Connect with us

Finance

Trump’s IRS Pick Promised Tax Benefits to Finance CEO

Published

on

Trump’s IRS Pick Promised Tax Benefits to Finance CEO

Former Rep. Billy Long (R-MO), President Donald Trump’s pick to head the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), was invited to attend Trump’s inauguration as the guest of a financial services CEO who said Long promised him benefits for his company, according to a recording obtained by the Lever.

The executive also stated that Long planned to give a top government job to a campaign donor at an embattled financial firm. Companies peddling tax schemes “don’t have to worry” about regulatory crackdowns under Long’s oversight, added the executive.

In a corporate Zoom recording provided to the Lever by Sen. Ron Wyden’s (D-OR) office, Terry Kennedy, CEO of financial services company Appreciation Financial, noted he helped Long attend Trump’s inauguration.

“I call up one of my friends and I said, ‘Hey, the IRS Commissioner Billy Long, the new one coming in that we’re all excited about. . . Is Billy coming to the inauguration?’” Kennedy said. “And. . . my friend says, ‘Well, he doesn’t have a ticket. He’s not because he’s not confirmed yet.’ I said, ‘Well, make him my guest.’”

Advertisement

Kennedy went on to note that he and Long “had dinner one night” during the inauguration and that he “spent a few nights with [Long].”

During that same call, Kennedy addressed Employee Retention Tax Credits (ERC), a pandemic-era program that the IRS says has been the target of the agency’s “civil and criminal investigations of potential fraud and abuse.” Kennedy asserted that companies would no longer have to worry about such IRS scrutiny because Long sold such products himself.

“He actually pushed ERC; is that not a blessing?” said Kennedy. “We could be worried about promoter audits now. We could be worried about anything with the old administration. But Billy actually is now taking over, and we don’t have to worry about that stuff.”

Promoter audits are IRS investigations looking into potential “abusive tax promotions” and other matters. The IRS has been specifically targeting companies promoting ERC tax schemes.

Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment ahead of publication.

Advertisement

The April 15 Zoom recording is from a monthly “Huddle Up” meeting hosted by Linqqs, an employee benefits management company that donated $50,000 to Trump’s inaugural committee. Kennedy is listed as the manager of Linqqs on the Nevada state government’s website.

According to Kennedy, Long promised to give him a “private letter ruling” — a special IRS determination that helps taxpayers with complex IRS issues avoid potential tax violations, according to the tax agency.

“Billy, please take your sales hat off and put your new IRS commissioner hat on,” Kennedy recounted asking Long in a conversation, seeking advice about his business’s financial arrangement.

Kennedy also highlighted that Long intends to hire Mark Czuchry, an attorney and managing partner at financial advising firm Lifetime Advisors, as legal counsel at the IRS. Czuchry donated $2,900 to Long’s failed Senate campaign efforts after Trump selected him to head the IRS, and other Lifetime Advisors employees donated an additional $7,800 to Long’s coffers.

Lifetime Advisors is among a number of firms named in an April 14 letter from Senate Finance Committee Democrats calling for a criminal investigation into a “scheme to sell investors a fraudulent tax shelter.” Long worked with Lifetime Advisors in 2023 after leaving Congress, where he sold various tax products, including some of the same tax credits that Treasury officials told Senate Democrats “do not exist.”

Advertisement

The Lever previously reported that employees of Lifetime Advisors and others helped Long pay off $130,000 in personal debt via campaign donations after Trump selected him to head the tax agency in December. Following the Lever’s reporting, three senators launched an investigation into the matter on May 15.

During Long’s confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Democratic senators pressed Long about his industry donors, plans to weaponize the IRS against his nonprofit enemies, and his pandemic tax schemes.

In his interrogation, Wyden suggested that his staff investigators had found a recording of a tax promoter recounting that Long had promised him a private letter ruling in his new position at the IRS.

Long denied the allegation, “I was in my room for about fifty hours with food poisoning during the inauguration, so I didn’t talk to many people.”

“These taped conversations are so troubling to me,” said Wyden. “What’s at issue is peddling fake tax credits, scamming small businesses, this questionable array of campaign contributions. . . the extent to which you tried to avoid answering these questions suggests to me someone who’s been up to their eyeballs in this sort of questionable behavior.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says

Published

on

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says
When Norway’s $2.2 trillion wealth fund — the world’s largest — sells a company’s shares over ethical concerns, should it explain why? This seemingly simple question has ​become a dilemma for its guardians, the finance minister told Reuters, as a government commission reviews the rules that have made the fund a ‌global benchmark for ethical investing.
Continue Reading

Finance

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Published

on

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Banks have had a stellar first quarter. The major U.S. banks raked in nearly $50 billion in profits in the first three months of the year, The Guardian reported.

That was largely due to Wall Street bank traders, who profited from a volatile stock exchange, Reuters showed.

But even without the extra bump from stock trading, banks are doing well when it comes to interest, the same Reuters article found. And some banks could stand to benefit even more from this one potential rule change.

Morgan Stanley thinks it could have a major impact on Citi in particular.

Upcoming changes for banks

To understand why Morgan Stanley thinks things are going to change at Citi, you need to understand some recent bank rule changes.

Advertisement

Banks make money by lending out money, which usually comes from depositors. But people need access to their money and the right to withdraw whenever they want.

So, banks keep a percentage of all money deposited to make sure they can cover what the average person needs.

But what happens if there is a major demand for withdrawals, as we saw during the financial crisis of 2008?

That’s where capital requirements come in. After the financial crisis, major banks like Citi were required by law to hold a higher percentage of money in order to avoid major bank failures.

For years, banks had to put aside billions of dollars. Money that couldn’t be lent out or even returned to shareholders.

Advertisement

Now, that’s all about to change.

Morgan Stanley thinks Citigroup could see an uptick in profit. Getty Images

Capital change requirements for major banks

Banks that are considered globally systemically important banking organizations (G-SIBs) have a higher capital buffer than community banks as they usually engage in banking activity that is far more complicated than your average market loan.

The list depends on the size of the bank and its underlying activity, according to the Federal Reserve.

Current global systemically important banks

A proposal from U.S. federal banking regulators could drastically reduce the amount that these large banks have to hold in reserve.

Changes would result in the largest U.S. banks holding an average 4.8% less. While that might seem like a small percentage number, for banks of this size, it equates to billions of dollars, according to a Federal Reserve memo.

Advertisement

The proposed changes were a long time coming, Robert Sarama, a financial services leader at PwC, told TheStreet.

“It’s a bit of a recognition that perhaps the pendulum swung a little too far in the higher capital requirement following the financial crisis, making it harder for banks to participate in some markets,” he said.

Citi’s upcoming relief  

Citi is a G-SIB and as such, is subject to the capital requirement rules. And the fact that it could get 4.8% of its money back to spend elsewhere is why Morgan Stanley is so optimistic about the bank.

In a research note, Morgan Stanley analysts said they expect Citi’s annualized net income to be better than expected due to the upcoming capital relief.

Advertisement

While Citi stated its return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), a type of financial measure, to be close to 13% by 2028, “the fact that Citi’s near-term and medium-term targets excluding capital relief were only marginally below our expectations including capital relief actually suggest upside to our numbers if Citi can deliver,” the note said.

More bank news

In fact, Citigroup’s own projections are likely conservative and it’s likely to show improvement each year, the analysts expanded.

“We have high conviction that the proposed capital rules will be finalized later this year and expect Citi can eventually revise the medium-term targets higher, suggesting further upside to consensus,” the Morgan Stanley analysts wrote.

Related: Citi just added an AI agent to your wealth management team

Advertisement

This story was originally published by TheStreet on May 11, 2026, where it first appeared in the Investing section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Continue Reading

Finance

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale

Published

on

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale
Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, settled on their new home last month. (Source: Supplied)

Natasha Luscri and Luke Miller consider themselves among the lucky ones. The couple recently bought their first home in the northwest suburbs of Melbourne.

It wasn’t something they necessarily expected to be able to do, but some good fortune with an investment in silver bullion and making use of government schemes meant “the stars aligned” to get into the market. Luke used the federal government’s super saver scheme to help build a deposit, and the couple then jumped on the 5 per cent deposit scheme, which they say made all the difference.

“We only started looking because of the government deposit scheme. Basically, we didn’t really think it was possible that we could buy something,” Natasha told Yahoo Finance.

RELATED

Last month they settled on their two bedroom unit, which the pair were able to purchase in an off-market sale – something that is becoming increasingly common in the market at the moment.

Advertisement

Rather perfectly, they got it for about $20-30,000 below market rate, Natasha estimated, which meant they were under the $600,000 limit to avoid paying stamp duty under Victoria’s suite of support measures for first home buyers.

“They wanted to sell it quickly. They had no other offers. So we got it for less than what it would have gone for if it had been on market,” Natasha said.

“We didn’t have a lot of cash sitting in an account … I think we just got lucky and made some smart investment decisions which helped.”

It’s a far cry from when the couple couldn’t find a home due to the rental crisis when they were previously living in Adelaide and had to turn to sub-standard options.

“We’ve managed to go from living in a caravan because we were living in Adelaide and we couldn’t find a rental with our dogs … So we’ve gone from living in a caravan, being kind of tertiary homeless essentially because we couldn’t get a rental, to now having been able to purchase our first home,” Natasha explained.

Advertisement

Rate rises beginning to bite for new homeowners

Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, are among more than 300,000 Australians who have used the 5 per cent deposit scheme to get into the housing market with a much smaller than usual deposit, according to data from Housing Australia at the end of March. However that’s dating back to 2020 when the program first launched, before it was rebranded and significantly expanded in October last year to scrap income or placement caps, along with allowing for higher property price caps.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending