Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Fight or Flight (2025) – Movie Review

Published

on

Fight or Flight (2025) – Movie Review

Fight or Flight, 2025.

Written and Directed by James Madigan.
Starring Josh Hartnett, Katee Sackhoff, Marko Zaror, Julian Kostov, Charithra Chandran, JuJu Chan Szeto, Sanjeev Kohli, Rebecka Johnston, Nóra Trokán, Sarah Lam, Irén Bordán, Danny Ashok, Willem van der Vegt,&nbsp, Jyuddah Jaymes, Declan Baxter, Bálint Adorjáni, Melissa Bale, and Hughie O’Donnell.

SYNOPSIS:

A mercenary takes on the job of tracking down a target on a plane but must protect her when they’re surrounded by people trying to kill both of them.

Advertisement

With Fight or Flight, first-time writer/director James Madigan loads a tantalizing premise with just enough close-quarters action to thrill and offset some of the narrative and expository clunkiness that occasionally detracts from that selling point.

Excommunicated from an unspecified agency and labeled an irredeemable psychopath, Josh Hartnett’s Lucas Reyes is wasting away the rest of his days in Bangkok, suddenly finding some purpose to sober up and pull off a mission that would give him a clean slate. The bad news is that this opportunity comes from his former field and life partner, Katee Sackhoff’s Katherine Brunt, a backstabber now listed in his phone under a heavily vulgar, insulting name. Nevertheless, she assures she can get him a passport and his no-fly ban lifted if he immediately heads to the airport and boards a plane supposedly holding a dangerous hacker dubbed the Ghost, who has created a device that could spell catastrophe for electronic devices worldwide. He is instructed to bring her back alive.

Unknowingly, the plane is packed with assassins looking to kill the Ghost, with a bounty also placed on Lucas’ life. Cue several bloody brawls that are, for the most part, practically staged, impressively choreographed with a focus on ferocious momentum and editing synchronized to the rhythm of attacks, and elevated by several brutal kills. James Madigan also knows that this is a goofy premise, so he wisely maintains a comedic tone throughout with staff taking their jobs to meet the needs of VIP flyers seriously throughout the carnage and pilots dementedly excited that this violent incident might require an impromptu difficult plane landing that turns them into the next Sully (a hero who Tom Hanks would also play in a future film directed by Clint Eastwood).

It’s also a wise move not to let this spiral into a meandering, predictable mystery regarding the identity of the Ghost. Lucas pinpoints the individual soon after realizing the dangerous gravity of the situation, forcing their hand into being handcuffed to a dead body or temporarily joining the fight for survival alongside him. In another nutty revelation, the Ghost is also aided by an all-women team of martial artists trained with deadly blades (JuJu Chan Szeto plays their leader), which adds to the variety in fighting styles and deadly dispatch methods.

However, as the fight sequences in Fight or Flight tend to go bigger and gorier, especially for the finale, ugly digital blood-splatter effects disappointingly began to murk up the photography. No one should care how a chainsaw ended up in this plane in a film this ridiculous, but the shoddy visuals behind the dismemberment and blood spraying leave something to be desired and are far less effective than watching Josh Hartnett and stunt performers put through barbaric physical ballet.

Advertisement

These scenes are still entertaining, though, and nowhere near as frustrating as the long stretches away from the plane, trying to explain more about what agency Lucas is working for and the politicking behind those scenes. Strangely, the film also starts taking itself a bit too seriously when getting into the Ghost’s motivations and what the device is meant for. Thankfully, none of this is too bothersome since James Madigan generally doesn’t forget that “fight” is part of the film’s title.

Fight or Flight could still use slightly more of the former and less talking, but the claustrophobic mayhem on display here is worth a look, alongside an ensemble having a blast. Josh Hartnett’s inherent charisma plays right into the cartoonish tone here, and his enjoyment is infectious.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association, Critics Choice Association, and Online Film Critics Society. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews and follow my BlueSky or Letterboxd 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.


movie review

HOPPERS

Advertisement

Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.

Advertisement

“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine. 

Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”

Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”

What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence. 

Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.

What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”  

In Pixar’s “Hoppers,” a teen girl discovers a secret device that can turn her into a talking beaver. AP

Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity. 

The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared. 

So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.

Advertisement

From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out. 

Mabel (Piper Curda) meets King George (Bobby Moynihan). AP

Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power. 

Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”   

That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities. 

Mayor Jerry (Jon Hamm) plans to destroy a local pond to build an expressway. AP

No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression. 

Advertisement

Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it. 

But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.

AP

“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.

Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

Published

on

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

4/5 stars

Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.

The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.

Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.

Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.

Advertisement
“This is like Avatar,” Mabel coos, and, in truth, it is. Plugged into a headset, Mabel is reborn inside a robotic beaver. She plans to recruit a real beaver to help populate the glade, which is set to be destroyed by Jerry’s proposed road.
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘How to Make a Killing,’ ‘Pillion,’ and ‘Midwinter Break’

‘How to Make a Killing’

Directed by John Patton Ford (R)

★★

Continue Reading

Trending