Connect with us

Finance

The industry hit hardest by DOGE cuts so far (hint: it’s not the media)

Published

on

The industry hit hardest by DOGE cuts so far (hint: it’s not the media)

Specific companies are already feeling the effects of cost cutting by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with the first wave of publicly available data showing a number of government consultants facing hundreds of millions of dollars in canceled or renegotiated contracts.

They include some prominent names, such as Deloitte. The ended contracts for that multinational London-based firm, DOGE claims, total more than $219 million in savings for taxpayers.

The effect on Deloitte’s bottom line isn’t clear but is a relatively small piece of Deloitte Worldwide’s reported 2024 revenue of $67.2 billion.

Other development and consulting firms — many such smaller businesses dot the Washington area and focus on US government contracts as their main source of revenue — could see much deeper relative cuts.

One recent lawsuit filed by a group of these companies — Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump — charged that “they have suffered and will continue to suffer enormous and concrete harm to their businesses” because of the administration’s actions.

Advertisement

At least one plaintiff charged that actions by the White House and DOGE have also left open “months of unpaid invoices” for work already done.

An official at one firm told Yahoo Finance that 20 contracts had been terminated in recent weeks and added that “the immediate issue is the federal government’s failure to pay for work it commissioned and approved — that’s fundamentally unfair.”

Another — perhaps more prominent — group of companies also faces cuts but at a vastly smaller scale: media outlets. They are now selling fewer subscriptions to the government for their services after a wave of cancellations.

Those savings add up to a bit more than $13 million in possible lost revenue, a Yahoo Finance analysis found, representing only about 0.18% of the overall claimed DOGE savings so far.

The final impact for all of these companies — and actual savings to taxpayers — remains far from clear as the DOGE team has repeatedly revised its claimed savings downward in recent days in response to errors being pointed out. The exact terms of the contracts also aren’t known.

Advertisement

What is clear is that much of the early focus has been on consulting and development companies such as Deloitte, DAI Global, and International Development Group.

In one example — the largest cut claimed by Musk’s team — the group says taxpayers have been saved $654,990,000 due to ending a contract with International Development Group Advisory Services.

Finance

Town Finance Director To Step Down In April

Published

on

Town Finance Director To Step Down In April

Nantucket’s municipal finance director Brian Turbitt has announced his resignation and will leave his position with the town on April 21st.

“With mixed emotion, I have submitted my resignation from the position of Town of Nantucket Director of Municipal Finance, effective April 21, to pursue an opportunity off-island,” Turbitt wrote in a message to the Current. “I have thoroughly enjoyed working with Town Manager Libby Gibson and her administration during the past 12 years and am extremely proud of all we have accomplished as a team. My time on Nantucket has been the experience of a lifetime, and one for which I am truly grateful and will never forget.”

Turbitt told the Current that despite his resignation, he will still attend the Annual Town Meeting in his current role on May 4th. Turbitt often presents and defends many of the town’s budget requests during the meeting, which falls just weeks after his scheduled departure date.

As the town’s chief financial officer, Turbitt oversees the town’s budget, guiding the $170 million operation. Turbitt has been with the town since 2014, but his 12-year tenure will end next month.

Continue Reading

Finance

300 years of wars show they are ‘always disaster times’ for holders of government debt because of inflation and financial repression | Fortune

Published

on

300 years of wars show they are ‘always disaster times’ for holders of government debt because of inflation and financial repression | Fortune

Government bonds, especially Treasuries, have long been seen as a safe haven during recessions, geopolitical calamities, and other market-moving disasters that create uncertainty.

But after looking at 300 years of U.S. and U.K. history, the Center for Economic Policy Research found that wars and pandemic-scale emergencies have pummeled holders of debt.

“The historical evidence reveals a striking pattern: government bonds have repeatedly generated substantial real losses during these extreme episodes,” authors Zhengyang Jiang, Hanno Lustig, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, and Mindy Xiaolan wrote. “They have even underperformed equities and real estates which are traditionally regarded as risky assets.”

That’s because wars typically triggered large increases in government spending, averaging about 7% of GDP annually during the first four years, and tax hikes alone were rarely sufficient for financing needs, they added.

The finding comes as the U.S. is waging war on Iran while the national debt has exploded to $39 trillion. The Pentagon is seeking more than $200 billion in a budget request for the conflict, sources told the Washington Post.

Advertisement

Across their dataset, the CEPR authors calculated that bondholders suffered average real losses of roughly 14% during the first four years of conflicts. The losses were so steep that they reduced the real value of government debt outstanding.

To add insult to injury, cumulative bond returns were more than 20% below the cumulative returns on stocks and real estate, the opposite of how those assets perform during financial crises or recessions.

“Whenever there is a major war, we observe a sharp decline in the bond performance — wars are always disaster times for bondholders,” they warned. “Similarly, the bondholders also suffered large losses during the ‘war on Covid-19.’”

Center for Economic Policy Research

A key factor in bond losses is inflation, according to CEPR, which said the cumulative rate averaged about 20% in the first four years of wars.

Advertisement

In fact, during the current U.S.-Israel war on Iran, Treasuries and government debt from other countries have sold off sharply as surging oil prices have raised expectations for elevated inflation while budget deficits are also seen worsening. Since the war began three weeks ago, the U.S. 10-year yield has soared more than 40 basis points.

But profligate spending wasn’t the only way inflation weighed on bonds. The think tank said it was often the result of policy choices to reduce debt burdens without explicitly defaulting, such as by suspending gold standard commitments.

Another reason bonds perform so poorly during wars is so-called financial repression, or government policies that curb borrowing costs by influencing financial markets. That prevents bond yields from keeping pace with inflation.

For example, the Federal Reserve implemented yield-curve control, capped Treasury rates, and launched massive bond buying during World War II.

CEPR’s findings have particular relevance for U.S. debt as Treasuries continue to form the foundation of the global financial system with the dollar serving as the world’s reserve currency.

Advertisement

That status has allowed the U.S. to borrow more cheaply than investors would otherwise allow. Meanwhile, the interest on U.S. debt is now the fastest-growing budget item and is already at $1 trillion a year. CEPR said its report presents governments with an important tradeoff.

“Protecting taxpayers from large spending shocks may require shifting part of the burden onto bondholders through inflation or financial repression,” it said. “Economic theory suggests that such policies may be optimal when taxation is highly distortionary. However, they also reduce the safety of government debt and may raise borrowing costs over time if investors anticipate these risks.”

Continue Reading

Finance

Bay Area gas prices near $4: The mental toll on drivers and financial strain on small businesses

Published

on

Bay Area gas prices near : The mental toll on drivers and financial strain on small businesses

According to new data from AAA, average gas prices in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, and Sarasota Counties are currently sitting just pennies below $4 a gallon.

In Citrus County, the average has already crossed that threshold, according to data.

Advertisement

The pain at the pump is becoming impossible to ignore for Bay Area drivers, and the rising costs are creating a ripple effect that is also hitting local small businesses hard.

Why you should care:

Why does that $4 mark trigger such a strong reaction from drivers?

Advertisement

“We have a bias towards round numbers. It’s why companies set prices at $9.99 instead of $10,” University of Tampa microeconomist Aaron Wood, who studies consumer behavior, said. “We have these reference points, these anchors in our brain. We use these heuristics to make consumption decisions.”

Wood, an associate professor of economics at UT, told FOX 13 it comes down to how our brains process the expense.

Advertisement

READ: Florida hospital sues to evict patient who refuses to leave for months

“When you’re standing there, pumping your own gas, you see the rotation of the number and so it’s different than like, if the Netflix price goes up or your lawn service — even sometimes grocery prices — gas is more upsetting. You’re watching it happen as opposed to something being buried in your credit card statement. So I think it’s upsetting to everybody because it’s so visceral, and it’s in your face,” Wood added.

Local perspective:

Advertisement

But that rising price tag isn’t just hurting daily commuters: It’s forcing local business owners to make tough choices, too.

Chris Gonzalez has owned Mona’s Floral Creations in Tampa for seven years. He says fuel costs are constantly on his mind.

Advertisement

“I’ve actually started watching the news every morning just to see how much it’s gone up from the day prior,” Gonzalez said. “I think about it more and more, like not even daily. It’s almost like every few hours I have to think about it, because I try to pass along the best, most competitive prices to my consumer — not only in my flowers, but also in my delivery charges.”

READ: DeSantis halts Manatee County cruise terminal plans with new environmental bill

Mona’s has been serving the Tampa community for nearly 50 years. In the seven years Gonzalez has owned the shop, he has only had to raise his delivery prices twice, from $10 to $12, and then to $15, which is the current rate. Now, he’s unsure what he’ll have to charge next week.

Advertisement

Gonzalez says he hopes that if he does have to raise delivery prices again—potentially up to $18, it will only be temporary.

“I’m trying to be as competitive as possible and continue the Mona’s brand that people know and love around here,” Gonzalez added.

Advertisement

What’s next:

To cope with the surge, Gonzalez is making adjustments to his shop’s daily operations. Instead of delivering a floral arrangement immediately after it’s made, his team is now holding orders so they can group deliveries together based on geographical routes.

“It just makes more sense from a fuel perspective,” he noted.

Advertisement

READ: Hillsborough deputies dismantle $388K multi-state luxury car theft ring; 3 arrested

And with Mother’s Day right around the corner, Gonzalez said he will be closely watching the changes in gas prices.

Advertisement

“We are in planning mode right now. We’re ordering our flowers. We’re planning what types of arrangements we’re going to offer for sale for moms,” Gonzalez said. “But now I have that additional thing: I have to think about what’s the price of gas going to be like in two months when Mother’s Day’s here?”

The Source: This article was written with information gathered by FOX 13’s Ariel Plaencia. 

Tampa
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending