Connect with us

Movie Reviews

KARATE KID: LEGENDS Review

Published

on

KARATE KID: LEGENDS Review
KARATE KID: LEGENDS is about a young Chinese martial arts prodigy who gets help from his teacher in Beijing and from Mister Miyagi’s prize karate student, Daniel. Li Fong and his mother relocate from Beijing to New York City for an important hospital job. Li attracts unwanted attention from a local karate champion, the ex-boyfriend of a girl Li’s befriended. Li secretly helps the girl’s father, an ex-boxer running a local pizza parlor, train for some boxing matches, to earn extra money to save his business. However, the father’s seriously injured when an opponent cheats. Li feels he owes him something. So, he enters a citywide karate tournament for a $50,000 cash prize.

KARATE KID: LEGENDS has a complex plot leading up to the tournament. So, it lacks the dramatic power of the original 1984 KARATE KID movie. However, it does star Jackie Chan as the kung fu teacher and Ralph Macchio as the original Karate Kid. So, KARATE KID: LEGENDS is fairly entertaining. It has a pro-family worldview extolling honor, fair play and perseverance. However, there’s strong fight scenes and brief foul language.

(BB, CapCap, FR, L, VV, N, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Strong pro-family worldview with strong pro-capitalist elements stresses honor, perseverance, fair play, helping others, and sticking together in times of trouble, a scene shows a wall that seems like a small shrine to a beloved teacher and mother lights a candle by a small photo of her late older son;

Advertisement

Foul Language:

One “s” word, four “a” words, one crude insult, and one OMG profanity;

Violence:

Strong martial arts and boxing violence and three scenes of people fighting on the street includes punching, kicking, flips, a boxing match, a karate tournament, martial arts training, training to box, and a sucker punch on a subway;

Sex:

Advertisement

No sex, but there’s two or three mentions about teenagers having boyfriends;

Nudity:

Upper male nudity during a boxing match and while in training;

Alcohol Use:

No alcohol use, but a mention about a dead man enjoying rice wine;

Advertisement

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

No smoking or drugs and,

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Villains cheat, such as throwing an illegal boxing punch or sucker punching another teenage boy on the subway when he’s not looking, father of teenage protagonist’s new girlfriend owes money to loan sharks for his pizza restaurant.

In KARATE KID: LEGENDS, a teenage kung fu prodigy from China named Li in New York City needs help from Mister Miyagi’s prize student, Daniel, and Miyagi’s kung fu friend in Beijing, who used to teach Li and his late brother, to win the prize money in a citywide karate tournament to help out the father of Li’s new girlfriend. KARATE KID: LEGENDS has a complex plot structure, so it doesn’t reach the dramatic heights of the classic, original 1984 movie, but it’s an entertaining, pro-family action movie about honor, fair play and perseverance, with lots of martial arts fighting and some foul language, which merit caution for older children and younger teenagers.

Advertisement

Teenage kung fu prodigy Li Fong and his mother, a surgeon, relocate from Beijing to New York City when she gets an important hospital job. Li’s brother died after he and Li had a run-in with a kung fu opponent and his buddies after a tournament. Li feels he let his brother down during the fatal altercation.

Li promised his mother to stop kung fu training and fighting for tournaments. However, in New York, he attracts unwanted attention from a local karate champion who happens to be the ex-boyfriend of Mia, a girl Li has befriended. Also, Li secretly helps the girl’s father, an ex-boxer with a local pizza parlor, train for some boxing matches to earn extra money to pay off a loan shark.

During the first boxing match, however, the father’s opponent throws an illegal punch and puts the father into a coma. Once again, Li feels he let somebody down, Mia as well as her father.

Li feels he owes them something. So, he decides to enter a citywide karate tournament with a $50,000 cash prize. His chances of winning look bleak. However, he gets help in training from his kung fu teacher in Beijing, Mr. Han, who enlists the help of Daniel LaRusso, the prize karate student of the late Mister Miyagi. One of Miyagi’s ancestors and one of Han’s trained together in martial arts long ago.

KARATE KID: LEGENDS has a complex plot structure leading up to the tournament. So, it lacks the dramatic power of the original KARATE KID movie, which was released 41 years ago. However, it does star Jack Chan as the kung fu teacher and Ralph Macchio as Daniel, the original Karate Kid. Macchio has become popular on Netflix recreating his role as Daniel in the hit TV series COBRA KAI. Also, Ben Wang makes a charismatic martial arts fighter in the movie as Li Fong. The movie has a good supporting cast beyond that. So, KARATE KID: LEGENDS is fairly entertaining. It also has some humor. For example, there’s a funny “jacket on, jacket off” routine that mimics the “wax on, wax off” jokes in the original KARATE KID.

Advertisement

KARATE KID: LEGENDS has a pro-family worldview that also stresses honor, perseverance and sticking together in times of trouble. The movie’s dialogue describes Han’s martial arts family and Mr. Miyagi’s martial arts family, which includes Daniel, as two branches coming from one tree. That’s also the kind of relationship the movie’s teenage protagonist, Li, establishes with his girlfriend, Mia, and her father. Finally, the plot revolves around helping a small businessman keeping his successful family business open and thriving.

Of course, there’s plenty of martial arts fighting in KARATE KID: LEGENDS, as well as the boxing match that sends the girl’s father to the hospital. KARATE KID: LEGENDS also has some brief foul language, which is mostly light. Finally, two scenes show light commemorative Buddhist shrines to Mr. Miyagi and to Li’s brother. So, MOVIEGUIDE® advises caution for older children and young teenagers.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – “Avatar: Fire and Ash” (20th Century), the third film in the always visually rich franchise that got its start in 2009, brings forward thematic elements that had previously been kept in the background and that viewers of faith will find it impossible to accept and difficult to dismiss. As a result, it requires careful evaluation by mature movie fans.

Against the recurring background of the fictional moon Pandora, the saga of the family whose fortunes were chronicled in the earlier chapters continues. The clan consists of dad Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his wife Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) as well as their three surviving children, teens Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) and Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) and tyke Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss).

Rounding out the household is Jake and Neytiri’s adolescent adopted son, Spider (Jack Champion).

As veterans of the earlier outings will know, Jake was originally a human and a Marine. But, via an avatar, he eventually embraced the identity of Neytiri’s Pandoran tribe, the Na’vi. While their biological kids are to all appearances Na’vi — a towering race with blue skins and tails — Spider is human and requires a breathing mask to survive on Pandora.

Lo’ak is guilt-ridden over his role in the death of his older brother, Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), and wants to redeem himself by proving his worth as a warrior. Kiri is frustrated that, despite her evident spiritual gifts, she’s unable to connect with Eywa, the mother goddess the Na’vi worship.

Advertisement

For his part, Jake is worried about Spider’s future — Neteyam’s death has left the still-grieving Neytiri with a hatred of the “Sky people,” as Earthlings are known on Pandora. He also has to contend with the ongoing threat posed by his potentially deadly rivalry with his former Marine comrade, Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who is also Spider’s estranged father.

As if all that weren’t enough, a further challenge arises when the Metkayina, the sea-oriented Pandorans with whom Jake et al. have taken refuge, are attacked by the fierce fire-centric Mangkwan, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), a malevolent sorceress. A three hour-plus running time is required to tie up these varied strands.

Along the way, the religion adhered to by the main characters becomes more prominent than in previous installments. Thus Eywa is both present on screen and active in the plot. Additionally, Kiri is revealed to have been the product of a virginal conception.

Director and co-writer (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) James Cameron’s extension of his blockbuster series, accordingly, not only includes material uncomfortable at best for Christians but also seems incongruent, overall, with monotheistic belief. Even well-catechized grown-ups, therefore, should approach this sprawling addition to Cameron’s epic with caution.

The film contains nonscriptural beliefs and practices, constant stylized but often intense combat violence with brief gore, scenes of torture, narcotics use, partial nudity, a couple of mild oaths, at least one rough term, numerous crude and a handful of crass expressions and an obscene gesture. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

Published

on

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

If this week’s Telugu release Gurram Paapi Reddy were a human, it would most likely be a teenager. It bursts with energy, overflowing with ideas and wearing its unabashed enthusiasm like a badge of honour. The audience too might end up surrendering to its infectious energy. Yet, like a distracted teenager, the film also gets so enamoured by its very idea that it loses control and does not know where to stop.

The vibe is eerily similar to Jathi Ratnalu early on. Again, Brahmanandam (as Vaidyanathan), is a judge. Faria Abdullah, the actress in the former film, is the only female presence in the lead lineup here. The other oddball male characters — Gurram Paapi Reddy (Naresh Agastya), Chilipi (Vamshidhar Goud), Goyyi (Jeevan Kumar) and Military (Rajkumar Kasireddy) — are the not-so-smart ones who get entangled in a mess.

The similarities end there. Brahmanandam, who is in terrific form, sets the tone of the comedy, doling out harsh punishments to petty criminals, not for their crimes, but for their sheer stupidity in getting caught. Gurram, Chilipi, Goyyi and Military are the victims who reunite after their jail term. This time, they are joined by Soudamini (Faria).

Gurram Paapi Reddy (Telugu)

Director: Murali Manohar

Cast: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah, Brahmanandam, Yogi Babu

Advertisement

Runtime: 160 minutes

Storyline: A gang of four ex-convicts swap dead bodies for easy money and land in a ‘royal’ mess.

While their earlier heist at a jewellery store goes terribly wrong, the new plan is strangely simple. The four men need to swap a dead body from Srisailam with another body in a graveyard in Hyderabad for a meagre sum. While they execute it, albeit with difficulty, it gets messy when the motive behind the swap comes to the fore, dating back to a royal gift from the pre-Independence era.

The key conflict is established prior to the intermission, but newer problems surface later. Though the story idea is deceptively straightforward, the director builds many layers to the fun quotient and it’s evident that he treats comedy like serious business.

The actors react to the situations without trying too hard to impress. The scenes are not only thematically funny, but also packed with outrageously hilarious one-liners. Every time one feels the film’s trajectory is sorted, there is a surprise. The screenplay is busy with backstories and subplots.

Advertisement

The second hour could have benefited from some economy in writing. Past connections are strung together, newer characters and their complexities are introduced, there are backup plans, flashbacks and a song is thrown into the mix. Thankfully, the humour quotient remains unaffected. Some breather would have been welcome.

The subplots involving Sangi Reddy, particularly the courtroom proceedings, and Markandeya Raju’s son crowd the screenplay, leaving the viewers with too many dots to connect. It’s inevitable for some restlessness to creep in towards the final 45 minutes — a stretch packed with several events and coincidences. A clever climax salvages the film.

Gurram Paapi Reddy is aware of the crucial balance between the goofiness of its characters and the seriousness of the plot. Too many characters and a packed, expansive narrative make the film exhausting, given its 160-minute runtime.

Naresh Agastya, Vamshidhar Goud, Faria Abdullah, Jeevan Kumar and Rajkumar Kasireddy share wonderful on-screen camaraderie and get ample scope to shine individually too. Yogi Babu, as a convict with night-blindness, brings the roof down even when he doesn’t dub for himself. Motta Rajendran’s antics look repetitive at times, though they land well.

This is also among Brahmanandam’s best on-screen appearances in recent times. It’s an absolute joy to see the veteran actor ever-hungry to prove his worth when he senses potential in a scene. John Vijay is in dire need of reinvention with his dialogue delivery and body language. Both songs in the film, composed by Krishna Saurabh, though well-shot, feel abrupt.

A narrative with lesser flab would have amplified the film’s impact. The makers tease the audience with a potential sequel idea, but appreciably it does not appear forced. The film is also complete in itself.

Advertisement

Gurram Paapi Reddy is a smartly written and performed con-comedy that delivers laughs aplenty, though a few segments become indulgent.

Published – December 19, 2025 08:22 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews  – The Times of India

James Cameron clarifies Matt Damon’s viral claim that he turned down 10 per cent of ‘Avatar’ profits

Filmmaker James Cameron has addressed actor Matt Damon’s long-circulating claim that he turned down the lead role in Avatar along with a lucrative share of the film’s profits, saying the version widely believed online is “not exactly true.”

For years, Damon has spoken publicly about being offered the role of Jake Sully in the 2009 blockbuster in exchange for 10 per cent of the film’s gross, a deal that would have translated into hundreds of millions of dollars given Avatar’s global earnings of USD 2.9 billion. The role eventually went to Australian actor Sam Worthington, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“Jim Cameron called me — he offered me 10 per cent of Avatar,” Damon says in the clips. “You will never meet an actor who turned down more money than me … I was in the middle of shooting the Bourne movie and I would have to leave the movie kind of early and leave them in the lurch a little bit and I didn’t want to do that … [Cameron] was really lovely, he said: ‘If you don’t do this, this movie doesn’t really need you. It doesn’t need a movie star at all. The movie is the star, the idea is the star, and it’s going to work. But if you do it, I’ll give you 10 per cent of the movie.’”

However, speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Cameron said Damon was never formally offered the part. “I can’t remember if I sent him the script or not. I don’t think I did? Then we wound up on a call and he said, ‘I love to explore doing a movie with you. I have a lot of respect for you as a filmmaker. [Avatar] sounds intriguing. But I really have to do this Jason Bourne movie. I’ve agreed to it, it’s a direct conflict, and so, regretfully, I have to turn it down.’ But he was never offered. There was never a deal,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Advertisement

The director added that discussions never progressed to character details or negotiations. “We never talked about the character. We never got to that level. It was simply an availability issue,” he said.

Addressing the widely shared belief that Damon turned down a massive payday, Cameron said the actor may have unintentionally merged separate ideas over time. “What he’s done is extrapolate ‘I get 10 percent of the gross on all my films,’” Cameron said, adding that such a deal would not have happened in this case. “So he’s off the hook and doesn’t have to beat himself up anymore.”

Continue Reading

Trending