Health
Woman’s double-twin relationship sparks court’s impossible paternity ruling
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A panel of judges has ruled that it is impossible to determine which of two identical twins fathered a woman’s baby.
The child (referred to as “P”), who was conceived in 2017, is now 8 years old, according to court documents.
The U.K. woman, who was only identified as “the mother,” reportedly engaged in sexual relations with the identical twins just four days apart.
MALE FERTILITY RATES CRASH AS DOCTORS REVEAL HEALTH THREATS: ‘SOMETHING VERY WRONG’
She remained in a relationship with one twin, who was named on the birth certificate and initially acted as the legal father, the filing stated. When the relationship ended, it triggered a legal dispute.
The mother and the twin who is not listed on the birth certificate brought the case, seeking to overturn an earlier ruling and have him legally recognized as the child’s father, the document detailed.
The child (referred to as “P”), who was conceived in 2017, is now 8 years old, according to court documents. (Child not pictured) (iStock)
The Court of Appeals ruled that legal paternity rights are only granted to a genetic father. While DNA testing shows a 50/50 chance for each twin to be the father, there is no definitive answer.
“Currently, the truth of P’s paternity is that their father is one or other of these two identical twins, but it is not possible to say which,” stated Lord Justice Moylan in the Court of Appeal ruling.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Moylan added that the child’s paternity “is binary and not a single man,” highlighting the legal uncertainty created by the case.
Since neither twin can prove he is the biological father, neither can be given legal parental responsibility, the court declared.
The case is significant because it reveals a limit of DNA evidence, which is the foundation of many legal cases.
Monozygotic (identical) twins share virtually identical genetic profiles, including the markers used in standard paternity tests. (iStock)
“Identical twins share the same genetic DNA code. While, over time, there are subtle changes to patterns around the DNA that would allow matching in some circumstances for adults’ cells, these markers are significantly degraded at the time of fertilization — making it not practical with current technology to assign paternity to identical twin brothers,” Paul Brezina, physician and fertility expert at Fertility Associates of Memphis, an Ivy Fertility Center, told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
In addition to medical questions, this situation could have an emotional impact on the parents and child, noted Brezina, who was not involved in the case.
“Support for the patient and the child through counseling and their medical professionals is vital moving forward,” he advised.
Since neither twin can prove he is the biological father, neither can be given legal parental responsibility, the court declared. (iStock)
Identical twins have long presented a challenge in DNA testing, previous medical research has shown.
Monozygotic (identical) twins share virtually identical genetic profiles, including the markers used in standard paternity tests, meaning they “cannot be differentiated using standard DNA testing,” according to a study published in Forensic Science International: Genetics.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
There are more advanced methods, such as whole genome sequencing, that can detect some rare genetic mutations among twins, but researchers say these techniques are complex, expensive and not commonly used in legal cases.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
A study published in PLOS Genetics confirms that distinguishing between identical twins’ DNA requires highly specialized analysis that goes beyond standard forensic testing.
Health
Marriage status has surprising link to cancer risk, study suggests: ‘Clear signal’
Marriage linked to lower cancer risk, study finds
Dr. Namrata Vijayvergia, a medical oncologist, shares insights into recent studies on health and lifestyle, explaining why marriage correlates with lower cancer risk due to better social support and healthy behaviors.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Adults who never married are significantly more likely to develop cancer, according to new research from the University of Miami.
A large study of more than 4 million Americans across 12 states found that this increased risk spans nearly every major cancer type. It is especially true for preventable cancers, such as types caused by smoking and infection.
Men who never married were found to have a 70% higher likelihood of cancer than their married counterparts. For women, that gap was even wider, with never-married individuals facing an 85% higher risk.
EATING MORE OF CERTAIN TYPE OF FOOD COULD SHORTEN CANCER SURVIVORS’ LIVES, STUDY FINDS
Previous research has linked marriage to better survival rates after a diagnosis, but this is one of the first studies to show that marital status could be a major indicator of whether a person will develop cancer in the first place.
“These findings suggest that social factors such as marital status may serve as important markers of cancer risk at the population level,” study co-author Paulo Pinheiro, a research professor of epidemiology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, said in a press release.
Adults who never married are significantly more likely to develop cancer, according to new research from the University of Miami. (Getty Images)
Between 2015 and 2022, the team examined cancer cases diagnosed at age 30 or older and compared the rates of various cancers to the marital status of participants. They then broke down the data by sex and race and adjusted for age.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Adult men who were never married had approximately five times the rate of anal cancer compared to married men, the study found.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Adult women who were never married had nearly three times the rate of cervical cancer compared to women who were or had been married.
“It’s a clear and powerful signal that some individuals are at a greater risk,” Frank Penedo, director of the Sylvester Survivorship and Supportive Care Institute at the University of Miami, said in the release.
For women, being married (and often, by extension, having children) was associated with lower risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers. (iStock)
For women, being married (and often, by extension, having children) was associated with lower risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers, likely due to hormonal and biological factors associated with pregnancy, according to the researchers.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Experts stressed that these findings do not mean marriage alone can protect against cancer.
“It means that if you’re not married, you should be paying extra attention to cancer risk factors, getting any screenings you may need, and staying up to date on healthcare,” Penedo said.
Experts stressed that these findings do not mean marriage alone can protect against cancer. (iStock)
The researchers also hypothesized that people who smoke less, drink less and take better care of themselves may be more likely to get married, meaning other factors could influence the findings.
More research is needed to confirm the outcome, they noted.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
The study was published in the journal Cancer Research Communications.
Health
This everyday drinking pattern could quietly raise liver disease risk
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Top stories
→ Widespread drinking habit could triple risk of advanced liver condition
→ Deadly bacterial disease could be stopped by pantry staple
→ Common vaccine slashes Alzheimer’s disease risk when dose is increased
Even occasional binge drinking could triple the risk of a serious liver condition, a new study suggests. (iStock)
On the lookout
→ 5 key factors may predict stroke risk years after first event
→ Unexplained shoulder pain could signal dangerous health condition
→ Experts reveal hidden link between poor sleep and Alzheimer’s disease
Monica Deyanira Cabrera Barajas, 26, underwent a 20-minute extraction that turned into a high-stakes medical procedure. (Jam Press)
Conversation starters
→ Woman swallows nose ring, finds it traveled to her lungs
→ Divorce boom may follow use of Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs
→ Drug-soaked paper is killing inmates amid reports of prison smuggling
On the table
→ Popular food additive linked to higher health risks in adults over 60
→ One simple eating habit may help boost weight loss
→ Hospital food could be harming America’s sickest patients
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Health
Common vaccine slashes Alzheimer’s disease risk when dose is increased
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A new, stronger flu shot could slash Alzheimer’s risk in half, according to new data.
The study, led by researchers at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), found that adults 65 and older who received a high-dose influenza vaccine had a significantly lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease compared to those who received the standard dose.
The immune system naturally weakens with age, making older adults less responsive to standard vaccines. To combat this, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a high-dose flu vaccine for people over 65. This version is approximately four times stronger than the standard shot.
ONE TYPE OF OLIVE OIL HAS A SURPRISING EFFECT ON BRAINPOWER DURING AGING
Alzheimer’s disease, a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, affects more than 6 million Americans, most of them age 65 or older.
Dr. Marc Siegel, a Fox News senior medical contributor, weighed in on the impact of the flu shot on Alzheimer’s risk.
Alzheimer’s disease, a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, affects more than 6 million Americans, most of them age 65 or older. (iStock)
As the vaccine directly affects the immune system, it is possible that this interaction could decrease inflammation in the body and “thereby indirectly decrease Alzheimer’s risk,” Siegel, who was not involved in the research, told Fox News Digital.
“Flu shots and their components do not cross the blood-brain barrier, meaning they aren’t directly affecting brain cells.”
“We can’t conclude from this that it is the flu shot itself that causes the effect.”
“I was stunned that, as a physician, I didn’t know a higher dose was offered,” lead study author Paul Schulz, professor of neurology at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, said in a press release.
Schulz also led a previous study linking general flu vaccination to a 40% reduction in Alzheimer’s risk.
While the previous research had already linked general flu vaccination to a reduction in Alzheimer’s risk, this new study looked specifically at the strength of the dose.
POPULAR DIET TIED TO LOWER DEMENTIA RISK FOR SOME GROUPS, STUDY REVEALS
“The public health department had seen our vaccine research and asked if I could come down to talk to them about it,” said Schulz. “We went through the findings, and they asked if there was a difference with different dosages; I was confused.”
Adults who received the quadruple-strength vaccine had a lower risk of Alzheimer’s than those who received the standard dose. (iStock)
After sorting through data from nearly 200,000 older adults, the team found the adults who received the high-dose vaccine had a lower risk of Alzheimer’s than those who received the standard dose.
Adults in the high-dose group had an almost 55% lower risk than those who weren’t vaccinated, significantly outperforming standard-dose protection.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
The protective effect of the high-dose vaccine was even more pronounced in women compared to men, although both groups saw significant benefits.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
This study shows a link, not a cause, the researchers noted.
Experts can’t say for certain that the flu shot itself stopped Alzheimer’s because people who get high-dose vaccines might also have other healthy habits, like better diets or more frequent check-ups.
The study focused on people over 65, so it’s unclear whether getting these shots earlier in life would provide the same level of protection. (iStock)
The researchers also looked at medical records after the fact, rather than following two controlled groups in real time, which can sometimes result in missing information or biases.
“This is not a cause/effect study,” Siegel reiterated. “We can’t conclude that the flu shot itself causes the effect; it could be something about the people who decide to take this shot.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The study also focused on people over 65, so it’s unclear whether getting these shots earlier in life would provide the same level of protection.
“This needs to be further studied, but it is already certainly another reason to take a flu shot,” Siegel added.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
The study was published in the journal Neurology.
-
Atlanta, GA6 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Toy Testing with a Discerning Bodega Cat
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Georgia4 days agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Arkansas23 hours agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Milwaukee, WI5 days agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Entertainment1 week agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium