brookline, Mass., puts it bluntly: “Stradivari was the best violin maker who ever lived. I think that’s really beyond debate.”

Stradivari made instruments between 1666 and 1734 in Cremona, Italy, with his sons assisting him for part of that time. Reuning says about 600 violins remain today. In addition to violins, Stradivari made cellos, violas, guitars, mandolins, harps and other instruments.

“Normally the best Strad is going to outperform a modern instrument in subtle ways,” Reuning says. Violinists will notice “the complexity of the sound, the shimmering beauty of the sound, the comfort of the musician to play that instrument and feel the feedback that he or she is getting to help them give their best performance.”

Stradivari’s prized “Golden Period”

Violinist Joshua Bell plays his Stradivarius violin from 1713 in Oakville, Calif., in 2010. Bell tells NPR there's something special about a Strad.

Violinist Joshua Bell plays his Stradivarius violin from 1713 in Oakville, Calif., in 2010. Bell tells NPR there’s something special about a Strad.

Eric Risberg/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Eric Risberg/AP

The violin up for auction was made during Stradivari’s “Golden Period” between 1707 and 1717, which experts consider the time period when he produced his finest work.

Advertisement

Sotheby’s is calling the violin the Joachim-Ma Stradivarius. It was owned and played for decades by Joseph Joachim, one of the most famous violinists of the 19th century. Violinist Si-Hon Ma acquired it in 1967 and performed on it until his death in 2009.

Joachim’s tenure with the instrument is what makes it particularly attractive to collectors, Bell says.

Bell is one of the few musicians who owns his Stradivarius. The instruments are often owned by wealthy collectors who lend them out to musicians to perform on.

Three types of people would typically want to buy a Stradivarius, Bell says. First, there are the players, though “most of us can’t afford” one, he says. Second, there are collectors who have a genuine appreciation for the instruments and “really appreciate their beauty and are intoxicated with the idea of a Strad.”

And third, some people might buy a Stradivarius simply as an investment, “the same way you would buy Bitcoin. But we try to keep the violins away from that crowd whenever possible,” he adds, laughing.

Advertisement

Si-Hon Ma’s estate donated the Joachim-Ma Stradivarius to the New England Conservatory in 2016 on the condition that it eventually could be sold to fund student scholarships, according to Sotheby’s. The school says it’s now planning to use proceeds from the sale to “establish the largest named student scholarship program in the history” of the New England Conservatory.

The auction begins Friday at 11:15 a.m. ET.

Lifestyle

It was called the Kennedy Center, but 3 different presidents shaped it

Published

on

It was called the Kennedy Center, but 3 different presidents shaped it

President John F. Kennedy, left, looks at a model of what was later named the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC., in 1963.

National Archives/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

National Archives/Getty Images

On Thursday, the Kennedy Center’s name was changed to The Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.

By Friday morning, workers were already changing signs on the building itself, although some lawmakers said Thursday that the name can’t be changed legally without Congressional approval.

Though the arts venue is now closely associated with President Kennedy, it was three American presidents, including Kennedy, who envisioned a national cultural center – and what it would mean to the United States.

Advertisement
New signage, The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, is unveiled on the Kennedy Center, Friday, Dec. 19, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

New signage, The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, is unveiled on Friday in Washington, D.C.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Advertisement

The Eisenhower Administration

In 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower first pursued building what he called an “artistic mecca” in Washington, D.C., and created a commission to create what was then known as the National Cultural Center.

Three years later, Congress passed an act to build the new venue with the stated purpose of presenting classical and contemporary music, opera, drama, dance, and poetry from the United States and across the world. Congress also mandated the center to offer public programs, including educational offerings and programs specifically for children and older adults.

The Kennedy Administration

A November 1962 fundraiser for the center during the Kennedy administration featured stars including conductor Leonard Bernstein, comedian Danny Kaye, poet Robert Frost, singers Marian Anderson and Harry Belafonte, ballerina Maria Tallchief, pianist Van Cliburn – and a 7-year-old cellist named Yo-Yo Ma and his sister, 11-year-old pianist Yeou-Cheng Ma.

In his introduction to their performance, Bernstein specifically celebrated the siblings as new immigrants to the United States, whom he hailed as the latest in a long stream of “foreign artists and scientists and thinkers who have come not only to visit us, but often to join us as Americans, to become citizens of what to some has historically been the land of opportunity and to others, the land of freedom.”

Advertisement

At that event, Kennedy said this:

“As a great democratic society, we have a special responsibility to the arts — for art is the great democrat, calling forth creative genius from every sector of society, disregarding race or religion or wealth or color. The mere accumulation of wealth and power is available to the dictator and the democrat alike; what freedom alone can bring is the liberation of the human mind and spirit which finds its greatest flowering in the free society.”

YouTube

Advertisement

Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline were known for championing the arts at the White House. The president understood the free expression of creativity as an essential soft power, especially during the Cold War, as part of a larger race to excellence that encompassed science, technology, and education – particularly in opposition to what was then the Soviet Union.

The arts mecca envisioned by Eisenhower opened in 1971 and was named as a “living memorial” to Kennedy by Congress after his assassination.

The Johnson Administration

Philip Kennicott, the Pulitzer Prize-winning art and architecture critic for The Washington Post, said the ideas behind the Kennedy Center found their fullest expression under Kennedy’s successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson.

“Johnson in the Great Society basically compares the arts to other fundamental needs,” Kennicott said. “He says something like, ‘It shouldn’t be the case that Americans live so far from the hospital. They can’t get the health care they need. And it should be the same way for the arts.’ Kennedy creates the intellectual fervor and idea of the arts as essential to American culture. Johnson then makes it much more about a kind of popular access and participation at all levels.”

Advertisement

Ever since, Kennicott said, the space has existed in a certain tension between being a palace of the arts and a publicly accessible, popular venue. It is a grand structure on the banks of the Potomac River, located at a distance from the city’s center, and decked out in red and gold inside.

At the same time, Kennicott observed: “It’s also open. You can go there without a ticket. You can wander in and hear a free concert. And they have always worked very hard at the Kennedy Center to be sure that there’s a reason for people to think of it as belonging to them collectively, even if they’re not an operagoer or a symphony ticket subscriber.”

The Kennedy Center on the Potomac River im Washington, D.C.

The Kennedy Center on the Potomac River in Washington, D.C.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Kennicott estimated it will only take a few years for the controversies around a new name to fade away, if the Trump Kennedy moniker remains.

He likens it to the controversy that once surrounded another public space in Washington, D.C.: the renaming of Washington National Airport to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in 1998.

Advertisement

“A lot of people said, ‘I will never call it the Reagan National Airport.’ And there are still people who will only call it National Airport. But pretty much now, decades later, it is Reagan Airport,” Kennicott said.

“People don’t remember the argument. They don’t remember the controversy. They don’t remember the things they didn’t like about Reagan, necessarily. . . . All it takes is about a half a generation for a name to become part of our unthinking, unconscious vocabulary of place.

“And then,” he said, “the work is done.”

This story was edited for broadcast and digital by Jennifer Vanasco. The audio was mixed by Marc Rivers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Fashion’s Climate Reckoning Is Just Getting Started

Published

on

Fashion’s Climate Reckoning Is Just Getting Started
From dangerous heat on factory floors to flooding across sourcing hubs, climate risks are catching up with fashion’s supply chains. While new recycling initiatives attempt to scale to address the industry’s waste and emissions problem, easing regulation in Europe raises questions about the path forward heading into 2026.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

The 2025 Vibe Scooch

Published

on

The 2025 Vibe Scooch

In the 1998 World War II film “Saving Private Ryan,” Tom Hanks played Captain John H. Miller, a citizen-soldier willing to die for his country. In real life, Mr. Hanks spent years championing veterans and raising money for their families. So it was no surprise when West Point announced it would honor him with the Sylvanus Thayer Award, which goes each year to someone embodying the school’s credo, “Duty, Honor, Country.”

Months after the announcement, the award ceremony was canceled. Mr. Hanks, a Democrat who had backed Kamala Harris, has remained silent on the matter. On Truth Social, President Trump did not hold back: “We don’t need destructive, WOKE recipients getting our cherished American awards!!!”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending