Entertainment
Review: The brilliant, incorrigible ‘Ahed’s Knee’ takes furious aim at contemporary Israel

In December 2017, 16-year-old Palestinian activist Ahed Tamimi was videotaped slapping and punching two armed Israeli troopers throughout a heated protest exterior her residence within the West Financial institution village of Nabi Salih. The video went viral, and Tamimi was arrested and sentenced to eight months in jail. Round that point, Bezalel Smotrich, a member of Israel’s legislature, tweeted that he wished {the teenager} had “gotten a bullet, no less than within the kneecap. That will have put her beneath home arrest for the remainder of her life.”
The fallout from that livid confrontation has impressed the title of a livid and confrontational new drama referred to as “Ahed’s Knee.” However the film, by some means each as arduous as bone and as versatile as a joint, shouldn’t be actually about Tamimi. Nor does it present a lot curiosity within the Israeli-Palestinian battle past a reference to this specific skirmish. Its protagonist is a middle-age Israeli writer-director generally known as Y (an outstanding Avshalom Pollak), who’s clearly meant to be a fictional stand-in for the film’s personal middle-age Israeli writer-director, Nadav Lapid. Y is planning to movie a video set up based mostly on Tamimi’s ordeal, but it surely’s his personal expertise that comes beneath this film’s forceful scrutiny.
This isn’t the primary time Lapid has drawn inspiration from his personal life, as he did in his 2019 stunner, “Synonyms.” Neither is it the primary time he has directed a blast of cinematic outrage at what he perceives to be the pervasive ethical complacency and mental chapter of latest Israeli society. His critique right here takes the type of a journey into the Arava, a stretch of desert in southern Israel, the place Y will attend a screening of considered one of his films at a small-town library. Touching down on this arid, lovely panorama, Y receives a heat welcome from Yahalom (Nur Fibak), a pleasant younger lady who works for the Ministry of Tradition and who will function his host, dramatic foil and ethical quandary.
Greeting Y with heat flattery and an accommodating smile, Yahalom asks him to signal a kind that can restrict his post-screening dialogue to a sequence of pre-approved matters — a request that instantly raises Y’s hackles and confirms his worst fears in regards to the overreaching hand of the state. When Yahalom quietly admits that she shares his concern and even his disgrace, Y sees an opportunity to reveal her misgivings and, together with them, the hypocrisy of the totalitarian cultural equipment that employs her — a scheme that, sadly, would wreck Yahalom within the cut price.
One thing like this actually occurred to Lapid a number of years in the past, although there’s no cause to suspect this film of being an correct recounting of that episode. Lapid delights in turning precise occasions into hypotheticals, and a part of the thrilling, present-tense pleasure of “Ahed’s Knee” is that it appears as unsure about what Y will do as he’s.
As he ventures out into the open desert for a little bit sightseeing, taking within the area’s desolate magnificence and marking his terrain (and at one level getting caught up within the incongruously sugary pop bliss of Vanessa Paradis’ “Be My Child”), he provides voice to a blistering fury that ultimately finds an unwilling however not uncomprehending ear in Yahalom.
Avshalom Pollak and Nur Fibak within the film “Ahed’s Knee.”
(Kino Lorber)
“Suppose I need to talk about a nationalist, racist, sadistic, abject Jewish state,” he barks at her, “whose sole intention is to cut back the soul, significantly the Arab soul, to impotence and incompetence, so it collapses beneath the state’s oppression and will likely be fully at its mercy.” That’s fairly an indictment, and it’ll shock nobody who’s seen Lapid’s “Synonyms,” through which a younger man travels to France and tries to shed his Israeli identification like a carapace, or “The Kindergarten Trainer,” in regards to the futile seek for magnificence and poetry in a nation seemingly incapable of appreciating them.
However Lapid doesn’t spare himself his personal indictment, if certainly we’re to grasp Y to be himself. It’s telling that, whether or not or not you end up in settlement with Y’s thesis, liking him stays roughly inconceivable. Pollak’s efficiency is all tough, prickly edges, softening solely when Y speaks tenderly on the telephone along with his ailing mom, considered one of his closest collaborators. (Lapid’s mom, movie editor Period Lapid, died of lung most cancers whereas they have been working collectively on “Synonyms.”) Fibak, against this, can’t assist however awaken your sympathies as Yahalom, who may hardly be described as harmless — her place inside a bigger scheme of collective culpability is a part of the film’s level — however whose quiet humility mounts its personal unshakable protection towards Y’s rhetorical offensive.
One factor practically all Lapid’s films share is an obsession with language, a priority for the precision of phrases but in addition an appreciation for his or her limitless potentialities. “Ahed’s Knee,” maybe much more so than its predecessors, tries to blow up the conventions of conventional film language, to discover a formal syntax that can match the ferocity of its broadsides.
Repeatedly on this film (which was shot by Shai Goldman and edited by Nili Feller), the digital camera takes uncooked, inelegant flight, its stressed, rattling whip pans usually approximating Y’s personal distracted eye actions. Generally Lapid directs your gaze heavenward, typically down at a parched panorama and typically at a closeup of one thing surprising: a crotch, a foot, a knee.
It’s not fairly, and it doesn’t care. “Ahed’s Knee” means to shatter your complacency, and in addition the complacency of its chosen medium. You may see this as a infantile act of revolt, or you could possibly see it as Ladiv, very like Y himself, refusing to undergo any agreed-upon parameters. He delights in coloring out of the traces, not least as a result of he is aware of it would make all the correct folks mad.
‘Ahed’s Knee’
In Hebrew with English subtitles
Not rated
Operating time: 1 hour, 40 minutes
Enjoying: Begins April 1 at Laemmle Glendale, Glendale; Laemmle Royal, West Los Angeles; and Laemmle City Heart 5, Encino

Movie Reviews
‘Black Bag’ Review: Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender Cozy Up in Steven Soderbergh’s Snazzy Spy Thriller

There’s much concern in Black Bag about a missing cyber-worm device called Severus, capable of destabilizing a nuclear facility. But you can file that malware gadget alongside the Codex in the Superman universe and the unfortunately named Mother Boxes in Justice League. No matter how closely you pay attention, the precise functions of these power tools will be at best vaguely clear, not that it matters. In Steven Soderbergh’s sleek spy drama, a classy crew of actors keeps bringing up Severus in the direst of tones. But all that’s far less intriguing than the shifting allegiances and double-crosses among an elite group of Brit intelligence agents.
Following the taut, Hitchcock-meets-De Palma suspense of the tech thriller Kimi and the masterfully shivery ghost story Presence, this third consecutive collaboration between Soderbergh and ace screenwriter David Koepp is a mild disappointment. It’s witty, stylishly crafted and boasts a stellar ensemble, led by especially toothsome work from Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender. It keeps you glued, even if the movie ultimately feels evanescent, a slick diversion you forget soon after the end credits have rolled.
Black Bag
The Bottom Line Tantalizing, even if the aftertaste doesn’t linger.
Release date: Friday, March 14
Cast: Cate Blanchett, Michael Fassbender, Marisa Abela, Tom Burke, Naomie Harris, Regé-Jean Page, Pierce Brosnan, Gustaf Skarsgard
Director: Steven Soderbergh
Screenwriter: David Koepp
Rated R,
1 hour 33 minutes
Still, there’s a lot to be said for being in capable hands, and even if the plot often has more complications than propulsion, Soderbergh and his actors give it a consistently pleasurable buoyancy. At this point, three-and-a-half decades and 35 features into a career with way more peaks than valleys, it’s enjoyable just to sit back and savor the playful dexterity of the director’s storytelling and the seductive sheen of his elegant visuals.
The title refers to any highly classified intel too sensitive to be shared, even between married colleagues like Kathryn St. Jean (Blanchett) and George Woodhouse (Fassbender). It also provides convenient cover for infidelities, betrayals and underhand dealings for the circle of senior agents in their immediate orbit. “Where were you this afternoon?” “Black bag.”
When Meacham (Gustaf Skarsgard), a fellow agent at the National Cyber Security Centre, assigns George to sniff out the traitor within the organization who has let Severus fall into the wrong hands, he asks would George be comfortable neutralizing Kathryn should it turn out to be her. But even without invoking the proverbial black bag, George keeps his cards close to his vest. Others at NCSC view his loyalty to Kathryn as his weakness.
The couple organizes a dinner party at their swanky London home and invite four senior associates who also happen to be couples, suspecting that one of them is the mole.
The guests are Colonel James Stokes (Regé-Jean Page), who reports directly to George; Dr. Zoe Vaughan (Naomi Harris), in-house NCSC shrink and Stokes’ lover; boozing, skirt-chasing Freddie Smalls (Tom Burke), resentful about being recently passed over for a promotion; and his current girlfriend, cyber comms expert Clarissa (Marisa Abela), the newest NCSC recruit. All four consider themselves friends of George and Kathryn but know their hosts well enough to figure there’s a hidden agenda behind the last-minute invite.
They are right to be suspicious. George, who enjoys cooking and bass fishing with the same glacial calm he brings to every task, warns Kathryn to avoid the chana masala, which he has laced with drugs to loosen the guests’ tongues. But nothing conclusive is revealed beyond Freddie’s twice-weekly hotel trysts with a mystery woman, an inconvenient disclosure when Clarissa has a steak knife handy.
Koepp’s script plants subtle clues that Kathryn might be the dodgy one, her skilled evasiveness very much in evidence during one standout scene — a mandated therapy session with Zoe, who notes that an air of hostility always wafts into the office ahead of her patient. Kathryn also remains cagey about the details of a meeting in Zurich. Her “black bag” response prompts George to enlist Clarissa’s help, accessing a keyhole in satellite coverage that allows him to observe his wife’s Swiss rendezvous without being detected elsewhere at NCSC.
When Clarissa cocks an eyebrow about marital mistrust, George says of his wife, “I watch her, and she watches me. If she gets into trouble, I will do everything in my power to extricate her.” The screenplay teases out the ambiguity as to whether Kathryn would do the same for George, or even if she’s laying a trap for him.
The drama is densely plotted, to the point where details at times get hazy. But the central dynamic of George and Kathryn’s relationship is a well-oiled machine that keeps everything else humming.
Fassbender and Blanchett’s characterizations are both distinct and perfectly synched. He’s icy and robotic, almost a cross between the actor’s roles in Prometheus and The Killer. In one dryly amusing moment, George gets the tiniest spatter of curry sauce on the cuff of his crisp white shirt, and in his usual affectless delivery, says, “I need to go change.” When it emerges that George surveilled his own father, who preceded him in the espionage business, he simply offers, “I don’t like liars.”
Blanchett, by contrast, makes Kathryn sultry and enigmatic, an ineffably poised operator whose posh intonations and erudite conversation give her the air of someone entirely free from self-doubt, carefully assessing every situation and her position in it. Her effortless old-world glamor doesn’t hide her anxieties about money, another factor that feeds the suspicion around her.
Blanchett’s many scenes with Fassbender are what make the movie’s motor purr. George and Kathryn are both circumspect, as their profession demands, but bound together by a charged sexual and emotional connection that makes Black Bag as much a close study of a marriage as a spy tale. When she asks, “Would you kill for me, George?” it seems more like foreplay than a test of loyalty.
Blanchett’s one moment of explosive anger (“Don’t ever fuck with my marriage again!”) is a welcome jolt of fire in a movie that mostly sticks to room temperature — a precision drone strike on Russian operatives notwithstanding. The attention required to keep up isn’t always rewarded by the most scintillating developments in a plot that tends more often to simmer on a medium flame than come to a boil.
The other members of the cast all have moments and all slot smoothly into the film’s intricate puzzle structure. The standout of the core group is Abela, making good on her head-turning work in Back to Black and Industry with a performance indicating at every turn that despite being a relative newbie, she’s as savvy as the veterans. And Pierce Brosnan is a zesty addition in his few scenes as NCSC head Arthur Steiglitz, an exacting boss in impeccably tailored suits whose directives come with the undisguised menace of someone with no tolerance for failure and a ruthless instinct for self-protection. Having him sit down to a plate of illegal Ikizukuri is a delicious touch.
Serving as DP and editor under his customary pseudonyms, Peter Andrews and Mary Ann Bernard, respectively, Soderbergh gives the film a lustrous look, with lots of sinuous tracking shots and slashes of lens flare. The jazzy rhythms are echoed by David Holmes’ moody, percussive score.
One sequence, cutting among a series of polygraph tests conducted by George, is Soderbergh at his snappiest, taking a cloak-and-dagger scenario and toying with our perceptions of truth and obfuscation. If Black Bag isn’t always at that level, it’s a tight hour-and-a-half of a type of sophisticated grownup entertainment that we don’t get enough of anymore.
Movie Reviews
The Monkey Movie Review: A chilling yet darkly hilarious horror film that embraces the absurdity of its premise

Review: Osgood Perkins takes a unique approach to The Monkey, blending supernatural horror with a wicked streak of dark comedy. While the premise—a toy monkey that triggers violent deaths—could be pure nightmare fuel, Perkins leans into its absurdity, allowing for moments of bleak humour amidst the tension. The film often revels in the ridiculousness of its concept, crafting death scenes that are so exaggerated they almost become morbidly funny. This tonal balancing act between horror and satire is one of the film’s most intriguing elements, though it may not land for all audiences.
Theo James delivers a committed performance as both Hal and Bill, capturing their contrasting reactions to the trauma they endured as children. His portrayal of Hal, the more straight-laced of the two, plays well against Bill’s more jaded, almost detached demeanour, adding an extra layer to the film’s comedic undertones. In a supporting role, Elijah Wood brings an offbeat energy that further reinforces the film’s darkly humorous sensibilities, while Tatiana Maslany adds emotional weight to the story. Colin O’Brien, as Hal’s son Petey, serves as the innocent heart of the film, grounding the supernatural chaos in something real.
Visually, The Monkey is as much a horror film as it is a grim parody of the genre. Perkins and cinematographer Andrés Arochi craft an eerie yet playfully exaggerated aesthetic, using heavy shadows, surreal framing, and unsettlingly bright moments of colour to highlight the monkey’s presence. The sound design is particularly effective, with the monkey’s cymbals becoming an almost comedic punchline—an ominous sound cue that signals doom in the most absurd circumstances. Perkins is aware of the inherent ridiculousness of his premise and leans into it, allowing the film to have fun with itself rather than taking everything too seriously.
However, the film’s biggest gamble—its tonal shifts—may also be its most divisive element. The transitions between horror, tragedy, and black comedy aren’t always seamless, and some viewers may be unsure whether they should be terrified or laughing. Additionally, Perkins’ signature slow-burn storytelling occasionally clashes with the film’s more playful moments, resulting in pacing issues that could test the patience of some audiences. While the film delivers many eerie moments, its humour may not land for those expecting a more straightforward horror experience.
Entertainment
KTLA taps Melvin Robert to take over 'Morning News' post of the late Sam Rubin

KTLA has added a new anchor to its “Morning News” lineup: newscaster Melvin Robert.
The Los Angeles news channel confirmed Wednesday that Robert, a senior correspondent and weekend co-host for “Extra,” will join its morning programming as its new entertainment anchor and reporter. He will take over for late journalist and longtime KTLA personality Sam Rubin.
Variety first broke the news of Robert’s hiring.
“I am overjoyed and humbled to join the KTLA 5 family,” Robert said in a statement. “This show carries such an iconic legacy, and I can’t wait to collaborate with so many people who I love, respect and admire. I believe so deeply in the power of connection and the transformative power that it holds to unite us all.”
He added: “That’s what morning television is all about, and that’s what the arts are all about, pulling us all together and giving us insight into our shared humanity. I can’t wait to start each and every morning with our Southern California viewers, and I am committed to earning their trust.”
Robert has big shoes to fill at KTLA. He joins the team less than a year after the news station lost veteran Rubin, who was the face of the news channel’s entertainment coverage for more than 30 years. Rubin was known among viewers and celebrities for his disarming interviews and warm personality. He died May 10 after a heart attack at age 64.
The anchor’s death rocked the KTLA newsroom as his former co-anchors shared emotional tributes on-air and with The Times. “Sam was a giant in the local news industry and the entertainment world, and a fixture of Los Angeles morning television for decades,” KTLA said at the time on social media.
With Robert set to begin his tenure later this month, KTLA news director Erica Hill-Rodriguez said Wednesday the channel is eager for audiences to get to know its newest anchor, who interned for the station in 2000.
“We can’t wait for our viewers to start their mornings with his insight into the world of entertainment,” she said, “and to experience the love he has for the community that has been his lifelong home.”
Robert will begin his KTLA run the week of March 17. The California native joined “Extra” in 2022 and in 2023 became an anchor for Fox 11 News’ “Good Day LA.” Robert, a Loyola Marymount University alum, was also among the original anchors at Spectrum News 1.
He officially signed off from his “Good Day L.A.” post last Friday, telling viewers he was leaving for a “really exciting, new and professional opportunity.”
-
Sports1 week ago
NHL trade board 7.0: The 4 Nations break is over, and things are about to get real
-
News1 week ago
Justice Dept. Takes Broad View of Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons
-
World1 week ago
Hamas says deal reached with Israel to release more than 600 Palestinians
-
Science1 week ago
Killing 166 million birds hasn’t helped poultry farmers stop H5N1. Is there a better way?
-
News1 week ago
Christianity’s Decline in U.S. Appears to Have Halted, Major Study Shows
-
World1 week ago
Germany's Merz ‘resolute and determined,' former EU chief Barroso says
-
Technology1 week ago
Microsoft makes Copilot Voice and Think Deeper free with unlimited use
-
Politics1 week ago
Some Republicans Sharply Criticize Trump’s Embrace of Russia at the U.N.