Movie Reviews
'Krishnam Pranaya Sakhi' movie review: Formulaic, middling love drama
!['Krishnam Pranaya Sakhi' movie review: Formulaic, middling love drama 'Krishnam Pranaya Sakhi' movie review: Formulaic, middling love drama](https://images.deccanherald.com/deccanherald%2F2024-08-16%2F0zui0x2t%2Ffile7wrmlliq0hc1694xv7df.png?rect=0%2C15%2C755%2C396&w=1200&ar=40%3A21&auto=format%2Ccompress&ogImage=true&mode=crop)
Actor Ganesh’s latest outing follows an age-old template of romantic movies. Krishna (Ganesh), a 32-year-old industrialist, falls head over heels for Pranaya (Malavika Nair), an orphan running an orphanage. With the entry of Jahnavi (Sharanya Shetty), we get the love triangle. If that wasn’t enough, there’s also the memory loss angle.
As soon as one talks of rich boy-poor girl movies with an element of amnesia, the first movie that comes to the mind of a Kannada movie connoisseur is ‘Hrudaya Sangama’ (1972). While the gripping Rajkumar-Bharathi starrer hinged on emotional performances, director Srinivas Raju chooses a fun narrative for this one.
The urge to mix a laughter riot with a middling non-linear storyline compromises the plot severely. The logical inconsistencies and lack of character development add to the woes. The first half is middling but director Srinivas Raju does an impressive job in holding viewers’ interest through it.
What works greatly for the film is Ganesh’s knack for playing typical romantic characters with flair and his camaraderie with seasoned comedian Sadhu Kokila.
Malavika impresses in her Kannada debut. She imparts the perfect dose of innocence that her character demands. Rangayana Raghu is hilarious as a comic villain. His Kannada accent typical of Telugu people from the Chikkaballapur region is spot on.
Raghu’s performance is brilliant at times and meek elsewhere. But for the mess, Ganesh might have as well got that critical mid-career break that he has long hoped for.
Published 16 August 2024, 20:13 IST
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Movie Reviews
Dominic Savage’s ‘CLOSE TO YOU’ (2023) – Movie Review – PopHorror
![Dominic Savage’s ‘CLOSE TO YOU’ (2023) – Movie Review – PopHorror Dominic Savage’s ‘CLOSE TO YOU’ (2023) – Movie Review – PopHorror](https://pophorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/imgonline-com-ua-resize-5y5DkoZpSf.jpg)
When I was a kid, I was different from my entire family. I fit right in punk rock; that was my passion and style choice. However, the torment I went through does not compare to people who aren’t happy with their gender. We put people who are different into a big pot of culture. I love being an outsider, and Close To You, directed by Dominic Savage, was almost like an anthem of strength for people who deal with darkness and confusion.
Synopsis
Sam (Elliot Page The Umbrella Academy) who found comfort in his new purpose and gender, is headed home for their fathers birthday. Sam had been gone for years and fell off the map. Upon Sam’s return, he struggles with acceptance from the people he loves. Sam protects his dignity and fear of not being accepted.
After his family welcomes him with open arms and general conncern Sam has to dig deep to find the love he used to have. With the entire family together, he has to deal with strong criticsm from his brother in law Paul (David Reale Molly’s Game). While Sam is growing, he runs into an old love Katherine (Hillary Baack, Helen). When the pot boils over between Sam and Paul, Sam’s life collapses. He slowly starts to bring himself back. Old memories and old flames are rekindled.
“The films I have been making over the past years have all been made with, and written
specifically for, a particular lead actor. They are, I feel, special collaborations that result in
stories that are rooted in absolute truth that have deep meaning and resonance for both me
and, most importantly, the actor. They are films about the complexities of our relationships, the
difficult parts of our lives, the every day of our existences, yet the striving for meaning and truth
within them.” -Dominic Savage
As much as I live for the horror community, sometimes drama movies impress me. However, I wouldn’t exactly call this drama. I think of it as empowering for people who can relate to it. I understand how hard it is for someone to accept and love you as you are. Sometimes, we need to hear that it’s OK to be different. That is what Close To You was centered around. The acting and emotion are powerful. Everyone landed their role perfectly; you could feel the tension in your own mind. What got me the most was the realism of the situation for so many people out there who just feel different.
In The End
I also loved the acceptance from the people who love Sam the most. I didn’t have the love I always yearned for with my parents. There are many scenes where you cheer on Sam and feel the crushing weight of emotions built inside. You can also feel everyone trying to build Sam up in self-confidence. Close To You is a movie I think everyone should see just once, just for a perspective for the people who may be intolerant. Some of us still believe in equal rights, and we don’t have to live it to accept it.
Close To You hits digital platforms August 16th.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: Yep. They’re back! ‘Alien: Romulus’ introduces next-gen Xenomorph foe Cailee Spaeny
![Movie Review: Yep. They’re back! ‘Alien: Romulus’ introduces next-gen Xenomorph foe Cailee Spaeny Movie Review: Yep. They’re back! ‘Alien: Romulus’ introduces next-gen Xenomorph foe Cailee Spaeny](https://www.hindustantimes.com/ht-img/img/2024/05/20/1600x900/Entertainment_News_1716196587643_1716196587841.jpeg)
“In space, no one can hear you scream,” went the tagline for the original “Alien” in 1979, a terrifying thought on multiple levels.
There may indeed be a scientific rationale for a space scream to be inaudible, but isn’t it scarier to simply realize nobody’s around to hear you? That was the case for Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley, once she became the last one standing against the fearsome Xenomorph. Nobody could hear her scream — nobody human, that is — because, duh, everyone was dead.
In any case, hearing won’t be a problem here on Earth at any multiplex showing “Alien: Romulus,” the much-anticipated new installment to the “Alien” franchise This is a very big, very loud, very jumpy horror flick, and the screams will come, and they’ll be audible. Which is precisely what “Alien” fans are surely waiting for.
And speaking of Ripley, no, neither she are present in this new version by Fede Álvarez, closer in feel to the horror roots of Ridley Scott’s original than James Cameron’s more action-focused 1986 “Aliens.” But now we have Rain Carradine, played by rising star Cailee Spaeny , a new-generation Ripley in everything but name. Spaeny takes up the mantle of badass space fighter with aplomb, and is easily the best part of a movie that, like the 1979 original, is short on character development.
There are many other parallels to the original . But like we said, don’t call it a sequel. In fact it’s an “interquel,” which wouldn’t be a bad horror film title in itself. The dictionary explains that it’s neither sequel nor prequel, but rather a “middlequel” between installments, known as “quels.”
Just kidding! It’s not in the dictionary. But it’s worth noting that Álvarez, in placing his movie between existing versions to form a new trilogy, yet aiming also for standalone entertainment, risks some tonal confusion. Not that you’ll be able to hear your thoughts, should this occur to you.
The premise is new, sort of. Álvarez, who co-wrote the screenplay with Rodo Sayagues, has said he got the idea from a deleted scene from Cameron’s film, in which young kids were seen amongst workers in a mining colony, and wondering what their lives would be like when they reached their 20s.
At the beginning, we find out: life is bleak indeed in the colony on Jackson’s Star, owned by the worker-exploiting Weyland-Yutani firm.
Rain’s miner parents have died of lung ailments. They’ve left her a caring brother, Andy, who is actually a “synthetic,” or humanoid robot. The “human” element is crucial because it allows an empathetic David Jonsson, in the role, to connect to the audience in a way that otherwise only Spaeny does — the rest of the cast is given virtually nothing to work with.
In any case, the two are not long for Jackson’s Star. After Rain is turned down for a travel permit to finally escape dark colony life, she and Andy join a risky venture.
There’s an decommissioned space station hovering above, and if they can raid it of hardware and other loot, they can bypass the brutal wait for permits and finally make it to a new home. And so, reluctantly, the two agree to join the others — Rain’s ex-boyfriend Tyler , his sister Kay , Bjorn and Navarro — on a bumpy flight to the Renaissance station.
Surely we’re not spoiling much to say that it’s best not to get attached to anybody.
Because, we all know what’s waiting up there, don’t we? It’s already been teased in the opening, with the rickety old station looking much like USCSS Nostromo, that ill-fated space tug in the original.
We hardly needed the hint, though. This is an “Alien” movie and it’s all about the Xenomorph, that terrifying creature who is diabolically “perfect,” able to survive in any atmosphere and to multiply, obviously, in the most disgusting of ways.
It’s not really a party — or a movie — until the creatures show up. And that, they do. Much has been made of this film’s use of practical effects, rather than a CGI-created universe. The actors have said this — as well as shooting in a linear fashion — helped them feel the genuine horror needed for their portrayals.
Does all this elevate the film beyond any of its predecessors? Like so many franchises that depend on intense fandom, that truly depends from what vantage point you’re joining in. Fans of the original will appreciate the many respectful echoes of that film Fans of Cameron’s take will appreciate the action that comes later in the film.
And while some will applaud the wild, outlandish, creative and possibly ridiculous swerve of those final minutes — not to spoil it — others may even laugh rather than scream.
It’s all good, though. In space, probably no one can hear you laugh, either.
“Alien: Romulus,” a 20th-Century Studios release, has been rated R by the Motion Picture Association “for bloody violent content and language. “ Running time: 119 minutes. Two stars out of four.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Movie Reviews
Rob’s Car Movie Review: Double Nickels (1977)
![Rob’s Car Movie Review: Double Nickels (1977) Rob’s Car Movie Review: Double Nickels (1977)](https://www.streetmusclemag.com/image/2024/08/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-08-15_08-17-46_698010.jpg)
From the 1980s through to today, the majority of car movies tend to be comfortably budgeted and widely released productions from major studios or distribution entities. Films like The Cannonball Run, Need for Speed, John Wick, and Ford v. Ferrari relied on big-money stars and massive advertising campaigns to spread awareness of the movie and bring in those box office dollars.
In the 1970s, however, the opposite was more commonly true.
Low-budget films produced through the efforts of independent companies were churned out by the dozen, often aimed at the drive-in movie crowd. They usually relied on an easy-to-digest high concept, rarely featured an actor you had ever heard of, and were less than stellar in terms of storytelling and technical proficiency. Falling into this category were such pictures as Bobby Jo and the Outlaw, Moonshine County Express, King of the Mountain, and Van Nuys Blvd.
While I have watched a number of these types of movies in the past, one that I had never heard of before recently came to my attention, and I thought for this month’s episode of Rob’s Car Movie Review, I’d give it a review.
So, without further delay, I present to you Double Nickels (1977)!
The theatrical, one-sheet movie poster for Double Nickels. (Image courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
Double Nickels was produced and distributed in the United States by Smokey Productions. Having worked on H.B. Halicki’s prior low-budget movies, the original 1974 version of Gone in 60 Seconds and he Junkman, a relative unknown, Jack Vacek, took it upon himself to try his hand at being an auteur filmmaker. He wrote, directed, produced, edited, acted, and performed stunts in the picture.
Performing alongside of Vacek was an ensemble of totally unknown actors, including Trice Schubert, Edward Abrahms, Heidi Schubert, George Cole, Tex Taylor, and Mick Brennan.
Shot in my current place of residence, Malibu, California, and other locations in the Los Angeles area on a micro-budget of $150,000, Double Nickels tells the story of a pair of California Highway Patrolmen, Smokey (Vacek) and Ed (Abrahms), who monitor a strip of the US1 Pacific Coast Highway.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-19_23-18-08_758337.jpg)
Jack Vacek as the main protagonist, California Highway Patrolman, Smokey. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
A chance encounter with a speeder, George (Cole) who purports to be in the auto repossession business, leads Smokey and Ed to moonlight for George, ostensibly taking back sports and luxury cars that the owners have failed to make payments on.
The two lawmen prove highly adept at boosting cars, successfully outwitting the owners, and on a couple of occasions, the police, whom they must stay clear of, since moonlighting is against Highway Patrol policy.
All is going well as the two rake in the extra dollars to supplement their Highway Patrol paychecks, until Smokey and Ed discover that the cars they have been reclaiming were not, in fact, being financed by any financial institution. They confront George with this information, who promises to question the man who has been bankrolling his repossession business.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-19_23-21-12_581796.jpg)
Edward Abrahms as Highway Patrolman, Ed. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
George delivers a car personally to his backer, Lewis Sloan (Taylor), and queries the man about the nature of his business. Sloan, in a not-so-veiled threat, tells George to mind his own business, prompting George to tell Smokey and Ed that he believes they have all unwittingly gotten themselves mixed up in an auto theft ring.
Realizing their jobs and their very freedom is in Jeopardy, Smokey, Ed, and George go to Sloan’s home and take back one of the cars they had previously boosted. Subsequently, a high-speed pursuit develops between our protagonists and Sloan, setting up a climactic final act that will decide who prevails.
Double Nickels is perhaps the quintessential 1970s B-movie, as it contains all the aforementioned technical deficiencies of the species and much more.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-20_00-19-12_961850.jpg)
George the repo man, portrayed by George Cole. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
For starters, to my eye, the film was likely shot on Super-16mm and blown up to 35mm for distribution to reduce film stock costs. As a result, the movie is left with a squarish aspect-ratio and huge globs of grain in the image. The version I watched was probably transferred from a very old print that had color-shifted over the years, as the color palate leans heavily towards magenta. I actually didn’t mind this so much, as it lends the film a seedy, 1970s look that films like Boogie Nights strived to recreate decades later.
The other technical aspects, such as the live sound recordings and editing, are also quite poor. Sometimes, you simply cannot hear the dialogue or follow the action. Sloppy jump cuts and abrupt scene exits are scattered throughout.
As was the case in the previously mentioned 1974 incarnation of Gone in 60 Seconds, the acting is pretty much abysmal, with the often laughable and ludicrous written words from the screenplay not doing the thespians any favors.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-20_00-37-04_933162.jpg)
Tex Taylor as auto theft kingpin, Lewis Sloan. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
Likewise, the story itself is nothing to write home about, either. The idea that a pair of cops could not see what they were getting themselves into with the repossession scheme is fairly ridiculous and fails to suspend disbelief. The tone of the story also shifts incongruously from drama to over-the-top slapstick comedy at times.
Having just trashed the film, you might find it incredible that I managed to enjoy it to a degree.
The movie’s running time is a mere 88 minutes, so it doesn’t represent a major ask for your time. On a personal level, it was fun for me to see how Malibu’s scenery and landmarks had changed over the decades before I moved here.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-21_01-58-36_058774.jpg)
The movie aptly captures the halcyon lifestyle of 1970s Southern California. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
The movie also acts as a snapshot of 1970s Southern California in the laconic, beach-and-sun-and-chicks-in-bikinis lifestyle that it presents. Hillarious and kitschy are the hairstyles, mustaches, and wide-lapeled, open shirts and bell-bottomed jeans throughout. Gen-Xers like me just love that stuff as it reminds us of our childhoods.
What’s more, the movie delivers in spades in terms of the automotive action.
While we are not presented with multitudes of raucous, high-end muscle cars from the era, likely because the film’s miniscule budget didn’t permit procuring them, we are treated to a few icons of the period.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-21_00-56-01_331972.jpg)
Smokey drives this awesome 1968 Chevy Chevelle SS in the film’s climactic chase sequence. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
The two best cars are the ones that are used in the 17-minute car chase that ends the movie: a 1968 Chevy Chevelle SS and a ‘73 Chevrolet Corvette C3.
The Chevelle, driven by Smokey, is unusual in that it is painted in code MM Burnished Saddle Metallic, a rare medium brown color, with white over-the-top stripes. It features aftermarket mag wheels, a black interior, and, as we see multiple times, is equipped with a manual transmission, which Smokey aggressively rows.
The C3 is driven by Sloan, who consistently chomps on a cigar while sawing at the steering wheel, with his henchman in the passenger seat occasionally leaning out of the window to fire off rounds at Smokey’s car with his .45.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-21_00-59-15_761511.jpg)
Lewis Sloan uses this Bright Orange ’73 Corvette to pursue Smokey. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
The ‘Vette looks fantastic in code 86 Bright Orange with a black interior, and is an automatic transmission car. Sadly, we never get a look under the hood of either car, but do hear their V8s roar throughout the spectacular pursuit.
Another car that features prominently in the film is Smokey’s dilapidated 1957 Chevrolet Task-Force 3100 series pick-up.
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-21_01-07-11_423321.jpg)
Smokey’s 1957 Chevrolet Task-Force 3100 series pick-up is used in a chase sequence in the Los Angeles River. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
Seemingly ancient and covered in peeling paint and primer, the truck features a manual transmission and is involved in multiple chase sequences, including one in the Los Angeles River.
Other vehicles in the movie include multiple Cadillacs, a wild dune buggy, 1970s-style custom vans, super-cool 1974 Dodge Monaco and ’72 Plymouth Satellite police cars, George’s gorgeous 1977 Mercedes-Benz 450 SEL, a 1966 Lincoln Continental with suicide doors, and Smokey’s 1975 Norton Commando 750 for motorcycle fans.
Though far from being a hot car, I’d be remiss in not mentioning the 1971 Ford Pinto that Ed escapes from the cops in by driving it down several flights of stairs. Quite a stunt!
![](https://www.speednik.com/files/2024/07/robs-car-movie-review-double-nickels-1977-2024-07-21_01-13-51_573131.jpg)
Even the movie’s police cars, like this 1972 Plymouth Satellite are cool. (Photo courtesy of Smokey Productions.)
If you go into Double Nickels forewarned that it is no Citizen Kane and that it possesses some of the worst technical and storytelling facets of 1970s low-budget filmmaking, it’s not impossible to enjoy the movie.
I tend to liken it to something you might watch if it was the only thing on TV at 3 am or if you were sick in bed. For all its bad acting and implausible plot machinations, it does nostalgically capture a Southern California that once existed and has some enviable cars and superb pursuits in it.
As such, I give Jack Vacek’s magnum opus five out of ten pistons.
-
News1 week ago
The ‘Blue Walz’: How a low-key Midwestern governor shot to the top to be Harris’ VP pick | CNN Politics
-
Ohio2 days ago
Ohio taxpayers sent families $966 million for private school tuition: Capitol Letter
-
World1 week ago
The day after in Dhaka
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘Confession’ Review: A Live-Action Manga Adaptation Crams Maximum Menace Into One Cabin
-
World1 week ago
Ex-Catalan leader Puigdemont headed back to Spain despite fear of arrest
-
Politics1 week ago
Kamala Harris shuts down anti-Israel protesters during campaign speech in Michigan: 'I'm speaking'
-
Sports1 week ago
What’s in a name (change)? For Josh Hines-Allen, it was about roots and recognition
-
News1 week ago
Map: 5.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Southern California