Movie Reviews
Film Review: The Beekeeper; Jason Statham is the bee's knees in ridiculous actioner – The AU Review
If there’s one thing we can rely on Jason Statham for, it’s B-movie cheap thrills that epitomise the term “guilty pleasure”. Escapism in its purest, bloodiest form, The Beekeeper (Statham took the B-movie memo a little too literally, it would seem) is a ridiculous actioner from proven genre director David Ayer (End of Watch, Fury, Suicide Squad) that has an awful lot of fun throwing everything but the kitchen sink into the cement mixer that is Kurt Wimmer‘s script; political corruption, secret societies and punchable tech-bros all on hand here, with an armed and dangerous Statham at the ready.
It all starts off quite calmly for Statham’s Adam Clay, a literal beekeeper who keeps to himself, harvesting honey from his expansive colony in the rented farmhouse of sweet-natured retiree Eloise Parker (Phylicia Rashad) in upstate Massachusetts. One evening, whilst pottering about online, she’s informed that her computer has been infected, and a number on screen prompts her to call about assistance. Unfortunately, the smarmy, aforementioned tech-bro with the punchable face is on the other end (played to punchable perfection by David Witts), and he cons the trusting Eloise out of her lifesavings, and the $2 million charity fund she’s head of, driving her to commit suicide.
It’s a considerably sad start for a film that announces its on-the-nose mentality with its title and peppers one-liners throughout that play on every bee-related pun you can think of; at one point, an exaggerated, South African assassin (Taylor James), about to strike Clay down, audibly asks “To bee or not to bee.” Yeah, it’s that kind of movie Oh yeah, there’s assassins afoot, because, you see, Clay isn’t just a beekeeper in the literal sense, there’s a whole collective of trained killers known as “Beekeepers”, and Clay, having been kicked, is looking to take out the naughty bees that have disrupted the hive’s dedication to the queen and her (supposedly) good work.
Honestly, you just have to go along with it as Clay hunts down those responsible for siphoning Eloise’s money, which leads him to brutally off many a disposable goon in a variety of manners that brings to mind recent action examples as the John Wick series, but, with the film’s committed lunacy, has more in common with the 80s and 90s action vehicles that were so often fronted by the likes of Dolph Lundgren and Jean-Claude Van Damme.
The ease in which Clay inserts himself into a variety of situations that are supposedly manned by competent law enforcers – all his shenanigans lead him to be tailed by a determined FBI agent (Emmy Raver-Lampman, leaning very heavily into the tough cop routine), who also happens to be the daughter of the departed Eloise – means the film, as a whole, has little stakes, and Josh Hutcherson‘s coked-up, man-baby villain never feels as if he’s going to stand a remote chance, but, again, The Beekeeper never comes across as a designed genre piece to buck expected stereotypes. It’s big, dumb fun, with a shockingly strong cast (Jeremy Irons and Minnie Driver even earn credits here), and if you expect elevation or intelligence, then you’ve grabbed from the wrong honeypot.
With previous Statham creations The Transporter and The Mechanic managing sequels off their simplistic premises, The Beekeeper would make for a fine addition to the actor’s seemingly unofficial trilogy of deceptively skilled professionals. We know how intricate and exciting the action genre can be, and even though The Beekeeper pushes against such a grain with standard dialogue and a nonsensical temperament, Statham’s truly the bee’s knees in this lane, and, sometimes, all you need to get the job done is a superficially sweet treat.
THREE STARS (OUT OF FIVE)
The Beekeeper is now screening in Australian theatres.
More to Explore on the AU:
Movie Reviews
Movie reviews drop for Project Hail Mary, They Will Kill You as critics weigh in – Art Threat
Show summary Hide summary
Movie Reviews are now pouring in for two wildly different films competing at the box office. Project Hail Mary is soaring with critical acclaim, while They Will Kill You faces a significantly rougher critical reception in the same weekend. Here’s what critics are saying about both.
🔥 Quick Facts
- Project Hail Mary Rating: 95% on Rotten Tomatoes with 8.4/10 on IMDB
- They Will Kill You Rating: 63% on Rotten Tomatoes with 6.5/10 on IMDB
- Release Spread: Project Hail Mary debuted March 20, They Will Kill You March 27, 2026
- Box Office Gap: Hail Mary earning $164.3 million domestically, Kill You debuted with only $5 million
Ryan Gosling’s Sci-Fi Adventure Dominates Critical Praise
Project Hail Mary, directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, has become the undisputed critical darling of late March. The 97%-rated film on major review aggregators showcases Ryan Gosling and Sandra Hüller in a space adventure that critics describe as heartfelt and visually stunning. According to reports, the film demonstrates how science fiction works best with emotional depth and character development at its core. Reviewers consistently praise its balance of action, humor, and genuine pathos.
The movie’s success extends beyond critical praise into audience reception. IMDB’s user score of 8.4/10 demonstrates strong viewer enthusiasm, while Metacritic’s 77 score signals broadly positive critical consensus. Rotten Tomatoes gives it 95% from critics, making it a rare achievement in blockbuster filmmaking for 2026. The film’s box office trajectory confirms this momentum, with earnings approaching $165 million domestically.
Zazie Beetz Leads Gore-Filled Horror That Misses With Critics
They Will Kill You, directed by Kirill Sokolov, takes a vastly different critical path. The horror-action-comedy film stars Zazie Beetz in a role critics acknowledge showcases her talent for intense performances, yet the film itself struggles with narrative and thematic depth. The movie features Patricia Arquette and Myha’la in supporting roles within a story about a woman working as a housekeeper in a New York high-rise filled with cult members.
Critics note that while the film excels in visual style and unbridled gore, it lacks substantive storytelling and character stakes. Rotten Tomatoes rates it 63%, signaling a mixed critical reception, while IMDB’s 6.5/10 score reflects audience disappointment. The film released March 27 to a disappointing $5 million opening weekend from Warner Bros., suggesting audiences may share critical hesitations about its derivative plot and tonal inconsistencies.
Critical Comparison and Reception Details
| Movie Detail | Project Hail Mary | They Will Kill You |
| Rotten Tomatoes | 95% Critics | 63% Critics |
| IMDB Rating | 8.4/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Release Date | March 20, 2026 | March 27, 2026 |
| Director | Phil Lord, Christopher Miller | Kirill Sokolov |
| Lead Actor | Ryan Gosling | Zazie Beetz |
“Project Hail Mary is a smart, moving, and very satisfying sci-fi adventure with real heart. A film that reminds you that science fiction works best not when it prioritizes spectacle over substance.”
— IMDB User Reviews, Consensus
Why Critics Embrace Heart Over Gore in 2026 Releases
The striking contrast between these two films reveals what critics value in contemporary cinema. Project Hail Mary succeeds by balancing ambitious science fiction concepts with genuine emotional storytelling and character development. The film trusts its audience to care about Ryan Gosling’s journey and the stakes involved in his space mission. Critics praise the cinematography, sound design, and the chemistry between leads as elevating the material beyond standard blockbuster fare.
Conversely, They Will Kill You emphasizes style, gore, and shock value without equal investment in narrative coherence or character motivation. While Zazie Beetz delivers an energetic performance, critics note the script fails to give her material worthy of her talent. The film’s Tarantino-influenced aesthetic and cartoonish violence entertain intermittently but don’t sustain engagement across its runtime. This disconnect explains why audiences stayed away in the opening weekend.
What Do These Reviews Mean for Future Box Office and Awards Season?
For Project Hail Mary, critical success likely signals continued audience interest and potential awards circuit momentum. The combination of 95% critical approval, strong audience reception, and proven box office legs suggests this film could maintain theater presence through April and beyond. Industry analysts expect it to continue collecting records previously held by other 2026 releases. Conversely, They Will Kill You faces an uphill battle with its modest opening and mixed reviews potentially limiting word-of-mouth expansion. The film may struggle to expand beyond its core horror audience during subsequent weekends.
These diverging critical receptions illustrate how modern audiences and critics increasingly reward substance over spectacle. Movie Reviews for both titles emphasize character, emotional investment, and thematic depth as determining factors in critical success. Whether audiences will sustain interest in both films throughout their theatrical runs remains to be seen, but early indicators suggest that the gap between them will only widen as release weekends progress forward.
Give your feedback
★★★★★
Be the first to rate this post
or leave a detailed review
Movie Reviews
Movie Review | Severin Films Releases Two Stunning 4Ks By Jess Franco – VAMPYROS LESBOS and SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY – Review
Film Feature by James Learoyd
Exciting news for horror fans everywhere! If you love Eurotrash, classic exploitation genre-films and a general ora of the bizarre, there’s a chance that you already love cinema’s greatest freak, Jesús (Jess) Franco: the controversial Spanish horror legend who produced almost (though perhaps over) 200 feature-length films in his career. These pictures were frequently defined by their musical experimentation; inclusion of erotic, almost pornographic, scenarios; as well as a flowing, stream-of-consciousness aesthetic formed through never-ending zooms, lack of concrete narrative, and reliance on the expressionistic language of editing.
I’m very happy to announce then that we’ve been blessed with two new 4Ks / blu-rays from Severin (a long-time supporter of Franco’s work) which are both lovingly put together with hours of phenomenal bonus features. The movies are Vampyros Lesbos (1971) – Franco’s most known and celebrated work – and She Killed in Ecstasy (1971), both starring the tragically departed Soledad Miranda in two of her six titles she produced with Franco over the span of a year. I was lucky enough to get early access to these discs and not only found myself falling in love with these movies again, but becoming truly inspired by the additional material provided. So, let’s dive into this provocative double-bill!
VAMPYROS LESBOS
On a rewatch, I can safely say that Vampyros Lesbos is a masterpiece, but in its own unusual way, and on its own unfathomable, formally stimulating terms. And part of what makes it a masterpiece might be because it requires more than one viewing, as well as a complete immersion in the larger contexts of Jess Franco’s filmic intentions. Franco’s love of older literature, especially horror, can be seen through much of his filmography, yet nowhere is it better crystalised as here, wherein he reinterprets the classical tale of Bram Stoker’s Dracula through a modern-day setting, queer characters and a sexually explicit presentation.
My main takeaway from the piece itself on my first rewatch is this: Franco is most skilled at immersing his audience in environments and feelings that are utterly intangible. For instance, the opening burlesque performance involving the use of reflection, the black background (which the film keeps returning to in snippets after the fact) completely exists within the deepest recesses of my psyche – despite, or because, it geographically lacks clarity, and doesn’t feel as if it has any real beginning or ending in terms of sequential beats. This is the kind of stuff this critic obsesses over.
(BONUS FEATURES)
I listened to one of the two featured audio-commentaries provided, that by Kat Ellinger, which is quite wonderful. At first, I found it overwhelming when it came to the focus on more academic discussion; but as soon as I settled in for her thought-provoking perspective, I became absorbed in how Ellinger framed what we were watching through the political and historic. I loved how she takes us through the relevance of literature as well as the contexts under which Franco made his films (frequently in exile due to the constraints imposed by dictator Generalissimo Franco of Spain and his regime, in addition to the authoritarian nature of the Catholic church at the time). Jess Franco was a real radical!
There is a featured interview with an old and grizzled Jess Franco, shortly before his passing in 2013, titled ‘Interlude in Lesbos’ which is quite interesting. Holding onto a cigarette which seemingly remains forever unlit, the man rests further and further back in his chair over the course of the footage, and the way the camera tracks his movements I found quite amusing.
‘Fever Dracula’ is then a featured interview with the incredibly articulate Stephen Thrower – the leading Franco academic whose writing and testimony has long been a bit of a staple of many physical releases of the director’s films. In this interview, he focuses on how Vampyros Lesbos announces a new and abstract form of cinematic language – one that would come to define the Franco style.
But maybe the biggest boast of these bonus features is titled ‘The Red Scarf Diaries’: an interview with Sean Baker regarding how the work of Soledad Miranda and Jess Franco influenced his Best-Picture-winning Anora. One can’t help but be charmed by how the Oscar-winning filmmaker expresses the journey all genre-fans embark on with Franco; one of perplexed beguilement, at first unimpressed by how “rough around the edges” the work is, yet eventually identifying the hallmarks of a real “auteur” with undiluted vision.
We then get an entry in an extended travel docuseries entitled ‘In the Land of Franco’ (this being Part 12). This is also presented by Stephen Thrower as he travels across Europe to now-iconic shooting locations, this part featuring hidden-away areas of Paris most prominently. It’s simple, informative and effective.
But arguably most significant on the disc is a feature which directly addresses the feeling of mourning which has hovered over every previous bit of testimony: the tragic car crash which lead to the death of Soledad Miranda at just age 27, while she was only partway through her planned collaborations with Franco. ‘Sublime Soledad’, presented by Amy Brown, serves as a poignant tribute. It’s tragic that Miranda never got to see any of these movies in the completed states which have become so beloved, but
Brown puts it nicely that it’s apparent that she found this kind of work creatively gratifying. Her performances will live on.
Finally, there’s a short and silly feature entitled ‘Jess is Yoda’ which I don’t want to spoil for everyone… but it’s hilarious, and quite enlightening.
SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY
What an insane film. Again, a rewatch for this critic, this picture is the far pricklier counter to the hypnotic tendencies of Vamyros Lesbos. She Killed in Ecstasy is a truly visceral watch, consisting of deeply disturbing sequences and genuine horror. It’s the strangest “revenge” movie out there.
A medical man is discovered to be conducting experiments on unborn foetuses (Thrower amusingly describes them as “pickled foetuses” since we’re shown the disruptive imagery of them stored in jars accompanied by the funky opening credits) and is then outcast from his profession, leading the character to commit suicide. His lover (played incredibly by Miranda) then takes it upon herself to brutally murder everyone on the board who voted for his dismissal. I love this movie.
Within the bonus features, it’s hilarious how conflicted Thrower is with the backwards moral implications of the film. His interview is ‘Ecstasy in Rage’ and is a great watch. It’s almost as if we are witnessing in real time Thrower attempt to make sense of what Jess was trying to say. He concludes that there’s a cognitive dissonance at play; Franco is depicting some of the most unsettling stuff but doing so in an almost glib and flippant manner, with suicide and murder being complemented by a fast-paced, comedic-sounding style of jazz.
My interpretation is that the presentation of the film – and just how unapologetically it places us in the perspective of a ‘bad person’ – makes the story feel even more disturbing, and Franco’s style and experimentation all the more ideologically provocative.
Other offerings on Disc 2 include another instalment of ‘In the Land of Franco’, another interview with Franco called ‘Jess Killed in Ecstasy’ (same setup as last time – in his old age, he’s still funny, horny and a genuine cinephile), as well as the same ‘Sublime Soledad’ video essay by Amy Brown. Also, on both this and the previous discs are the very entertaining German-language trailers.
But one more touching feature is an interview with actor Paul Muller in his old age, who was a frequent Franco collaborator. He provides some amusing anecdotes about the director and his fascinating persona. I especially enjoyed how he highlighted Franco’s ultra-relaxed style of direction. There was never any script, and Franco would just allow the performers to act whenever they either did or didn’t feel like it – often getting just partway through the day, Jess would break for lunch and say, “we’ll continue tomorrow” (there are many similarities to Franco’s idol Jean-Luc Godard in this respect).
To surmise, Severin has produced a comprehensive guide and appreciation of Franco’s work, with two of his most significant releases and creatively pure expressions. These discs were also far more emotionally involving and reflective than I was anticipating! And when reevaluating what Jess Franco did so well as a visual artist, one could argue that more cinema should be brave enough to offer a location or mood without the need for point B to follow on from point A.
Franco’s worlds grow in the mind over time, crafting a place that you can revisit, be hypnotised by, and yet still not fully comprehend the reasons for its resonance.
Movie Reviews
Has Super Mario Bros. From 1993 Actually Aged Well? | IGN Flashback Review – IGN
In 1993, Nintendo unleashed the first big budget video game adaptation with Super Mario Bros. A bafflingly muddled mixture of influences that, for more than 30 years, has been the gold standard for bad movies. IGN’s Brian Altano joins Clint Gage and Scott Collura to talk about the troubled production that plagued the Mushroom Kingdom, why Mario wears yellow for nearly a third of the movie and how 2 weeks is all that separates Dennis Hopper as Koopa from Jurassic Park. Can Super Mario Bros. has a chance to set a new high score at IGN? Strap in to the de-evolution machine because that’s what Flashback Reviews are for!
-
Miami, FL5 days agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
South-Carolina2 days agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
New Mexico1 week agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Science1 week agoRecord Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
-
Minneapolis, MN5 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Tennessee1 week agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Politics1 week agoTrump gives Iran 48-hour ultimatum to reopen Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on power plants
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoMovie Review: “FORBIDDEN FRUITS” – On Wednesdays We Cast Spells – Rue Morgue