Connect with us

Finance

Moral and financial failure at Yorkshire is set to allow Colin Graves back in the door | Azeem Rafiq

Published

on

Moral and financial failure at Yorkshire is set to allow Colin Graves back in the door | Azeem Rafiq

The likely return of Colin Graves as Yorkshire chairman exposes a failing game. It has been accelerated by bad financial management, weak governance and leadership and a complete moral failure on the part of those running the sport in this country and those whose money keeps it going. Maybe there is still time to act, still time to show some backbone, but it’s running out fast.

In August 2020, I spoke in public for the first time about my experiences at Yorkshire. The 40 months since then have been difficult for me and for the game, and most painful of all is the fact that it looks like we have ended right back where we started. Nothing has changed. All we have had are empty words and broken promises.

I cast my mind back to November 2021, when under intense political pressure the England and Wales Cricket Board suspended Yorkshire from hosting international cricket because of its slow and substandard response to my testimony. In the hours that followed dozens of companies ended their associations with the club. Nike, Yorkshire Tea, Tetley’s Brewery and Harrogate Water were all among the companies who cancelled sponsorships.

Now a man who has always seemed to minimise the club’s problems, a man who last June went on television and dismissed racism as “banter”, a man whose family trust was described as a “roadblock” to reform, is likely to return to Headingley as chairman. So where is the outcry now? Where are the interventions?

My question now is for Yorkshire’s current sponsors, major companies such as Uber Eats, Vertu Motors, NIC Services Group, Al-Murad Tiles, C&C Insurance and Sodexo, and for their kit suppliers, Kukri. Does Colin Graves reflect your values? Is it acceptable to describe racism as banter?

Advertisement

Often companies only seem to act when the light is shone on them. Well, make no mistake, that light is going to shine. Sponsors found their moral compass before, and they need to find it again, because any organisation supporting this is complicit in it. There is still time for them to act, to leave now and stop Yorkshire stepping back in time and undoing what progress they have made in the past three years.

Colin Graves is understood to be in talks regarding a return to Yorkshire CCC as chairman. Photograph: Mike Egerton/PA

As for the ECB, the governing body’s anti-racism stance has been exposed as nothing but words. Last week, I read an interview with their chair, Richard Thompson, who when asked about the report of the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket said he thought his organisation had “navigated that well”. That tells you something about the ECB’s attitude: it is not about action, it is about perception.

All I have seen is self-protection, PR plans, and kicking the can down the road. There is no consistency there, which you would expect if its actions were led by values rather than reputation management: the ECB criticised Graves when he described racism as banter, but did nothing when Ian Botham, current chairman of Durham, decided to attack the ICEC report as “a nonsense” and “a complete and utter waste of money”. What message does that send to young players from ethnic minorities?

The ECB says it has “a zero-tolerance stance to any form of discrimination”, but now shrugs its shoulders as Graves remains in the driving seat to take charge of one of the biggest and most historic counties in the game. They are great at producing promises and action plans but not so good at action, and the impression is that those who hold the keys to change are not interested in making it happen.

I do not believe the situation was out of their control. We know they loaned Yorkshire a six-figure sum towards the end of last year and if keeping Graves out and Yorkshire afloat was going to mean them helping out further that is what they should have done. Zero tolerance means zero tolerance, not zero tolerance until it becomes too expensive.

Advertisement

Not that Yorkshire didn’t have other options. Just before Christmas, Lord Mann, the former MP for Bassetlaw and now a member of the House of Lords, revealed he had offered to connect Yorkshire’s board with three people who could have helped them to finance the club, but they refused to even talk to them. The idea that Graves has been forced upon the club, that they had no other option, is ridiculous. I was told in February 2023 that plans were already being made for him to make a comeback. The way his return is being presented is so disingenuous it’s quite scary.

I still believe that everyone deserves a second chance. If Graves wants to lead the club and the game in a positive direction he can’t just say the right things, he needs to do the right things – not just words, but action. He has to show he has accepted what has happened in the past, and is ready to take substantial action and offer clear direction now and when difficult decisions are necessary in the future. It is fair to say there has been no sign of any of this yet.

Since the Cricket Discipline Commission hearings I have tried to rebuild my life and move forward. I’m committed to this fight but I don’t just want to be an anti-racism campaigner, a name that crops up whenever racism is an issue in cricket. It has been impossible to leave it behind. It has been upsetting to watch from afar how little effort has gone into making good on all the promises made.

I’m still in contact with people at the club, good people who want change and who are frustrated with what is going on. Parents get in touch with me, people who have been discriminated against and wronged and who want help and support. So the battle continues. There are a lot of questions still to be asked, and I’m determined to ask them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending