Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Weekend film reviews: ‘I.S.S.,’ ‘The Kitchen,’ ‘Founder’s Day’

Published

on

Weekend film reviews: ‘I.S.S.,’ ‘The Kitchen,’ ‘Founder’s Day’

The latest film releases are I.S.S., The End We Start From, The Kitchen, and Founder’s Day. Weighing in are Katie Walsh, film reviewer for the Tribune News Service, the Los Angeles Times, and The Wrap; and William Bibbiani, film critic and co-host of the podcast Canceled Too Soon and The Critically Acclaimed Network.

I.S.S.

In this science fiction thriller, the U.S. and Russia are each trying to take over the International Space Station. Academy Award winner Ariana DeBose and Chris Messina play astronauts who watch a war break out on Earth below them. 

Walsh: “There’s three American astronauts and three Russian cosmonauts on this International Space Station and they each receive a separate message … to take control of the space station as they see this crazy nuclear attack happen on the planet below them. 

But the most tension comes not from action sequences. But there’s a conversation where two astronauts are making a sandwich, and you’re on the edge of your seat because everything becomes so loaded and so meaningful. … Is this person manipulating me? Is this person going to pull something? Because in the beginning of the movie, we see that they’ve all developed this really nice friendship. … It’s this happy unity. But it’s an interesting reflection of what happens on the earth … happens on the space station in microcosm.”

Bibbiani: “What we’ve got here is a great concept and a pretty darn good cast. And I think it struggles to be a thriller when it tries to actually give you the thrills. There’s a sequence in the movie, for example, where two people are trying to fight, and there might be a fight to the death. And it’s in zero gravity. And it’s hard to make that look exciting or intimidating because of the very nature of everyone floating around helplessly.”

Advertisement

The End We Start From

This British survival thriller follows a woman and her newborn baby who are trying to get home amid an environmental disaster in London. It stars Jodie Comer and is based on the 2017 book of the same name. 

Bibbiani: “I am of the belief that there are only three kinds of movies. There are post-apocalyptic movies; there are pre-apocalyptic movies, which is most movies; and then there’s mid-apocalyptic movies. And this is a mid-apocalyptic movie. And I find those to be the most depressing because you actually get to see how everything falls apart. I found this movie very thoughtful, and I thought the performances were very sensitive and endearing. But it’s one of those things where I’m watching this and I’m just like, ‘So no real hope then?’” 

Walsh: “It was hard to watch at times because it feels very realistic, not only in the fact that it is torrential flooding … but also in the way that you see society break down. These shelters, the scarcity of food causing people to get really desperate, the way some people just run away and isolate themselves from it. …  I think Jodie Comer is probably one of the best actors working today. She’s incredible in this film, and she basically hikes all over England with a baby strapped to her chest. So it’s quite a performance.” 

The Kitchen

Advertisement

This dystopian drama is set in London, where there’s an enormous gap between the rich and poor, and all social housing is gone. Residents of a community called The Kitchen refuse to abandon their homes.

Bibbiani: “Class disparity has led some people to live in … very solace but very beautiful, well-maintained buildings, and everyone else is living in basically this part of the city that is just falling apart. But it’s their home. And in an effort to basically take all of that land from squatters, there are just random raids all the time, just to drag people away, and then we never see them again. It’s very bleak.

… The world itself … isn’t a world that we haven’t seen before. … I don’t see anything here that couldn’t have come across in a short. It just feels really padded. And unfortunately, it’s just not very engaging either in its plot or its characters, so I was disappointed.”

Founder’s Day

This slasher film is set days ahead of a highly contested mayoral election, as a series of murders begin to unfold in a small town. The killer? Someone wearing a powdered George Washington-style wig and wildling a gavel. 

Advertisement

Walsh: “It’s the most formulaic slasher I’ve ever seen. It’s also about 20 minutes too long. And I did not find this compelling at all. It’s like they know slasher movies so well, they know them too well because everything just unfolds beat by beat by beat exactly how you kind of think it will.”

Bibbiani: “The thing about slasher movies and the thing about any kind of formulaic movie whether it’s slashers, romantic comedies, is that genre gives you a skeleton, and on top of that skeleton, you’re supposed to put something fresh, a new coat of paint here. … The way that it tries to tie this all into some sort of political statement is really thin. And I don’t think it really gets at all of the divisiveness and all of the real anger at the heart of a lot of modern political discourse, which can be, and has been, the source for excellent horror movies before. The entire Purge series is based on how angry we are politically right now and really spoke to the moment for better and mostly worse.” 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

‘Marty Supreme’

Directed by Josh Safdie (R)

★★★★

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Joe Carnahan was a sagacious choice to co-write and direct the engrossing and visceral survival thriller “Not Without Hope,” given Carnahan’s track record of delivering gripping and gritty actioners, including early, stylish crime thrillers such as “Narc” (2002) and “Smokin’ Aces” (2006), and the absolutely badass and bonkers Liam Neeson v Giant Wolves epic “The Grey” (2011).

Based on the non-fiction book of the same name, “Not Without Hope” plunges us into the stormy waters of the Gulf of Mexico for the majority of the film, and delivers a breathtaking and harrowing dramatic re-creation of the 2009 accident that left four friends, including two NFL players, clinging to their single-engine boat and fighting for their lives. The survival-at-sea story here is a familiar one, told in films such as “White Squall,” “The Perfect Storm,” and “Adrift,” and the screenplay by Carnahan and E. Nicholas Mariani leans into well-worn tropes and, at times, features cliché-ridden dialogue. Still, this is a well-paced and powerful work, thanks to the strong performances by the ensemble cast, some well-placed moments of character introspection, and the documentary-style, water-level camerawork by Juanmi Azpiroz.

Zachary Levi (the TV series “Chuck,” the “Shazam!” movies) is best known for comedy and light action roles. Still, he delivers solid, straightforward, and effective dramatic work as Nick Schuyler, a personal trainer who helps his friends Marquis Cooper (Quentin Plair) and Corey Smith (Terrence Terrell), two journeyman NFL players, get ready for another season. When their pal Will Bleakley (Marshall Cook) shows up at a barbecue and announces he has just been laid off from his financial firm, he’s invited to join the trio the next morning on a day-trip fishing trip from Clearwater, FL., into the Gulf of Mexico. (The casting is a bit curious, as the four lead actors are 10-20 years older than the ages of the real-life individuals they’re playing — but all four are in great shape, and we believe them as big, strong, physically and emotionally tough guys.)

We can see the longtime bond between these four in the early going, though we don’t learn much about their respective stories before the fishing trip. Kudos Carnahan and the studio for delivering a film that earns its R rating, primarily for language and intense action; the main characters are jocks and former jocks, and they speak with the casual, profanity-laced banter favored by many an athlete. (Will, describing the sandwiches he’s made for the group: “I got 20 f*cking PB&Js, and 20 f*cking turkey and cheese.”) There’s no sugarcoating the way these guys talk—and the horrors they wind up facing on the seas.

The boat is about 70 miles off the coast of Clearwater when the anchor gets stuck, and the plan to thrust the boat forward to dislodge it backfires, resulting in the vessel capsizing and the men being thrown overboard. Making matters worse, their cell phones were all sealed away in a plastic bag in the cabin, and a ferocious storm was approaching. With title cards ticking off the timeline (“13 Hours Lost at Sea,” “20 Hours Lost at Sea,” “42 Hours Lost at Sea”), we toggle back and forth between the men frantically trying to turn over the boat, keep warm, signal faraway ships, battling hunger and thirst, and the dramas unfolding on land. Floriana Lima as Nick’s fiancée, Paula, and Jessica Blackmore as Coop’s wife, Rebekah, do fine work in the obligatory Wait-by-the-Phone roles.

Advertisement

It’s terrific to see JoBeth Williams still lighting up the screen some 40 years after her “Big Chill” and “Poltergeist” days, delivering powerful work as Nick’s mother, Marcia, who refuses to believe her son is gone even as the odds of survival dwindle with each passing hour. Josh Duhamel also excels in the role of the real-life Captain Timothy Close, who oversaw the rescue efforts from U.S. Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg. At one point, Close delivers a bone-chilling monologue about what happens when hypothermia sets in—“hallucinations, dementia, rage…eventually, it breaks your mind in half”—a point driven home when we see what’s happening to those men at sea. It’s savage and brutal, and heartbreaking.

Given this was such a highly publicized story that took place a decade and a half ago, it’s no spoiler to sadly note there was only one survivor of the accident, with the other three men lost to the sea. Each death is treated with unblinking honesty and with dignity, as when the natural sounds fade at one point, and we hear just the mournful score. With Malta standing in for the Gulf of Mexico and the actors giving everything they have while spending most of the movie in the water and soaked to the bone, “Not Without Hope” is a respectful and impactful dramatic interpretation that feels true to the real-life events.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Published

on

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Selected by Tajikistan but ultimately not accepted by the Academy to compete in the Oscar international feature category, “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” begins ambitiously, with a famous quote from playwright Anton Chekhov about setups and payoffs — about how if a gun is established in a story, it must go off. Moments later, an inviting long take involving a young man selling an antique rifle ends in farcical tragedy, signaling an equally farcical series of events that grow stranger and stranger. The film, by Iranian director Shahram Mokri, folds in on itself in intriguing (albeit protracted) ways, warping its meta-fictional boundaries until they supersede its characters, or any underlying meaning.

Still, it’s a not-altogether-uninteresting exercise in exploring the contours of storytelling, told through numerous thematically interconnected vignettes. The opening Chekhov quote, though it might draw one’s attention to minor details that end up insignificant, ensures a heightened awareness of the movie’s artifice, until the film eventually pulls back and becomes a tale of its own making. But en route to this semi-successful postmodern flourish, its character drama is enticing enough on its own, with hints of magical realism. It begins with the tale of a badly injured upper-class woman, Sara (Hasti Mohammai), discovering that her car accident has left her with the ability to communicate with household objects.

Sara’s bandages need changing, and the stench of her ointment becomes a quick window into her relationships. Her distant husband rejects her; her boisterous stepdaughter is more frank, but ultimately accepting; her gardener and handyman stays as diplomatic as he can. However, the film soon turns the gunfire payoff in its prologue into a broader setup of its own, as a delivery man shows up at Sara’s gate, insisting that she accept delivery for an object “the deceased man” has paid for.

Mokri eventually returns to this story (through a slightly tilt-shifted lens), but not before swerving headfirst into a seemingly unrelated saga of extras on a film set and a superstitious prop master, Babak (Babak Karimi), working on a shot-for-shot remake of an Iranian classic. A mix of rapid-fire Tajik, Persian and Russian dialogue creates dilemma upon dilemma when Babak’s ID goes missing, preventing him from being able to thoroughly check the prop ammunition for an assassination scene.

Danger begins to loom — a recent Alec Baldwin case even warrants a mention on-screen — as the notion of faulty firearms yanks Chekhov’s wisdom front and center once more, transforming it from a writing tip into a phantasmagorical inevitability. In keeping with the previous story, the props even communicate with each other (through subtitles) and begin gossiping about what might come to pass.

Advertisement

After establishing these narrative parameters through unbroken, fluid shots filmed at a sardonic distance, Mokri soon begins playing mischievous temporal games. He finds worthwhile excuses to revisit scenes from either different angles or with a slightly altered aesthetic approach — with more proximity and intimacy — in order to highlight new elements of his mise-en-scène. What’s “real” and “fictional,” even within the movie’s visual parlance, begins to blur in surreal ways, largely pivoting around Babak simply trying to do his job. However, the more this tale engorges through melodic, snaking takes, the more it circles around a central point, rather than approaching it.

The film’s own expanse becomes philosophically limiting, even though it remains an object of curiosity. When it’s all said and done, the playfulness on display in “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” is quite remarkable, even if the story’s contorting framework seldom amounts to much, beyond drawing attention to itself. It’s cinema about cinema in a manner that, on one hand, lives on the surface, but on the other hand, invites you to explore its texture in ways few other movies do.

Continue Reading

Trending