Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Self Reliance

Published

on

Film Review: Self Reliance


























Rating: 2 out of 5.

Seasoned comedy actor Jake Johnson tries his hand behind the camera in mildly amusing Self Reliance. Johnson also leads the film opposite Anna Kendrick (Pitch Perfect, A Simple Favor), both playing contestants in some twisted game of cat and mouse. If only Self Reliance leaned into a thriller meets comedy vibe, its premise could have been fulfilled. With omnipresent murderers supposedly always lurking, so much as a single moment of danger would instantly elevate the film. Instead, it ends up rather slight and unremarkable.

Produced by comedy legends The Lonely Island, Self Reliance begins as Andy Samberg the actor, starring as himself, commands Tommy (Johnson) to join him in a limo. As Andy soon explains, single, childless Tommy has been selected to participate in the biggest reality show on the dark web. He could be eligible to win $1,000,000 in cash—of course, there’s one major catch. In order to nab the funds, Tommy must survive thirty days being relentlessly pursued by people who want to murder him. What’s in it for the opposers never gets elaborated on much, but if Tommy is to have any hope of surviving, he may need to take advantage of a surprising loophole.

Tommy can only be killed if completely alone. In other words, making certain that every second of his daily routine gets spent surrounded by another human is genuinely vital to his survival. Not a single one of Tommy’s family believes his plight exists. He tries to hire a man to stay with him for the full thirty days and “shadow” him. The trajectory of Self Reliance changes in a major way from the second Tommy meets up with Maddy (Kendrick), a fellow contestant in the game. The two began a quick and easy love affair, with Maddy clinging to her mother in the hopes of making it out the contest on the other side.

Advertisement

Stylistically speaking, very little here sets itself apart from a number of indie comedies at any given film festival. There are no unique camera angles, nor do any exciting chase sequences or moments of genuine uncertainty about the game itself rear their head. A supporting cast of familiar faces, from Christopher Lloyd to Emily Hampshire, pop in here or there. They leave absolutely no major marks on the narrative as a whole.

To be honest, I expected a sharper, funnier movie from Jake Johnson. The premise screams with opportunities that Johnson does not embrace. That’s a real shame considering that the film itself is not atrocious or anything, and the cast mostly delivers. It’s more a matter of the parts not adding up to a satisfying whole. In some ways, Self Reliance reminded me of Charlie Day’s directorial effort from last year, Fool’s Paradise. I will say it manages to be a bit better than that, even if that’s not really saying much anyway.

Sign up to play the game of Self Reliance, exclusively in AMC Theaters one night only on January 3rd.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Jay Kelly (2025)

Published

on

Movie Review – Jay Kelly (2025)

Jay Kelly, 2025. 

Directed by Noah Baumbach.
Starring George Clooney, Adam Sandler, Laura Dern, Greta Gerwig, Riley Keough, Grace Edwards, Stacey Keach, Jim Broadbent, Patrick Wilson, Emily Mortimer and Billy Crudup.

SYNOPSIS:

Famous movie actor Jay Kelly embarks on a journey of self-discovery, confronting his past and present with his devoted manager Ron. Poignant and humor-filled, pitched at the intersection of regrets and glories.

Advertisement

Noah Baumbach introduces George Clooney’s Jay Kelly with a beautiful behind-the-scenes one-take that hints we’re about to get a wizard’s curtain look at what it takes to make it in Hollywood. It’s another stab at Babylon with the Netflix bucks, or Jerry Maguire in the acting world. In a way, that’s what this muddled melodrama is, but the journey is so downright odd that it’s difficult to care about anything that’s going on.

Clooney is an aging icon, essentially playing himself, who instead of taking a part in a project directed by two of Hollywood’s up-and-coming stars, is triggered into going on a European vacation to stalk his youngest daughter. This throws his entourage into a panic. A ragtag group of highly strung enablers that includes Adam Sandler’s agent, Laura Dern’s PA, and Emily Mortimer’s stylist.

On this Planes, Trains and Automobiles journey, Jay steps into scenes from the past – his big break and the moral ramifications of it, meeting the mother of his first child, or letting down a director he loved dearly. They are all played with melancholy, a soft-focus sadness befitting of a movie loaded with regret. If that tone had been sustained then Jay Kelly might have earned the empathy and heart that it so yearns for. 

However, these moments are peppered throughout a film that’s tonally all-over-the-place. At one stage it appears Clooney has stepped into a sitcom as he boards a train and is confronted by a conveyor belt of the broadest characters imaginable. It’s so heightened and over-the-top that any intended mirth is rendered redundant by the fact you’re bemused by the creative choices. It’s a reaction that’s repeated as they visit Italy, where they encounter even more of these cartoonish characters, and it all culminates in a baffling chase across a field, the conclusion of which elicits the wrong kind of laughter.

It’s all the more jarring because the cast are putting in awards-worthy performances. Clooney is magnificent in the contemplative moments; the discussions with his eldest daughter (the terrific Riley Keough), a reunion with his old drama school “budd-ay” Tim (a phenomenal turn from Billy Crudup), and a final-reel encounter with his ball-busting father (Stacy Keach). These are the times when Kelly becomes Clooney, intentionally blurring that line, grounding the character in reality, and that’s when the film lands, when you feel for him, because on-the-whole Jay’s an unlikeable and empty presence. But then that’s the whole idea.

Advertisement

The same can’t be said for Sandler, whose beat-down agent is to some extent the audience projection, especially during the more exasperating parts of the film. Better when he’s afforded quieter asides than being part of a broadly painted family that includes the most Jonathan Lipnicki kid since Jonathan Lipnicki, his nice-guy turn will surely land him plenty of nominations come awards season.

In the end Baumbach, who co-wrote the script with Emily Mortimer, can’t decide whether he wants to admonish his star or celebrate him, but by landing somewhere in the middle it dulls the impact of Jay Kelly. The final flourish is a perfect example of this, where Jay sits through a show reel of George Clooney’s finest moments, from The Peacemaker, through Syriana and The Thin Red Line, and it’s hard not to get swept up in the gravitas and emotion of it all, but come the dimming of the lights you begin to wonder whether you or the characters have learned anything at all.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film ★ ★ / Movie ★ ★

Matt Rodgers – Follow me on Twitter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Angammal Movie Review: Small story with layered, believable people

Published

on

Angammal Movie Review: Small story with layered, believable people
0

The Times of India

TNN, Dec 04, 2025, 4:44 PM IST

3.5

Angammal Movie Synopsis: A widow refuses to wear a blouse to please her son’s prospective in-laws, sparking quiet family conflict over conformity and dignity.Angammal Movie Review: The smallest acts of defiance can become the biggest battles. Angammal (Geetha Kailasam) has lived her entire life wearing traditional attire without a blouse, exposing one shoulder and her chest in a way she finds comfortable. Her younger son Pavalam (Saran), fresh from medical school and eager to introduce his girlfriend Jasmine (Mullaiyarasi) and her affluent family, asks his mother to change this one thing. Just wear a blouse, he says. Look sophisticated. Angammal refuses, and that refusal becomes the film’s entire engine.Director Vipin Radhakrishnan keeps the premise simple but pours effort into making these characters feel real. This is character-first filmmaking. Even Sudalai (Bharani), the aimless elder brother who idles away with his nadhaswaram, registers as an actual person rather than a rural type. His interactions with his wife Sharada (Thendral Raghunathan), his brother, and with Angammal carry genuine texture. You believe these people exist beyond what the script demands of them.Geetha Kailasam absolutely carries this film. Angammal’s wit, stubbornness, loneliness, and pride all come through in how she moves, reacts, and shifts her body language. She’s flawed and often unreasonable, which only makes her more compelling. This isn’t a performance that announces itself loudly. It works through small gestures and sharp line deliveries that accumulate into something memorable.The conflict itself is less about society actively oppressing Angammal and more about Pavalam’s insecurities. He’s projecting what he thinks others will judge, creating his own prison of expectations. That layer of introspection gives the film more weight than a straightforward tradition-versus-modernity reading would. The family’s attempts to convince Angammal reveal their own fears and compromises as much as hers.Saran handles Pavalam’s conflicted affection decently, though his persistence on this single issue occasionally feels mismatched with his otherwise mild personality. Anjoy Samuel’s cinematography captures the arid, windy terrain without overplaying it, letting the setting enhance rather than dominate.Runtime is the main limitation here. Two hours is a stretch for a premise this contained. A few scenes circle back to the same arguments without fresh angles, and the pacing sags when the film has already made its point. Tighter editing would have sharpened the emotional impact considerably.The film lands because it refuses to pick sides or wrap things neatly. These people are stubborn, flawed, and contradictory, and the script lets them stay that way through the end.Written By: Abhinav Subramanian

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Oh. What. Fun.’ on Amazon Prime Video, a cruddy Christmas comedy that Hangs Michelle Pfeiffer out to dry

Published

on

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Oh. What. Fun.’ on Amazon Prime Video, a cruddy Christmas comedy that Hangs Michelle Pfeiffer out to dry

Oh. What. Fun. (now streaming on Amazon Prime Video) is for all the put-upon moms out there who do all the work during Christmas. They bake cinnamon rolls, wrap presents, light candles, deck the halls, haul the decks, glaze the ham, arrange cookies just so in little tins, take out the trash, feed the ceremonial holiday chupacabra, lubricate the hydraulics on the cement mixer – whatever the tradition calls for, they do it. They all live in gigantic houses and look like Michelle Pfeiffer, too, with her hair in a loose side braid and a $229 Williams Sonoma apron around her waist. But this particular Xmas-movie mom has had enough of being underappreciated, and that’s why there’s a record-scratch FZWOOP sound about 80 seconds in. (You’ve been warned.) So: is Oh. What Fun. any actual fun? Well. About that. 

The Gist: Claire Clauster (Pfeiffer) has an ax to grind, and we can almost hear blade hitting stone as she narrates about how every Christmas movie is about men, men, men. In reality, it’s the women who are “the true heroes of the holidays,” she says. They do all the work while everyone else sips cocoa on the couch and steps on all the best lines in Christmas Vacation. I’d feel a little more sympathetic for Claire if she didn’t come right out and admit that she starts planning for Christmas on Jan. 1, which is rather OTT, right? But hahaha, this movie isn’t necessarily about how it might be OK if she’d just elect to do one or two less things every Christmas. I mean, maybe she’s doing some of this to herself, which is what the movie is sorta accidentally about sometimes? I mean, it’s not a big deal if the fam dropped the chupacabra ceremony from the Xmas tradition agenda – it’s always so long, drawn-out and messy, what with all the blood, you know? – so Mom can put her feet up for a stretch. She always insists on polishing the extra-fancy tridents first, and badger livers are so expensive now, what with the tariffs. Maybe we should just skip it this year. I’m sure Jesus won’t mind.

Wait, are we still talking about the FZWOOP movie? Yes of course! Claire is an empty-nester alongside hubby Nick (Denis Leary). While she does All The Things, he sits in the garage, putting together a dollhouse that seems to require an engineering degree he clearly doesn’t possess. It’s a gift for their twin grandkids, soon to visit with their mother, Channing (Felicity Jones), Claire and Nick’s oldest offspring, a.k.a. the responsible one, and her goofy hubby Doug (Jason Schwartzman). The middle kid is Taylor (Chloe Grace Moretz), who shows up every year with a different girlfriend, this time, Donna (Devery Jacobs), introduced as DJ Sweatpants, which is a Gen Z joke! Kids these days! They like bad music and wear sloppy clothes! Please laugh! The youngest is Sammy (Dominic Sessa, depressingly far from new holiday classic The Holdovers), a slacker-type fresh off a breakup with his girlfriend (Maude Apatow). Across the street lives Claire’s archrival in Xmas decor and celebration perfection, Jeanne (Joan Chen), whose daughter Lizzie (Havana Rose Liu) might have just thrown a lingering glance in Sammy’s general direction.

Like any good suburban White lady living in an adorable, spaciously sprawling home, and whose surely considerable income is never even hinted at (maybe she and Nick are retired?), Claire worships an Oprah-Martha-style morning talk show host that airs at a time accessible only to people who don’t work, Zazzy Tims (Eva Longoria), and good Christ on a cracker, there’s a ton of big names in this movie, isn’t there? I think that means the movie doesn’t suck 99 fruitcakes! All Claire wants is to enter a Zazzy-sponsored contest for the Best Christmas Mom Ever, but everyone in the family is just too self-involved to nominate her despite the fact that she does EVERYTHING for EVERYBODY ELSE. E.g., get tickets for the whole family to see a holiday dance extravaganza, and then gets left behind, and nobody notices until after the show starts. Whoops. And so, nearly halfway into the movie, the premise finally kicks in, and she snaps. By the way, the chupacabra thing is just a joke. Promise! I swear to god and the Holiest of Marys, and as always, hail St. Nick!

Oh What Fun movie
Photo: Alisha Wetherill/Prime

What Movies Will It Remind You Of? Oh. What. Fun. really wants to be a cross between home-for-the-holidays stuff like The Family Stone and looser, sillier flicks like classic Christmas Vacation or unclassic Christmas with the Kranks, with a nod to Home Alone

Performance Worth Watching: Watching Pfeiffer try to corral her hastily sketched character, who careens wildly between relatably sweet and borderline wacko, might be unintentionally funny if it wasn’t at the expense of a beloved longtime actor who’s won us over a dozen-plus times during her Hollywood career.

Advertisement

Memorable Dialogue: A fellow underappreciated mom commiserates with Claire: “My stocking looks like a limp penis. No love. It just hangs there.” 

A Holiday Tradition: Baked goods, prezzies, ugly sweaters, betinseled greenery, carols, stockings on fireplaces, lawn inflatables, deep-seated familial resentment boiling over into toxicity, Elf on a Shelf horrors – Christmas is fully intact here.

Does The Title Make Any Sense? It’s sarcasm, ya freakin’ moron. Especially when you take into account how much fun you’ll have while watching it.  

Where to watch Oh What Fun movie
Photo: Everett Collection

Our Take: Per Claire, the only three words a mom wants to hear at Christmastime are… “Can I help?” That’s the joke! That’s also the theme of Oh. What. Fun., the punctuation asserting the cynical snark silently simmering beneath all the overly forced, peppermint bark-fueled mirth, here exaggerated so it makes a bigger noise when the protagonist makes it all go kablooey. One can really sense Pfeiffer struggling to center her character, and filmmaker Michael Showalter (Wet Hot American Summer, The Big Sick) shows little interest in helping out his protagonist with tighter writing or specific direction, thus adding a layer of irony to this dumbass movie. Are we supposed to sympathize with her, or believe she’s gotten a bit too kooky about Christmas? Moms get no respect from their families, neighbors or film directors, it seems.

The movie proceeds with the consistently nagging sense that none of the star-riddled cast deserves a shoddy screenplay content to be a decoupage of cliches cribbed from too many of the movies it directly references (A Charlie Brown Christmas, A Christmas Story and several others get snippets of screentime here, a pinheaded miscalculation that inevitably leads to Oh. What. Fun. being the object of unfavorable comparisons). Showalter just doesn’t seem to care that much, his cast flailing for emotional handholds – especially Jones, who seems overwhelmed with the task of keeping this circus of nonsense grounded – and executing a tonally and thematically jumbled script, which might not be as objectionable if the jokes were funnier and the characters less canned. 

One set piece finds Claire shoplifting from a notable mall store that gets unofficial promotional consideration; another features Sessa’s pointedly dreary performance of ‘The 12 Days of Christmas.’ There’s a level of desperation to the comedy here that’s more depressing than joyful. Typically funny folks like Moretz and Schwartzman do little more than fart around, Danielle Brooks drops in for a cameo that no-so-subtly extolls the virtues of being a delivery driver (please note which streaming service is premiering this movie), and Chen’s character is one joke begging to be something more than a Stepfordish stereotype. Oh. What. Fun. is a dried-out festive cheese log of a movie and any attempt to appreciate its sad stabs at humor is to bust your cracker in it every stinking time. Throw it out in the yard for chupacabra bait.

Advertisement

Our Call: Oh. What. Fun. jingle smells. SKIP IT.

jingle-binge-banner
Photos: Everett Collection, Photo Illustration: Dillen Phelps

It’s the most wonderful time of the year! (At least, that’s what Andy Williams promised.) The holidays are a time to celebrate with family, friends, food, and, let’s not forget, fun things to watch. Whether you’re huddled up with the whole family in your living room or cozying up under the covers with your tablet, let Decider be your guide to all things festive this holiday season.

John Serba is a freelance film critic from Grand Rapids, Michigan. Werner Herzog hugged him once.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending