Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through our links on this page.
Fitness
Fitness: Find right balance between pleasure and pain when you exercise
No matter who’s exercising, the closer the workout comes to requiring maximum effort the more unpleasant the exerciser feels.
Article content
For some people, exercise requires too much effort. Others believe it isn’t exercise unless their physical limits are being pushed. This love/hate relationship with effort often marks the dividing line between exercisers and non-exercisers. It’s also the theme of numerous studies exploring how effort can be manipulated to be less of an exercise deterrent.
Advertisement 2
Article content
No matter who’s exercising, the closer the workout comes to requiring maximum effort the more unpleasant the exerciser feels. Workouts that stay in a more moderate zone generally elicit more enjoyment, though the line between when a workout goes from feeling good to feeling uncomfortable varies considerably between individuals.
Article content
Some people maintain a level of intensity that never creeps into the zone where there’s more pain than pleasure. But most exercisers opt for a gradual rise in intensity until it takes effort to maintain the pace, then try keeping it there to the end of the workout.
Also popular is interval training where intensity peaks for short periods of time followed by equally short periods of recovery. This ebb-and-flow style of workout has been billed as more palatable for those who find it difficult to sustain longer bouts of constant effort, though the jury’s out as to whether steady state or interval training are more palatable for people trying to make exercise a habit.
The trouble is, when it comes to evaluating enjoyment during exercise, there’s a distinct difference in feedback depending on when the exerciser is polled. Remembered pleasure or displeasure is distinctly different from feelings elicited during a workout. The longer the gap between the end of the workout and when the exerciser reports their feelings, the more favourable they view the workout.
Advertisement 3
Article content
Still, no matter how much time modifies our feelings, some things we don’t forget. Studies suggest the more unpleasant the workout, the less likely we are to go back for more. There is a caveat, however. Researchers studying how enjoyment factors into exercise adherence have noted a difference between recreational exercisers and athletes. With goal-based athletes, bouts of extreme exertion are associated with accomplishment, which alters their outlook not just on the importance of enjoyment during a bout of exercise but also on how they rate enjoyment post-workout. With this crowd, the idea that exercise has to hurt to be beneficial is ingrained into their psyche.
For everyone else, the slope of exercise enjoyment within a single workout is worthy of study. Is there a way to manipulate the timing of pleasure so that we end workouts feeling on a high versus physically wrung out? And will that feeling of pleasure make the next workout less intimidating and therefore more likely to happen?
There’s some research suggesting that instead of focusing on increasing or maintaining intensity, a workout should end easier than it started. Others recommend easing into effort and finishing with purpose. Then there’s the pyramid format that starts off at a comfortable intensity, increases to maximum effort midway and ramps down again as the workout winds down. Each format has its pros and cons, with results inconclusive as to whether one design is more enjoyable than others.
Advertisement 4
Article content
Adding to the body of evidence is a recent study published in Psychology of Sport and Exercise reviewing what the researchers call the “slope of pleasure” and its effects on remembered pleasure, forecasted pleasure and enjoyment. The researchers from California State University in Bakersfield theorized that the optimal slope of pleasure occurred when exercisers experienced a gradual increase and then decrease in effort, versus an ascending (the workout gets harder, with peak effort occurring toward the end of the workout) or descending (the workout ramps up in intensity quickly then eases off to finish easier than it started) slope. The idea was to see whether a less intense start or finish was more enjoyable.
To make sure all workouts were similar in volume and overall intensity, they all started with a two-minute warmup followed by 30 minutes of continuous exercise and a 10-minute recovery. All protocols were matched in overall effort with about 20 minutes of exercise at a moderately hard intensity and 10 minutes at or around peak effort.
The ascending slope increased intensity by 2.5 per cent every two minutes while the descending workout decreased intensity by 2.5 per cent every two minutes. The ascending/descending protocol increased intensity by 2.5 per cent every two minutes, then at the midpoint started decreasing effort by 2.5 minutes. Enjoyment was polled before exercise, every five minutes during exercise and 10 minutes after exercise.
Advertisement 5
Article content
Only the ascending workout changed the level of enjoyment over the course of the workout with exercisers feeling worse when intensity continually increased. The other workouts, both of which featured a decrease in intensity, noted no change in enjoyment from the start to the end of the workout.
These results disproved the researchers’ hypotheses, who thought enjoyment would increase as intensity level dropped. It also differed from previous research reporting that a decrease in intensity resulted in greater exercise enjoyment, including greater remembered pleasure, than workouts that got increasingly harder.
But the takeaway for the average exerciser isn’t that the results weren’t as forecasted. Instead, the idea that intensity can be manipulated to provide a more enjoyable workout is worthy of notice.
Also important to highlight is that individuals have very different preferences about when during a workout intensity ramps up and when it starts receding.
If you’re naturally slow out of the gate, consider these results permission to take your time before ramping up intensity. And if you start off strong but fade down the stretch, go ahead and coast into the finish line. Stop fighting against your natural inclination to take the path of least resistance and lead your workouts by what makes you feel good rather than someone else’s idea of the ideal workout plan.
Recommended from Editorial
Fitness: Does exercise improve posture?
Fitness: Does middle age mark the end of your body as you knew it?


Advertisement 6
Article content
Article content
Fitness
How the 3-3-3 Rule Helped Me Stick to an Exercise Routine
If you’ve ever started a new workout routine with the best intentions only to find yourself skipping sessions by week two, you’re not alone. I’m the type to get trapped in the same cycle of burnout, where I go hard for a couple of weeks, feel exhausted, feel guilty, and repeat. For me, what finally broke that cycle wasn’t a new gym membership or a fancy fitness app, but a simple scheduling hack: the “3-3-3 rule.” I’d seen this rule applied it to general productivity, and all the same principles can apply to your fitness habits, too. Here’s how you can use the 3-3-3 rules to structure your workouts and create a habit that sticks.
What is the 3-3-3 rule?
The 3-3-3 “rule” (or “method,” or “gentle suggestion”) is essentially a weekly workout framework built around three types of movement, each done three times per week:
-
Three strength training sessions. This includes lifting weights, bodyweight circuits, resistance bands, whatever builds muscle and challenges your body.
-
Three cardio sessions. This includes running, cycling, swimming, jump rope, a dance class—what counts as “cardio” is up for debate, but here, I think of it as anything that gets your heart pumping.
-
Three active recovery days. This includes light walking, yoga, stretching, foam rolling, and so on.
And yes, I realize this math adds up to nine intentional days of movement across a seven-day week. Here’s the thing: You do double duty some days, or skip workouts here and there, or adjust to a nine-day cycle, because the point isn’t rigid scheduling. The point is rhythm over a strict structure. For me, the 3-3-3 rule provides a sense of momentum that’s flexible enough to fit into real life, but consistent enough to actually stick to.
Why the 3-3-3 rule works for me
Before I get into how the 3-3-3 rule helped me specifically, let’s talk about why so many workout plans fall apart in the first place. I believe most of them make two classic mistakes. The first is doing too much, too soon. You go from zero to six days a week at the gym, you get burnt out, and the whole thing unravels. The second mistake is having no real structure at all—just vague intentions, like “I’ll work out when I can,” which never materializes into anything real for a lot of people.
For me, the 3-3-3 rule solves both of those problems. It gives me enough structure to build habit and momentum, but not so much intensity that my body and brain feel overwhelmed. I personally adore running, but I struggle to motivate myself to lift weights; the 3-3-3 rhythm here helped me find a middle ground between those two workouts. When I know I have three strength sessions to hit in a week (or nine-ish day cycle), I can look at my calendar and find three slots without too much drama or dread.
There’s also plenty of breathing room built into the plan, which was the biggest game changer for me. I used to have the (toxic) thought that my rest days were wasted days, which is a mentality that led to either overtraining or complete inactivity with pretty much no middle ground.
Plus, there’s something psychologically satisfying about the number three. I know and love the rule of threes in photography, comedy, survival tips, and all over the place.
How to make a 3-3-3 workout schedule work for you
The 3-3-3 rule has a ton of wiggle room for customization. Here are some ideas for how you can approach it:
What do you think so far?
For strength days, pick a format you actually enjoy. That might be a full-body circuit, a push/pull/legs split, or a class at your gym. (Boxing, anyone?) Your focus on these days should be a progressive challenge—push yourself, yes, but don’t obliterate yourself.
For cardio days, variety helps. Mix a longer, easier effort with a shorter, more intense session (like a 20-minute interval run). I know I’m biased, but cardio really shouldn’t feel like punishment.
For recovery days, resist the urge to “make them count” by sneaking in extra work. The whole point is to let your body consolidate the gains from your harder days. Walk, stretch, breathe, and trust the process.
Another practical tip: Pick a night to map out your 3-3-3 week ahead of time. You’ll probably find that the week arranges itself pretty naturally once you’re looking for those nine windows.
The bottom line
As always, consistency should always be your priority in fitness. If you’ve been struggling to find a rhythm, if your past workout plans have always fizzled out around week three, give the 3-3-3 rule an honest four-week try. Maybe start with a 1-1-1 month! After all, the 3-3-3 rule isn’t a hack to totally transform your physique, but I do think it can provide something way more valuable. Finding a routine that works for you—like the 3-3-3 rule works for me—is the first step to make exercise a reliable, sustainable part of your life.
Fitness
I’m a running coach — I’ve just tested shoes actually designed for women’s feet, and they’re a total game changer
Why you can trust TechRadar
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
QLVR ENDVR: Two minute review
Most running shoes feel familiar for a reason: the formula has barely changed in millennia. We have archaeological evidence of shoes being fastened with “shoelaces” as far back as around 3,500 BC, yet the basic lace-up running trainer remains the default.
QLVR (pronounced “clever”) set out to challenge that. Its debut shoe, the ENDVR, is a laceless “running slipper” built around a women-specific mechanical structure, with a slip-on Wing Fit system inspired by the way a bird’s wing opens and closes around movement.
The brand’s core argument is blunt: most athletic shoes are designed on men’s lasts (the mechanical devise used by manufacturers to create the foot shape) and scaled down for women, even though women’s feet tend to have different shapes and pressure points. So, they decided to literally break the mould and design something specifically for women’s feet.
It sounds like a noble ambition, although it didn’t necessarily start out as one. Originally the company was focused on doing away with laces. But co-founder and footwear designer Martin Dean soon realised this would be impossible with a unisex shoe.
“We were tweaking the design but we couldn’t get it to work. The unisex fit system means it would just be too loose on the back of a woman’s foot,” said Dean.
“That’s when we realised that the majority of footwear is made to fit a man’s foot. So we thought ‘let’s launch this for women’.”
As a runner who often struggles with shoe fit, I could immediately relate to Dean’s explanation. I spend an inordinate amount of time fiddling with laces trying to get the fit around my ankle just right. I don’t want the laces to dig in, but I also don’t want my ankles rocking around. I also struggle with the width of running shoes finding that the toe box shape is never quite right. Typically, a lot of running technology, not just shoes but also some of the best running watches, are male by default.
When I heard about the QLVR ENDVR I was keen to try them out. Maybe, finally, this shoe would fit! Over the past couple of months, I’ve been testing the shoe on a range of activities. Treadmill intervals, 10k easy road runs, gym sessions and as an everyday trainer for trips around the shops.
As soon as I slipped the pair on they immediately felt different. But were they the shoe I was ultimately looking for?
What makes it different?
The ‘women-first’ part is not just a marketing line. QLVR is designed around a more ‘triangular’ female foot shape, with a narrower heel, wider toe area, and higher arches, rather than shrinking a men’s shoe and relying on laces to make up the slack.
The laceless part is the standout: the Wing Fit system is designed to sit in a closed, ‘laced-up’ position, flexing as you step in and then holding the rearfoot securely once your heel drops. In practice, it’s the first slip-on I’ve tried that feels like it’s meant to be run in. There is an immediate locked-in feel, and the foot is held snugly inside with minimal slippage. Being able to slip on a shoe and have the perfect heel fit straight away is a revelation.
Then there’s sustainability. QLVR leans hard into bio-based materials: a dandelion-derived foam it calls Dandelite, a Pebax Rnew polymer (from castor beans) for the Wing Fit system and propulsion plate, and a Tencel yarn upper made from eucalyptus fibres.
What it’s like to run in
The fit is the first shock. I used QLVR’s sizing guidance and went down to a UK 6.5 (I usually size up to a 7 in running shoes). Straight out of the box, they felt very snug: secure around the ankle and heel, with noticeably more arch presence than I’m used to.
But that sense of the arch’s prominence faded fast. Once I started moving, the shoe relaxed into something closer to a slipper-like comfort, without the wobbly, overly soft feeling some max-cushioned shoes can have. For easy treadmill miles, it’s been especially pleasant: quiet, stable, and easy to forget about.
The laceless convenience is not a gimmick, either. If you’re popping out for a short run, going from work to gym, or fitting training into the cracks of a day, sliding in and heading off is genuinely freeing. No lace bite across the midfoot, no fiddling to get heel lockdown just right. The rearfoot hold is simply “there” every time.
QLVR positions the ENDVR as a shoe that can handle everything from intervals to cross-training. Based on my testing, that checks out. It feels comfortable and controlled for steady running, and supportive enough for gym sessions where you’re moving laterally or lifting lightly.
But that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. For me, the snugness may be a limiter. On longer distances, feet swell and I like a little more room up front. With my toes close to the end of the shoe and a hint of heel rub developing, I’d be cautious about taking these beyond half marathon territory. But then again, they are designed as an all-round training shoe rather than a long distance running pair.
Grip has been mostly fine on roads, but on icy patches I felt less confident than in some of my regular winter-friendly trainers. And, subjectively, the look will be divisive: the Wing Fit silhouette is unapologetically bold, and personally I think they’re pretty ugly.
One extra practical win: QLVR says you can machine-wash the shoes cold after removing the insoles and using a laundry bag.
Price and availability
The QLVR ENDVR costs £165 ($233, AUS $311) and is sold direct from the QLVR website. QLVR says it ships worldwide, although its FAQ notes US shipping is temporarily on hold while it assesses the impact of new import tariffs. The pricing is pretty much on-par with mid-range running and gym shoes.
QLVR ENDVR: Specifications
|
Type |
Neutral multi-training |
|
Drop |
9mm drop with 35mm rear / 26mm forefoot stack height |
|
Weight |
270g (women’s size 6) |
Sizing note
QLVR’s current guidance is worth considering carefully, as it is a little contradictory. The product page and FAQ suggest the shoe can size up a bit small, recommending going up half or a full size if you’re between sizes. But the size chart says if you follow its guide you don’t need to go up in size, as toe wiggle-room is built in. This is why I opted for a 6.5 after measuring my feet according to their metrics. If I wanted to run longer distances in these shoes, I would definitely size up to 7.
QLVR: Scorecard
|
Category |
Comment |
Score |
|
Value |
Appropriate for mid-range shoes |
4/5 |
|
Design |
Innovative and interesting |
4/5 |
|
Performance |
Great for mid-distance |
4/5 |
QLVR ENDVR: Should I buy?
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
First reviewed: March 2026
Fitness
Mere minutes of daily vigorous exercise can cut your risk of 8 diseases | CNN
Move more. Sit less. For many years, that’s been accepted guidance for people wanting to get healthier.
Now that message is getting refined, with a growing body of research suggesting that certain types of movements may be more beneficial than others when it comes to health benefits.
The intensity of your exercise may matter as well. A new study published in the European Heart Journal found that a small amount of vigorous activity may be linked to lower risk of eight different chronic diseases.
The findings raise questions about why intensity matters and how people can incorporate more intense exercise routines into everyday life. To better understand the study’s implications, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously served as Baltimore’s health commissioner.
Before beginning any new exercise program, consult your doctor. Stop immediately if you experience pain.
CNN: What did this study examine about exercise and its relationship to chronic disease?
Dr. Leana Wen: This investigation looked at how the intensity of physical activity is related to the risk of developing a range of chronic diseases. Researchers analyzed data from two very large groups in the UK Biobank, which is a long-term health study in the United Kingdom that tracks medical and lifestyle information from hundreds of thousands of participants. One group included about 96,000 people who wore wrist activity trackers that objectively measured their movement, and the other included more than 375,000 people who self-reported their activity.
The researchers followed participants over an average of about nine years and examined the development of eight conditions: major cardiovascular events, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, immune-related inflammatory diseases, fatty liver disease, chronic respiratory disease, chronic kidney disease and dementia, as well as overall mortality.
The key finding was that the proportion of activity done at vigorous intensity mattered. People who had more than about 4% of their total activity classified as vigorous had substantially lower risks of developing these conditions compared with people who had no vigorous activity at all. The numbers were stunning, with the participants having the following results:
-
63% lower risk of dementia,
-
60% lower risk of type 2 diabetes,
-
48% lower risk of fatty liver disease,
-
44% lower risk of chronic respiratory disease,
-
41% lower risk of chronic kidney disease,
-
39% lower risk of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases,
-
31% lower risk of major cardiovascular events,
-
29% lower risk of atrial fibrillation, and
-
46% lower risk of death from any cause.
These results are amazing. Imagine if someone invented a medication that could reduce the risks of all these diseases at once — it would be very popular! Crucially, even people who exercised a lot still benefited if the proportion of time they spent doing vigorous physical activity was increased. Conversely, people who were relatively inactive also benefited from adding just a little bit of higher-intensity exercise to their daily routines.
CNN: What counts as “vigorous” physical activity?
Wen: Vigorous activity is generally defined as exercise that substantially raises your heart rate and breathing. A simple way to gauge it is the “talk test.” If you can speak comfortably in full sentences while exercising, you are likely in the low to moderate range. If you are so out of breath that you can only say a few words at a time, that is vigorous.
Running, cycling, lap swimming or climbing stairs quickly could count. But this also depends on people’s baseline fitness. For some individuals, taking longer strides with walking can be vigorous exercise. Others who are already fairly fit would need to do more. It’s also important to remember that vigorous activity doesn’t have to be in the context of a structured exercise plan. Short bursts of effort in daily life, such as rushing to catch a bus or carrying heavy groceries upstairs, can also qualify if they raise your heart rate and make you breathless.
CNN: Why might higher intensity exercise provide additional health benefits?
Wen: Higher intensity activity places greater demands on the body in a shorter period. This type of movement can improve cardiovascular fitness, increase insulin sensitivity and support metabolic health more efficiently than lower-intensity activity alone. Some studies have also linked vigorous activity with cognitive benefits.
Greater intensity may have distinct benefits across different organ systems. The researchers found that some conditions, such as immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, appeared to be more strongly linked to the intensity of activity than to the total amount. On the other hand, type 2 diabetes and kidney disease were influenced by both how much activity people did and how intense it was. Why this is the case is not yet known, but intensity appears to have a significant impact across diseases affecting multiple organs.
CNN: How much vigorous activity do people need?
Wen: The threshold for people seeing a benefit appears to be relatively low. The researchers found that once people reached more than about 4% of their total activity as vigorous, their risk of developing chronic diseases dropped substantially.
To put that into practical terms, we are not talking about professional athletes dedicating their lives to hours of high-intensity training. Everyday people may see benefits from just doing a few minutes of vigorous effort daily.
CNN: How can people realistically incorporate vigorous activity into their daily routines?
Wen: One helpful way to think practically is that vigorous activity does not have to happen all at once. It can be accumulated in short bursts throughout the day.
People can take the stairs instead of the elevator and do so at a faster pace than usual. When they are heading to work, they can add some speed walking. They can park farther away when grocery shopping and walk briskly while carrying groceries.
Structured exercise also can incorporate intervals where people alternate between moderate and more intense effort. If you’re swimming laps, you can warm up at a more leisurely pace, then do a few laps at a faster pace, then again at a leisurely pace and repeat. This suggestion applies to any other aerobic exercise: Aim for multiple intervals of at least 30 seconds to a minute each where your body is working hard enough that you feel noticeably out of breath.
CNN: What about someone who is older or has mobility issues?
Wen: Not everyone can or should engage in high-intensity activity in the same way. Vigorous activity is relative to that person’s baseline. For someone who is not used to exercise, even a short period of slightly faster walking or standing up repeatedly from a chair could be considered high intensity. And not everyone may be able to walk. In that case, some exercises from the chair can have aerobic benefits.
Individuals who have specific medical conditions should consult with their primary care clinicians before embarking on a new exercise routine. People with mobility issues also may benefit from working with a physical therapist who can help to tailor exercises appropriate to their specific situation.
CNN: What is the key takeaway for people trying to improve their health?
Wen: To me, the main takeaway from this study is that it’s not only how much total exercise you get but also how hard you push yourself that matters. And you don’t have to have a lot of high-intensity exercise: Adding just a little has substantial health benefits across a wide range of chronic health conditions.
At the same time, exercise needs be practical. People should look for opportunities to safely increase intensity in ways that fit their daily lives. The most effective approach to physical activity is a balanced one: Exercise regularly, incorporate more challenging activities when you can and build habits that are sustainable over time.
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN’s Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
-
Washington6 minutes ago
The Church of Jesus Christ has announced its 384th temple
-
Wisconsin12 minutes agoWisconsin authorities put total arrests from clashes at beagle breeding facility at about 25
-
West Virginia18 minutes agoThis week in West Virginia history: April 19-25
-
Wyoming24 minutes agoIdaho semitruck driver involved in fatal accident at Wyoming FlyingJ – East Idaho News
-
Crypto30 minutes agoUpcoming ‘Bitcoin’ Movie With Casey Affleck, Gal Gadot Probes Satoshi’s Identity
-
Finance36 minutes agoHong Kong reasserts role as safe haven in global finance amid Iran conflict
-
Fitness42 minutes agoHow the 3-3-3 Rule Helped Me Stick to an Exercise Routine
-
Movie Reviews54 minutes agoFILM REVIEW: ROSE OF NEVADA – Joyzine
