Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Night Swim | Reelviews Movie Reviews

Published

on

Night Swim | Reelviews Movie Reviews

Night Swim looks and feels like one of those
throw-away horror films that Blumhouse churns out with regularity. Last year, M3gan
took the January pole position and lapped the pack, stunning with a $30M
opening weekend and final domestic gross of nearly $100M. Night Swim isn’t
expected to do as well – the marketing hasn’t been as aggressive and the film
isn’t as expertly made – but it should fare nicely in the wasteland that is
early January.

Night Swim is primarily a ghost story but, although
director Bryce McGuire (who wrote the screenplay based on a 4-minute short film
he co-made with Rod Blackhurst in 2014) choreographs some creepy water-based
scares (the best of which, as featured in the trailer, involves a game of Marco
Polo), the plot is a mess. The “truth” is unsatisfying and the resolution lacks
impact. The movie is at its best when it’s content with being atmospheric and spooky.
As soon is it starts explaining things, the story goes down the drain with the
water being pumped out of the pool.

The movie opens with an effectively unsettling prologue in which
a young girl (Ayazhan Dalabayeva) has an unfortunate counter while swimming in
a backyard pool. Jumping ahead to the present day, we meet the Waller family:
father Ray (Wyatt Russell), mother Eve (Kerry Condon), daughter Izzy (Amelie
Hoeferle), and son Elliot (Gavin Warren). Ray, a former Major League Baseball
player, is afflicted with a progressive neuromuscular disease (possibly ALS),
and has been recommended with daily water therapy to help with his condition.
So the family buys a house with a backyard pool. And, while his daily swims
seem to cause an almost miraculous improvement to Ray’s health, the other three
family members have less pleasant experiences with the pool, hearing voices, seeing
ghostly apparitions and, in one case, discovering an underground world of
ghouls and ghosts far beneath the surface. While Eve, Izzy, and Elliot come to
believe that the pool is haunted, Ray sees only his physical advances.

I haven’t seen Night Swim’s inspiration but it’s easy
to envision that, denuded of most of its ridiculous plot, this could be fertile
ground for horror. McGuire proves himself to be a more capable director than
writer. By using a variety of lenses and angles, he expands the rather ordinary
setting of an in-ground pool into something vast and potentially dangerous. This
seemingly harmless recreational location becomes fraught with terrifying possibilities,
giving new meaning to the term “deep end.”

The Blumhouse method demands that filmmakers refrain from
hiring “name” actors as a way to lower costs. Although there have been
exceptions (notably Jamie Lee Curtis), most B-grade productions emerging out of
Jason Blum’s warehouse have featured anonymous performers of variable quality. Night
Swim
is no different. While Oscar nominee Kerry Condon is expectedly very
good, crafting a credible character from a thinly-written type, he co-stars
aren’t on the same level. Young actors Amelie Hoeferle and Gavin Warren could
use more seasoning and Wyatt Russell (the son of Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn)
spends a little too much time mugging for the camera.

For those whose only requirements for horror movies are that
they avoid the excesses of blood/gore/violence prevalent in R-rated fare and
incorporate a few good jump-scares, Night Swim checks the requisite
boxes. For those looking for a more complete experience, however, the movie
struggles even to achieve the level where it would be considered worthwhile as
a streaming option. It has moments but those never add up to a complete film.
Oh, and as an aside, how come it’s okay to kill cats in horror movies while
executing dogs are verboten?

Advertisement

Night Swim (United States, 2024)





Movie Reviews

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Published

on

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Selected by Tajikistan but ultimately not accepted by the Academy to compete in the Oscar international feature category, “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” begins ambitiously, with a famous quote from playwright Anton Chekhov about setups and payoffs — about how if a gun is established in a story, it must go off. Moments later, an inviting long take involving a young man selling an antique rifle ends in farcical tragedy, signaling an equally farcical series of events that grow stranger and stranger. The film, by Iranian director Shahram Mokri, folds in on itself in intriguing (albeit protracted) ways, warping its meta-fictional boundaries until they supersede its characters, or any underlying meaning.

Still, it’s a not-altogether-uninteresting exercise in exploring the contours of storytelling, told through numerous thematically interconnected vignettes. The opening Chekhov quote, though it might draw one’s attention to minor details that end up insignificant, ensures a heightened awareness of the movie’s artifice, until the film eventually pulls back and becomes a tale of its own making. But en route to this semi-successful postmodern flourish, its character drama is enticing enough on its own, with hints of magical realism. It begins with the tale of a badly injured upper-class woman, Sara (Hasti Mohammai), discovering that her car accident has left her with the ability to communicate with household objects.

Sara’s bandages need changing, and the stench of her ointment becomes a quick window into her relationships. Her distant husband rejects her; her boisterous stepdaughter is more frank, but ultimately accepting; her gardener and handyman stays as diplomatic as he can. However, the film soon turns the gunfire payoff in its prologue into a broader setup of its own, as a delivery man shows up at Sara’s gate, insisting that she accept delivery for an object “the deceased man” has paid for.

Mokri eventually returns to this story (through a slightly tilt-shifted lens), but not before swerving headfirst into a seemingly unrelated saga of extras on a film set and a superstitious prop master, Babak (Babak Karimi), working on a shot-for-shot remake of an Iranian classic. A mix of rapid-fire Tajik, Persian and Russian dialogue creates dilemma upon dilemma when Babak’s ID goes missing, preventing him from being able to thoroughly check the prop ammunition for an assassination scene.

Danger begins to loom — a recent Alec Baldwin case even warrants a mention on-screen — as the notion of faulty firearms yanks Chekhov’s wisdom front and center once more, transforming it from a writing tip into a phantasmagorical inevitability. In keeping with the previous story, the props even communicate with each other (through subtitles) and begin gossiping about what might come to pass.

Advertisement

After establishing these narrative parameters through unbroken, fluid shots filmed at a sardonic distance, Mokri soon begins playing mischievous temporal games. He finds worthwhile excuses to revisit scenes from either different angles or with a slightly altered aesthetic approach — with more proximity and intimacy — in order to highlight new elements of his mise-en-scène. What’s “real” and “fictional,” even within the movie’s visual parlance, begins to blur in surreal ways, largely pivoting around Babak simply trying to do his job. However, the more this tale engorges through melodic, snaking takes, the more it circles around a central point, rather than approaching it.

The film’s own expanse becomes philosophically limiting, even though it remains an object of curiosity. When it’s all said and done, the playfulness on display in “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” is quite remarkable, even if the story’s contorting framework seldom amounts to much, beyond drawing attention to itself. It’s cinema about cinema in a manner that, on one hand, lives on the surface, but on the other hand, invites you to explore its texture in ways few other movies do.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Christmas Karma’ movie review: A Bollywood Carol with little cheer

Published

on

‘Christmas Karma’ movie review: A Bollywood Carol with little cheer

Kunal Nayyar in ‘Christmas Karma’
| Photo Credit: True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

Christmas jumpers are all I can remember of this film. As this reimagining of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol dragged on with sickly-sweet sentimentality and song, my eyes constantly tried to work out whether those snowflakes and reindeer were printed on the jerseys or, if knitted, how complicated the patterns would have been.

Christmas Karma (English)

Director: Gurinder Chadha

Starring: Kunal Nayyar, Leo Suter, Charithra Chandran, Pixie Lott, Danny Dyer, Boy George, Hugh Bonneville, Billy Porter, Eva Longoria, Mia Lomer

Storyline: A miserly businessman learns the true meaning of Christmas when visited by ghosts of Christmas past, present and future

Advertisement

Runtime: 114 minutes

Gurinder Chadha, who gave us the gorgeous Bend it Like Beckham (who wants to make aloo gobi when you can bend the ball like Beckham indeed) has served up an unappetising Bollywood song-and-dance version of Dickens’ famous Christmas story.

A still from the film

A still from the film
| Photo Credit:
True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

A curmudgeonly Indian businessman, Ishaan Sood (Kunal Nayyar), fires his entire staff on Christmas Eve—except his accountant, Bob (Leo Suter)—after catching them partying at the office. Sood’s nephew, Raj (Shubham Saraf) invites him for a Christmas party which he refuses to attend.

He returns home after yelling at some carol singers for making a noise, the shopkeeper (Nitin Ganatra) at the corner for his business decisions and a cabbie (Danny Dyer) for being too cheerful.

His cook-housekeeper, Mrs. Joshi (Shobu Kapoor) tells him to enjoy his dinner in the dark as he has not paid for heat or electricity. He is visited by the spirit of his dead business partner, Marley (Hugh Bonneville), who is in chains with the spirits of all the people he wronged. Marley’s spirit tells Sood that he will be visited by three spirits who will reveal important life lessons.

Advertisement
A still from the film

A still from the film
| Photo Credit:
True Bit Entertainment/YouTube

The Ghost of Christmas Past (Eva Longoria), with Day of the Dead makeup and three mariachis providing musical accompaniment, shows Sood his early, happy days in Uganda as a child and the trauma of being expelled from the country by Idi Amin.

Sood comes to Britain where his father dies of heartbreak and decides the only way out is to earn a lot of money. He meets and falls in love with Bea (Charithra Chandran) but loses her when he chooses paisa over pyaar even though he tries to tell her he is being ruthless only to earn enough to keep her in luxury.

The Ghost of Christmas Present (Billy Porter) shows Bob’s twee house full of Christmas cheer, despite the roast chicken past its sell-by date, and his young son, Tim, bravely smiling despite his illness.

The Ghost of Christmas Future (Boy George, Karma is sure a chameleon!) shows Sood dying alone except for Bob and Mrs. Joshi. He sees the error of his ways and throws much money around as he makes everything alright. He even ends up meeting up with his childhood friend in Uganda.

Apart from the mixed messages (money makes everything alright, let us pray for the NHS but go to Switzerland to get well) and schmaltzy songs, Christmas Karma suffers from weak writing and wooden acting.

Advertisement

Priyanka Chopra’s Hindi rendition of George Michael’s ‘Last Christmas’ runs over the end credits featuring Chadha and the crew, bringing back fond memories of Bina Mistry’s ‘Hot Hot Hot’ from Bend it Like Beckham. Even a sitar version by Anoushka Shankar is to no avail as watching this version of A Christmas Carol ensures bad karma in spades.

Christmas Karma is currently running in theatres

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dust Bunny

Published

on

Dust Bunny

An orphaned girl hires her hitman next-door neighbor to kill the monster under her bed. This R-rated action/horror movie mashup has lots of violence but surprisingly little gore. However, there are still many gruesome moments, even if they’re just offscreen. And some language and a strange portrayal of Christian worship come up, too.

Continue Reading

Trending