Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Medieval Movie Review: The Court Jester – Medievalists.net

Published

on

Medieval Movie Review: The Court Jester – Medievalists.net

By James Turner

When The Court docket Jester was first launched in 1955, whimsy was not essentially a attribute that the common cinemagoer would have related intently with the medieval interval. Starring the inimitable Danny Kaye, it’s a musical comedy set in a trackless and timeless facsimile of the Center Ages. At its core, The Court docket Jester is a joyous and artfully constructed farce which whips its viewers by its quite a few set items and shenanigans at an exhilarating tempo.

The true pleasure and genius of The Court docket Jester is its plotting and the style wherein misunderstandings steadily pile upon coincidences making a frantic and heady combine for our principal gamers to whimsically cavort by. The setting is medieval England, the 12 months indeterminate, and we’ve got the fictional King Roderick usurping the throne from the rightful inheritor – a child boy identifiable solely by an unusually alliterative birthmark, a purple pimpernel. This royal child has been whisked to security by the Black Fox, a Robin Hood-style insurgent with a trigger.

Danny Kaye stars along with his standard relish and aplomb as Hubert Hawkins, the Black Fox’s bard who’s firstly of the movie pushing for a extra energetic function within the band’s freedom combating efforts. In traditional fashion, he quickly will get greater than he bargains for when a raid by Roderick’s troopers compels Hubert and the Black Fox’s lieutenant, the gorgeous Maid Jean, performed by Glynis Johns, to don disguises and smuggle out the younger king. Taking refuge in audacity, they handle to flee the troopers by dint of some pithy wordplay and spotless character work, earlier than coming throughout the usurper’s new court docket jester, Giacomo, on the street.

Advertisement

After subduing the jester, it’s determined, by Jean, that Hubert ought to take Giacomo’s identification and infiltrate the royal palace whereas she locates a brand new secure haven for the royal child. Earlier than departing, Jean reveals the existence of a insurgent spy throughout the royal palace, entrusting Hubert with a whistled tune by which to determine himself. In the meantime, unbeknownst to our heroes, a tangled weave of machinations are starting to unfold throughout the royal palace.

A trio of the king’s advisors are urging him to marry his daughter, the newly elevated princess Gwendolyn, who I used to be startled to acknowledge as a younger Angela Lansbury, to the ambiguously Scottish Sir Griswold of MacElwain, as a approach of coping with the Black Fox and establishing his reign. The willful Gwendolyn alternatively longs for a romance within the classical chivalric mannequin and has cajoled and bullied the court docket witch Griselda, performed by Mildred Natwick, into prophesying one for her. With their relationship fraying and her life underneath instant risk by the capriciously forceful princess, the determined hedge witch identifies the imminently anticipated Giacomo as Gwendolyn’s long-expected nice love.

On the similar time, it’s revealed that the true villain of the movie, Roderick’s righthand and the person who murdered the true royal household, is Lord Ravenhurst. He views the king’s trio of advisors as a risk to his standing and plans to have them killed by the hands of this Giacomo, who is mostly a grasp murderer masquerading as a jester. Ravenhurst is performed with chilling poise by the exquisitely sinister swashbuckler veteran Basil Rathbone whose presence lends the movie’s willfully farcical proceedings an air of authenticity and real risk.

Blissfully unaware of all of this, Hubert as Giacomo arrives at court docket and shortly ingratiates himself with King Roderick. He does this by an impromptu musical efficiency and the promise of the most recent gossip from the Italian court docket, in any case as Hubert says what higher place to court docket Italians. Baked into this encounter is a pithy tongue tornado, delivered at breakneck velocity and with serene confidence by Danny Kaye, involving the Duke, Duchess, Doge and their numerous doings. Following Giacomo’s acceptance at court docket, Giacomo who’s trying to find his contact is left with the unlucky impression that Ravenhurst, looking for to make contact along with his murderer, is a fellow insurgent.

Advertisement

Maid Jean can be at court docket having been waylaid shortly after parting from Hubert by one other group of troopers who had been, for causes in all probability greatest left unexamined, underneath orders to take stunning ladies to the king’s court docket. There she should try and preserve the royal child secure, hidden in certainly one of a collection of an identical wicker baskets, whereas additionally making an attempt to assassinate Roderick. Griselda the witch’s shocking experience at hypnosis involves play a outstanding function on this section of the film. Used solely on Hubert, it provides to the chaos and cascade of misunderstandings as he’s not capable of recall precisely what he has finished or the usually at cross functions conversations he has had with different characters.

Because the farce ripens and deepens, Hubert skillfully makes use of one other musical quantity to cover the true king beneath the inquisitive usherer’s very nostril. In the meantime, Ravenhurst discovering the destiny of the actual Giacomo leaps to the conclusion that Hubert is actually the Black Fox even because the hapless bard is arrested following the Princess’ unhelpful and unsought however heartfelt public declaration of affection.  Jean cannily staves off King Roderick’s advances by urging the king to throw warning to the wind and ignore the chance that she could also be a provider of the horrible however fictitious illness named after her father which had induced him, her aunts, uncles and cousins to all die from in agony.

Advertisement

Ravenhurst convinces the king to knight “Giacomo” in order that he might face the Princess’ newly arrived fiancé, Sir Griswold in single fight, his aim to permit the Black Fox to dispatch his rival earlier than unmasking him and securing his place as Roderick’s quantity two. This tees off one of many film’s most iconic and memorable scenes, Griselda and the Princess be a part of forces to poison Sir Griswold as the 2 knights drink earlier than the king to toast their impending struggle to the dying. Sadly they try to take action in a approach uniquely complicated for Hubert who as we’ve got learnt all through the movie can’t fairly resist repeating after which mangling rhymes, inserting a pellet of poison in a vessel marked with a pestle that means that he ought to eschew this vessel with a pestle and drink out of the chalice from the palace as an alternative, which we’re reassured holds the brew that’s true.

Hubert’s confusion is just heightened when on the final minute the chalice from the palace is damaged and the pellet of poison is as an alternative positioned within the flaggon with a dragon that means that the vessel with the pestle now holds the brew that’s true. Hubert’s fumbling efforts to maintain this straight by chanting the rhyme forewarns Sir Griswold just for him to develop into equally tongue-tied. Some extra slapstick antics ensue just for the actual Black Fox to swoop in and save the day, restoring the rightful king to the throne whereas Hubert bests Ravenhurst in a hilariously contrived and see-saw-like prolonged bout of swordplay.

In distinction to those iconic hijinks and the kinetic pacing of the plot with its whirl of bewilderment and clashing agendas, the musical numbers regardless of their prominence within the movie will not be notably memorable. There may be nothing, for example, fairly comparable with Les Misérables’ ‘Grasp of the Home’ which you discover yourselves buzzing days later.

The slapstick is a bit hit and miss as an engine for comedy. The ultimate struggle in opposition to the dastardly Lord Ravenhurst, wherein Hubert is consistently triggering and releasing himself from the hypnotic suggestion he’s a grasp swordsman and the conclusion of his earlier trial by fight are going to get just a few guffaws and chuckles. Alternatively, some bits such because the magnetization of his armour through lightning strike previous to this struggle with Sir Griswold, really feel a bit dated though little doubt the intelligent digicam trickery which went into them would have been appreciated by audiences in 1956.

Advertisement

To be completely trustworthy, which in fact expensive reader I’ll all the time be with you, The Court docket Jester will not be replete with laugh-out-loud gags of bare hilarity. Dialogue, jokes and wordplay are all delivered at breakneck velocity and someway appear to slide by earlier than the viewers and characters alike can correctly digest them. This, nevertheless, is a characteristic relatively than a bug. The sheer chaos and farcical environment of the movie are in themselves a supply of heady pleasure that sweeps the viewers alongside in a cascade of pithy dialogue and more and more weird or convoluted happenstances.

A lot of the film’s comedic sensibilities are borrowed from its star, Danny Kaye. Whereas comparatively obscure now, on the time of the movie’s launch, Kaye was a family title in America having starred in a raft of musicals, comedies and musical comedies over the continuing decade. These movies embody such notable field workplace success as The Child from Brooklyn (1946) a few Brooklyn-born milkman who turned boxing champion who fails to comprehend that his fights have been fastened, The Inspector Common (1949), Knock on Wooden (1954) and White Christmas (1955) the place he shared prime billing with Bing Crosby.

Poster for The Court docket Jester

Kaye’s comedy is a curious mix of fast-paced and thoroughly constructed verbal avalanches and non-verbal bodily comedy, blended slapstick antics with exaggerated, even tortuous, facial reactions. An strategy to comedy that he developed and refined throughout his prolonged bout performing in Asia to audiences with a restricted grasp of English. In The Court docket Jester, as in all of his roles, Kaye performs Hubert with compellingly earnest sincerity and an accompanying bashfulness which verges on the outright apologetic. This mix endears the viewers by inviting them in as understanding individuals within the movie’s whimsical environment and set items.

This symbiosis between main actor and materials is clearly no coincide because the movie was written and the challenge put collectively particularly with Danny Kaye in thoughts. It was produced, written and directed by long-standing collaborators Melvin Frank and Norman Panama. Frank and Panama’s partnership started once they met as college students on the College of Chicago and earned their spurs within the leisure trade by writing for Bob Hope and Groucho Marx which gave them helpful expertise in modulating their work for the kinds and idiosyncratic mannerisms of specific artists.

Support Medievalists on Patreon

The duo efficiently broke into Hollywood as screenwriters, their most notable work for this era was The Highway to Utopia (1946) for which they gained an Oscar for greatest screenplay. Starring Bing Crosby and Bob Hope, the musical comedy was the most recent in a collection of the extremely widespread ‘Highway to…’ collection. Previous to The Court docket Jester Frank and Panama had beforehand collaborated with Kaye to nice field workplace and demanding success with Knock on Wooden and White Christmas. The music for The Court docket Jester was offered by veteran trade composers Walter Scharf and Vic Schoen.

Given the vagueness and Hollywood genericness of the setting, The Court docket Jester has little to say in regards to the Center Ages. However then it was by no means actually meant to. What it’s, is an totally enchanting and charming riff on the conventions of Golden Age historic Swashbucklers that can by no means fail to amuse.

Advertisement

James Turner has just lately accomplished his doctoral research at Durham College earlier than which he attended the College of Glasgow. Deeply afraid of numbers and distrustful of counting, his essential analysis pursuits encompass medieval aristocratic tradition and identification.

Click on right here to learn extra from James Turner

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Summer Camp’ is an entertaining disappointment

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Summer Camp’ is an entertaining disappointment

Nothing forges a friendship like treating an arrow wound. For Ginny, Mary and Nora, an ill-fated archery lesson and an injured classmate are just the beginning of the lifetime of trouble they’re about to start.

Ginny is a year above the other two, more experienced in both summer camp and girlhood, and takes it upon herself to somewhat forcefully guide her younger friends. Mary cowers in the bathroom away from her bunkmates, spouting medical facts, while Nora hangs back, out of place. When their camp counselor plucks them out of their cabin groups to place them in the new “Sassafras” cabin, they feel like they fit in somewhere for the first time.

50 years later, “Summer Camp” sees the three girls, now women, reunite for the anniversary reunion of the very same camp at which they met. Although they’ve been in touch on-and-off in the preceding decades, this will be the first time the women have seen each other in 15 years.

Between old camp crushes, childhood nemeses and the newer trials of adulthood, the three learn to understand each other, and themselves, in a way that has eluded them the entirety of their friendship.

I really wanted to like “Summer Camp.”

Advertisement

The opening scene, a glimpse at the girls’ first year together at Camp Pinnacle, does a good job at establishing Ginny, Mary and Nora’s dynamic. It’s sweet, funny and feels true to the experience of many adolescent girls’ friendships.

On top of that, this movie’s star-studded cast and heartwarming concept endeared me to it the moment I saw the trailer. Unfortunately, an enticing trailer is about the most “Summer Camp” has to offer.

As soon as we meet our trio as adults, things start to fall apart. It really feels like the whole movie was made to be cut into a trailer — the music is generic, shots cut abruptly between poses, places and scenes, and at one point two of the three separate shots of each woman exiting Ginny’s tour bus are repeated.

The main character and sometimes narrator, Ginny Moon, is a self-help writer who uses “therapy speak” liberally and preaches a tough-love approach to self improvement. This sometimes works perfectly for the movie’s themes but is often used to thwop the viewer over the head with a mallet labeled “WHAT THE CHARACTERS ARE THINKING” rather than letting us figure it out for ourselves.

There are glimpses of a better script — like when Mary’s husband asks her whether she was actually having fun or just being bullied, presumably by Ginny. This added some depth to her relationship with him, implying he actually does listen to her sometimes, and acknowledged the nagging feeling I’d been getting in the back of my head: “Hey, isn’t Ginny kind of mean?”

Advertisement

Despite all my annoyance with “Summer Camp,” there were a few things I really liked about it. I’m a lot younger than the main characters of this movie, but there were multiple points where I found myself thinking, “Hey, my aunt talks like that!” or, “Wow, he sounds just like my dad.”

The dynamic of the three main characters felt very true to life, I’ve known and been each of them at one point or another. It felt especially accurate to the relationships of girls and women, and seeing our protagonists reconcile at the end was, for me, genuinely heartwarming.

“Summer Camp” is not a movie I can recommend for quality, but if you’re looking for a lighthearted, somewhat silly romp to help you get into the summer spirit, this one will do just fine.

Other stories by Caroline

Advertisement

Caroline Julstrom, intern, may be reached at 218-855-5851 or cjulstrom@brainerddispatch.com.

Caroline Julstrom finished her second year at the University of Minnesota in May 2024, and started working as a summer intern for the Brainerd Dispatch in June.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Garfield Movie

Published

on

The Garfield Movie

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ( out of 5)

He looks pretty good for being 45 years old and having a solid diet of the four basic food groups: lasagna, lasagna, lasagna, and lasagna. Garfield (Chris Pratt) has graced newspapers, cinemas, toy stores and has been a window ornament in cars worldwide. As one of the world’s most recognised cats, it is no wonder that he would get a new animated franchise to honour his four decades of lounging around in our lives.

This unlikely adventure takes audiences back to the origins of his life with Odie the beagle and their owner, Jon Arbuckle (Nicholas Hoult). As he does all he can to avoid Mondays and any form of exercise and finds new levels of leisure, the orange cat is suddenly confronted by his past as he is reintroduced to his long-lost father, Vic (Samuel L. Jackson). Their sudden family reunion is tainted by the unexpected need for his father to rectify a wrong with one of his former feline friends, the Persian cat – Vinx (Hannah Waddingham). The two cats and a friendly beagle must reacquaint themselves with one another as they work with Odie to fulfil the order from the criminal kitty who needs them to deliver a milk order that would rub any cat the wrong way. Along the way, they must befriend a wise bull named Otto (Ving Rhames) to stay ahead of dairy security officer Marge (Cecily Strong) as they hope to achieve their mission and get home to their life of lasagna and leisure.

When reviewing a film about a lazy, pasta-eating cat, one must manage expectations. To expect this to be groundbreaking cinema might be a bit of a stretch. Also, considering that there is little for families to enjoy in cinemas, The Garfield Movie might be the best snack food option for parents for the season. The tone goes from ridiculous to sentimental and back to farcical as if the source material is based on a classic cartoon, which, of course, it is. A consideration as you continue with this review and realise that the film will do exactly what it is meant to do, entertain families with the fun, ridiculous actions of the cat with little motivation to do much with his life except eat his favourite Italian food and spend time with his owner. Chris Pratt and the rest of the cast come along for the ride to complement this tale of friendship, family and food.

What should parents know about The Garfield Movie? Suppose your children loved the antics of the Super Mario Brothers or liked the humour delivered by the Minions. In that case, this film will provide laughs and a hankering for Italian food afterwards. Most of the laughs for parents will fly over the heads of the little ones and will provide something for the adults in the audience. There is little to object to outside the gluttonous tendencies of this legendary cat. The discussion opportunities after the film include the three Fs of family, friendship and forgiveness.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: The Funeral (2023) by Orcun Behram

Published

on

Film Review: The Funeral (2023) by Orcun Behram

Orcun Behram blends genres, a bleak atmosphere and a statement for his sophomore feature

Although Turkish cinema scene is more associated with mainstream art house efforts, its more genre-oriented pool is also quite strong and recognized globally. One of the newer examples of it, a multi-genre crossover “The Funeral” written and directed by Orcun Behram is touring the genre festivals since its world premiere at the last year’s edition of Sitges. Most recently, it was showcased at the official competition of Grossmann Fantastic Wine and Film Festival in Ljutomer, Slovenia, where it scooped the main Viscious Cat award.

Behram opens his film with a sequence mostly located in a hearse van touring the back roads of Turkey to a small village graveyard where a funeral takes place in the rain. Its purpose is to establish the character of our protagonist, the driver named Cemal (Ahmet Rifat Sungar, best known for his roles in Nuri Bilge Ceylan‘s “Three Monkeys” and “The Wild Pear Tree”) as a loner and a man of few words who possibly holds a secret. Soon enough, Cemal is approached by his colleague with a hush-hush offer he cannot really refuse. His job is to make a certain corpse disappear for a period of time, until the situation settles, so it could be buried properly, and the reward for his effort would be a hefty, but not unbelievably large sum of money.

Initially, Cemal is wary that the offer might be a set-up, but he reluctantly agrees. The corpse he should carry around for a month or so belongs to Zeynep (Cansu Türedi who built her career on Turkish television), supposedly a victim of honour killing done by her influential family. Cemal drives the van away, checks into a no-questions-asked roadside motel and engages in his routines of chain-smoking and solo-drinking, until he hears some not-quite-dead noises coming from the back of his van. Well, Zeynep is a bit undead and quite hungry, and, since Cemal develops certain feelings for her, he starts caring and providing for her, urging them to be constantly on the move, while the police starts the search for a serial killer. However, there is no safe place in the world for the two of them, not even Cemal’s native home, and the day of meeting with Zeynep’s family is approaching…

Advertisement

“The Funeral” is a genre salad of sorts, blending the ideas of the road movie, “necromantic” comedy, love-on-the-run, horror and revenge thriller and doing so in a pace that often tests the audiences’ patience during the (almost) two hours of runtime until the make-it-or-break-it moment for the ending. To do so, Behram has to exercise full control over the material in order to converge the interesting ideas he has towards a point. There is a constant threat that the multitude of ideas would take the film over, but the filmmaker barely manages to hold a grip over them.

The first of the film’s strong points is the acting. It is not a surprise that Ahmet Rifat Sungar is reliable in a role of a cryptic loner, since those roles suit him well. On the other hand, Cansu Türedi is a proper revelation, since the actress nails the role with limited means of expression, given that her character does not speak. The supporting actors also create a rich tapestry contributing to the second of “The Funeral’s” strong points – its atmosphere. The realistic bleakness of it is conjured in the drained colours in the work of the art director Tuncay Özcan and the cinematographer Engin Özkaya who also lensed the filmmaker’s previous film “Antenna” (2019). However, Burk Alatas‘ editing could have been a bit firmer.

If you like The Funeral check also this video

But the reason the film mostly succeeds in making a point is the point itself. Behram packs a punch against the inherent conservativism, patriarchy and misogyny still present in the Turkish society, but is smart enough to hold it until the right moment. However, marketing “The Funeral” as a purely genre experience does not do the film any favors, since it serves better as an example of a hybrid of a genre- and an art house movie.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending