Health
Citing N.I.H. Cuts, a Top Science Journal Stops Accepting Submissions
Environmental Health Perspectives, widely considered the premier environmental health journal, has announced that it would pause acceptance of new studies for publication, as federal cuts have left its future uncertain.
For more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins — from “forever chemicals” to air pollution — and publish the research free of charge.
The editors made the decision to halt acceptance of studies because of a “lack of confidence” that contracts for critical expenses like copy-editing and editorial software would be renewed after their impending expiration dates, said Joel Kaufman, the journal’s top editor.
He declined to comment on the publication’s future prospects.
“If the journal is indeed lost, it is a huge loss,” said Jonathan Levy, chair of the department of environmental health at Boston University. “It’s reducing the ability for people to have good information that can be used to make good decisions.”
The editor of N.E.J.M. described the letter as “vaguely threatening.” On Tuesday, the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology, published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that it had received such a letter.
Scientific journals have long been a target of top health officials in the Trump administration.
In a book published last year, Dr. Martin A. Makary, the new commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, accused journal editorial boards of “gate-keeping” and publishing only information that supports a “groupthink narrative.”
In an interview with the “Dr. Hyman Show” podcast last year, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is now secretary of health and human services, said he planned to prosecute medical journals under federal anti-corruption laws.
“I’m going to find a way to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you’re going to start publishing real science,” he said.
Still, the announcement regarding E.H.P. baffled researchers, who pointed out that the funding cuts seemed to conflict with the Trump administration’s stated priorities.
For instance, Mr. Kennedy has repeatedly emphasized the importance of studying the environment’s role in causing chronic diseases. The new administration has also expressed interest in the transparency and public accessibility of scientific journals, an area in which E.H.P. has been a trailblazer.
E.H.P. was one of the first “open-access” journals, allowing anyone to read without a subscription. And unlike many other open-access journals, which often charge researchers thousands of dollars to publish their work, E.H.P.’s federal support meant scientists from smaller universities could publish without worrying about a fee.
“There are multiple layers of irony here,” Dr. Levy said.
E.H.P. isn’t the only journal caught in the crossfire of funding cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services.
A draft budget for the department, obtained by The New York Times, proposes axing two journals published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Emerging Infectious Diseases and Preventing Chronic Disease. Both are published free of charge to authors and readers and are among the top journals in their fields.
Andrew Nixon, an H.H.S. spokesman, said “no final decision has been made” about the upcoming budget.
Emerging Infectious Diseases, published monthly, provides cutting-edge reports on infectious disease threats from around the world.
It has helped to shape preparedness and response to outbreaks, said Jason Kindrachuk, a virologist at the University of Manitoba who has published research on the Marburg and mpox viruses in the journal.
The news “is very disheartening,” he said.
Health
Widespread habit may raise colorectal cancer risk more than you think
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Colorectal cancer is now officially the leading cause of cancer-related death among men and women 50 and younger, according to research from the American Cancer Society.
While some risk factors — like age, family history and genetics — can’t be controlled, there are some lifestyle behaviors that can increase the chances of the disease.
One of those is drinking alcohol, which has been linked to an increased risk of at least six different types of cancer.
HIDDEN VIRUS INSIDE GUT BACTERIA LINKED TO DOUBLED COLORECTAL CANCER RISK, STUDY FINDS
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies alcoholic beverages as a Group 1 carcinogen, which means there is strong, sufficient evidence that it causes cancer in humans.
Dr. Tereza Cristina Sardinha, chief of colon and rectal surgery services at Catholic Health on Long Island, New York, confirmed that alcohol is a well-known risk factor for all cancers, but particularly those of the gastrointestinal tract.
Drinking alcohol has been linked to an increased risk of at least six different types of cancer. (iStock)
“The alcohol, or ethanol, will metabolize and break down into acetaldehyde,” she shared with Fox News Digital. “This metabolism of alcohol is very toxic to the DNA of the cell, which over time can lead to the development of cancer.”
Alcohol also changes the microbiome of the gut, which is another strong factor in cancer risk, according to Sardinha.
Colorectal cancer is now officially the leading cause of cancer-related death among men and women 50 and younger. (iStock)
“The microbiome has a significant effect on many pathogens in the colon and rectum, and diet and alcohol definitely affect the types of bacteria in your gut.”
When the gut’s “first line of defense” is disrupted, it can trigger a series of changes, particularly DNA damage, inflammation and oxidative stress within cells, the doctor said.
“These processes are closely linked to cancer development, which is why alcohol is considered a carcinogen.”
NEARLY 40% OF CANCERS CAN BE PREVENTED WITH 3 LIFESTYLE CHANGES, STUDY FINDS
The relationship between alcohol and colorectal cancer risk is “dose-dependent,” she said.
“Patients who drink regularly for a long period of time, meaning at least 10 years, will have a lifetime increase in the development of colorectal cancer.”
“The negative impact of spirits (hard liquor) is greater than beer, which is more than wine,” a doctor told Fox News Digital. (iStock)
Research shows that for those who drink at least two drinks per day — which is considered “moderate consumption,” the doctor said — the lifetime risk of colorectal cancer will increase by at least 25%.
A heavier drinker, consuming more than two drinks a day, will have an exponentially greater risk.
COLORECTAL CANCER NOW DEADLIEST TYPE FOR CERTAIN GROUP OF AMERICANS, STUDY FINDS
“What really makes the difference is not only the volume but the frequency,” Sardinha said. “I just saw one of my patients who I operated on last week, and she drinks six beers a day, and she developed colon cancer. She’s not morbidly obese, she’s not a smoker. The only risk factor she has is alcohol.”
The doctor advises her patients to avoid alcohol “or at least minimize intake.”
“What really makes the difference is not only the volume but the frequency.”
If someone stops drinking, the risk won’t disappear immediately, the doctor noted.
“It takes about an average of 10 years to know if cancer risk decreased or not,” she said. “But we do know that if you continue drinking, your risk will definitely increase.
MOM WITH NO SYMPTOMS HAD STAGE 4 COLORECTAL CANCER — AND A RARE SURGERY SAVED HER LIFE
“That’s why we recommend that patients stop drinking or exponentially decrease their intake in the same way we tell them to exercise and increase fruits and vegetables in their diet.”
Sardinha pointed out that alcohol isn’t the only culprit.
“Not all heavy drinkers develop cancer, so there has to be some other mechanism that plays a role,” she said.
And not all types of alcohol are equal in terms of colorectal cancer risk, according to Dr. Nathan Goodyear, integrative medicine physician at Williams Cancer Institute in California.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
“The negative impact of spirits (hard liquor) is greater than beer, which is more than wine,” he told Fox News Digital.
A Danish study also found that wine consumption was associated with a lower risk of death, while beer and spirits were not, Goodyear pointed out. Spirits had the highest risk, especially at three to five drinks per day.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“The effects of wine, beer and spirits were independent of each other,” the doctor said.
The context in which alcohol is consumed can also play a role, he noted.
In addition to stopping or limiting alcohol intake, doctors say other healthy lifestyle behaviors, like exercise, have been shown to decrease the chances of colorectal cancer. (iStock)
“In the U.S., alcohol is often used in the context of addiction — another hit to keep the high,” Goodyear said. “But in some communities, such as Sardina, Italy, and Ikaria, Greece, wine is part of the culture, social connections and community.”
“Wine is taken outside the context of addiction and taken within the context of a plant-based diet, social settings, daily movement, faith, community and life.”
Other ways to minimize risk
In addition to stopping or limiting alcohol intake, Sardinha shared other healthy lifestyle behaviors that have been shown to decrease the chances of colorectal cancer.
One “huge and well-established” factor is regular exercise, she said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“If you don’t exercise, if you don’t move, you definitely increase your risk of colorectal cancer,” she told Fox News Digital. “Even for patients who have been diagnosed with cancer, once they have surgery and are able to exercise, that will improve their long-term prognosis.”
Smoking is another highly carcinogenic habit, and it’s a common myth that it’s only associated with lung cancer.
“We do know that if you continue drinking, your risk will definitely increase.”
“Smoking is a risk factor for most cancers, and colorectal cancer is one of them,” Sardinha said.
Taking steps to address and prevent obesity is also a well-established way to minimize risk, as is adopting a healthy, high-fiber diet to promote proper bowel function, according to the doctor.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
“Diets that are lower in fiber are often more constipating, and, therefore, if there’s anything in the food that is carcinogenic, that is going to have more direct, prolonged contact with the bowel wall, with the cells, and increases the chances of DNA damage,” she said.
“Obviously, we cannot change our family history, but those good lifestyle habits will make a difference in the risk of colorectal cancer.”
Health
Wellness expert reveals surprising health benefits of daily cold exposure: ‘Huge difference’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Interview of the week
Wim Hof breaks down his three-pillar method for more energy, less stress
Top stories
→ First case of severe mpox disease reported in major city
→ Deadly meningitis outbreak prompts college students to call for campus shutdown
→ Mom with no symptoms had colorectal cancer — and a rare surgery saved her life
A Los Angeles mother said her jarring symptoms were dismissed by doctors for years, chalked up to a side effect of childbirth, but they turned out to be signals of colorectal cancer. (Amy Piccioli)
Rises and falls
→ Cigarette smoking plummets to historic single-digit low in U.S.
→ Male fertility rates decline as experts reveal health threats
→ Surges in adult ADHD stimulant prescriptions have doctors concerned
Conversation starters
→ Canadian patients left waiting 15+ hours in emergency room
→ The real reason for sagging jowls, and what will and won’t help
→ Study reveals surprising results after stopping GLP-1 weight-loss drugs
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Health
Needle-free diabetes management could be on the horizon, study suggests
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Oral insulin could one day replace injections for people with diabetes, new scientific discoveries suggest.
Researchers from Kumamoto University in Japan have announced the development of an insulin pill to help lower blood sugar.
For diabetics, insulin is typically administered via injection, but the pill would offer a non-invasive treatment option.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
“Insulin injections remain a daily burden for many patients,” said associate professor Shingo Ito, a researcher in the study’s press release. “Our peptide-based platform offers a new route to deliver insulin orally, and may be applicable to long-acting insulin formulations and other injectable biologics.”
Oral insulin could one day replace injections for people with diabetes, new scientific discoveries suggest. (iStock)
The study, published in the journal Molecular Pharmaceutics, tested the delivery of oral insulin by building a carrier peptide called DNP-V. This peptide helps to transport insulin through the small intestine, where protein drug absorption is usually poor.
In diabetic mice models, the researchers administered the peptide by mouth with zinc-stabilized insulin, which was formulated with zinc ions to make it more stable, according to the study.
“Insulin injections remain a daily burden for many patients.”
The result was a rapid and significant drop in blood glucose, as well as a sustained (longer-term) decrease. The mice’s blood sugar was reduced to near-normal levels.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
When DNP-V was attached directly to insulin, the results showed enhanced absorption in the intestines and a similar glucose-lowering effect, the researchers noted.
The treatment was effective in different diabetes models, significantly reducing blood sugar spikes after meals with just one dose per day.
The study was done in mice, which leaves uncertainty if the treatment will translate to humans. (iStock)
The findings suggest that DNP peptides could serve as flexible, adaptable platforms for delivering large-molecule drugs by mouth, the authors concluded in the study abstract.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
“This technology can simply and effectively convert injectable biopharmaceuticals into orally administrable forms, offering a promising path to practical, patient-friendly oral therapies,” they wrote.
Although the researchers are optimistic about the findings translating to larger therapeutic models, they noted that the results in mice do not guarantee the same outcome in humans, and that more research is needed.
For diabetics, insulin is typically administered via injection to regulate blood sugar levels. (iStock)
Dr. Marc Siegel commented on this development, noting that oral insulin could make a big difference in healthcare.
“Insulin use, especially in type 1 diabetes, is sometimes difficult to regulate by injection,” Siegel, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. “Oral use would have major advantages.”
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
He added, “This is very promising provided that it works in humans, which is a big ‘if.’”
Fox News Digital reached out to the study authors for comment.
-
Detroit, MI3 days agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Oklahoma1 week agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Nebraska1 week agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
-
Georgia6 days agoHow ICE plans for a detention warehouse pushed a Georgia town to fight back | CNN Politics
-
Alaska7 days agoPolice looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
-
Southwest1 week agoTalarico reportedly knew Colbert interview wouldn’t air on TV before he left to film it
-
Minnesota1 week agoMany with Minnesota ties make Forbes list of world’s richest people
-
Science1 week agoFederal EPA moves to roll back recent limits on ethylene oxide, a carcinogen