Connect with us

Finance

House Finance Chair talks Millionaires Tax and likely legal, initiative challenge

Published

on

House Finance Chair talks Millionaires Tax and likely legal, initiative challenge

The chair of the Washington House Finance Committee says a public hearing on the proposed “millionaires tax” drew the expected mix of strong support and sharp criticism, but she now says the public sign-in process itself may have been manipulated.

Rep. April Berg (D) Everett, chaired a roughly two-hour House Finance hearing and heard from backers and opponents, describing moments as “a little spicy” and saying she would have preferred “a little less vitriol.”

But she disputes that over 100,000 people signed up to participate, heavily weighted against the tax.

Berg said she was contacted ahead of the hearing by people who said their names were listed even though they did not register, or were listed under a position they did not take. She said that grew from a handful of reports into something far larger by the weekend, prompting staff to search for exact duplicates and other irregularities.

Berg said staff found more than 19,000 exact duplicate entries, and the issue “calls into question” part of the democratic process of testimony. She says lawmakers have asked the House Clerk and Attorney General to investigate any impropriety. The Snohomish County Democrat, along with most of her colleagues, approved an initiative just two years ago that called for an outright ban on future income taxes.

Advertisement

The “Millionaires Tax” legislation, approved by the State Senate last week, is expected to be amended by her committee, and Berg believes a vote on the House floor could take place next week. Yet, she expects, as does Governor Bob Ferguson, that there will be a legal and initiative challenge to the tax proposal.

When asked if she thought it was correct to include the income tax in the House and Senate budgets with the expectation of a challenge, Berg said, “I do,” she continued, “Folks say, hey, we don’t think this is legal. They have a right to adjudication going before our courts to argue their case.”

“At this moment, as a policy maker, as a chair of house, finance, as a legislator, I believe this bill is absolutely legal,” she said.

There were suggestions in advance of the meeting that the bill could have impacts on professional sports franchises and players. An NFL Player’s Association representative was slated to testify during the hearing, but did not appear for reasons that are unknown.

“Forty-one other states have an income tax. 41 other states have a tax similar to this on high earners in their state. I think that argument just does not hold water. That is like saying that we clearly don’t have professional sports in California, which has a much more aggressive income tax. New York has a much more aggressive income tax than us. Illinois. I mean, the list goes on,” she said. “We are the outlier at this moment. I think we’re going to be just fine recruiting very talented athletes across the board with this tax, just as those other 41 states are as well.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending