Connect with us

Finance

Changing The Tune On Tokenization

Published

on

Changing The Tune On Tokenization

Businesses are finding value in putting real-world assets on blockchains.

For years, tokenization—creating a digital representation of a tangible asset like real estate—was just a finance-sector buzzword. But lately, more companies are making it a reality by weaving it into their corporate finance strategies (i.e., smart contracts, stablecoins and tokenized US Treasury bills).

The bet is that after a two-year stretch of economic turbulence and sticky inflation, tokenization can help increase liquidity, facilitate faster payments, lower costs, and improve risk management. And while big-name firms are still in the early phases of adopting this Web3 tech, they’re already boasting about viable use cases.

Look at Citi’s new pilot program with global logistics company Maersk. The third-largest US bank tokenized a smart contract to serve the same purpose as bank guarantees and letters of credit, reducing transaction processing times “from days to minutes.”

Big-picture, the firm predicts that tokenized assets will grow by a factor of 80 in private markets and reach up to almost $4 trillion in value by 2030.

“Partnerships like the one made by Citi and Maersk are a significant step forward in showcasing the potential of tokenization for streamlining cash management and trade finance,” says Paul Turner, an Abu Dhabi-based executive director at multi-asset fintech provider Capex.

Advertisement

Visa is testing tokenization, too. In September, the payments giant teamed up with Paysafe in London to integrate a tokenization service that, it expects, will better protect customers.

Within the same month, Visa led a $12.5 million funding round for Agrotoken. The Argentina-based startup is touted as the first platform to convert physical grains into a digital counterpart via tokenization.

Like other real-world assets [RWAs], the grain goes from being a “real-world asset” to an investment instrument. Once ownership is registered on the blockchain, it becomes tradable, and can be divided into fractions, or securely held.

“There’s a whole drumbeat around wanting to get tokenized real-world assets on chain,” Richard Johnson, CEO of Texture Capital, a broker-dealer specializing in tokenized assets, says.

In the case of Agrotoken, farmers can exchange their tokenized grain for things like supplies, machinery or fuel. The “grain tokens” can also be used to generate a guarantee to request loans, exchanged for local currency, or as a hedge against inflation.

Advertisement

Tokenization projects are also taking off at Johnson’s former company, Société Générale. The French multinational bank, where he was once head of quantitative electronic services, is “busy putting more institutional assets on chain.” In December, SocGen grabbed headlines when its Ethereum-based stablecoin, the EUR CoinVertible, started trading on European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp.

Afterward, the asset management arm of Paris-based insurance firm AXA used the SocGen stablecoin to buy 5 million euros ($5.4 million) worth of tokenized green bonds. According to AXA, this format bolsters transparency and traceability, and speeds up transactions and settlements.

Also in December, DWS Group (formerly Deutsche Asset Management) confirmed partnering with blockchain firm Galaxy Digital to launch a euro-denominated stablecoin that will “accelerate mass market adoption of digital assets and tokenization.”

Scenarios like these are going to inspire more C-suite executives to embrace tokenization in 2024, if they haven’t already, says Caitlin Long, founder and CEO of Custodia Bank. “Every bank CEO knows this technology is coming, and if they’re not planning for it now, they’re already behind,” she adds. “Watch what they do, not what they say.”

Among the new use cases Long notices, many revolve around tokenized dollars, which can serve as a cash equivalent for accounting and for liquidity coverage ratio purposes. One of the significant benefits of tokenized dollars is that they’re programmable, and “can be embedded into all kinds of software applications, including smart contracts and artificial intelligence,” she explains.

Advertisement

Tokenized securities are also helpful because of their believed narrower margin for error. “I’m always amazed at the inaccuracies in corporate stockholder or bondholder lists,” Long says. “Tokenization will help fix those inaccuracies while also cutting costs.”

Token Economies

Observers of the “token economy” trend say clashing attitudes could possibly hinder the momentum of mainstream adoption. On one end there are proponents like BlackRock’s Larry Fink. On January 12, the CEO of the world’s largest asset management firm praised the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for finally approving a bitcoin exchange-traded fund, or ETF, after years of back-and-forth.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust was among the crypto ETFs that made their trading debut in the US last month. Fink now wants Ethereum ETFs to win SEC approval, but so far, the Gary Gensler-led agency has refused.

“These ETFs are stepping stones toward tokenization, and I believe that’s where we’re headed,” Fink said in a TV appearance.

In contrast, there’s JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who  told lawmakers during a December 6 Senate hearing that he has “always been deeply opposed to crypto, bitcoin, etc.”

Advertisement

Dimon didn’t delineate whether the “etcc” included all tokenization, but it’s worth noting that his firm claims to handle $1 billion in daily transactions on its private blockchain network.

This “hot and cold” tone underscores a lack of focus on the utility of the technology, Jack O’Holleran, CEO of San Francisco-based blockchain startup Skale Labs, says. “The beauty of web3 is that it brings power, transparency, and ownership to users and workers of networks and marketplaces,” he adds. “Web3 will happen with or without the support of centralized banking leaders.”

Abroad, it’s a different vibe. On a recent visit to the Token 2049 event in Singapore, O’Holleran noticed that his Asia-Pacific counterparts are actively encouraged to adopt tokenization.

“APAC projects” enjoy an “innovative ecosystem, supportive regulatory frameworks, and a vibrant community that actively fosters blockchain and tokenization initiatives,” he says. “The US is falling behind in the race to grab Web3 global market share. I’m hoping this will change.”

Capex’s Turner shares a similar sentiment. “The US regulatory landscape is still evolving, with various agencies overseeing different aspects, leading to uncertainty and hindering clear implementation guidelines,” he adds. “The large size of the US economy and its financial markets could hinder the incentives to be a first mover in this area.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Turner notes, countries like Singapore are “more proactive and supportive of regulatory frameworks for tokenization in a bid to attract startups and companies to explore the technology and become a global hub for the industry.”

In November, the Monetary Authority of Singapore launched several tokenization pilots. The campaign attracted marquee US firms, including Citi, T. Rowe Price Associates, Fidelity International, BNY Mellon, Franklin Templeton, Apollo and, yes, even JPMorgan Chase.

The EU is also warming up to tokenization, Johnson says, citing regulators “coming up with a new rule book.” In May, the EU adopted its Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (MiCAR), establishing an overall framework for markets in crypto-assets across the region.

That’s a positive, Johnson says, “whereas here in the US, the mantra has been that [regulators] don’t need any new rules. “I think that’s wrong.”

Skeptics also cite the shady goings on at some of the crypto industry’s most prominent companies. In 2022, there was the $32 billion “fiasco,” as Johnson calls it, that enveloped crypto exchange FTX.

Advertisement

Less than a year later, the stablecoin issuer Terraform Labs collapsed and crypto lender Celsius underwent a $4.7 billion bankruptcy. And, like FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, Celisus’ founder and former CEO Alex Mashinsky faced fraud charges.

On-chain security is also an issue. According to research from blockchain firm CertiK, more than $1.8 billion in digital assets went missing last year. That’s high, despite being a 51% drop from 2022, when losses to hacks and other incidents totaled $3.7 billion.

For Betsabe Botaitis, CFO of blockchain software developer Hedera, the advice is simple: “Prioritize cybersecurity measures to protect your company’s assets and sensitive information.”

“CFOs need to begin realizing that their companies will sooner or later use digital assets as an embedded part of their operations,” Botaitis says. Their teams “will need to anticipate and be ready to account for, and report on, any digital asset position.” 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending