Connect with us

Finance

Poll: Gen Z condemns Trump on inflation but sees personal finances improving more than older generations

Published

on

Poll: Gen Z condemns Trump on inflation but sees personal finances improving more than older generations

New data on Gen Z indicates that young Americans are relatively rosy on the economy despite the issues facing their generation — but they are deeply divided when it comes to pressing societal issues, according to results from a new NBC News Stay Tuned Poll, powered by SurveyMonkey.

Three in 10 American adults under 30 years old say their personal financial situation has gotten worse compared to a year ago, and a similar 27% say their personal finances are better today. But while this second number may seem low, members of Gen Z were more likely than older generations to say their personal financial situation has gotten better over the last year. In comparison, only 18% of adults over 65 years old said their finances have gotten better over the last year.

Notably, pluralities of Gen Z registered voters surveyed last year in two waves of the 2024 NBC News Stay Tuned Gen Z poll reported their personal financial situation was worse than the year before, perhaps signaling their discontent toward the Biden administration and struggles with inflation at the time. That generation makes up a growing portion of the U.S. electorate, and it split more closely in the 2024 election than young voters had in years, with a double-digit shift toward Trump among voters under 30 compared to 2020, according to the NBC News exit poll. Male voters under 30 split practically evenly in 2024, the exit poll showed.

Beyond generational divides, the new poll also found different economic attitudes by gender specifically among Gen Z. Pluralities of men and women under 30 said their finances were about the same compared to a year ago, but a third of young men said their personal financial situation was better, compared to 20% of women who said the same.

A plurality of adults across all generations said inflation and the rising cost of living is the economic issue that is the most important to them and their family right now.

Advertisement

Gen Z is emphatic about how they feel the policies of the Trump administration will affect their finances. While majorities across all generations disapprove of the way President Donald Trump is handling inflation and the cost of living, 7 in 10 members of Gen Z disapprove — 14 percentage points higher than the rate of disapproval among the oldest adults surveyed.

Gen Z opposes Trump’s hard-line immigration tactics on college campuses

Gen Z adults are largely unified in opposing how Trump’s hard-line immigration policies have affected college campuses, though there are important differences by party identification.

A full 92% of Gen Z adults believe it is important that people in the United States who hold student visas, work visas and green cards are given due process protections when facing criminal or civil charges. A majority of nearly every demographic said those due process protections are important — including Republicans and those who identify with the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

About a quarter of young adults overall support revoking visas if the government determines a person’s presence in the U.S. would have “adverse foreign policy consequences” — the process the Trump administration has used to initiate deportations of some students over their criticism of and protest against Israel’s military action in Gaza.

Palestinian supporters gather for a protest at Columbia University in New York on Oct. 12, 2023.Yuki Iwamura / AP file

Attitudes differ along party lines, though, with a majority (56%) of Gen Z Republicans saying they support the deportations, compared to only 19% of independents and 7% of Democrats.

Advertisement

There were also gender differences: 18% of women said they support the deportations (82% oppose) compared to 30% of men (70% oppose).

Gen Z more liberal across a range of societal issues

The poll finds that Gen Z holds more liberal views than older Americans on a range of social issues. There are key gender and partisan divides among adults under 30, however.

For example, 74% of Gen Z said efforts or programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) are helpful to the country, a number that is higher than for any other generation. Within Gen Z, 85% of women think DEI efforts are helpful compared to 63% of men.

Interestingly, these gender numbers barely change when looking at the intersection of gender and education — a variable thought to be the main dividing line in U.S. politics. Roughly 6 in 10 Gen Z men believe these efforts are helpful, regardless of whether they attended college. That compares to roughly 8 in 10 women who think these programs are helpful, also regardless of college attendance.

There is another notable gender divide on the question of traditional gender roles.

Advertisement

A 67% majority of adults under 30 disagree with the statement that America would be stronger if more women held traditional gender roles in society, such as homemaking and raising children. But there’s a 15-point gender gap.

While a majority of young men disagree, 41% agree that women should hold more traditional gender roles, compared to only 26% of young women. Three-quarters of young women disagree, including a 58% majority who said they strongly disagree.

Meanwhile, majorities across all generations agreed that there are only two genders, male and female. Six in 10 Gen Z respondents agreed, the lowest of any generation — again with large gender splits among young adults on this question.

Seven in 10 young men agree with the statement, while around half (51%) of young women agree.

This NBC News Stay Tuned poll was powered by SurveyMonkey, the fast, intuitive feedback management platform where 20 million questions are answered daily. It was conducted online April 11-20 among a national sample of 19,682 adults aged 18 and over, including 2,230 adults ages 18-29. Reported percentages exclude item nonresponse and round to the nearest percentage point. The estimated margin of error for this survey among all adults is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. The estimated margin of error for this survey among 18-29-year-olds, or Gen Z, is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

'There Could Be A Whole Other Life He's Living' 'The Ramsey Show' Host Says After Wife Finds $209K Debt Behind Her Back

Published

on

'There Could Be A Whole Other Life He's Living' 'The Ramsey Show' Host Says After Wife Finds 9K Debt Behind Her Back
A hidden financial discovery exposed the scale of debt inside a long-running marriage. Anne, a caller from Pittsburgh, reached out to “The Ramsey Show” for guidance after uncovering $209,000 in credit card balances. Married for 19 years and now in her 50s, she said the balances accumulated without her knowledge. She said her husband managed nearly all household finances. Anne added that her name was not on the primary bank account. She had no online access, and both personal and business expense
Continue Reading

Finance

Will Trump’s US$200 Billion MBS Purchase Directive Reshape Federal National Mortgage Association’s (FNMA) Core Narrative?

Published

on

Will Trump’s US0 Billion MBS Purchase Directive Reshape Federal National Mortgage Association’s (FNMA) Core Narrative?
In early January 2026, President Donald Trump directed government representatives, widely understood to include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to purchase US$200 billion in mortgage-backed securities to push mortgage rates and monthly payments lower. Beyond its housing affordability goal, the move highlights how heavily the administration is leaning on government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae to influence credit conditions and the mortgage market’s structure. With this large-scale…
Continue Reading

Finance

Holyoke City Council sends finance overhaul plan to committee for review

Published

on

Holyoke City Council sends finance overhaul plan to committee for review

HOLYOKE — The City Council has advanced plans to create a finance and administration department, voting to send proposed changes to a subcommittee for further review.

The move follows guidance from the state Division of Local Services aimed at strengthening the city’s internal cash controls, defining clear lines of accountability, and making sure staff have the appropriate education and skill level for their financial roles.

On Tuesday, Councilor Meg Magrath-Smith, who filed the order, said the council needed to change some wording about qualifications based on advice from the human resources department before sending it to the ordinance committee for review.

The committee will discuss and vote on the matter before it can head back to the full City Council for a vote. It meets next Tuesday. The next council meeting is scheduled for Jan. 20.

On Monday, Mayor Joshua Garcia said in his inaugural address that he plans to continue advancing his Municipal Finance Modernization Act.

Advertisement

Last spring, Garcia introduced two budget plans: one showing the current $180 million cost of running the city, and another projecting savings if Holyoke adopted the finance act.

Key proposed changes include realigning departments to meet modern needs, renaming positions and reassigning duties, fixing problems found in decades of audits, and using technology to improve workflow and service.

Garcia said the plan aims to also make government more efficient and accountable by boosting oversight of the mayor and finance departments, requiring audits of all city functions, enforcing penalties for policy violations, and adding fraud protections with stronger reporting.

Other steps included changing the city treasurer from an elected to an appointed position, a measure approved in a special election last January.

Additionally, the city would adopt a financial management policies manual, create a consolidated Finance Department and hire a chief administrative and financial officer to handle forecasting, capital planning and informed decision-making.

Advertisement

Garcia said that the state has suggested creating the CAFO position for almost 20 years and called on the City Council to pass the reform before the end of this fiscal year, so that it can be in place by July 1.

In a previous interview, City Council President Tessa Murphy-Romboletti said nine votes were needed to adopt the financial reform.

She also said past problems stemmed from a lack of proper systems and checks, an issue the city has dealt with since the 1970s.

The mayor would choose this officer, and the City Council will approve the appointment, she said.

In October, the City Council narrowly rejected the finance act in an 8-5 vote.

Advertisement

Supporters ― Michael Sullivan, Israel Rivera, Jenny Rivera, Murphy-Romboletti, Anderson Burgos, former Councilor Kocayne Givner, Patti Devine and Magrath-Smith ― said the city needs modernization and greater transparency.

Opponents ― Howard Greaney Jr., Linda Vacon, former Councilors David Bartley, Kevin Jourdain and Carmen Ocasio — said a qualified treasurer should be appointed first.

Vacon said then the treasurer’s office was “a mess,” and that the city should “fix” one department before “mixing it with another.”

The City Council also clashed over fixes, as the state stopped sending millions in monthly aid because the city hadn’t finished basic financial paperwork for three years.

The main problem came from delays in financial reports from the treasurer’s office.

Advertisement

Holyoke had a history of late filings. For six of the past eight years, the city delayed its required annual financial report, and five times in the past, the state withheld aid.

Council disputes over job descriptions, salaries and reforms also stalled progress.

In November, millions in state aid began flowing back to Holyoke after the city made some progress in closing out its books.

The state had withheld nearly $29 million for four months but even with aid restored, Holyoke still faces big financial problems, the Division of Local Services said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending