Connect with us

Entertainment

Playing Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X 'terrified' the stars of 'Genius: MLK/X'

Published

on

Playing Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X 'terrified' the stars of 'Genius: MLK/X'

Kelvin Harrison Jr. and Aaron Pierre had the same reaction after learning that they had been hired to play the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, respectively, in National Geographic‘s “Genius: MLK/X.”

Terror.

Not only did they both initially feel overwhelmed by the daunting responsibility of portraying the iconic civil rights leaders but they also felt their performances would likely be compared to those of others. Denzel Washington portrayed Malcolm X in the eponymous 1992 film that earned him an Oscar nomination, Samuel L. Jackson starred as King in Katori Hall’s Broadway production of “The Mountaintop” and James Earl Jones also portrayed King in the miniseries “Freedom to Speak.”

But with the support of friends and producers, Harrison and Pierre eventually overcame their doubts, delivering distinctive and bold portraits of the two men.

“MLK/X” is the fourth season of “Genius,” a biographical anthology series that has focused on Albert Einstein, Pablo Picasso and Aretha Franklin in previous installments. The final two episodes of the eight-part season, which premiered Feb. 1, run Thursday on National Geographic and stream the following day on Hulu and Disney+.

Advertisement

Co-starring as King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, is Weruche Opia (HBO’s “I May Destroy You”), and Jayme Lawson (“Till”) plays Betty Shabazz, the wife of Malcolm X. The executive producing team includes Gina Prince-Bythewood, Reggie Rock Bythewood, Brian Grazer and Ron Howard.

Harrison (“Chevalier”) and Pierre (“Foe”) knew each other — they are both involved in the upcoming “The Lion King” prequel, “The Lion King: Mufasa.” Pierre plays the title character, while Harrison plays the villain Scar.

Even though they share only a few scenes in “Genius,” they clearly became bonded during the project and expressed a palpable fondness for each other during a recent joint interview at a Pasadena hotel. Pierre occasionally patted Harrison’s knee during the discussion, calling him “my best friend.” This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

1

2

Advertisement

1. Aaron Pierre plays Malcolm X. 2. Kelvin Harrison Jr. plays the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

It must have been good news to be cast in this series, but I’m sure it was also scary.

Harrison: Initially, I was terrified. I didn’t know whether it was appropriate for me to be cast. I was 27, 28 years old, had just started acting and hadn’t lived that much life. I feel I have gotten the benefit of Dr. King’s and Malcolm’s work, but what was it that I could do to bring a further understanding of it? Then I thought, “I just have to get over myself.” The producers told me Dr. King was young when he began his journey. There was a lot of responsibility bestowed on him. Plus, he had a wife and kid. I felt a little naive, but that also fits in with the story we’re telling. It’s about taking on that naivety and not mistaking it for ignorance or a lack of intelligence. It’s also about not losing that sense of hope that we have in our country and our identities in who we are, putting one foot in front of the other and walking in faith. Then I got excited thinking, “I can’t believe I get to go on this journey.”

Advertisement

Pierre: I share that sentiment. I’m the same age as Kelvin. When I got the call, I questioned whether I had the capacity, the endurance, the durability, the emotional intelligence, the life experience. I didn’t say yes immediately because I needed to sit with that and understand what that feeling was and how I was going to channel those feelings into something that would propel me forward as opposed to prohibiting me. Once I thought I could do that, largely because of the support network about me personally and creatively, I knew I could begin embarking on the journey. You find joy in it, which is so important because what these men did needs to be celebrated and championed.

1

2

1. Aaron Pierre as Malcolm X in “Genius: MLK/X.” (Richard DuCree / National Geographic) 2. Kelvin Harrison Jr. as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (Richard DuCree / National Geographic)

Advertisement

What was the research process like?

Pierre: We both watched and absorbed a tremendous amount of historical footage. I went to “The Autobiography of Malcolm X,” which is something I think I will revisit more than once in my lifetime. Then there’s “The Sword and the Shield: The Revolutionary Lives of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X,” which I trusted implicitly with its historical knowledge and insight. I visited Harlem, which fueled me in a very beautiful way.

Harrison: My initial instinct was to watch every movie about Dr. King, but my young actor brain and every actor I respected said, “Stay away from doing that.” So I refused that impulse. Then I had to figure out what those actors did. What I found out is that they brought a little bit of themselves to the role. I had to do an investigation of myself to figure out how to bring my humanity.

To prepare for their roles, Aaron Pierre, left, with Kelvin Harrison Jr., says they “both watched and absorbed a tremendous amount of historical footage.”

Advertisement

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

Aaron, were you intimidated by Denzel Washington’s acclaimed performance as Malcolm X in Spike Lee’s film?

Pierre: Denzel is a hero of mine. I have the utmost respect for him, not only artistically but personally. I had to manage that a hero of mine had played a hero of mine. I dealt with that by accepting that truth and then setting it free. Once I did that, I was able to permit myself to be liberated and safe enough to explore my own portrayal and bring my own life experience to Malcolm.

Kelvin, you had a similar situation. The actors who have played King include Jeffrey Wright and James Earl Jones.

Advertisement

Harrison: It’s kind of none of my business at a certain point. Dr. King was called to do something. If the people behind this project are calling me to do this, they see something in me I can’t see. And it’s arrogant for me to sit there and debate about it.

Pierre: At a certain point, we made peace with that fact, realizing all we can do is do our best. We use everything in our power to serve these tremendous men and their stories and legacies. Beyond that point, we have to set it free and let it be. It’s the only way to protect your well-being.

King and Malcolm X’s stories are told on parallel tracks. You share only a few scenes, but it’s clear you felt connected to each other.

Pierre: Absolutely. Aside from the professional work we share, this is one of my dearest friends. There’s a true sense of support and seeing one another through each others experience. We have so many parallels and similarities of our respective lives. We didn’t see each other a lot on set, but when we did, we checked in with each other. We understood that what we were embarking on was not easy. It required vulnerability.

Harrison: One of the times we did connect was when he came over to my little apartment in L.A. He brought doughnuts and I cooked. We talked about everything — how our journeys were going so far. Then we watched “Devil in a Blue Dress” with Denzel and Don Cheadle. We filled our cups with these beautiful portrayals. It was inspiration. It’s so easy to want to retreat when you’re on a journey like this. You get overwhelmed. You want to say, “This is too hard, I’m backing out.” So it’s important to have those moments to reconnect and say, “We’re in this together.”

Advertisement

The actors say they tried to support each other in their roles. “We talked about everything — how our journeys were going so far,” says Kelvin Harrison Jr.

(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)

What was the most challenging day for you both?

Pierre: If we’re being honest, every day was challenging. This isn’t an engagement that ended with the final scene of the day. This demanded that we be engaged every day for the five or six months we did this. Every day we felt the weight of wearing those jackets.

Advertisement

Were you ever able to relax? What did you do to relieve stress?

Pierre: I’m really very grateful to Kelvin and Weruche. I have a tendency, no matter what the project is, but particularly with a project of this magnitude, to completely immerse myself for the duration. But they really looked after me. I would just be sitting in my trailer, in the suit with the glasses on, waiting for the next scene. Then one or both of them would drop by and say, “I brought you some shrimp.” They would bring joy. They contributed to the health of my personal well-being.

Harrison: I read somewhere that Martin’s favorite show was “Star Trek,” and he would watch that to decompress. So I thought, “I’ve got to find my own show.” So I got addicted to “Big Brother.” That was my “Star Trek.” I know that show is ridiculous, but I refuse to give it that label because it’s so good. It was like, “They’re stuck in this house. On the set, I’m stuck in this universe.” I related to them, and it would make me laugh and have fun.

What do you think audiences will learn from “Genius”?

Pierre: I hope it will dispel the myths and reveal the truth about the experiences of these men. There is a considerable amount of misinformation about Malcolm X. They need to gain the understanding that he operated from a place of love and light. Some might say he was advocating for physical engagement. I disagree. I think he was advocating for safeguarding and preserving the safety and livelihoods of your loved ones, your community and for those who look like you.

Advertisement

Harrison: Our job as storytellers is to inspire. With this story, I see it as a mirror to our country and the cyclical nature of it.

Entertainment

When, unlike our upcoming 250th anniversary, a bicentennial mattered to orchestras

Published

on

When, unlike our upcoming 250th anniversary, a bicentennial mattered to orchestras

A century and a half ago, Richard Wagner was running out of cash as he was preparing to stage his four momentous nights of opera known as the “Ring Cycle” when he got a message from the Women’s Centennial Executive Committee in Philadelphia. It offered him a princely $5,000 (around $150,000 today) to write a triumphant 12-minute orchestral score to open the Centennial Exposition in Fairmont Park celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

On May 10, 1876, Theodore Thomas, perhaps America’s most famous conductor at the time (he would go on to head the New York Philharmonic and help found the Chicago Symphony), led the premiere of Wagner’s “Grosse Festmarsch” with a 150-member orchestra, its brass and percussion so impressive that the addition of cannon fire Wagner suggested was not needed. The crowd was said to number well over 100,000. President Ulysses S. Grant attended and invited Emperor Dom Pedro II of Brazil to join him along with members of Congress and Supreme Court justices for what remains a unique Declaration of Independence spectacle and debacle.

The “Centennial March,” as it came to be known, turned out to be dreck. Even Wagner, who carelessly tossed it off in a couple of weeks, said the best thing about the score was the fee, which he had demanded to be paid in gold. But what sounds like something AI might come up with if asked to write a pompous march in the style of Wagner began the American obsession with celebrating the Declaration of Independence, the words and deeds of our presidents, our very democracy with the assist of the symphony orchestra and opera.

One hundred years later, the country was awash with federal, state, city and philanthropic funding for a music-happy bicentennial of exceptional ambition. “With millions available in hand and more money to come,” Time Magazine wrote in 1975, “the Bicentennial is the biggest bonanza for the American composer since Hollywood discovered the musical.”

Advertisement

And so it was. The centerpiece was the National Endowment for the Arts Bicentennial Orchestra Commissioning Project. That funded America’s six top orchestras to each commission a major work that all six would play. In addition, the NEA offered further support to 34 American orchestras for dozens more new scores.

Everyone got into the act. The New York State Council of the Arts alone sponsored 68 commissions. Orchestras everywhere came up with striking projects. The Pittsburgh Symphony, for instance, premiered L.A. composer John LaMontaine’s opera/oratorio “Be Glad Then America” that featured the folk singer Odetta as the Muse of Liberty and enlisted ROTC students to reenact the Battle of Lexington overhead the orchestra.

The National Symphony commissioned symphonies from Roy Harris and William Schuman as well as Alan Hovhaness’ “Ode to Freedom,” a lovely short violin concerto written for Yehudi Menuhin. The list goes on.

We are obviously not seeing or hearing much like that in a semiquincentennial year when our government’s green gets the most attention for promoting algae. Even so, the NEA does indeed have an “America250” project (though it does little to publicize it, let alone fund it on the scale of 50 years ago) that is promoting more than 50 artworks. In music, they range from the Montgomery Symphony’s premiere in February of Nkeiru Okoye’s oratorio “A Time for Jubilee,” commemorating the 60th anniversary of the 1965 Selma-to-Montgomery civil rights marches, to a New West Symphony premiere last weekend of Michael Christie’s “A Ronald Reagan Portrait” at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum.

The major East Coast orchestras are paying some attention. The New York Philharmonic premiered David Lang’s luminous “the wealth of nations.” The National Symphony got the most attention in its attempt to commission Philip Glass’ “Lincoln” Symphony, which the composer pulled in opposition to an un-Lincoln-like presidential takeover of the Kennedy Center. Glass then gave the rights to the Boston Symphony for a July 5 first performance.

Advertisement

The National Symphony did pull off the premiere of Peter Boyer’s “American Mosaic,” and it was to the Altadena composer that Philadelphia, this time around, entrusted its Declaration of Independence commemoration. Boyer’s multimedia oratorio, “A Hundred Years On,” was given its premiere by the Philadelphia Orchestra last month at the orchestra’s outdoor summer home, the Mann Center.

Upcoming will be a few repeat performances. Next month, “the wealth of nations” lands at the Aspen Festival, as does the “Lincoln” Symphony at the Cabrillo festival (with an L.A. Phil performance next season). “American Mosaic,” of which the Pacific Symphony was a co-commissioner, had its West Coast premiere in Costa Mesa last month and was scheduled to be performed at the Hollywood Bowl by the National Symphony in August, but that has now been replaced by Dvorak’s commonplace “New World Symphony.”

None of this comes close to comparing with the attempted civic zest of 1976. The NEA made it a matter of admirable policy that commissioned new works get multiple performances. Yet despite several of these being substantial works by some of our most noted and venturesome composers, few bicentennial commissions have survived. Even odder is that many of the composers did not necessarily feel compelled to explore nationalist themes. For them, American liberty implied freedom to simply write the kind of music they cared about.

The six works for the six orchestras were David del Tredici’s irresistibly over-the-top “Final Alice” (Chicago Symphony), Elliott Carter’s arrestingly impenetrable-on-first-hearing “Symphony for Three Orchestras” (New York Philharmonic), John Cage’s irrepressibly come-what-may “Renga” (Boston Symphony), Morton Subotnick’s brilliant electronic-landscaped “Before the Butterfly” (Los Angeles Philharmonic), Leslie Bassett’s introspective “Echoes From an Invisible World” and Jacob Druckman’s abstract-modernist “Chiaroscuro” (Cleveland Orchestra).

No orchestra has brought back its commission over the last half century, and only Chicago and New York recorded their commissions. No recording at all exists of L.A.’s, although Subotnick’s inventive uses of electronic music with a standard symphony orchestra went on to have considerable influence. None of these works, it appears, are likely to be heard anywhere in America this year, with one sort-of exception.

Advertisement

An explanation for that may be that, while 1976 was a fraught time for America — the country was recovering from the Vietnam War, we had a president and vice president who were not elected, there was runaway inflation, etc. — the music of the time represented optimism. Many works around the country explored new electronic music technology. It was the year Glass wrote “Einstein on the Beach” and Steve Reich created “Music for 18 Musicians” — the composers’ first masterpieces — demonstrating that Minimalism mattered.

That sense of liberation is clearly behind Del Tredici’s “Final Alice,” an hourlong romp around the ending of “Alice in Wonderland” for superhuman soprano and orchestra. It is so obsessively and addictively wild that its tamest moments sound like Richard Strauss on LSD. It does have a cult following although performances are few and far between.

Cage’s score is an abstract work based on the Japanese form of collective poetry known as renga, in which each poet attempts to write a line that is as distant as possible in meaning from the preceding line. Cage translates that to an independence of instrumental parts. While “Renga” can be performed alone Cage further suggests it be played along with an actual bicentennial work he wrote separately, “Apartment House 1776.” That is what Boston and the other orchestras did.

Indeed, “Apartment House” got the lion’s share of bicentennial attention and ridicule. When Zubin Mehta conducted it at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, the L.A. Philharmonic did not take it seriously and many walked out on it.

The work features four vocal soloists who represent Native American, Sephardic, African American and Protestant religious traditions, along with instrumental music based on early American hymn tunes. Everything is cut up and put together through chance operations into what Cage called a Musicircus. Under the circumstances “Renga” was hardly noticed, although two decades later, “Renga” came into its own when Michael Tilson Thomas famously conducted it with the San Francisco Symphony and the surviving members of the Grateful Dead.

Advertisement

Still the idea that “Apartment House” need not stand alone, that our traditions and those of long-ago Japan belong together, represented for Cage a future for America. We need not act like a superpower, he noted, but merely be one nation, no more and no less, among many.

We are obviously not that nation. A half-century later, “Apartment House” tends to exist mainly in its own right. An excellent London new music ensemble calls itself Apartment House. Detroit Opera recently staged it with a 2026 need to give the singers the opportunity to select their own music rather than reflect on our heritage. If American music in 1976 represented a collective, inquisitive, inventive American spirit of discovery, the semiquincentennial in the age of social media has become more about the individual identity.

As a sign of how we think about ourselves, the Los Angeles Philharmonic begins its Hollywood Bowl season five days after the 4th with a program of American music conducted by Thomas Wilkins that opens with Valery Coleman’s “Fanfare for Uncommon Times,” which was written five years ago.

But for now, the work that stands out is Lang’s “the wealth of nations.” It balances harsh thoughts of how the promise of capitalism has failed society and how racism remains with music of stunning beauty and glory, to gently but forcefully show us, in our age of American dissatisfaction, the direction in which we might go to make us proud again. It needs many performances.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sender

Published

on

Sender

In Sender, writer-director Russell Goldman’s high-anxiety debut, the filmmaker expands on his 2022 short Return to Sender, in which Allison Tolman starred as a woman who receives packages she didn’t order. That may not sound like a premise that would result in a paranoid, darkly comedic thriller, much less a feature. But in extending his story from 18 minutes to just over 90, Goldman follows a maddening scenario involving an online retailer called Smirk, a fictionalized Amazon counterpart. More significantly, he captures the frenzied mindset of his protagonist, who grapples with staying sober and several other major life changes—all compounded by a layer of justifiable paranoia brought on by the endless packages. Goldman’s tweaky style and elusive scripting create a peculiar, out-of-whack presentation that destabilizes the viewer, firmly placing us in his main character’s perspective. However, by the end, the journey through this cine-manic headspace doesn’t add up to much, and the potential character study at the center feels somewhat lost in the mechanics of the conspiracy. 

Britt Lower (AppleTV’s Severance) stars as Julia, who has just lost her job and moved into a rental home to get her life on track. She is backed financially by her overbearing sister Tatiana (Anna Baryshnikov), who occasionally comes nosing around to verify that Julia doesn’t backslide. And she doesn’t. Julia attends regular Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, where she meets the steely Whitney (Rhea Seehorn), who isn’t interested in being her sponsor. But at home, Julia receives a Smirk package with her brand of lipstick. The problem? She didn’t order it. She calls customer service, and the representative doesn’t help much before telling her, “Be sure to stay alert and aware.” Wait, what? Sender is loaded with nagging, unplaceable details like this. They’re often amusing, intriguing, and exasperating in the same moment. But these pieces don’t complete a whole picture, at least not a narratively satisfying one. 

The Smirk packages, delivered by the outwardly helpful, nice-guy driver Charlie (David Dastmalchian), contain a random assortment of objects, from drum kits to protein powder. The squirrelly Julia, already coming apart at the seams from her recent drama, doesn’t know what to make of it. She’s convinced there’s some plot against her, perhaps by someone at Smirk. To what end, she doesn’t know. But Goldman gives us a glimpse of the long-term consequences of her ordeal in the prologue, which features Jamie Lee Curtis (also a producer) as Lisa, a woman in circumstances similar to Julia’s. Lisa’s response to receiving a box of soil with a broken shin pad (with “Can’t Can’t Can” scrawled on it) entails an attempt to suffocate herself with the bubble wrap, only to do far worse with a sharp edge of the shin pad. To show Lisa’s fate, Goldman’s imagery becomes twisted and surreal but also cryptic. 

Sender’s disorienting mood is matched by a skewed formal presentation. Cinematographer Gemma Doll-Grossman’s wide-angle lenses and arch angles might feel at home in a Ken Russell or Terry Gilliam feature such as The Devils (1971) or 12 Monkeys (1996). Julia’s half-remembered drinking binges, accented by blurry close-ups, suggest she may have slept with any number of coworkers. She can’t remember, and it embarrasses her. Her rental is dressed in simple if shabby décor, which gives way to Julia’s erratic collage-like overhaul. Melisa Myers’ stuffed production design makes the most of heightened colors and banal, cluttered rooms that lend a normality to the bizarre, ever more disturbing predicament. Nathan Ruyle’s erratic music delivers what must be described as a soundscape rather than a traditional score, with collusive sound effects and tones driving our certainty that Julia is onto something. Along with Marco Rosas’ discordant editing, Goldman’s technical approach effectively reflects Julia’s fragmented, sleep-deprived mind. But his work as a writer hasn’t done enough to justify this level of technique. 

After Julia makes a revelatory discovery that small cameras have been embedded in the products from those mysterious packages, the eventual explanation about what has been happening and why strains logic and underwhelms. It also raises even more unanswered questions. Although well-made and acted—Lower and Seehorn should be on track to movie stardom—Goldman’s script could have used another draft to better work through what unfolds. Sender doesn’t give us enough of its characters’ inner lives beyond the situation at hand, so Julia, Charlie, Tatiana, and Whitney feel like devices in a scenario rather than well-drawn human beings. Even so, Goldman fills his film with deeply broken people who try to gain control of their lives by controlling others, exposing and preying on their weaknesses. Despite the material’s potential resonance, Goldman’s style is overpowering. Still, his kernel of an idea and the way he explores it demonstrate his clear skill, and for much of Sender, its sheer oddball energy earns admiration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Danny Glover reveals Alzheimer’s diagnosis, says family has his back

Published

on

Danny Glover reveals Alzheimer’s diagnosis, says family has his back

“Lethal Weapon” star Danny Glover has revealed he has been living with Alzheimer’s disease for years.

In an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt that aired on the “Today” show on Wednesday, the 79-year-old actor and activist opened up about living with the disease. According to People, he received his diagnosis in 2023, which was not long after he was awarded an honorary Oscar in 2022.

“I could live with it, in a sense,” Glover says of his condition, which has been affecting his movement, speech and memory. “I’m sure as it advances, things are going to be different and changing.”

A neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer’s is a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior and worsens over time, according to the Alzheimer’s Assn. Holt reports that more than 7 million Americans over 65 are living with Alzheimer’s, with Black men suffering at a rate double the national average.

Advertisement

Glover and his family say the Hollywood icon is sharing his story now to “have ownership of his life” and to help remove the stigma around the disease.

“They’ve got my back,” Glover says of his family’s support.

Besides his portrayal of L.A. police Det. Roger Murtaugh in the “Lethal Weapon” film series, Glover is known for roles in movies including “Places in the Heart” (1984), “The Color Purple” (1985), “To Sleep With Anger” (1990), “Angels in the Outfield” (1994), “Dreamgirls” (2006) and “The Last Black Man in San Francisco” (2019). He’s also been a vocal advocate for social justice and humanitarian causes both in the U.S. and abroad.

He was the recipient of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award in 2022.

“I don’t feel like it’s the end of my life,” he said in his interview with People about living with Alzheimer’s. “There’s work to do.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending