Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Sankranthiki Vasthunnam Review – Gulte

Published

on

Sankranthiki Vasthunnam Review – Gulte

2.75/5


2 Hr 24 Mins   |   Family   |   14-01-2025


Cast – Venkatesh, Meenakshi Chaudhary, Aishwarya Rajesh, Srinivasa Reddy, Naresh, Sai Kumar, Upendra Limaye, VTV Ganesh, Srinivas Avasarala and others

Director – Anil Ravipudi

Advertisement

Producer – Dil Raju

Banner – Sri Venkateswara Creations

Music – Bheems Ceciroleo

Advertisement

After delivering a blockbuster with ‘F2’ and a hit with ‘F3’, Victory Venkatesh and Anil Ravipudi teamed for the third time with, Sankranthiki Vasthunnam, to score a hat-trick of successful films in their combination. With a chartbuster song ‘Godari Gattu Meeda’ and a huge round of promotions including reels, etc., the team managed to generate very good buzz around the film. Did Venkatesh & Anil Ravipudi score a hat-trick in their combination? Did Dil Raju manage to score a hit at the box office after a series of disappointing films? Did Venkatesh get back onto the success track after a forgettable film, Saindhav, which was released in theatres during the last Sankranthi? Let’s find out with a detailed analysis.

What is it about?

Y D Raju(Venkatesh), an Ex-Cop and an encounter specialist leads a happy life with his wife(Aishwarya Rajesh), four kids and a joint family in a village near Rajahmundry. His Ex-Girlfriend(Meenakshi Chaudhary), a Cop, reaches out to him one fine day and requests him to help the police department perform a secret rescue operation. Who is that Y D Raju and the team have to rescue? Why did Y D Raju’s wife want to be part of the rescue mission? Forms the rest of the story.

Advertisement

Performances:

Victory Venkatesh played a tailor-made role in the film. Y D Raju’s role is a cakewalk for him as he has done many similar roles in the past. He is as usual very good with his comedy timing. His dialogues in the form of a ‘Message’ to men during a fight sequence in the second half, his act as a loveable husband and his act as a husband who gets sandwiched between wife and ex-girlfriend are sure to bring the roofs down in theatres.

Aishwarya Rajesh as an innocent and possessive wife delivered a very good performance. Her performance as an innocent wife in the first half deserves a special mention. Meenakshi Chaudhary as ex-girlfriend and a COP delivered a good performance. Seems like the appreciation she got for her role in ‘Lucky Baskhar’ instilled a lot of confidence in her and that confidence is evident in the way she carried her role beside a senior hero like Venkatesh & a seasoned performer like Aishwarya Rajesh.

The little kid who played the role of Bulliraju is a show stealer. The sequences involving him in the first half are one of the major highlights of the film. Animal Actor, Upendra Limaye, got a meaty role as Jailer but his performance is over-the-top and patience-testing at times. Srinivasa Reddy & Sai Kumar generated a few laughs in the second half and made their presence felt. Naresh & VTV Ganesh have good screen space but not much fun was generated from their roles. Srinivas Avasarala in a crucial role made his presence felt and looked believable in the role of a CEO.

Technicalities:

Advertisement

Songs by Bheems Ceciroleo are the biggest highlight of the film. It is refreshing to hear good old melody songs after a long time in a Telugu film and equally refreshing to hear Ramana Gogula’s vocals after a very long time. The ‘Godari Gattu Meeda’ song is sure to turn theatres into concerts this festive season. Bheems Ceciroleo’s background score is also good.

The cinematography by Sameer Reddy is pretty ordinary. The film is made on a shoestring budget looking at the ordinary visuals at most of the places. Editing by Tammiraju should have been better in the second half and also during the pre-interval. The drama during the pre-interval is good but it should have been better with some crisp editing.

Production values by Sri Venkateswara Creations are adequate. It seems the team made a deliberate decision to make the film on a limited budget and it is evident with the production quality.

Positives:

  1. Two Sequences Involving Bulliraju In The First Half
  2. Songs
  3. Venkatesh Comedy Timing
  4. Aishwarya Rajesh’s Innocent Performance
  5. Pre-Climax Sequence on Venkatesh
  6. Bheems Ceciroleo’s Background Score

Negatives:

  1. Over The Top Sequences In Second Half
  2. Upendra Limaye’s Forced Comedy
  3. Lack of Proper Story
  4. Logicless Writing

Analysis:

Anil Ravipudi is one of the very few directors in Telugu who scored seven back-to-back successful films. Selecting a simple story and mixing it with enough fun moments at regular intervals is his success formula. He followed a similar approach even for ‘Sankranthiki Vasthunnam’.

Advertisement

The first half of the film passes without any major complaints. The film started slowly and the pace of the film picked once the setup shifts to Y D Raju and family. A couple of comedy sequences and a couple of songs worked very well in the first half and it gives a good satisfactory feeling to the audience. The editing during the pre-interval block should have been crisp though. This entire block is dragged for at least two to three minutes.

The good thing about Anil Ravipudi is that he knows the pulse of his target audience very well. The dialogues he wrote for the wife’s character and the innocent sequences he conceived involving husband and wife characters are sure to work out very well among his target audience, that is the families. Especially, the married women are sure to relate with Aishwarya Rajesh’s character and are likely to like her character immensely.

The real problem with the film is the lack of a proper story and over-the-top forced comedy in the second half. There are a few laughs generated in the second half but on the whole, the writing in the second half looked rushed, forced, half-baked and loud. Upendra Limaye’s character in the second half did not work as expected due to poor writing and the loud performance. It seems like the deadline to release the film for ‘Sankranthi’ was not given to the team enough time for writing. Also, the sudden inclusion of ‘Social Message’ related to teachers out of nowhere during the climax of the film seems unnecessary and doesn’t sync well with the rest of the film. Ravipudi and the team should have written and conceived at least one hilarious block on Bulliraju’s character in the second half just like how they used his character in the first half.

You may have to stop using your thinking brain throughout the film and excuse the over-the-top loud comedy in the second half to get entertained. Overall, Sankranthiki Vasthunnam is a decent passable entertainer to watch in theatres with family.

Sankranthiki Vasthunnam – Passable Entertainer

Advertisement

Rating: 2.75/5

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – Cartoon characters can devolve into dullards over time. But some are more enduringly appealing than others, as the adventure “The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants” (Paramount) proves.

Yellow, absorbent and porous on the outside, unflaggingly upbeat SpongeBob (voice of Tom Kenny) is childlike and anxious to please within. He also displays the kind of eagerness for grown-up experiences that is often found in real-life youngsters but that gets him into trouble in this fourth big-screen outing for his character.

Initially, his yearning for maturity takes a relatively harmless form. Having learned that he is now exactly 36 clams tall, the requisite height to ride the immense roller coaster at Captain Booty Beard’s Fun Park, he determines to do so.

Predictably, perhaps, he finds the ride too scary for him. This prompts Mr. Krabs (voice of Clancy Brown), the owner of the Krusty Krab — the fast-food restaurant where SpongeBob works as a cook — to inform his chef that he is still an immature bubble-blowing boy who needs to be tested as a swashbuckling adventurer.

The opportunity for such a trial soon arises with the appearance of the ghostly green Flying Dutchman (voice of Mark Hamill), a pirate whose elaborately spooky lair, the Underworld, is adjacent to SpongeBob’s friendly neighborhood, Bikini Bottom. Subject to a curse, the Dutchman longs to lift it and return to human status.

Advertisement

To do so, he needs to find someone both innocent and gullible to whom he can transfer the spell. SpongeBob, of course, fits the bill.

So the buccaneer lures SpongeBob, accompanied by his naive starfish pal Patrick (voice of Bill Fagerbakke), into a series of challenges designed to prove that the lad has what it takes. Mr. Krabs, the restaurateur’s ill-tempered other employee, Squidward (voice of Rodger Bumpass), and SpongeBob’s pet snail, Gary, all follow in pursuit.

Along the way, SpongeBob and Patrick’s ingenuity and love of carefree play usually succeed in thwarting the Dutchman’s plans.

As with most episodes of the TV series, which premiered on Nickelodeon in 1999, there are sight gags intended either for adults or savvy older children. This time out, though, director Derek Drymon and screenwriters Pam Brady and Matt Lieberman produce mostly misfires.

These include an elaborate gag about Davy Jones’ legendary locker — which, after much buildup, turns out to be an ordinary gym locker. Additionally, in moments of high stress, SpongeBob expels what he calls “my lucky brick.” As euphemistic poop gags go, it’s more peculiar than naughty.

Advertisement

True to form, SpongeBob emerges from his latest escapades smarter, wiser, pleased with his newly acquired skills and with increased loyalty to his friends. So, although the script’s humor may often fall short, the franchise’s beguiling charm remains.

The film contains characters in cartoonish peril and occasional scatological humor. The OSV News classification is A-I – general patronage. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG — parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Housemaid

Published

on

The Housemaid

Too good to be true? Yep, that’s just what Millie’s new job as a housemaid is—and everyone in the audience knows it. What they might not expect, though, is the amount of nudity, profanity and blood The Housemaid comes with. And this content can’t be scrubbed away.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Avatar: Fire and Ash (2025)

Published

on

Movie Review – Avatar: Fire and Ash (2025)

Avatar: Fire and Ash, 2025.

Directed by James Cameron.
Starring Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldaña, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Oona Chaplin, Kate Winslet, Cliff Curtis, Joel David Moore, CCH Pounder, Edie Falco, Brendan Cowell, Jemaine Clement, Giovanni Ribisi, David Thewlis, Britain Dalton, Jack Champion, Trinity Jo-Li Bliss, Jamie Flatters, Bailey Bass, Filip Geljo, Duane Evans Jr., Matt Gerald, Dileep Rao, Daniel Lough, Kevin Dorman, Keston John, Alicia Vela-Bailey, and Johnny Alexander.

SYNOPSIS:

Jake and Neytiri’s family grapples with grief after Neteyam’s death, encountering a new, aggressive Na’vi tribe, the Ash People, who are led by the fiery Varang, as the conflict on Pandora escalates and a new moral focus emerges.

Advertisement

At one point during one of the seemingly endless circular encounters in Avatar: Fire and Ash, (especially if director James Cameron sticks to his plans of making five films in this franchise) former soldier turned blue family man (or family Na’vi?) and protector Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) tells his still-in-pursuit-commander-nemesis-transferred-to-a-Na’vi-body Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang) that the world of Pandora runs deeper than he or anyone imagines, and to open his eyes. It’s part of a plot point in which Jake encourages the villainous Quaritch to change his ways.

More fascinatingly, it comes across as a plea of trust from James Cameron (once again writing the screenplay alongside Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) that there is still much untapped lore and stories to tell in this world. If this repetitive The Way of Water retread is anything to go by, more isn’t justified. Even taken as a spectacle, the unmatched and undeniably stunning visuals (not to mention the most expressive motion capture ever put to screen, movie or video game), that aspect is less impactful, being only two years removed from the last installment rather than a decade, which is not to be confused with less impressive. Fortunately for the film and its gargantuan 3+ hour running time, James Cameron still has enough razzle-dazzle to scoot by here on unparalleled marvel alone, even if the narrative and character expansions are bare-bones.

That’s also what makes it disappointing that this third entry, while introducing a new group dubbed the Ash People led by the strikingly conceptualized Varang (Oona Chaplin) – no one creates scenery-chewing, magnetic, and badass-looking villains quite like James Cameron – and their plight with feeling left behind, rebelling against Pandora religion, Avatar: Fire and Ash is stuck in a cycle of Jake endangering his family (and, by extension, everyone around them) with Quaritch hunting him down for vengeance but this time more fixated on his human son living among them, Spider (Jack Champion) who undergoes a physical transformation that makes him a valuable experiment and, for better or worse, the most important living being in this world. Even the corrupt and greedy marine biologists are back hunting the same godlike sea creatures, leading to what essentially feels like a restaging, if slightly different, riff on the climactic action beat that culminated in last time around.

Worse, whereas The Way of Water had a tighter, more graceful flow from storytelling to spectacle, with sequences extended and drawn out in rapturously entertaining ways, the pacing here is clunkier and frustrating, as every time these characters collide and fight, the story resets and doesn’t necessarily progress. For as much exciting action as there is here, the film also frustratingly starts and stops too much. The last thing I ever expected to type about Avatar: Fire and Ash is that, for all the entrancing technical wizardry on display, fantastical world immersion, and imaginative character designs (complete with occasional macho and corny dialogue that fits, namely since the presentation is in a high frame rate consistently playing like the world’s most expensive gaming cut scene), is often dull.

Yes, everything here, from a special-effects standpoint, is painstakingly crafted, with compelling characters that James Cameron clearly loves (something that shows and allows us to take the story seriously). Staggeringly epic action sequences are worth singling out as in a tier of its own (it’s also a modern movie free from the generally garish and washed-out look of others in this generation), but it’s all in service of a film that is not aware of its strengths, but instead committed to not going anywhere. There are a couple of important details here that one could tell someone before they watch the inevitable Avatar 4, and they will be caught up without needing to watch this. If Avatar: The Way of Water was filler (something I wholeheartedly disagree with), then Avatar: Fire and Ash is nothing. And that’s something that hurts to say.

Advertisement

Without spoiling too much, the single best scene in the entire film has nothing to do with epic-scale warring, but a smoldering courting from Quaritch for Varang and her army of Ash People to join forces with his group. In a film that’s over three hours, it would also have been welcome to focus more on the Ash People, their past, and their current inner workings alongside their perception of Pandora. It’s not a shock that James Cameron can invest viewers into a villain without doing so, but the alternative of watching Jake grapple with militarizing the Na’vi and insisting everyone learn how to use “sky people” firearms while coming to terms with whether or not he can actually protect his family isn’t as engaging; the latter half comes across as déjà vu.

The presence of Spider amplifies the target on everyone’s backs, with Jake convinced the boy needs to return to his world. His significant other Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña), with rage building inside her stemming from the family losing a child in the climax of the previous film, encourages a more aggressive approach and is ready to kill Spider if him being a part of the family threatens their remaining children (with one of them once again a 14-year-old motion captured by Sigourney Weaver, which is not as effective a voice performance this time as there are scenes of loud agony and pain where she sounds her age). The children also get to continue their plot arcs, with similarly slim narrative progression.

Not without glimpses of movie-magic charm and emotional moments would one dare say James Cameron is losing his touch. However, Avatar: Fire and Ash is all the proof anyone needs to question whether five of these are required, as it’s beginning to look more and more as if the world and characters aren’t as rich as the filmmaker believes they are. It’s another action-packed technical marvel with sincere, endearing characters, but the cycling nature of those elements is starting to wear thin and yield diminishing returns.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder

Advertisement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Continue Reading

Trending