Connect with us

Health

Gag Me With a Spoon! The Weird Stories Behind Your Favorite ’80s Idioms

Published

on

Gag Me With a Spoon! The Weird Stories Behind Your Favorite ’80s Idioms

The ’80s was a time of excess: big hair, dramatic makeup, colorful clothes, and bold pop music loaded with synthesizers. Even the way people talked was an extension of this heightened style. Every decade has its slang and idioms — think “Groovy” and “Far out” in the ’60s or “Talk to the hand” and “As if!” in the ’90s — and the Reagan era is no exception. As with many idioms, a lot of the defining ’80s sayings came from popular culture and represented different social groups; valley girls, slackers, and rebels among them. Want to return to a simpler time by using ’80s slang in your own future conversations? Keep reading. We’ve collected seven of the most memorable idioms of the decade, plus the wacky origin stories behind them. 

Gag Me With a Spoon

What it means: I’m disgusted.

Its origin: “Gag me with a spoon” was one of many ’80s phrases rooted in the distinct dialect of Valley girls. These early-’80s teens lived in California’s San Fernando Valley and were known for hanging out at the mall and speaking in a breezy cadence peppered with the words “like” and “totally.” Valley girls were also fond of phrases that seemed to end with a question mark, even when they weren’t questions; this is known as uptalk, and it’s often associated with young women. “Gag me with a spoon” is a Valley girl phrase used to indicate disgust — as being gagged with a spoon definitely sounds unpleasant. The idiom gained broader recognition through avant-garde rocker Frank Zappa’s 1982 hit “Valley Girl,” which featured his teen daughter, Moon, doing her very best Val-speak.

Totally Tubular

What it means: That’s awesome.

Its origin: The word “tubular,” which means “having the form of or consisting of a tube,” was first used in 1673, according to Merriam-Webster. Over 300 years later, the word took on a whole new meaning. In the ’60s and ’70s, surfers started using it to describe “a hollow, curling wave, ideal for riding,” according to the Online Etymology Dictionary. Surfing has long been a popular pastime in sunny California, and the phrase was soon picked up by Valley girls, in the process losing its original reference to tubes. Something that’s “totally tubular” isn’t tube-shaped — rather, it’s just a creative way to express approval.

Advertisement

Totally Gnarly

What it means: That’s disgusting OR That’s excellent. 

Its origin: Like “totally tubular,” “totally gnarly” dates back to the 17th century and has its slang roots in surf culture. In its original iteration, gnarly referred to things that were knotty and rugged, and surfers claimed the word to describe dangerous waves. The 1982 teen movie Fast Times at Ridgemont High launched “gnarly” into the mainstream, as the lovable slacker Spicoli (Sean Penn in one of his first on-screen roles) spoke the word in an unforgettable fashion. But contrary to what you might assume, something that’s “totally gnarly” isn’t necessarily bad — it all depends on the context. As the Online Etymology Dictionary reports, “it meant both ‘excellent’ and ‘disgusting.’” Ah, the nuances of language!

Take a Chill Pill

What it means: Calm down.

Its origin: This rhyming idiom came to prominence on college campuses early in the decade, says Green’s Dictionary of Slang. The idea of a “chill pill” brings medication to mind, and according to Atlas Obscura, chill pills were a real thing back in the 19th century. These pill formulas, which a person could apparently concoct at home using some seriously suspicious-sounding ingredients, were said to remedy the chills that came from fevers. The ’80s idiom isn’t about these specific pills, though, and rather uses “chill” in the modern sense that’s rooted in describing things as “cool” (which came from the mid-20th-century jazz scene). The phrase “take a chill pill” is basically telling someone to “be cool” or “relax.” Some people have also claimed that the phrase was related to medication for ADHD that was gaining popularity around the time.

Couch Potato

What it means: A lazy person who spends most of their time sitting on the couch watching TV.

Advertisement

Its origin: According to The New Yorker, this phrase was first used in 1976, when a man named Tom Iacino called his friend, Robert Armstrong, and asked “Hey, is the couch potato there?” when Armstrong’s girlfriend picked up. Rather than get offended and hang up the phone in a huff, Armstrong got Iacino’s permission to trademark the phrase, and it took off from there. In 1983, Armstrong and writer Jack Mingo published The Official Couch Potato Handbook, a comical guide to the lazy lifestyle. Soon enough, there were even couch potato toys.

She’s Bodacious

What it means: She’s attractive and/or She’s outstanding. 

Its origin: “Bodacious” is a portmanteau of the words “bold” and “audacious,” and was originally coined in the 19th century. While the ’80s usage typically refers to female attractiveness, the word initially meant remarkable and noteworthy, says Merriam-Webster. “Bodacious” was a favorite phrase of Citizens Band radio users in the ’70s and often used in the classic comic strip Snuffy Smith. In 1989, the sci-fi comedy Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, which centered on a pair of silly but sweet teen boys, made “bodacious” into a widespread slang word. To hear the movie’s stars Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter describe it, something that’s bodacious is “outstandingly outstanding.” Who could argue with that?

What’s Your Damage?

What it means: What’s your problem?

Its origin: “What’s your damage?” is meant to be asked in a tone dripping with sarcasm. The saying originated in Heathers, a cult-favorite 1989 teen movie starring Winona Ryder and Christian Slater. Daniel Waters, the movie’s screenwriter, revealed to Entertainment Weekly that the phrase was not an original creation. “It’s embarrassing,” he admitted. “I stole from when I was a camp counselor and one of my little camper girls, Jamie, used to say, ‘What’s your damage?’ I just completely stole that from her.” Heathers is one of the most quotable movies of the ’80s, and “What’s your damage?” quickly became a go-to question for fed-up teens everywhere.

Advertisement

If any of these idioms were to make a comeback, we think that would be totally radical (which is a good thing!). Whether you used these phrases back in the day or want to try them out for the first time now, there’s no denying that ’80s slang remains pretty darn bodacious.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

A Federal Lab That Tracked Rising S.T.I.s Has Been Shuttered

Published

on

A Federal Lab That Tracked Rising S.T.I.s Has Been Shuttered

Drug-resistant gonorrhea, a form of the widespread sexually transmitted infection, is considered an urgent health threat worldwide. The United States has just lost its ability to detect it.

Among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employees fired on Tuesday were 77 scientists who, among other work, gathered samples of gonorrhea and other S.T.I.s from labs nationwide, analyzed the genetic information for signs of drug resistance, and readied the samples for storage at a secure facility.

No other researchers at the agency have the expertise, or the software, to continue this work. The abrupt halt has stranded about 1,000 samples of gonorrhea and other sexually transmitted pathogens that had not yet been processed, and perhaps dozens more headed to the agency.

There are as many as 30 freezers full of samples that now have no custodians, said one senior C.D.C. official who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

“We were just really shut down midair, like there was no warning,” the official said. “It was just completely unplanned and chaotic.”

Advertisement

The C.D.C.’s work on S.T.I.s had taken on greater urgency in the past few years as rates of new infections soared. More than 2.4 million new S.T.I.s were diagnosed in 2023, about one million more than 20 years ago.

Nearly 4,000 babies were born with congenital syphilis in 2023. About 280 were stillborn or died soon after.

“Whoever got rid of the lab just doesn’t understand how important the lab is,” said another senior C.D.C. official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

About 600,000 new gonorrhea cases were diagnosed in the United States in 2023. The bacteria that cause gonorrhea, called Neisseria gonorrhoeae, spread through sexual contact to the genitals, rectum and throat. Left untreated, it can cause infertility and sterility, blindness in infants or even death.

Gonorrhea has become resistant to nearly every available antibiotic, leaving a single class that still snuffs it out. The most powerful defense combines a shot of ceftriaxone with azithromycin, but some evidence hints that gonorrhea is evolving to sidestep even that treatment.

Advertisement

Over more than 25 years, the C.D.C. lab archived about 50,000 gonorrhea samples — the largest collection in the world — which allow scientists to track how the pathogen has changed over time. It’s not clear what will happen to the samples.

One new public health strategy makes it even more important for the nation to track gonorrhea, said Dr. Jenell Stewart, an infectious diseases physician at Hennepin Healthcare in Minneapolis.

In a bid to combat resurgent syphilis and chlamydia, the C.D.C. recommended last year that gay and bisexual men and transgender women take doxycycline, a widely used antibiotic, within 72 hours of unprotected sex.

Cities like San Francisco and Seattle that had earlier endorsed the practice, called doxy-PEP, have already seen drastic drops in the rates of those infections.

But researchers are worried that widespread use of doxycycline might increase resistance to the entire class of antibiotics, called tetracyclines. A few studies suggest there may be reason to worry.

Advertisement

Harvard University researchers last month analyzed more than 14,000 genetic sequences generated by C.D.C. researchers and found that the proportion of gonorrhea bacteria with antibiotic resistance increased to more than 35 percent last year, from less than 10 percent in 2020.

The federal scientists who produced that data and made it publicly available have all been fired. “Without public health money and infrastructure, I’m not sure who if anyone will take up the torch to monitor gonorrhea resistance,” Dr. Stewart said.

“This is a huge loss,” she added.

Dr. Stewart and a colleague spent two years preparing the protocol and an app to study doxy-PEP in cisgender women and monitor gonorrhea resistance.

The study was supported by the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network, whose funding was slashed last month.

Advertisement

At least five other grants to study doxy-PEP have been terminated, along with a variety of grants at the National Institutes of Health aimed at preventing S.T.I.s, including H.I.V.

Any lab can test for S.T.I.s, but commercial tests cannot determine whether gonorrhea will respond to available treatments. C.D.C. scientists developed the only such test, and provided funding and training to a few dozen labs on the sophisticated testing.

Samples were sent to the agency for confirmation. Without the agency scientists, testing for drug sensitivity will most likely cease, several experts said.

“We cannot have a national surveillance system without a national lab,” said one scientist who leads a C.D.C.-funded lab but did not wish to be identified without authorization to speak to the media.

C.D.C. scientists were also helping to develop alternatives to the nation’s outdated syphilis test. It cannot identify an active infection, only whether someone was ever infected. The agency has three large contracts to develop new rapid syphilis tests.

Advertisement

But without expertise and the samples from C.D.C. scientists, it’s unclear whether that work can continue, said a senior official with knowledge of the situation.

The fired scientists had about 1,400 years of field experience between them. The official said, “These were highly trained people that are not replaceable easily.”

Continue Reading

Health

Dementia risk could dip with common vaccine, study suggests

Published

on

Dementia risk could dip with common vaccine, study suggests

The link between the zoster vaccine and a lower dementia risk has been strengthened in new research.

A study by Stanford Medicine, published in the journal Nature on April 2, found that the vaccine — which is used to prevent shingles — reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis by about 20% over the next seven years.

“If these findings are truly causal, the zoster vaccine will be both far more effective and cost-effective in preventing or delaying dementia than existing pharmaceutical interventions,” the researchers noted in the study.

NEW BLOOD TEST DIAGNOSES ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND MEASURES HOW FAR IT’S PROGRESSED

These findings also support an emerging theory that viruses impacting the nervous system can increase dementia risk.

Advertisement

Senior study author Pascal Geldsetzer, MD, PhD, assistant professor of medicine at Stanford, said he considers these findings “hugely important” for clinical medicine, population health and research.

Researchers have marked a link between the zoster vaccine and lower dementia risk in multiple data sets. (iStock)

“For the first time, we now have evidence that likely shows a cause-and-effect relationship between shingles vaccination and dementia prevention,” he told Fox News Digital. 

“We find these protective effects to be large in size – substantially larger than those of existing pharmacological tools for dementia.”

The randomized trial took advantage of the unique way the zoster vaccine was rolled out in Wales, U.K., in 2013, Geldsetzer noted.

Advertisement

TWO ALZHEIMER’S DRUGS HELP PATIENTS LIVE INDEPENDENTLY AT HOME FOR LONGER PERIODS

“They said that if you had your 80th birthday just prior to the start date of the program, you are ineligible, and you remain ineligible for life,” he said. “If you had your 80th birthday just after, you were eligible for at least one year.”

“We see in our data that just a one-week difference across this date-of-birth cutoff means that you go from essentially no one getting vaccinated to about half of the population getting vaccinated.”

nurse holding hands with a senior patient

The study found that women benefited from the vaccine more than men in terms of reduced dementia risk. (iStock)

Both the vaccine-eligible and ineligible groups are “good comparison groups,” according to Geldsetzer, since the only difference is that they were born a few days earlier or later.

The same protective effect of shingles vaccination for dementia has been identified in different populations and countries that rolled out the vaccine in a similar way, the researcher revealed.

Advertisement

EXPERIMENTAL WOMEN’S CANCER DRUG BOOSTS SURVIVAL RATES IN NOTABLE STUDY

To gather more evidence and confirm the link, Geldsetzer recommends conducting a clinical trial.

“I’m currently trying to raise funds to conduct such a trial from private foundations and philanthropy,” he said.

“We want to trial the live-attenuated vaccine (the vaccine for which we have generated our compelling body of evidence), which is no longer being manufactured in the U.S.”

Vaccine in the arm

The protective effect of shingles vaccination for dementia has been identified in different populations and countries, according to researchers. (iStock)

Family physician Dr. Mark Loafman, who was not involved in the study, weighed in on the association between the shingles vaccine and dementia risk.

Advertisement

“We commonly see intriguing headlines from studies showing an association between a particular health outcome and exposure to something in the environment, our diet or medication,” the Chicago doctor said in an interview with Fox News Digital. 

“The challenge when interpreting this type of data is that an association is in no way proof that the exposure is what caused the health finding.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Loafman said this large-population study does a “very good job” of excluding the possibility that the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups share different attributes that could skew the outcome.

“So, it really does look like the vaccine does indeed offer a fairly significant level of protection against developing dementia.”

Advertisement
Dementia brain scan

These findings support an “emerging theory” that viruses impacting the nervous system can increase dementia risk, according to Stanford Medicine. (iStock)

“The study also includes compelling evidence to support two highly plausible mechanisms … in which the vaccine decreases the incidence of dementia,” he added.

This includes the fact that the herpes virus, which causes chickenpox and shingles, settles into the nervous system and lies dormant, which can ignite shingles later. 

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

“Secondly, the live-attenuated vaccines, like the shingles vaccine, are associated with neuroprotective properties,” Loafman went on. “The association is not in itself causal, but this study adds a lot more credibility to this association.” 

Advertisement

Loafman, who has already received the shingles vaccine himself, said he will recommend it to patients in light of this research.

“These findings bring even more encouragement for me to recommend it to my eligible patients, friends and family,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Trump’s Next Tariffs Target Could be Foreign-Made Pharmaceuticals

Published

on

Trump’s Next Tariffs Target Could be Foreign-Made Pharmaceuticals

Newer and more expensive medications are more likely to be made in the United States or Europe. Ireland, in particular, has become a hub because it is a tax haven.

Many of the industry’s biggest blockbusters are manufactured at least partly in Ireland. Among them are: Keytruda, Merck’s cancer drug; Zepbound, Eli Lilly’s weight-loss drug; and Stelara, Johnson & Johnson’s anti-inflammatory drug used for conditions like arthritis.

Mr. Trump has taken notice. “This beautiful island of five million people has got the entire U.S. pharmaceutical industry in its grasp,” he said in March at a meeting with Prime Minister Micheal Martin of Ireland.


U.S. production of pharmaceuticals peaked, by one measure, in 2006.

That was around the time a wave of top-selling American-made drugs lost patent protection, creating opportunities for generic manufacturers in India and China to ramp up production of generics. Around the same time, U.S. government incentives to manufacture in Puerto Rico were phased out, while new carrots, like tax advantages in Ireland, encouraged manufacturers to move production overseas.

Advertisement

In 2021, most of America’s top-consumed generic drugs, as well as key antibiotics and antivirals, had no American facility producing their active ingredients, according to Clarivate.

Mr. Trump said on Wednesday that “the United States can no longer produce enough antibiotics to treat our sick.”

For example, nearly all the world’s sites producing the active ingredient of amoxicillin, a common antibiotic, are in China, India or Europe, according to Clarivate.

A Tennessee plant, now owned by a company called USAntibiotics, used to supply nearly all of the amoxicillin consumed in the United States. It now imports the active ingredient from Europe and uses it to formulate pills. The plant now supplies about 5 percent of America’s amoxicillin.

Medications are usually protected from tariffs under a World Trade Organization agreement aimed at protecting patients’ access to vital drugs. The tariffs that Mr. Trump imposed on certain imports in his first term did not hit pharmaceuticals.

Advertisement

Starting in February, drugmakers importing active ingredients made in China into the United States have had to pay a tariff that Mr. Trump imposed on Chinese goods. That tariff rose to 20 percent in March. (Wednesday’s levies add a new 34 percent tariff on most Chinese imports, though that does not apply to medicines.)


For the manufacturers of inexpensive generic drugs with razor-thin profit margins, the added costs of tariffs could be “a tipping point” that prompts them to exit the market, said Erin Fox, an expert at the University of Utah who tracks drug shortages.

Dr. Fox said she was most worried about drugs for which shortages are already common, such as generic medications given as an injection. These injections are harder to make than pills and are much less profitable than newer medications, discouraging manufacturers from jumping in. An example is lidocaine, used to numb pain during medical procedures. Most production of lidocaine’s active ingredient is in India, according to Clarivate.

Continue Reading

Trending