Connect with us

Finance

CFOs spend more time on long-term planning in an age of uncertainty, McKinsey finds

Published

on

CFOs spend more time on long-term planning in an age of uncertainty, McKinsey finds

Good morning. Finance chiefs are starting to look beyond short-term concerns in a way they haven’t in previous years, according to new McKinsey research. Emerging risks to their companies’ growth and a focus on strategy require their attention and management.

“I think CFOs continue to deal with a lot on their plate,” Ankur Agrawal, a partner in McKinsey’s New York office, and co-author of the report, told me. “So in many ways, this survey is consistent with the expanding challenge of the CFO role.”

Supply chain disruptions, weak demand, geopolitics, and also technology disruption are among the challenges finance chiefs say need to be addressed. Fifty-five percent of CFOs surveyed pointed to long-term planning and resource allocation as a top priority for finance, up from 30% in Q1 2023. And 60% now say strategic planning is a top priority, compared to 38% who said the same last year, according to the report.

It’s not that managing the short term has become easier for CFOs. There’s still uncertainty in the macro environment. But there’s a bit “more confidence on visibility in the near term,” Agrawal said. “The variables are more understood than not.” 

McKinsey research also points to challenges with implementing technology. Nearly all respondents (98%) say their finance functions have invested in digitization and automation, and believe that gen AI has the potential to create value. However, the majority of CFOs surveyed say just one-quarter or less of their processes were digitized or automated in the past 12 months. And less than half of respondents say they currently have their finance processes automated.

Advertisement

What is causing the slow pace? “I think the biggest challenge and roadblock is, honestly, talent,” Agrawal said.  

More than limitations due to infrastructure, tools, and data, CFOs say the main hurdle is finding finance professionals who can really leverage and deploy these advanced technologies, he said. 

Another finding is that CFOs are twice as likely than in Q1 2023 to predict their companies’ investment levels will remain unchanged—a departure from the past two surveys, when CFOs predicted an increase in investment. Why does Agrawal think there’s a hesitation in investments? With elections in the U.S. and in other parts of the world and economic volatility still a concern, “you can call it cautious steering,” he said.

Sheryl Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Aaron Rosenberg was named CFO at BeiGene, Ltd. (Nasdaq: BGNE), a global oncology company, effective July 22. Rosenberg will succeed Julia Wang, who is departing to pursue external opportunities and will stay with the company through August. Rosenberg has more than 20 years of experience at Merck & Co., Inc., most recently serving as SVP and corporate treasurer. He also held roles such as SVP of corporate strategy and planning and VP and finance lead of Merck Animal Health. 

Advertisement

Logan Powell, global president and CFO at Puttshack, a provider of tech-infused mini-golf venues, was promoted to CEO, effective immediately. Powell succeeds Joe Vrankin, who oversaw the company’s growth in the U.K. as CEO and subsequently brought the concept to the U.S. in 2021. Powell and Vrankin have collaborated on this transition, as Vrankin will be moving on from the company. Powell has served as CFO since 2019. Before joining Puttshack, he was a partner at Copper Beech Capital, LLC.

Big Deal

Don’t drown in data debt; champion your Data First culture is a new report released by HFS Research, a global research and analysis firm, in partnership with Syniti, a data management provider. More than 80% of enterprise leaders say that effective data management significantly drives the top line, bottom line, and shareholder value. However, over 40% of their organizational data is unusable and is not trusted, according to the report.

“Many business leaders still take a backseat when setting key data objectives, causing data to remain siloed across departments, and resulting in misaligned expectations across IT and business professionals,” Phil Fersht, CEO and chief analyst, HFS Research, said in a statement. The findings are based on interviews of more than 300 Global 2000 business leaders (49% from the U.S.) across industries to find out how organizations are navigating a complex landscape of data management.

Going deeper

“Here’s how Wall Street and business leaders are reacting to Biden’s exit from the presidential race” is a new report by Fortune’s Jason Ma, in light of President Joe Biden’s announcement on Sunday that he won’t seek reelection. For example, Gina Bolvin, president of Bolvin Wealth Management Group said in a statement: “Biden stepping down is a whole new level of political uncertainty.”

Overheard

“One mistake has had catastrophic results. This is a great example of how closely tied to IT our modern society is—from coffee shops to hospitals to airports, a mistake like this has massive ramifications.”

Advertisement

—Nick Hyatt, director of threat intelligence at security firm Blackpoint Cyber, told CNBC in an interview regarding the botched software update from the cybersecurity company CrowdStrike on Friday that caused a global IT outage.

This is the web version of CFO Daily, a newsletter on the trends and individuals shaping corporate finance. Sign up for free.

Finance

The Most Innovative People in Finance 2026

Published

on

The Most Innovative People in Finance 2026
Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Want unlimited access to top ideas and insights? Subscribe Now

Banking has entered a new phase of transformation that has the potential to remake large swaths of the industry. For much of the past decade, innovation was often framed around modernization efforts such as upgrading legacy systems, improving digital channels, or experimenting with emerging technologies through pilots and limited deployments. Now, the institutions pulling ahead competitively are distinguished by their willingness to explore innovation early and their ability to operationalize it at scale and translate it into measurable business outcomes.

Across the industry, innovation is beginning to reshape the economics and competitive structure of financial services in more tangible ways. Revenue models are evolving. Operational costs are being reconfigured through the strategic integration of artificial intelligence, cloud computing and blockchain. That, in turn, is fundamentally changing how capital is allocated. Risk management is becoming more data driven, predictive and automated. Customer expectations around speed, personalization and accessibility continue to rise as the instant-everything culture takes hold. 

What makes the current cycle particularly significant is that several major technology shifts are unfolding simultaneously and beginning to intersect. AI, real-time payments, digital assets, tokenization, cloud-native infrastructure, embedded finance, and programmable financial systems are increasingly reinforcing one another and revamping how financial institutions operate, deliver services and compete.

These factors compelled American Banker to launch The Most Innovative People in Finance, a new annual ranking that recognizes the top 50 individuals who are driving these massive waves of digital transformation—producing measurable results, shoring up their competitive positions, opening new markets, and, in some cases, redefining the industry.

Leading this year’s list is #1-ranked Vantage Bank CEO Jeff Sinnott for the launch of the U.S.’s first bank-issued stablecoin; followed in the top five spots by Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long (#2) for the debut of a tokenized deposit network for community banks; Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti (#3) for developing and deploying the firm’s widespread internal use cases for agentic AI; TD Bank SVP and Chief AI Scientist Maksims Volkovs (#4) for the development of its predictive foundation AI model; and Anchorage Digital CEO Nathan McCauley (#5) for becoming the issuer of Tether’s U.S.-regulated stablecoin USA₮.

Advertisement

The methodology used to select the 50 individuals is based on quantitative and qualitative factors encompassing leadership, investment in technology innovation, and number, size and impact of digital transformation initiatives over a single year (2025) and three-year time horizon, including internal cost efficiency gains and/or new revenue generation, and, where applicable, impact on the industry. American Banker also considered the role that the individual played in driving digital transformation initiatives in 2025, percentage of technology budget allocated to new innovation projects, products and initiatives, specific funding amount allocated to digital transformation initiatives annually, acquisitions and partnerships initiated to advance the bank’s innovation, impact on creating an internal culture of innovation, and number of patents held in their name.

Why does recognition of outstanding leadership in innovation matter now more than ever? 

Consider that AI sits at the center of much of the transformative change—with advanced forms of AI increasingly coordinating workflows, monitoring transactions in real time, supporting liquidity management, identifying anomalous behavior, and assisting with operational decision-making across multiple functions simultaneously. 

At the same time, the movement and representation of value itself is changing, with stablecoins, tokenized deposits, blockchain-based settlement systems, and digital-asset infrastructure evolving from experimentation into broader commercial use cases. 

As such, real-time payment networks, richer transaction data standards, embedded financial services, and intelligent payment routing are transforming payments into a central layer of customer engagement and commercial activity. 

Advertisement

Underpinning many of these developments is a broader modernization of banking infrastructure. Cloud-native architecture, API-driven platforms, and modular technology environments are driving adaptability, data accessibility, ecosystem connectivity, and the ability to integrate intelligence directly into operational workflows. 

This period of structural change is altering the competitive dynamics of the industry, requiring leadership that understands when to invest, where to modernize, which risks are worth taking and how to aggressively reposition their institutions for the future. 

Continue Reading

Finance

Crypto’s 24/7 Derivatives Era Is Forcing Traditional Finance To Adapt

Published

on

Crypto’s 24/7 Derivatives Era Is Forcing Traditional Finance To Adapt

Crypto has always traded on a different clock. Bitcoin does not close for weekends, liquidity does not pause for holidays, and leverage does not wait for clearing desks to reopen on Monday morning. For years, that difference helped separate crypto-native venues from regulated financial infrastructure.

That separation is narrowing. CME Group said its regulated cryptocurrency futures and options will be available for 24-hour, seven-day trading beginning May 29, pending regulatory review, with trading continuing on CME Globex except for a weekly maintenance window. The move is more than an operational extension. It is a sign that traditional finance is being pulled toward the market structure crypto normalized first.

The harder question is not whether institutions can trade crypto around the clock. They already can, through offshore venues, prime brokers, market makers, and liquidity providers. The harder question is whether regulated finance’s clearing, custody, surveillance, privacy, and risk systems can operate in markets where leverage, information, and volatility never really switch off.

Crypto’s 24/7 derivatives era is not simply making digital assets look more institutional. It is forcing traditional finance to become more continuous.

Advertisement

Derivatives are becoming crypto’s institutional layer

The center of gravity in crypto markets has been moving away from simple spot trading for years. Spot markets still matter, especially for retail flows, exchange liquidity, and ETF-related demand. But derivatives are where much of the institutional market now expresses risk, hedges exposure, prices volatility, and manages leverage.

That shift is visible in the data. CCData’s January 2026 Exchange Review reported combined centralized exchange volumes of $5.26 trillion, while spot trading accounted for $1.27 trillion. The implication is clear: derivatives represented the majority of centralized exchange activity that month.

This matters because derivatives do not just reflect price discovery. In crypto, they increasingly shape it. Futures, perpetual swaps, and options influence liquidity, funding rates, volatility expectations, and institutional positioning. When derivatives become the dominant venue for market expression, trading hours become less a convenience issue and more a structural one.

That is why CME’s move is significant. Regulated access is no longer just about listing a bitcoin or ether contract. It is about matching the operating rhythm of the asset itself.

CME also said client demand for digital asset risk management helped drive a record $3 trillion in notional cryptocurrency futures and options volume in 2025. That is not a fringe market asking for extended access. It is a regulated derivatives marketplace responding to institutional demand for more continuous risk management.

Advertisement

Continuous trading still runs into legacy settlement

The tension is that continuous execution does not automatically mean continuous settlement. CME’s model extends trading access, but it still preserves familiar institutional mechanics. Weekend and holiday trades are assigned the next business day’s trade date, and clearing, settlement and regulatory reporting continue to flow through the next business day framework.

That is the bridge traditional finance is trying to build: crypto-speed execution on top of regulated market infrastructure. It is a practical compromise, but also a revealing one. Crypto markets solved for continuous trading first and institutional controls second. Traditional finance is trying to do the reverse.

There are good reasons for that. Regulated derivatives markets cannot simply discard reporting obligations, margin discipline, risk controls, and clearing protocols. Their value proposition is precisely that institutions can trade within a transparent, supervised framework.

But always-on markets compress the time available to react. A move that happens on a Sunday morning can affect collateral needs, counterparty exposures, hedge ratios, and liquidity conditions before traditional workflows fully resume. In that environment, operational readiness becomes part of market structure.

The next competitive edge may not be who lists the product first. It may be who can monitor risk, margin exposure, custody flows, and compliance exceptions in real time without weakening the controls institutions rely on.

Advertisement

Transparency becomes a risk surface

Crypto’s always-on design also introduces a second challenge: information moves continuously too. Public blockchains make settlement visible, auditable, and difficult to falsify. That can reduce certain intermediary risks. But the same transparency can expose flows that businesses would normally treat as confidential.

“It does both simultaneously,” said Natalie Newson, Senior Blockchain Investigator at CertiK, when asked whether public blockchain transparency reduces systemic risk or creates new attack surfaces. “Settlement finality is also publicly auditable,” she said, but “front-running and MEV are persistent issues in blockchain.”

That duality is central to the institutional adoption question. Public auditability is useful when markets need trust in settlement. It is less straightforward when market participants reveal treasury movements, collateral positioning, payroll flows, or supplier payments in real time.

Newson framed the business risk directly. “If your treasury wallet is known, and on-chain, it eventually becomes known, counterparties, suppliers, and competitors can watch your liquidity position in real time,” she said.

For trading firms, that visibility can affect execution. For corporations, it can expose working capital strategy. For institutions, it can turn settlement infrastructure into a source of market intelligence for competitors. In a 24/7 derivatives environment, information leakage does not wait for office hours either.

Advertisement

This is where the conversation moves beyond cybersecurity. The issue is not just hacks, exploits, or smart contract vulnerabilities. It is whether an always-on financial system can protect commercially sensitive behavior while preserving the auditability that makes blockchain infrastructure useful in the first place.

Privacy is becoming part of market infrastructure

The early crypto argument treated transparency as a feature. That was true for open monetary networks and early DeFi systems, where public verification helped establish trust. But what works for a speculative or experimental market does not automatically work for enterprise finance.

“Transparency becomes a structural constraint the moment a business tries to use blockchain for real operations,” said Varun Kabra, Chief Growth Officer of Concordium. “Payroll, supplier contracts, treasury flows, pricing structures, these are not marketing data points.”

That is the institutional bottleneck hiding inside the 24/7 trading conversation. It is not enough for markets to stay open. The systems around those markets need ways to prove identity, authorization, eligibility, and compliance without exposing more information than necessary.

Kabra’s broader point is that the next phase of adoption depends on combining privacy with accountability. “The next phase of adoption won’t come from arguing with regulators,” he said. “It will come from building systems where privacy and accountability coexist by design.”

Advertisement

That logic is already moving beyond financial markets. Concordium’s partnership with the Danish Ice Hockey Union includes a Verified Fan Programme using zero-knowledge proofs and an Agentic Commerce initiative around verified AI agents, showing how users or automated agents could prove access rights or authorization without disclosing unnecessary personal data.

The sports example is not the point. The infrastructure pattern is. As markets become more automated and more continuous, identity and selective disclosure become part of the same control stack as margining, custody, and surveillance.

Traditional finance is learning to operate on crypto’s clock

The obvious reading of CME’s 24/7 move is that crypto is becoming more institutional. That is true, but incomplete. The more interesting reading is that traditional finance is beginning to adopt pieces of crypto-native market structure because client demand, volatility, and liquidity have already moved in that direction.

This does not mean regulated finance will become decentralized. It will not. Institutions still need clearinghouses, custodians, reporting systems, market surveillance, and legal accountability. What changes is the cadence. Risk systems that were designed around market closes and business-day workflows will need to function in a market where exposure changes continuously.

That transition will not happen all at once. Execution hours can expand faster than settlement systems. Trading access can move faster than compliance architecture. Liquidity can move faster than privacy standards. The result is a hybrid market structure: crypto assets trading on a crypto clock, through increasingly regulated venues, with traditional finance rebuilding its control layer around a more continuous environment.

Advertisement

For investors, this means crypto derivatives are becoming more than a trading product. They are becoming the test case for how legacy market infrastructure adapts to always-on finance.

The next phase of institutional crypto adoption will not be defined only by which assets get listed or which venues gain market share. It will be defined by whether the financial system can manage risk, identity, privacy, and settlement at the speed crypto markets already demand.

Continue Reading

Finance

New financial grades raise concerns about colleges’ long-term stability

Published

on

New financial grades raise concerns about colleges’ long-term stability

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — Families are navigating the already stressful college planning process, and a new set of financial grades is prompting many to look more closely at the stability of the schools they are considering.

Forbes’ annual financial report card for private, nonprofit colleges and universities is putting a spotlight on how well schools can manage their finances. The rankings are based on each institution’s ability to cover immediate expenses with cash on hand — a measure that is increasingly resonating with parents.

In the Triangle, the grades vary widely. Duke University received an A+, while Meredith College earned a B-. Shaw University was rated C-, and Saint Augustine’s University received a D.

For families, those grades are becoming an important part of the decision-making process, alongside academic and campus life.

“This college experience is much more than the books and the tuition,” Wake Forest parent Meranda Van Ningen said.

Advertisement

Van Ningen said a school’s financial condition is now a key factor as she — and many other parents — evaluate long-term value and security.

“We had to really lean in and ask the questions, make sure that we were getting the answers we appreciated,” she said. “They want us. They want our money to come in and to pay for that next year.”

She said the financial grades offer insight into how well schools can navigate economic challenges.

“Show that they can handle this tough, tough economy, to be honest, and that they know how to roll with it because campuses have good years and bad years as well,” Van Ningen said.

Financial planners say that shift in focus is well-founded, especially as some colleges across the country face financial strain or closure.

Advertisement

“A lot of smaller colleges are closing throughout the country,” said Gray Pendleton, president of Pendleton Financial. “I think it’s important to look at the financial health of the school.”

Experts say the added scrutiny reflects the high stakes of higher education, often one of the largest investments a family will make. Along with reviewing financial grades, they encourage families to thoroughly research institutions before committing.

They also stress the importance of early financial preparation to manage rising costs.

“Even like, $10 to $100 a month,” Pendleton said. “The NC 529 savings plan is great. And that’s an aggressive, age based plan. That’s a good opportunity.”

As financial grades draw more attention, families are increasingly weighing not just where students will thrive academically, but also which schools are best positioned to remain financially secure over the long term.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending