Connect with us

Health

How to Change Minds? A Study Makes the Case for Talking It Out.

Published

on

How to Change Minds? A Study Makes the Case for Talking It Out.

Co-workers caught on a Zoom name, deliberating a brand new technique for an important mission. Roommates on the kitchen desk, arguing about how one can break up utility payments pretty. Neighbors at a metropolis assembly, debating how one can pay for avenue repairs.

We’ve all been there — in a bunch, making an attempt our greatest to get everybody on the identical web page. It’s arguably one of the crucial vital and customary undertakings in human societies. However reaching settlement will be excruciating.

“A lot of our lives appear to be on this form of Rashomon scenario — folks see issues in numerous methods and have completely different accounts of what’s taking place,” Beau Sievers, a social neuroscientist at Dartmouth Faculty, stated.

A couple of years in the past, Dr. Sievers devised a research to enhance understanding of how precisely a bunch of individuals achieves a consensus and the way their particular person brains change after such discussions. The outcomes, just lately revealed on-line however not but peer-reviewed, confirmed {that a} strong dialog that leads to consensus synchronizes the talkers’ brains — not solely when fascinated with the subject that was explicitly mentioned, however associated conditions that weren’t.

The research additionally revealed a minimum of one issue that makes it more durable to succeed in accord: a bunch member whose strident opinions drown out everybody else.

Advertisement

“Dialog is our biggest instrument to align minds,” stated Thalia Wheatley, a social neuroscientist at Dartmouth Faculty who advises Dr. Sievers. “We don’t suppose in a vacuum, however with different folks.”

Dr. Sievers designed the experiment round watching motion pictures as a result of he needed to create a sensible scenario by which members may present quick and significant modifications of their opinions. However he stated it was surprisingly tough to seek out movies with scenes that could possibly be seen in numerous methods. “Administrators of films are excellent at constraining the sorts of interpretations that you just might need,” he stated.

Reasoning that smash hits usually didn’t supply a lot ambiguity, Dr. Sievers centered on movies that critics beloved however didn’t deliver blockbuster audiences, together with “The Grasp,” “Attractive Beast” and “Start,” a 2004 drama by which a mysterious younger boy exhibits up at a lady’s engagement social gathering.

Not one of the research’s volunteers had seen any of the movies earlier than. Whereas mendacity in a mind scanner, they watched scenes from the assorted motion pictures with out sound, together with one from “Start” by which the boy collapses in a hallway after a tense dialog with the elegantly dressed girl and her fiancé.

After watching the clips, the volunteers answered survey questions on what they thought had occurred in every scene. Then, in teams of three to 6 folks, they sat round a desk and mentioned their interpretations, with the purpose of reaching a consensus rationalization.

Advertisement

The entire members have been college students in the identical grasp of enterprise administration program, and plenty of of them knew one another to various levels, which made for energetic conversations reflecting real-world social dynamics, the researchers stated.

After their chats, the scholars went again into the mind scanners and watched the clips once more, in addition to new scenes with a number of the similar characters. The extra “Start” scene, for instance, confirmed the girl tucking the little boy into mattress and crying.

The research discovered that the group members’ mind exercise — in areas associated to imaginative and prescient, sound, consideration, language and reminiscence, amongst others — turned extra aligned after their dialog. Intriguingly, their brains have been synchronized whereas they watched the scenes they’d mentioned, in addition to the novel ones.

Teams of volunteers got here up with completely different interpretations of the identical film clip. Some teams, for instance, thought the girl was the boy’s mom and had deserted him, whereas others thought they have been unrelated. Regardless of having watched the identical clips, the mind patterns from one group to a different have been meaningfully completely different, however inside every group, the exercise was way more synchronized.

The outcomes have been submitted for publication in a scientific journal and are underneath assessment.

Advertisement

“This can be a daring and modern research,” stated Yuan Chang Leong, a cognitive neuroscientist at College of Chicago who was not concerned within the work.

The outcomes jibe with earlier analysis exhibiting individuals who share beliefs are likely to share mind responses. For instance, a 2017 research offered volunteers with certainly one of two reverse interpretations of “Fairly Mouth and Inexperienced My Eyes,” a brief story by J.D. Salinger. The members that had acquired the identical interpretation had extra aligned mind exercise when listening to the story within the mind scanner.

And in 2020, Dr. Leong’s crew reported that when watching information footage, mind exercise in conservatives seemed extra like that in different conservatives than that in liberals, and vice versa.

The brand new research “means that the diploma of similarity in mind responses relies upon not solely on folks’s inherent predispositions, but additionally the widespread floor created by having a dialog,” Dr. Leong stated.

The experiment additionally underscored a dynamic acquainted to anybody who has been steamrollered in a piece assembly: A person’s conduct can drastically affect a bunch choice. Among the volunteers tried to steer their groupmates of a cinematic interpretation with bluster, by barking orders and speaking over their friends. However others — significantly those that have been central gamers within the college students’ real-life social networks — acted as mediators, studying the room and looking for widespread floor.

Advertisement

The teams with blowhards have been much less neurally aligned than have been these with mediators, the research discovered. Maybe extra stunning, the mediators drove consensus not by pushing their very own interpretations, however by encouraging others to take the stage after which adjusting their very own beliefs — and mind patterns — to match the group.

“Being prepared to vary your individual thoughts, then, appears key to getting everybody on the identical web page,” Dr. Wheatley stated.

As a result of the volunteers have been eagerly making an attempt to collaborate, the researchers stated that the research’s outcomes have been most related to conditions, like workplaces or jury rooms, by which individuals are working towards a standard purpose.

However what about extra adversarial situations, by which folks have a vested curiosity in a specific place? The research’s outcomes won’t maintain for an individual negotiating a increase or politicians arguing over the integrity of our elections. And for some conditions, like artistic brainstorming, groupthink will not be a really perfect end result.

“The subject of dialog on this research was most likely fairly ‘protected,’ in that no personally or societally related beliefs have been at stake,” stated Suzanne Dikker, a cognitive neuroscientist and linguist at New York College, who was not concerned within the research.

Advertisement

Future research may zero in on mind exercise throughout consensus-building conversations, she stated. This may require a comparatively new method, often called hyperscanning, which might concurrently measure a number of folks’s brains. Dr. Dikker’s work on this enviornment has proven that character traits and conversational dynamics like taking turns can have an effect on brain-to-brain synchrony.

Dr. Wheatley agreed. The neuroscientist stated she has lengthy been pissed off along with her area’s give attention to the remoted mind.

“Our brains developed to be social: We’d like frequent interplay and dialog to remain sane,” she stated. “And but, neuroscience nonetheless putters alongside mapping out the only mind as if that can obtain a deep understanding of the human thoughts. This has to, and can, change.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

Cancer Remission Like Catherine’s Does Not Always Mean the Illness Is Cured

Published

on

Cancer Remission Like Catherine’s Does Not Always Mean the Illness Is Cured

Princess Catherine, wife of Prince William, reported on Tuesday that her cancer was in remission. But what does it mean to be in remission from cancer?

Doctors discovered her cancer unexpectedly last March when she had abdominal surgery. She has not revealed the type of cancer she has, nor how advanced it was when it was discovered.

But she did say she had chemotherapy, which she said had been completed in September. She told the British news agency PA Media that she had a port, a small device that is implanted under the skin and attached to a catheter that goes into a large vein. It allows medicines like chemotherapy drugs to be delivered directly to veins in the chest, avoiding needle sticks.

Catherine told PA Media that chemotherapy was “really tough.”

“It is a relief to now be in remission and I remain focused on recovery,” she wrote on Instagram.

Advertisement

Her announcement “certainly is good news and is reassuring,” said Dr. Kimmie Ng, associate chief of the division of gastrointestinal oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

But cancer experts like Dr. Ng say that the meaning of remission in a patient can vary.

In general, when doctors and patients talk about remission, they mean there is no evidence of cancer in blood tests or scans.

The problem is that a complete remission does not mean the cancer is gone. Even when a cancer is “cured” — defined as no evidence of cancer for five years — it may not be vanquished.

That makes life emotionally difficult for patients, who have to have frequent visits with oncologists for physical exams, blood tests and imaging.

Advertisement

“It’s really scary,” Dr. Ng said. “The amount of uncertainty is very very hard,” she added.

But that ongoing surveillance is necessary, despite the toll it takes on patients.

“Different cancers have different propensities of returning or not returning,” said Dr. Elena Ratner, a gynecologic oncologist at the Yale Cancer Center.

As many as 75 to 80 percent of ovarian cancers, she noted, can come back in an average of 14 to 16 months after a remission, depending on the stage the cancer had reached when it was found and on the cancer’s biology.

“Once the cancer returns, it becomes a chronic disease,” Dr. Ratner said. She tells her patients: “You will live with this cancer. You will be on and off chemotherapy for the rest of your life.”

Advertisement

Dr. Ratner’s gynecological cancer patients have to come back every three months for CT scans to keep an eye out for evidence that the cancer has returned.

“The women live CT scan to CT scan,” she said. “They say that for two and a half months, they have a wonderful life, but then, in time for the next CT scan, the fear returns.”

“It costs them — it costs them a lot,” she said.

“It’s awful, yet I am amazed every day by their strength,” she said of her patients.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Death Toll in Gaza Likely 40 Percent Higher Than Reported, Researchers Say

Published

on

Death Toll in Gaza Likely 40 Percent Higher Than Reported, Researchers Say

Deaths from bombs and other traumatic injuries during the first nine months of the war in Gaza may have been underestimated by more than 40 percent, according to a new analysis published in The Lancet.

The peer-reviewed statistical analysis, led by epidemiologists at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, used modeling in an effort to provide an objective third-party estimate of casualties. The United Nations has relied on the figure from the Hamas-led Ministry of Health, which it says has been largely accurate, but which Israel criticizes as inflated.

But the new analysis suggests the Hamas health ministry tally is a significant undercount. The researchers concluded that the death toll from Israel’s aerial bombardment and military ground operation in Gaza between October 2023 and the end of June 2024 was about 64,300, rather than the 37,900 reported by the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

The estimate in the analysis corresponds to 2.9 percent of Gaza’s prewar population having been killed by traumatic injury, or one in 35 inhabitants. The analysis did not account for other war-related casualties such as deaths from malnutrition, water-borne illness or the breakdown of the health system as the conflict progressed.

The study found that 59 percent of the dead were women, children and people over the age of 65. It did not establish what share of the reported dead were combatants.

Advertisement

Mike Spagat, an expert on calculating casualties of war who was not involved in this research, said the new analysis convinced him that Gaza casualties were underestimated.

“This is a good piece of evidence that the real number is higher, probably substantially higher, than the Ministry of Health’s official numbers, higher than I had been thinking over the last few months,” said Dr. Spagat, who is a professor at Royal Holloway College at the University of London.

But the presentation of precise figures, such as a 41 percent underreported mortality, is less useful, he said, since the analysis actually shows the real total could be less than, or substantially more. “Quantitatively, it’s a lot more uncertain than I think comes out in the paper,” Dr. Spagat said.

The researchers said their estimate of 64,260 deaths from traumatic injury has a “confidence interval” between 55,298 and 78,525, which means the actual number of casualties is likely in that range.

If the estimated level of underreporting of deaths through June 2024 is extrapolated out to October 2024, the total Gazan casualty figure in the first year of the war would exceed 70,000.

Advertisement

“There is an importance to war injury deaths, because it speaks to the question of whether the campaign is proportional, whether it is, in fact, the case that sufficient provisions are made to to avoid civilian casualties,” said Francesco Checchi, an epidemiologist with an expertise in conflict and humanitarian crises and a professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine who was an author on the study. “I do think memorializing is important. There is inherent value in just trying to come up with the right number.”

The analysis uses a statistical method called capture-recapture analysis, which has been used to estimate casualties in other conflicts, including civil wars in Colombia and Sudan.

For Gaza, the researchers drew on three lists: The first is a register maintained by the Palestinian Ministry of Health, which mainly comprises the dead in hospital morgues and estimates of the number of unrecovered people buried in rubble. The second is deaths reported by family or community members through an online survey form the ministry established on Jan. 1, 2024, when the prewar death registration system had broken down. It asked Palestinians inside and outside Gaza to provide names, ages, national ID number and location of death for casualties. The third source was obituaries of people who died from injuries that were published on social media, which may not include all of the same biographical details and which the researchers compiled by hand.

The researchers analyzed these sources to look for individuals who appear on multiple lists of those killed. A high level of overlap would have suggested that few deaths were uncounted; the low amount they found suggested the opposite. The researchers used models to calculate the probability of each individual appearing on any of the three lists.

“Models enable us to actually estimate the number of people who have not been listed at all,” Dr. Checchi said. That, combined with the listed number, gave the analysts their total.

Advertisement

Patrick Ball, director of research at the Human Rights Data Analysis Group, and a statistician who has conducted similar estimates of violent deaths in conflicts in other regions, said the study was strong and well reasoned. But he cautioned that the authors may have underestimated the amount of uncertainty caused by the ongoing conflict.

The authors used different variations of mathematical models in their calculations, but Dr. Ball said that rather than presenting a single figure — 64,260 deaths — as the estimate, it may have been more appropriate to present the number of deaths as a range from 47,457 to 88,332 deaths, a span that encompasses all of the estimates produced by modeling the overlap among the three lists.

“It’s really hard to do this kind of thing in the middle of a conflict,” Dr. Ball said. “It takes time, and it takes access. I think you could say the range is larger, and that would be plausible.”

While Gaza had a strong death registration process before the war, it now has only limited function after the destruction of much of the health system. Deaths are uncounted when whole families are killed simultaneously, leaving no one to report, or when an unknown number of people die in the collapse of a large building; Gazans are increasingly buried near their homes without passing through a morgue, Dr. Checchi said.

The authors of the study acknowledged that some of those assumed dead may in fact be missing, most likely taken as prisoners in Israel.

Advertisement

Roni Caryn Rabin and Lauren Leatherby contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

Health

Dementia risk for people 55 and older has doubled, new study finds

Published

on

Dementia risk for people 55 and older has doubled, new study finds

Dementia cases in the U.S. are expected to double by 2060, with an estimated one million people diagnosed per year, according to a new study led by Johns Hopkins University and other institutions.

Researchers found that Americans’ risk of developing dementia after age 55 is 42%, double the risk that has been identified in prior studies, a press release stated.

For those who reach 75 years of age, the lifetime risk exceeds 50%, the study found.

AGING ‘HOTSPOT’ FOUND IN BRAIN, RESEARCHERS SAY: ‘MAJOR CHANGES’

Women face a 48% average risk and men have a 35% risk, with the discrepancy attributed to women living longer than men.

Advertisement

Dementia cases in the U.S. are expected to double by 2060, with an estimated one million people diagnosed per year. (iStock)

The study, which was published in the journal Nature Medicine on Jan. 13, analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS), which has tracked the cognitive and vascular health of nearly 16,000 adults since 1987.

DEEP SLEEP CAN KEEP TWO BIG HEALTH PROBLEMS AT BAY, NEW STUDIES SUGGEST

“Our study results forecast a dramatic rise in the burden from dementia in the United States over the coming decades, with one in two Americans expected to experience cognitive difficulties after age 55,” said study senior investigator and epidemiologist Josef Coresh, MD, PhD, who serves as the founding director of the Optimal Aging Institute at NYU Langone, in the release.

Understanding risk factors

“One of the main reasons for the increase is that great medicine and tecnological advances are keeping us alive longer and age is a risk factor for dementia,” Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

“Obesity is associated with inflammation, diabetes and high blood pressure, which are all independent risk factors for dementia.”

In addition to aging, other risk factors include genetics, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, unhealthy diets of ultraprocessed foods, sedentary lifestyles and mental health disorders, the release said.

“We have an obesity epidemic with over 45% adults obese in the U.S.,” Siegel noted. “Obesity is associated with inflammation, diabetes and high blood pressure, which are all independent risk factors for dementia.”

      

“And as an unhealthy population, we also have more heart disease, and atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for cognitive decline,” he added.

Advertisement

Dementia risk was found to be higher among people who have a variant of the APOE4 gene, which has been linked to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Black adults also have a higher risk.

virtual volumetric drawing of brain in hand

Researchers found that Americans’ risk of developing dementia after age 55 is 42%, double the risk that has been identified in prior studies. (iStock)

Research has shown that the same interventions used to prevent heart disease risk could also prevent or slow down dementia, the study suggested.

“The pending population boom in dementia cases poses significant challenges for health policymakers in particular, who must refocus their efforts on strategies to minimize the severity of dementia cases, as well as plans to provide more health care services for those with dementia,” said Coresh.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

What needs to change?

Professor Adrian Owen, PhD, neuroscientist and chief scientific officer at Creyos, a Canada-based company that specializes in cognitive assessment and brain health, referred to the increase in dementia cases as a “tidal wave.”

Advertisement

“This new study’s anticipated surge in dementia cases underscores the urgent need for early and accurate detection,” he told Fox News Digital.

“By catching issues early, we give people the power to make lifestyle adjustments, seek available treatments and plan their futures with clarity.”

“By identifying cognitive decline at its earliest stages, we have an opportunity to intervene before patients and families bear the full weight of the disease.”

Owen recommends conducting regular cognitive assessments as part of routine check-ups to proactively identify early signs of cognitive decline.

“By catching issues early, we give people the power to make lifestyle adjustments, seek available treatments and plan their futures with clarity,” he said.

Advertisement
Man with doctor

“By identifying cognitive decline at its earliest stages, we have an opportunity to intervene before patients and families bear the full weight of the disease.” (iStock)

Maria C. Carrillo, PhD, chief science officer and medical affairs lead for the Alzheimer’s Association in Chicago, said there is an “urgent need” to address the global crisis of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. 

To help keep the aging brain healthy, the Alzheimer’s Association published its report 10 Healthy Habits for Your Brain. Some of the tips are listed below.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

– Participate in regular physical activity.

– Learn new things throughout your life and engage your brain.

Advertisement

– Get proper nutrition — prioritize vegetables and leaner meats/proteins, along with foods that are less processed and lower in fat.

– Avoid head injury (protect your head).

– Have a healthy heart and cardiovascular system — control blood pressure, avoid diabetes or treat it if you have it, manage your weight and don’t smoke.

Man with Alzheimer's

Research has shown that the same interventions used to prevent heart disease risk could also prevent or slow down dementia. (iStock)

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers for additional comment.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending