Is Love Hurts an action movie? A romance? A comedy? As it turns out, the film is more disappointing than being stood up on a first date
The Snapshot: By trying to be an action movie, romance movie and comedy movie all at once, Love Hurts fails at being any of them.
Love Hurts
3 out of 10
14A, 1hr 23mins. Action Romance Comedy.
Directed by Jonathan Eusebio.
Starring Ke Huy Quan, Ariana DeBose, Daniel Wu, Lio Tipton, Cam Gigandet and Sean Astin.
Advertisement
Believe me, dissuading couples from seeing Love Hurts is going to hurt me a lot more than it hurts you.
Despite having so many great components, the total marriage of the varied cast, script and a story with empty promises makes Love Hurts a Valentine’s Day mess. The film is a overly violent and underdeveloped disappointment.
The story is of a former assassin turned innocent realtor (Ke Huy Quan, best known for the Oscar-winning Everything, Everywhere All At Once) being dragged back into his criminal life by an ex-girlfriend (Ariana DeBose), only for a set of rival thugs to come and hunt them both down.
Former stuntman Jonathan Eusebio makes his debut as a film director, and while his skill for fight choreography is evident, he can’t make sense of the film’s weak screenplay and countless loose ends.
Not only is the movie a comedy with unfunny jokes, it’s also a romance with shallow relationships and thin chemistry between most of the pairings. Only the action elements sometimes succeed with some impressive fights and stunts — but the camera is so shaky and distracting it’s hard to enjoy them.
Advertisement
Worst of all is the film’s atrocious script. There are multiple narrators with clashing tones, there are several side characters who appear with context or explanation, and the repetitive exposition is dull and pointless.
Throughout the story, there’s a recurring theme that “hiding ain’t living,” in that the source of love is being true to oneself and going after what it is we really want. But that theme, highlighted in so much of the marketing and early story, is left at surface level by only being repeatedly mentioned out loud instead of explored in any way.
Quan and DeBose (both Academy Award winners!) are both earnest, likeable actors who deserves better than this for a star vehicle. While I enjoyed him and Lio Tipton as his assistant Ashley, many other performers fell flat.
Many of the rival assassins and killers are forgettable, each with thin, unneeded subplots that often get abandoned. Daniel Wu as master villain Knuckles is also barely in the film, but the most surprising letdown is DeBose’s work (normally great) as Rose, which is campy and hokey instead.
With such a great cast and unique concept, Love Hurts should’ve been a home run for Valentines Day. Instead, the film leaves you feeling empty and disappointed like being dumped by your ex-partner.
The lethal and tenacious Aatami Korpi returns in this sequel to 2022’s Sisu. Like its predecessor, Sisu: Road to Revenge offers up nonstop, gory hyper-violence as the old soldier shoots and stabs his way through the Soviet Union’s Red Army to avenge his family’s murder. Paired with all the bloodshed is a handful of f-words and some drinking, as well.
I am an audience of one at a late afternoon “preview” matinee of “Sisu 2,” aka “Sisu: Road to Revenge,” the sequel to the savage sleeper hit by Finnish carnage Jalmari Helander.
Do the locals know something I don’t? Or are the good folks in “The Last Capital of the Confederacy” showing their red ball cap displeasure at a movie about mowing down Russians by staying home?
I’m guessing it’s the fact that Screen Gems’ marketing didn’t spend enough to move the needle even a centimeter that dampened enthusiasm, as nobody knows about it.
That’s no big deal, because this sequel is inferior in pretty much every way to the original “Sisu,” which came out of nowhere back in 2023 and which takes its title from a Finnish word that more of less means unfettered rage. It’s not on a par with Helander’s “Rare Exports” Santa-horror splatter film either. He’s due for a misstep. Here it is.
“Road to Revenge” brings back our non-speaking, unstoppable and unkillable Finnish commando Korpi (Jorma Tommila), this time out to haul the pieces to his house across the Russian border after the end of World War II.
When your anti-hero is “unstoppable” and “unkillable,” that lowers the stakes. A lot.
Advertisement
Throw in feeble pacing and thus no urgency to its story of driving, shooting, stabbing and missle-launching his way through legions of belligerant Russians, fresh from their triumph in “The Great Patriotic War,” and you’ve got a thriller whose only creative bits are random moments of Russian-mutilating and murdering.
Remember, the vodka/borscht-folk and their dictator sided with the Nazis at the beginning of WWII, only to F-around and find out you can never trust a Nazi. And the Russians further earned their history’s bad-guys status by invading Finland at the start of the war, and paying dearly for their miscalculation, at least for a time.
The Soviet Russians annexed Finnish territory at war’s end, and that’s where Korpi lived. So he’s got his passport and his battered, oversized military truck and he’s aiming to move the logs of his old homestead, where his family was slaughtered, to a new location across the new border.
Ivan doesn’t want him to get away with it.
The stages of his quest are broken into superfluous “chapters” like “Old Enemies,” “Motor Mayhem:” and “Incoming.” The dialogue, almost all of it by a Russian tormentor (Stephen Lang) who commanded the troops who failed to finish off the Finn in the first film, is every bit as pointless.
Advertisement
“Unleash Hell,” like they haven’t already. “Keep your eyes open,” the most worthless command cliche of them all. And “Look at me,” served up as if he isn’t looking at you.
Duels against armored commandos on motorcycles (!?), airborne fighter bombers and the like ensue. Our hero takes another licking and keeps on ticking. The Russians? Let the body count commence, Comrades!
I laughed at a few of the more audacious butcherings, but that was early on. The narrative settles into a slog in the middle acts and no pull-out-the-stops train ride finale could drag it out of the mud.
Rating: R, graphic violence, pretty much start to finish, profanity
Cast: Jorma Tommila, Richard Brake and Stephen Lang.
Credits: Scripted and directed by Jalmari Helander. A Screen Gems release.
Advertisement
Running time: 1:29
About Roger Moore
Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine
Star Cast: Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo, Jeff Goldblum, Jonathan Bailey, and Michelle Yeoh.
Director: Jon M. Chu
Wicked: For Good Movie Review Out: Solid Performances But Underwhelming Conclusion (Photo Credit – Instagram)
What’s Good: Wicked: For Good is definitely a showpiece when it comes to production values, and so, every single frame is beautiful to look at and the ultimate Wizard of Oz experience when it comes to visuals.
What’s Bad: The film is slower than the first, and it feels, especially when the new songs don’t hit like the ones in the previous instalment ,and dialogue feels like a lot of filler.
Advertisement
Loo Break: Anywhere in the first act, as the film moves so slowly that you can probably go and come back and not miss anything.
Watch or Not?: If you loved the first one, then yes, you need to see this and close the cycle.
Language: English (with subtitles).
Available On: Theaters
Runtime: 137 Minutes
Advertisement
User Rating:
Opening:
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Ariana Grande Shines (Photo Credit – YouTube)
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Script Analysis
Wicked: For Good is a solid film, there is no doubt about that, you just have to look at the powerful visuals, and the entire production value, but the script might be the weakest aspect of the film, especially when it comes to structure and dialogue, which affects the pacing, making the first two acts of this musical epic feel like it could do with a couple more drafts to make the story tighter, and the flow a lot more natural.
As it is, the first two acts move a snail’s pace, and the songs simply don’t match the quality and catchiness of the songs in the first two acts of the first film, here, the songs feel like they are there just to make the film longer, and it is hard to remember one that is simply memorable enough to sing along. Fans of the original musical will probably have a lot more fun with this aspect of the film, but as a newcomer, I did feel a drop in quality on the musical side.
The dialogue also does a lot of damage to the film, as it feels like everything is delivered in two or three lines that are too long, when it could have been conveyed in a simpler and more efficient way. It just doesn’t work, and while the actors do their best, the material doesn’t hold up. Nevertheless, some jokes here and there truly land, and the film does tell a compelling, complete story, which is a lot more than many other films do today.
The third act also feels quite rushed, and the connections to the original Wizard of Oz film, and the characters from that story deserved a lot more, because they are so legendary and iconic, that for some reason this movie feels like it should just move away from them as fast as it can, hurting the overall impact of the story, and the character growth.
Advertisement
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Star Performance
Cynthia Erivo is quite solid in here, and she is plotwise, the main character, but let’s be real, this is the Ariana Grande show, who basically steals the show in every single scenes she is in, not only with her powerful voice but also with her solid acting abilities, she just has it, when it comes to presence, delivery and charisma.
The rest of the cast is quite good. Bailey does some terrifying things in the film and effectively creates all the darkness it needs, while Goldblum’s Oz is just right – nothing to talk about, but definitely his performance, along with the rest from all the other actors, doesn’t hurt the film; it elevates it.
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Movie Lacks Crisp Editing At Places (Photo Credit – YouTube)
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Direction, Music
Jon M. Chu started as a relatively standard director. Still, he has definitely graduated to the big leagues with these two films, as the scale of everything just goes out of the window when it comes to the visuals and the camera’s placement, which is always in the perfect spot to show it. Really, the world-building that Chu and his team have created here is outstanding.
The music, as we said before isn’t as good or memorable as the first film which really hurts the experience because this is a musical and I thought the best was being safe for last in the song department, of course, it will be a matter of taste, as it is everything but this is definitely one of the biggest negative points for the film. Nevertheless, the performers are truly going out of their way to create something extraordinary, so there is really nothing to criticize regarding the actors, dancers and singers themselves.
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Takes Viewers On An Atmospheric Ride (Photo Credit – YouTube)
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: The Last Word
Wicked: For Good closes this adventure in a solid manner, although the overall package feels weaker than the first film, which is disappointing. However, Jon. M. Chu, his team, and his cast demonstrate that they truly care about the project, and it shows on the screen as the film finally delivers on being entertaining, grandiose, and visually stunning. It could have been better, but what is there is truly remarkable.
Wicked: For Good Trailer
Wicked: For Good releases on 21 November, 2025.
Advertisement
Share with us your experience of watching Wicked: For Good.
Must Read: Now You See Me: Now You Don’t Movie Review: The Strange Case Of A Sequel That Nobody Wanted & Many Had Already Forgotten!