Connect with us

Movie Reviews

SEE HOW THEY RUN

Published

on

SEE HOW THEY RUN
SEE HOW THEY RUN is a thriller comedy set in 1953 London. An alcoholic detective and his rookie feminine assistant examine the homicide of a Hollywood director. The homicide occurred on the theater the place Agatha Christie’s play THE MOUSETRAP is celebrating the primary anniversary of its profitable run. Scotland Yard assigns world-weary Inspector Stoppard to the homicide case, however he’s irritated when his boss appoints a rookie policewoman, Constable Stalker, to shadow him. Can Stoppard keep sober sufficient to seek out Leo’s killer earlier than she or he kills once more?

SEE HOW THEY RUN is a humorous, droll comedy. Followers of conventional English mysteries will get pleasure from it. That mentioned, it’s generally a bit of gradual. Sam Rockwell is a kick because the world-weary lead inspector, and Saoirse (“Sur-sha”) Ronan can also be enjoyable as Constable Stalker. They’ve good chemistry collectively. SEE HOW THEY RUN has an ethical worldview inherit in the primary plot, which entails the uncovering of a assassin. Nevertheless, there’s some foul language in see how they run, plus allusions to an effeminate male character’s homosexuality. So, MOVIEGUIDE® advises warning for older kids.

(BB, C, Ho, RH, LL, VV, S, AA, D, M):

Dominant Worldview and Different Worldview Content material/Parts:

Ethical worldview in a comical setting a couple of homicide investigation, throughout which one character dangers their life for one more character, however there are solutions that one male character is gay, although it’s not strongly overt, and there’s some revisionist historical past the place an actual life higher class Englishman is performed by a black actor

Advertisement

Foul Language:

Eight obscenities (together with two or three “s” phrases and two “h” phrases), two GD profanities, seven mild profanities (similar to OMG and OG)

Violence:

Two characters get right into a battle, one character is hit from behind and killed, and there’s some gunplay on the climax

Intercourse:

Advertisement

No intercourse scenes however there are some references to adultery and one male character is quite effeminate and advised to be a gay

Nudity:

No nudity

Alcohol Use:

Alcohol use, plus a personality will get topsy as soon as and drunk as soon as

Advertisement

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

Smoking however no medicine; and,

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Jealousy, revenge.

SEE HOW THEY RUN is a thriller comedy set in London in 1953 the place an alcoholic Scotland Yard detective and his rookie feminine assistant examine the homicide of a Hollywood director on the theater the place Agatha Christie’s play THE MOUSETRAP is celebrating the primary anniversary of its tremendously profitable run. SEE HOW THEY RUN is a humorous, droll comedy that followers of conventional English mysteries will get pleasure from, however there’s some foul language and woke casting that requires warning.

Advertisement

The film opens the evening of the one-year anniversary in 1953 of the opening of well-known thriller author Agatha Christie’s profitable play THE MOUSETRAP. Some Hollywood filmmakers, who wish to flip the play right into a film, are attending the anniversary, together with the producer, the screenwriter and the director, Leo Kopernick, an obnoxious man performed by Adrian Brody.

In the course of the get together, Leo picks a battle with the play’s star, Richard Attenborough (sure, that Richard Attenborough). He tackles “Dickie,” and so they each slam into the anniversary. After the battle, Dickie goes to the basement to retrieve a brand new swimsuit to put on. Whereas he’s there, nevertheless, an nameless determine wearing an overcoat and a hat slung down low over his head conks him on the top and kills him. The killer then phases Leo’s lifeless physique on the sofa on the set above.

World-weary Scotland Yard Inspector Stoppard is assigned to the homicide case, however he’s irritated when his boss appoints a rookie policewoman, Constable Stalker, to shadow him on the case. Stoppard’s annoyance will increase when Constable Stalker retains leaping to conclusions concerning the suspects. In the meantime, Stoppard retains on sneaking drinks throughout their investigation.

Can Stoppard keep sober sufficient to seek out Leo’s killer earlier than she or he kills once more?

SEE HOW THEY RUN is a humorous, droll comedy that followers of conventional English mysteries will get pleasure from. That mentioned, it’s generally a bit of gradual. Nevertheless, Sam Rockwell is a kick because the world-weary lead inspector, and Saoirse (“Sur-sha”) Ronan can also be enjoyable as Constable Stalker. They’ve good chemistry collectively.

Advertisement

SEE HOW THEY RUN has ethical worldview inherit in the primary plot, which entails the uncovering of a assassin. Nevertheless, it has some foul language and a few allusions to an effeminate male character’s homosexuality. So, MOVIEGUIDE® advises warning for older kids.

On a facet observe, the filmmakers have determined to do some woke casting. For instance, the screenwriter is performed by the good black actor from Britain, David Oyelowo, whose character is a bit effeminate. This isn’t annoying, however the filmmakers have turned Agatha Christie’s second husband right into a black Englishman, when he was a really white, higher class Englishman. This type of casting is simply weird, an annoying instance of left-wing revisionist historical past. Leftists and communists are recognized for his or her sickening makes an attempt to vary historic details for ideological causes.

Now greater than ever we’re bombarded by darkness in media, films, and TV. Movieguide® has fought again for nearly 40 years, working inside Hollywood to propel uplifting and optimistic content material. We’re proud to say we’ve collaborated with among the prime business gamers to affect and redeem leisure for Jesus. Nonetheless, essentially the most influential individual in Hollywood is you. The viewer.

What you take heed to, watch, and skim has energy. Movieguide® needs to provide the sources to empower the nice and the gorgeous. However we will’t do it alone. We’d like your assist.

You may make a distinction with as little as $7. It takes solely a second. In the event you can, contemplate supporting our ministry with a month-to-month reward. Thanks.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Black Dog: Chinese director Guan Hu makes Cannes debut

Published

on

Black Dog: Chinese director Guan Hu makes Cannes debut

2.5/5 stars

Black Dog begins with all the trappings of a revenge Western. Set in a godforsaken town where bad guys roam around with impunity, it revolves around a reticent man returning home after a decade-long absence to confront his sworn enemies.

It also seems to have everything in place for a political allegory. Juxtaposing images of crumbling tenements with incessant radio news bulletins about the Beijing Olympics, the story, set in 2008, could offer commentary about the clash of reality and dreams in 21st century China.

As it turns out, Guan Hu’s film is neither. From the big bang of its first half-hour, Black Dog is slowly reduced to a whimper, as what was set up to be a hard-boiled genre film turns into a sentimental relationship drama about a wayward man’s attempt to connect with his family, friends, foes and his new four-legged buddy.

Having transformed himself from a Sixth Generation indie filmmaker to a master of battle-heavy blockbusters like The Eight Hundred and The Sacrifice, Guan begins Black Dog with what is arguably the most stunning set piece in mainland Chinese cinema so far this year.
Somewhere amid the tumbleweed-filled steppes of northwest China, hundreds of dogs run down a mountain towards a remote road, causing a travelling bus to flip over. Among those who crawl from the debris is Lang (Eddie Peng Yu-yan), a mysterious, taciturn ex-convict returning home after a decade away.

Settling into his long-abandoned home, his past returns to haunt him in the form of the local butcher, who accused Lang of having caused his nephew’s death.

Advertisement
A still from Black Dog.

But the bad guy in town is Yao (Jia Zhangke), the chain-smoking leader of a bunch of “dog management officers” who capture strays and steal pets in order to resell them elsewhere for a profit.

Lang joins Yao to earn some hard cash, only to find his humanity flickering back to life when he forms a bond with a raging, rabies-stricken hound. This inspires him to reconcile with his adversaries, his ailing zoo-master father and his younger self.

While there’s nothing wrong with Guan’s decision to steer a fatalistic tale towards a happy ending, the change of tone does Peng few favours, as he is forced to reprise the kind of gawky man-child role he has been typecast in for just too long.

A still from Black Dog, set in the steppes of northwest China.

Meanwhile, the flood of positive energy in the second half of the film renders its remarkable set design evoking doom and gloom irrelevant. The same can be said even of apparently important characters: Dong Liya’s circus acrobat, for example, is left with nothing to do as the prospect of forming a relationship with Lang evaporates.

The canines are cute, though – and for some, perhaps, that is Black Dog’s main draw.

Want more articles like this? Follow SCMP Film on Facebook
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Kinds of Kindness: Poor Things director at his most elusive

Published

on

Kinds of Kindness: Poor Things director at his most elusive

In the first, “The Death of R.M.F.”, Jesse Plemons plays Robert, a man who appears in thrall to Raymond (Willem Dafoe), who sets Robert’s agenda, from his diet to his sexual encounters.

In the second, “R.M.F. Is Flying”, Plemons plays Daniel, a cop whose wife Liz (Emma Stone) has gone missing; when she returns, he is convinced she is an imposter.

Finally, in “R.M.F. Eats a Sandwich”, Stone plays Emily, a woman who seeks out a cult leader (Dafoe) for a spiritual and sexual awakening.

Hong Chau in a still from Kinds of Kindness. Photo: Atsushi Nishijima

Inevitably, as is the case with most portmanteau films, one episode stands out – in this case “The Death of R.M.F.”, which has an unnerving quality to it.

The second instalment is the most shocking, featuring Liz and Daniel sitting around with friends (Mamoudou Athie and Margaret Qualley) watching a highly explicit sex tape the four of them made.

Advertisement

Bringing up the rear is the final short, which rather drags with its depictions of sweat lodges, bodily contamination, and Stone skidding around in her cool-looking Dodge Challenger.

With Hong Chau (The Whale) and Joe Alwyn (who featured in Lanthimos’ The Favourite) also appearing, it is undoubtedly a fine cast, one led by Plemons, who truly understands how to perform in the Lanthimos style.

Stone, now on her third movie with the Greek director, seems to relish the extremes she gets to go to.

(From left) Willem Dafoe, Jesse Plemons and Hong Chau in a still from Kinds of Kindness. Photo: Atsushi Nishijima

Quite what it all means, however, is another thing entirely. The characters seem to be in states of crisis, with miscarriage a common theme.

Looking at humanity in all its weirdness, Kinds of Kindness is a baffling film to take in, as abrasive as its musical score from Jerskin Fendrix, who performed similar tricks on Poor Things.

Certainly, compared to his more accessible films, such as The Favourite and Poor Things, this feels like Lanthimos at his most elusive and frustrating.

Want more articles like this? Follow SCMP Film on Facebook
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes’ Review: A Legend Opens Up in Nanette Burstein’s Engaging HBO Doc Based on Rediscovered Audio Recordings

Published

on

‘Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes’ Review: A Legend Opens Up in Nanette Burstein’s Engaging HBO Doc Based on Rediscovered Audio Recordings

A celebrity from the age of 11, Elizabeth Taylor was practiced at public relations for almost all her life, so there aren’t many personal revelations in Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes. But Nanette Burstein‘s elegantly constructed documentary, mostly in Taylor’s own words backed by illuminating archival images, works as a lively bit of film history about movie stardom in the volatile 1960s as the studio system was fading and the media exploding.

The film — which premiered at Cannes in the Cannes Classics sidebar — is based on 40 hours of recently rediscovered audiotapes, recordings Taylor made in the mid-1960s for a ghost-written memoir (long out of print). It was the most frenzied moment of her fame, when she was coming off the paparazzi-fueled scandal that was Cleopatra. Taylor, who died in 2011, recalls her many marriages — four when she made these recordings, since she was on the first of two to Richard Burton — and her career, from her start as a child in Lassie Come Home (1943) through her Oscar-winning performance in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966).

Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Tapes

The Bottom Line

An entertaining if unsurprising time capsule.

Advertisement

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Cannes Classics)
Cast: Elizabeth Taylor
Director: Nanette Burstein
Writers: Nanette Burstein, Tal Ben-David

1 hour 41 minutes

As she did in Hillary, about Hillary Clinton, and The Kid Stays in the Picture, based on Robert Evans’ autobiography, Burstein stays out of her celebrity subject’s way. Taylor’s voice is playful, almost girlish. Occasionally she is blunt, but more often seems cautiously aware of being recorded. Richard Meryman, the Life magazine reporter doing the interviews, is heard asking questions at times, but Taylor is firmly in control, at least on the surface.

Beneath that you can tell how beautifully Burstein and her editor and co-writer, Tal Ben-David, shaped the visuals. The archival photos and news clips offer a telling backdrop of images and sound bites, often more informative than what Taylor says — from shots of crowds filling the streets of London to see her on the day of her second wedding, to the actor Michael Wilding, to film of her in mourning black at the funeral of her beloved third husband, the producer Mike Todd, who died in a plane crash. The visual exceptions are the clichéd, recurring establishing shots of an old-fashioned reel-to-reel tape recorder, next to a martini glass.

Advertisement

Moving chronologically, Taylor begins with her desire to act even as a child. Photos from that time offer a reminder that she was always astonishingly beautiful. These early sections are fine but bland. She was too young to be married the first time, to Nicky Hilton, she says, and the second marriage just didn’t work out. George Stevens gave her subtle direction and bolstered her confidence when she made A Place in the Sun (1951). When she made Giant with him five years later, he berated her, telling her she was just a movie star and not an actress, a charge that often dogged her.

Taylor becomes sporadically more biting as the film goes on, displaying a sharp-tongued wit and personality. That is particularly true when she talks about her marriage to Eddie Fisher, the first of her marital scandals, covered endlessly in tabloids. It was public knowledge that Fisher and his wife, Debbie Reynolds, were the Todds’ best friends. Shortly after Mike Todd’s death, Fisher left his wife, whose image was always cheery and wholesome, for Taylor. “I can’t say anything against Debbie,” Taylor sweetly says on the tape, and without taking a breath goes on, “But she put on such an act, with the pigtails and the diaper pins.” She says of Fisher, “I don’t remember too much about my marriage to him except it was one big frigging awful mistake.”

Burstein includes some enlightening sidelights from that period. A news clip of the recently married couple has them surrounded by journalists on the steps of a plane, with one reporter asking Fisher about his bride, “Can she cook?” Even as a tease, who would dare say that now?

That fuss was nothing next to Cleopatra (1963), now notorious as the film so over-budget it almost bankrupted 20th Century Fox, and the set on which Taylor and Burton, each married to other people, indiscreetly sparked to each other from the start. The Vatican newspaper weighed in on the affair, disapprovingly. Taylor says her own father called her “a whore.” In one of the film’s more telling scenes, she says of their affair, “Richard and I, we tried to be what is considered ‘good,’ but it didn’t work,” a comment that at once plays into the moralistic language of her day and resists it. These signs of Taylor’s savvy awareness of herself as a public personality are the film’s most intriguing, if scattershot, moments.

The film also shows how besieged the couple was by the paparazzi, at a turning point in celebrity culture. Occasionally other voices are heard in archival audio, and in this section George Hamilton says of the press, “They were not going for glamour anymore. They were going for the destruction of glamour,” suggesting a longing for the old pre-packaged studio publicity days. But Taylor herself is never heard complaining. A realist, she made hiding from the paparazzi into a game for her children so they wouldn’t be frightened.

Advertisement

The recordings end at the point where she is assuring Meryman that she and Burton would be together for 50 years. The film then takes a quick trot through the rest of her days, including rehab at the Betty Ford Center and raising money for AIDS research. But the last word should have been Taylor’s. There is a private Elizabeth, she says. “The other Elizabeth, the famous one, really has no depth or meaning to me. It is a commodity that makes money.” The movie star Taylor is the one who most often comes through in the film, but that is engaging enough.

Continue Reading

Trending