Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Magnus von Horn Crafts an Evocative Nightmare in ‘The Girl with the Needle’ – Awards Radar

Published

on

Film Review: Magnus von Horn Crafts an Evocative Nightmare in ‘The Girl with the Needle’ – Awards Radar

To say Magnus von Horn’s The Girl with the Needle is hard to watch may be the understatement of the year. Even when its harrowing sound design doesn’t make the audience subject to agonizing screams that rattle our bones and haunt our minds long after the credits have finished rolling, the movie’s overall presentation destabilizes and shocks the very minute cinematographer Michał Dymek (who also worked with Jesse Eisenberg on A Real Pain this year, demonstrating massive range) distorts several faces in its opening shot. It’s a complex sequence of images to describe in words, especially when feeling it in front of our eyes. However, it must be seen to be believed. 

The film is thoroughly unpleasant, particularly in the context in which von Horn depicts and the protagonist we follow for 123 minutes. For some, that may be a massively hard sell, and it’s understandable why many will not want to go near a movie like this because it doesn’t simply show brutal acts of violence but makes the audience experience each ounce of dread for two brutal hours. The dirty, almost perverse use of black-and-white primes the audience that this will not be a joyful story, and even if there are fleeting moments of hope in Karoline’s (Vic Carmen Sonne) path, they are almost always supplanted by despair and loss. 

Karoline works in a factory during World War I but is struggling to make ends meet after the presumed death of her husband, Peter (Besir Zeciri). Having not heard anything about him ever since he went to war, she has moved on and becomes infatuated with Jørgen (Joachim Fjelstrup), the factory owner, who has also liked Karoline. These moments of love between the two aren’t depicted happily, even if a slight connection begins to blossom. One, however, sees that Jørgen is simply using Karoline to satiate his sexual impulses, which she can’t realize. But since this is a story where pain trumps anything else, their presumptive marriage gets shut down by Jørgen’s mother (Benedikte Hansen), resulting in Karoline being left alone and pregnant. 

Her husband has also returned, morbidly disfigured by the war, and has become an object of attraction for a circus of “freaks” to look at. When he comes back home, Karoline gives him food, but immediately rejects him, wanting nothing to do with the fact that he is now a “monster.” However, after she no longer has a job following her “break-up” with Jørgen, she decides to end it all and sticks a needle in herself to get rid of the baby. The black-and-white subdues the blood and any outright moments of ‘gore’ but makes it even more disturbing when Dymek lingers on her face as the needle slowly penetrates her body. We feel each ounce of the pain she inflicts upon herself, further exacerbated by an unshakably haunting musical score from Frederikke Hoffmeier, recalling the atmosphere Mica Levi laid out through their score in The Zone of Interest

Karoline’s life is ultimately saved by Dagmar Overbye (an incredible Trine Dynholm), the bakery owner who takes a liking to her and promises to help get rid of the baby when she goes into labor. When the day ultimately arrives, Karoline brings her baby to Dagmar, and she is sent to a new family…or so, that’s what women who want to get rid of their newborns think. You see, Dagmar actually kills the babies and disposes of them without their knowledge. This isn’t a spoiler, but what the movie is actually based on – a Danish serial killer who has murdered between 9 and 25 children, including one of her own, from 1913 to 1920 and was sentenced to death in 1921. 

Advertisement

Her ruling was later amended to a life sentence, but what’s most horrific about von Horn’s depiction of Dagmar is how she has no explanation for why she would do something like this. The second half of the movie attempts (and the keyword is: attempts, she’s beyond saving) to humanize her in developing a close relationship between Dagmar and Karoline, who begins to work for her as a caretaker for the babies before they are “sent” to a new family. Of course, she’s utterly impervious to what is happening until she follows her one day and sees firsthand where they end up. 

But the humanity depicted here is a mere façade in an attempt for Dagmar to manipulate Karoline, whom she thinks is easily gullible. However, when she attaches herself to a baby that will eventually get killed in Dagmar’s bare hands, something clicks within the killer that she didn’t perceive before when it came to Karoline. Unfortunately, von Horn doesn’t explore this path and always portrays the character in a rather cold, ruthless lens. Still, it works in Dynholm’s favor, whose piercing eyes constantly betray what she says to Karoline. But our protagonist can’t realize it since she’s grown to like what Dagmar has brought to her, because she may very well be the only person who likes her for who she is. 

But does she really? It’s in that question that The Girl with the Needle begins to lose itself (and languishingly drag) during its midsection, where its constantly involving (but not too rapid) pace pulled the audience into its evocative nightmare, only for the movie to grind to a halt in developing a relationship based on lies. Despite constantly rock-solid work from Carmen Sonne (who seems like a revelation even after starring in Hlynur Pálmason’s Godland) and Dynholm, von Horn has difficulty translating their connection beyond the dark confines of its black-and-white frame. Of course, this acts as a signifier for what’s to come, and the ultimate reveal is far more disturbing than one thinks, partly due to the most petrifying sound design heard in a movie since Jonathan Glazer’s Oscar-winning 2023 film. 

We never see the babies being killed, but we hear their helpless cries, then turning into terrified screams before they abruptly stop breathing. It’s the year’s most disturbing scene, so hard to stomach it eventually gets repeated in an even more distressing way. The shattering sounds punctuate its morbid aesthetic, which, in turn, burn our retinas and ensure we will never forget what we have seen and heard. Such a moment like this is bound to cause controversy, especially in its depiction of violence against children. But von Horn doesn’t sensationalize, nor does he linger on the killings. They are shocking enough simply because the act itself is so horrible, and one can’t understand why such a person could ever do something like this. 

Visually, it’s also not hard to see the influences Dymek plays with in representing such terror. German expressionism is the most obvious in the black-and-white and grimy, almost otherworldly lens each shot is visualized with, but he even steals Dziga Vertov compositions in its opening extreme close-up of an eye looking at a city. Yet, they don’t feel like outright plagiarism but are always in service of how von Horn wants to portray this tragic tale of hopelessness that, beyond all expectations, ends on a more hopeful note for Karoline. 

Advertisement

In a world where, at the time, famine, sickness, and poverty sadly plagued most human beings in a post-war setting, von Horn at least ensures that her protagonist gets a fighting chance for survival and happiness. It absolutely won’t be easy, as illustrated in how she has to make ends meet in the movie’s opening section, but her will is strong enough for her to push through the pain and hope that things will get better, at least for her sake. 

Perhaps it may be futile, and maybe the movie does get much colder than it should be, which, in turn, distances us from emotionally latching onto Karoline’s profoundly personal story. Still, there’s no denying The Girl with the Needle’s incredible nightmarish power, which works best when plot efficiency is at its minimum. Most of it is told through its striking visuals and note-perfect sound design, crawling under the audience’s skin before they even have a chance to react to the horror drawn on the screen. It may alienate audiences once more eventually see it, but it’s by design because when the end credits ultimately appear, you will never forget it. 

SCORE: ★★★1/2

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Black Bag’ Review: Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender Cozy Up in Steven Soderbergh’s Snazzy Spy Thriller

Published

on

‘Black Bag’ Review: Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender Cozy Up in Steven Soderbergh’s Snazzy Spy Thriller

There’s much concern in Black Bag about a missing cyber-worm device called Severus, capable of destabilizing a nuclear facility. But you can file that malware gadget alongside the Codex in the Superman universe and the unfortunately named Mother Boxes in Justice League. No matter how closely you pay attention, the precise functions of these power tools will be at best vaguely clear, not that it matters. In Steven Soderbergh’s sleek spy drama, a classy crew of actors keeps bringing up Severus in the direst of tones. But all that’s far less intriguing than the shifting allegiances and double-crosses among an elite group of Brit intelligence agents.

Following the taut, Hitchcock-meets-De Palma suspense of the tech thriller Kimi and the masterfully shivery ghost story Presence, this third consecutive collaboration between Soderbergh and ace screenwriter David Koepp is a mild disappointment. It’s witty, stylishly crafted and boasts a stellar ensemble, led by especially toothsome work from Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender. It keeps you glued, even if the movie ultimately feels evanescent, a slick diversion you forget soon after the end credits have rolled.

Black Bag

The Bottom Line

Tantalizing, even if the aftertaste doesn’t linger.

Advertisement

Release date: Friday, March 14
Cast: Cate Blanchett, Michael Fassbender, Marisa Abela, Tom Burke, Naomie Harris, Regé-Jean Page, Pierce Brosnan, Gustaf Skarsgard
Director: Steven Soderbergh
Screenwriter: David Koepp

Rated R,
1 hour 33 minutes

Still, there’s a lot to be said for being in capable hands, and even if the plot often has more complications than propulsion, Soderbergh and his actors give it a consistently pleasurable buoyancy. At this point, three-and-a-half decades and 35 features into a career with way more peaks than valleys, it’s enjoyable just to sit back and savor the playful dexterity of the director’s storytelling and the seductive sheen of his elegant visuals.

The title refers to any highly classified intel too sensitive to be shared, even between married colleagues like Kathryn St. Jean (Blanchett) and George Woodhouse (Fassbender). It also provides convenient cover for infidelities, betrayals and underhand dealings for the circle of senior agents in their immediate orbit. “Where were you this afternoon?” “Black bag.”

Advertisement

When Meacham (Gustaf Skarsgard), a fellow agent at the National Cyber Security Centre, assigns George to sniff out the traitor within the organization who has let Severus fall into the wrong hands, he asks would George be comfortable neutralizing Kathryn should it turn out to be her. But even without invoking the proverbial black bag, George keeps his cards close to his vest. Others at NCSC view his loyalty to Kathryn as his weakness.

The couple organizes a dinner party at their swanky London home and invite four senior associates who also happen to be couples, suspecting that one of them is the mole.

The guests are Colonel James Stokes (Regé-Jean Page), who reports directly to George; Dr. Zoe Vaughan (Naomi Harris), in-house NCSC shrink and Stokes’ lover; boozing, skirt-chasing Freddie Smalls (Tom Burke), resentful about being recently passed over for a promotion; and his current girlfriend, cyber comms expert Clarissa (Marisa Abela), the newest NCSC recruit. All four consider themselves friends of George and Kathryn but know their hosts well enough to figure there’s a hidden agenda behind the last-minute invite.

They are right to be suspicious. George, who enjoys cooking and bass fishing with the same glacial calm he brings to every task, warns Kathryn to avoid the chana masala, which he has laced with drugs to loosen the guests’ tongues. But nothing conclusive is revealed beyond Freddie’s twice-weekly hotel trysts with a mystery woman, an inconvenient disclosure when Clarissa has a steak knife handy.

Koepp’s script plants subtle clues that Kathryn might be the dodgy one, her skilled evasiveness very much in evidence during one standout scene — a mandated therapy session with Zoe, who notes that an air of hostility always wafts into the office ahead of her patient. Kathryn also remains cagey about the details of a meeting in Zurich. Her “black bag” response prompts George to enlist Clarissa’s help, accessing a keyhole in satellite coverage that allows him to observe his wife’s Swiss rendezvous without being detected elsewhere at NCSC.

Advertisement

When Clarissa cocks an eyebrow about marital mistrust, George says of his wife, “I watch her, and she watches me. If she gets into trouble, I will do everything in my power to extricate her.” The screenplay teases out the ambiguity as to whether Kathryn would do the same for George, or even if she’s laying a trap for him.

The drama is densely plotted, to the point where details at times get hazy. But the central dynamic of George and Kathryn’s relationship is a well-oiled machine that keeps everything else humming.

Fassbender and Blanchett’s characterizations are both distinct and perfectly synched. He’s icy and robotic, almost a cross between the actor’s roles in Prometheus and The Killer. In one dryly amusing moment, George gets the tiniest spatter of curry sauce on the cuff of his crisp white shirt, and in his usual affectless delivery, says, “I need to go change.” When it emerges that George surveilled his own father, who preceded him in the espionage business, he simply offers, “I don’t like liars.”

Blanchett, by contrast, makes Kathryn sultry and enigmatic, an ineffably poised operator whose posh intonations and erudite conversation give her the air of someone entirely free from self-doubt, carefully assessing every situation and her position in it. Her effortless old-world glamor doesn’t hide her anxieties about money, another factor that feeds the suspicion around her.

Blanchett’s many scenes with Fassbender are what make the movie’s motor purr. George and Kathryn are both circumspect, as their profession demands, but bound together by a charged sexual and emotional connection that makes Black Bag as much a close study of a marriage as a spy tale. When she asks, “Would you kill for me, George?” it seems more like foreplay than a test of loyalty.

Advertisement

Blanchett’s one moment of explosive anger (“Don’t ever fuck with my marriage again!”) is a welcome jolt of fire in a movie that mostly sticks to room temperature — a precision drone strike on Russian operatives notwithstanding. The attention required to keep up isn’t always rewarded by the most scintillating developments in a plot that tends more often to simmer on a medium flame than come to a boil.

The other members of the cast all have moments and all slot smoothly into the film’s intricate puzzle structure. The standout of the core group is Abela, making good on her head-turning work in Back to Black and Industry with a performance indicating at every turn that despite being a relative newbie, she’s as savvy as the veterans. And Pierce Brosnan is a zesty addition in his few scenes as NCSC head Arthur Steiglitz, an exacting boss in impeccably tailored suits whose directives come with the undisguised menace of someone with no tolerance for failure and a ruthless instinct for self-protection. Having him sit down to a plate of illegal Ikizukuri is a delicious touch.

Serving as DP and editor under his customary pseudonyms, Peter Andrews and Mary Ann Bernard, respectively, Soderbergh gives the film a lustrous look, with lots of sinuous tracking shots and slashes of lens flare. The jazzy rhythms are echoed by David Holmes’ moody, percussive score.

One sequence, cutting among a series of polygraph tests conducted by George, is Soderbergh at his snappiest, taking a cloak-and-dagger scenario and toying with our perceptions of truth and obfuscation. If Black Bag isn’t always at that level, it’s a tight hour-and-a-half of a type of sophisticated grownup entertainment that we don’t get enough of anymore.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Monkey Movie Review: A chilling yet darkly hilarious horror film that embraces the absurdity of its premise

Published

on

The Monkey Movie Review: A chilling yet darkly hilarious horror film that embraces the absurdity of its premise
Story: Twin brothers Hal and Bill Shelburn stumble upon an eerie, mechanical cymbal-banging monkey as children, only to discover that every time it plays, someone dies. Terrified, they dispose of the toy, hoping to leave its horrors behind. But years later, as adults, Hal finds that the sinister relic has resurfaced, bringing death in its wake once more.

Review: Osgood Perkins takes a unique approach to The Monkey, blending supernatural horror with a wicked streak of dark comedy. While the premise—a toy monkey that triggers violent deaths—could be pure nightmare fuel, Perkins leans into its absurdity, allowing for moments of bleak humour amidst the tension. The film often revels in the ridiculousness of its concept, crafting death scenes that are so exaggerated they almost become morbidly funny. This tonal balancing act between horror and satire is one of the film’s most intriguing elements, though it may not land for all audiences.

Theo James delivers a committed performance as both Hal and Bill, capturing their contrasting reactions to the trauma they endured as children. His portrayal of Hal, the more straight-laced of the two, plays well against Bill’s more jaded, almost detached demeanour, adding an extra layer to the film’s comedic undertones. In a supporting role, Elijah Wood brings an offbeat energy that further reinforces the film’s darkly humorous sensibilities, while Tatiana Maslany adds emotional weight to the story. Colin O’Brien, as Hal’s son Petey, serves as the innocent heart of the film, grounding the supernatural chaos in something real.

Visually, The Monkey is as much a horror film as it is a grim parody of the genre. Perkins and cinematographer Andrés Arochi craft an eerie yet playfully exaggerated aesthetic, using heavy shadows, surreal framing, and unsettlingly bright moments of colour to highlight the monkey’s presence. The sound design is particularly effective, with the monkey’s cymbals becoming an almost comedic punchline—an ominous sound cue that signals doom in the most absurd circumstances. Perkins is aware of the inherent ridiculousness of his premise and leans into it, allowing the film to have fun with itself rather than taking everything too seriously.

However, the film’s biggest gamble—its tonal shifts—may also be its most divisive element. The transitions between horror, tragedy, and black comedy aren’t always seamless, and some viewers may be unsure whether they should be terrified or laughing. Additionally, Perkins’ signature slow-burn storytelling occasionally clashes with the film’s more playful moments, resulting in pacing issues that could test the patience of some audiences. While the film delivers many eerie moments, its humour may not land for those expecting a more straightforward horror experience.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Reviews: My Dead Friend Zoe and Ex-Husbands

Published

on

Film Reviews: My Dead Friend Zoe and Ex-Husbands

‘My Dead Friend Zoe’

An Army vet is haunted by a fallen comrade.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending