Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Die My Love’ Movie Review: A Descent into Madness and the Unraveling of Maternal Reality

Published

on

‘Die My Love’ Movie Review: A Descent into Madness and the Unraveling of Maternal Reality

Die My Love Movie Review

Lynne Ramsay’s Die My Love is not a film designed for comfort. It arrives with the intensity of a fever dream and the jagged edges of a raw nerve, refusing to offer easy answers or tidy resolutions to the existential nightmare unfolding on screen.

This is film as immersion therapy, plunging viewers headfirst into the psychological disintegration of Grace, a young mother trapped in rural Montana whose grip on reality splinters with each passing day. At countless points through this film, I found myself questioning my own sanity and wondering what was actually happening. Was it real? Was it a metaphor? Or was it a dream or a hallucination? Honestly, by the end, I was asking those same questions about the film as a whole.

What’s Die My Love About?

Based on Ariana Harwicz’s 2012 novel, “Die My Love follows Grace (Jennifer Lawrence) and Jackson (Robert Pattinson), a couple who relocate from New York City to Jackson’s inherited family home in the Montana wilderness. What begins as an idyllic escape quickly transforms into something far more sinister. After the birth of their child, Grace descends into severe postpartum depression that morphs into full psychosis, her sense of self eroding as the walls close in around her.

The movie takes us through Grace’s increasingly disturbing behavior: crawling through tall grass with a butcher knife, throwing herself through glass doors, tearing sinks from bathroom walls, and engaging in primal acts of desperation that blur the line between sexuality and violence.

The film’s structure deliberately disorients. Time becomes elastic and ambiguous, with scenes unfolding in a non-linear fashion that mirrors Grace’s fractured mental state. We see glimpses of Grace and Jackson’s passionate early days in their relationship juxtaposed against the numbing monotony of new parenthood.

Advertisement

Jackson’s mother, Pam (Sissy Spacek), lives nearby and struggles with her own tenuous grip on reality following the recent death of her husband, Harry (Nick Nolte). There’s also Karl (LaKeith Stanfield), another new parent who may or may not be real, existing somewhere in the liminal space between Grace’s imagination and actual encounters.

Die My Love Movie Trailer

Die My Love Movie Review: What I Did and Didn’t Like

Shot on 35mm film in a claustrophobic 4:3 aspect ratio, the film traps audiences in Grace’s perspective. Even when she roams through vast Montana landscapes, there’s no escape. Cinematographer Seamus McGarvey utilized Kodak Ektachrome reversal stock to create a skewed, almost dreamlike visual signature that enhances the film’s disorienting quality. The result is a viewing experience that feels suffocating and overwhelming, mirroring the protagonist’s psychological imprisonment.

But what really made Die My Love so compelling, and simultaneously so maddening (for me), is its refusal to conform to traditional narrative structures. Ramsay has created a mood piece that prioritizes emotional truth over plot mechanics, and the results are both mesmerizing and exasperating. The film succeeds brilliantly in making you feel Grace’s isolation and desperation. The use of that boxy 4:3 frame constantly reminds us that Grace is trapped, no matter how much open space surrounds her.

The dark humor threaded throughout is unexpected and effective. Grace’s interactions with the people in her life carry an absurdist quality that prevents the film from becoming oppressively bleak. When Jackson brings home an incessantly barking dog expecting Grace to care for it while he travels for work, the scene plays as both tragedy and dark comedy. Lawrence’s commitment to these moments of black humor gives them an uncomfortable authenticity.

Advertisement
Die My Love Movie Review

The Script

Working from a screenplay she co-wrote with playwrights Enda Walsh and Alice Birch, Ramsay transforms Harwicz’s internal monologue into a predominantly visual experience. The novel is written in a stream-of-consciousness style, filled with poisonous thoughts and maternal ambivalence, but Ramsay wisely avoids leaning too heavily on voiceover or dialogue-heavy exposition. Instead, the script relies on physicality and behavior to convey Grace’s psychological state.

The screenplay’s greatest strength lies in its resistance to easy categorization or diagnosis. Grace is never explicitly diagnosed with postpartum depression or psychosis. There are no scenes with doctors prescribing medication or family interventions with clear treatment plans. This omission is deliberate. Director Lynne Ramsay pushed back against critics who labeled the film simply as a postpartum depression story, stating at Cannes: “This whole postpartum thing is just bullshit. It’s not about that. It’s about a relationship breaking down, it’s about love breaking down, and sex breaking down after having a baby. And it’s also about a creative block.”

The script explores how Grace’s identity as a writer has been subsumed by motherhood, how sexual intimacy transforms (or disappears) after childbirth, and how isolation can accelerate mental decline. Grace’s struggles become universal even as they manifest in extreme, specific ways.

A Complicated Service to Maternal Mental Health?

Yet this ambiguity raises questions about the film’s service to those dealing with postpartum depression. Does Die My Love do justice to this experience?

The answer is complicated. On one hand, the film’s unflinching portrayal of maternal ambivalence and psychological suffering gives voice to feelings many new mothers experience but fear acknowledging. The shame, the isolation, the sense of losing yourself while everyone expects you to be grateful and fulfilled… these emotional truths resonate powerfully.

Lawrence herself, who experienced postpartum depression after filming, noted in interviews that watching the film helped her understand Grace’s mindset: “I hadn’t experienced postpartum while filming, but I knew that suicide is a leading cause of death among new moms. I couldn’t understand how she could do that because I loved my baby so much. But once I experienced postpartum, I realized it has nothing to do with love; it’s about feeling imperfect next to something so perfect.”

Advertisement

On the other hand, by refusing to name Grace’s condition or explicitly show her receiving help, the film risks leaving viewers without resources or hope. And, while artistically bold, the ending (don’t worry, no spoilers here), may not offer much solace to those seeking affirmation that recovery is possible.

Ramsay’s comments about the film’s metaphorical nature suggest she views Grace’s self-destruction as a kind of liberation. Speaking about the ending (again, trust me, no spoilers), she explained: “I was trying my hardest. It’s not in the book. I just felt like she wants to burn the world down. It’s a metaphorical liberation.”

This framing positions the film more as a Gothic tale about a woman who refuses to be domesticated. Whether this artistic choice serves or undermines the understanding of postpartum mental health issues remains an open question….

The Performances

Jennifer Lawrence in Die My Love
Jennifer Lawrence in ‘Die My Love’

Jennifer Lawrence as Grace

The performances in Die My Love are without question the film’s strongest element. Jennifer Lawrence delivers what is arguably the most challenging and uncompromising work of her career. This is not the charismatic, accessible Lawrence of The Hunger Games or Silver Linings Playbook. This is something feral, raw, and completely untethered. She filmed many of these scenes while four-and-a-half months pregnant with her second child, adding an extraordinary physical and emotional layer to an already demanding role.

Lawrence’s Grace is simultaneously seductive and repellent, maternal and destructive, vulnerable and terrifying. She shifts from catatonic emptiness to explosive rage within single takes, her body language morphing from predatory crawling to collapsed exhaustion.

The physicality of the performance is stunning. Whether she’s scratching bathroom walls until her nails bleed, climbing inside a refrigerator, or prowling on all fours through grass like an animal stalking prey, Lawrence commits completely. There’s no vanity here, no concern for likability or traditional markers of movie-star glamour. She embodies Grace’s dissolution with a freedom that feels almost dangerous to watch.

Advertisement

Critics have already begun discussing Oscar potential for Lawrence’s performance, which would be her fifth nomination. The comparison to her work in 2017’s Mother! is inevitable, but this feels even more visceral and unprotected. 

Robert Pattinson in Die My Love
Robert Pattinson in ‘Die My Love’

Robert Pattinson as Jackson

Robert Pattinson wisely portrays Jackson in a deliberately understated manner, creating a stark contrast to Lawrence’s volcanic performance. His Jackson is not a villain, but rather a well-meaning man completely out of his depth. Pattinson channels an everyman quality, portraying a thirty-something man-child who brings home a dog, expecting his struggling wife to care for it, and suggests his wife “talk” about her feelings, while fundamentally not understanding the severity of her crisis.

The performance is effective precisely because Jackson’s ordinariness makes Grace’s extraordinary suffering more isolating. Pattinson and Lawrence share genuine chemistry, particularly in the film’s opening sequences, where they communicate through physicality rather than words, nuzzling, biting, wrestling in primal displays of desire.

The Supporting Cast

Sissy Spacek delivers a quietly powerful performance as Pam, Jackson’s widowed mother, who recognizes something of her own struggles in Grace’s unraveling. Spacek brings maternal warmth tinged with her own grief and instability, sleepwalking with a gun in scenes that blur the line between dark comedy and genuine menace. Her scenes with Lawrence crackle with understanding, two women adrift in their own ways, connected by shared loss and dislocation. 

LaKeith Stanfield’s Karl exists in an ethereal space that keeps audiences guessing whether he’s real or a figment of Grace’s imagination. His understated performance adds to this ambiguity, making his interactions with Grace feel simultaneously grounded and dreamlike. The film never definitively confirms Karl’s reality, leaving viewers to question how many of his scenes actually happened versus whether they exist purely in Grace’s fractured psyche (one of my many ‘what the heck is going on’ moments…).

Die My Love Movie Review

Overall Thoughts

Die My Love is not for everyone, and it doesn’t pretend to be. Ramsay has crafted a film that exists in the space between arthouse provocation and genuine psychological horror, borrowing techniques from Antonin Artaud’s Theater of Cruelty to break down the barriers that keep audiences feeling safe.

The film works best when understood not as a straightforward narrative but as a sensory experience designed to replicate Grace’s mental state. The aggressive sound design, with blaring rock music and deafening slams that assault the ears… the claustrophobic framing that traps characters in doorways and corners… the time distortions that make it impossible to track how much time has passed… all of these choices serve to destabilize viewers in ways that mirror the protagonist’s experience. When you emerge from Die My Love, you should feel like you’ve been through something, like you’ve barely survived tumultuous rapids. That’s the point.

Advertisement

But does that make a good film? The question of whether this movie serves those experiencing postpartum depression remains complex. It offers validation for dark feelings rarely depicted on screen, but it also provides no roadmap for recovery or healing. Grace’s story ends in metaphorical immolation, and while Ramsay intends this as liberation rather than tragedy, the distinction may be lost on viewers seeking hope.

Perhaps the film’s greatest service is simply its willingness to depict maternal struggle without sentimentality or easy resolution, to show that sometimes love isn’t enough to fix what’s broken, and that the societal pressure to perform gratitude for motherhood can itself become suffocating.

However, this one just didn’t work for me – despite the beautiful cinematography and incredible performances.

Die For Me Movie Review: Final Grade

Grade: C-

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Oh What Fun movie review: Modern spin on Home Alone with Michelle Pfeiffer does not do much better

Published

on

Oh What Fun movie review: Modern spin on Home Alone with Michelle Pfeiffer does not do much better

Who doesn’t love a comfortable and harmless Christmas comedy film? The holiday season is here, and more often than not, movies like Home Alone, Bridget Jones’ Diary, or Planes, Trains, and Automobiles make up for a good idea for a rewatch. Prime Video’s latest offering, Oh. What. Fun. offers a spin on that genre, emphasising how these movies sideline the mothers and the female characters who work so hard to make the holidays special and, in return, get relegated to supporting roles of extremely less significance.

Oh What Fun movie review: Michelle Pfeiffer in a still from the film, which is available to watch on Amazon Prime Video.

The premise

“Scrooge is famously grumpy around the holidays, and I’m not entitled to one little outburst?” asks Michelle Pfeiffer’s Claire in the beginning. Fair point. Claire is a mother and now a grandmother who is busy making sure everything is okay before Christmas Eve with the whole clan. However, the film, directed by Michael Showalter, makes the mistake of referencing those classic films at the beginning, adding an invisible weight to the film that serves as a stark reminder that it is not living up to those expectations.

Claire is obsessed with the television show hosted by Zazzy Tims (Eva Longoria), and wishes that her children nominate her for the annual Holiday Moms competition. But she can’t force it, can she? Her husband Nick (Denis Leary) is not as interested. Her kids? She is not sure. Oldest daughter Channing (Felicity Jones), who is married to Doug (Jason Schwartzman) arrives with their two children. Taylor (Chloë Grace Moretz) is once again here with her new girlfriend, while the youngest child Sammy (Dominic Sessa), has just been dumped by Mae-bell (Maude Apatow). So he manages to make a face at all times, and then goes on to sing a song which makes the rest of the family groan.

Advertisement

Movie Review

Oh. What. Fun

Oh. What. Fun

Rating Star 2.5/5

Claire plans a special Christmas, however, she is forgotten by her family. When they finally realise that she is missing, their holiday is at risk.

Director

Michael Showalter

Advertisement

Cast

Michelle Pfeiffer, Felicity Jones, Chloe Grace Moretz, Dominic Sessa, Danielle Brooks

Advertisement

Does it work?

Chaos erupts in modest ways until the rest of the gang forgets to include Claire as they leave home for the live dance performance, which she arranged in the first place. See the Home Alone reference? Yes, up until now, the film feels prudently self-aware of its aspirations. The characters are deliberately caricaturish at times, and there’s not a single moment of concentrated emotional connection amid all the introductions and dialogues. Yet, after this major central crisis, the film seems no closer to understanding Claire, so neither do we. It is not moving towards something gravely original, and neither do we want that either.

Predictability is what gives this genre its all-too-comforting illusion, after all. So, when the midway turn gives way for not much to root for- even for Claire, the problem sticks like a bad joke. Oh. What. Fun is oh so predictable, oh so timid, and oh so underbaked at times that it takes a whole lot to keep up till the last few minutes. Pfeiffer emerges innocent, as does the rest of the ensemble cast, particularly Sessa. This is nowhere close to the hallmark films it refers to rectifying in the first place. Good intentions are never enough, and this release is oh so good in that declaring that example.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Jay Kelly (2025)

Published

on

Movie Review – Jay Kelly (2025)

Jay Kelly, 2025. 

Directed by Noah Baumbach.
Starring George Clooney, Adam Sandler, Laura Dern, Greta Gerwig, Riley Keough, Grace Edwards, Stacey Keach, Jim Broadbent, Patrick Wilson, Emily Mortimer and Billy Crudup.

SYNOPSIS:

Famous movie actor Jay Kelly embarks on a journey of self-discovery, confronting his past and present with his devoted manager Ron. Poignant and humor-filled, pitched at the intersection of regrets and glories.

Advertisement

Noah Baumbach introduces George Clooney’s Jay Kelly with a beautiful behind-the-scenes one-take that hints we’re about to get a wizard’s curtain look at what it takes to make it in Hollywood. It’s another stab at Babylon with the Netflix bucks, or Jerry Maguire in the acting world. In a way, that’s what this muddled melodrama is, but the journey is so downright odd that it’s difficult to care about anything that’s going on.

Clooney is an aging icon, essentially playing himself, who instead of taking a part in a project directed by two of Hollywood’s up-and-coming stars, is triggered into going on a European vacation to stalk his youngest daughter. This throws his entourage into a panic. A ragtag group of highly strung enablers that includes Adam Sandler’s agent, Laura Dern’s PA, and Emily Mortimer’s stylist.

On this Planes, Trains and Automobiles journey, Jay steps into scenes from the past – his big break and the moral ramifications of it, meeting the mother of his first child, or letting down a director he loved dearly. They are all played with melancholy, a soft-focus sadness befitting of a movie loaded with regret. If that tone had been sustained then Jay Kelly might have earned the empathy and heart that it so yearns for. 

However, these moments are peppered throughout a film that’s tonally all-over-the-place. At one stage it appears Clooney has stepped into a sitcom as he boards a train and is confronted by a conveyor belt of the broadest characters imaginable. It’s so heightened and over-the-top that any intended mirth is rendered redundant by the fact you’re bemused by the creative choices. It’s a reaction that’s repeated as they visit Italy, where they encounter even more of these cartoonish characters, and it all culminates in a baffling chase across a field, the conclusion of which elicits the wrong kind of laughter.

It’s all the more jarring because the cast are putting in awards-worthy performances. Clooney is magnificent in the contemplative moments; the discussions with his eldest daughter (the terrific Riley Keough), a reunion with his old drama school “budd-ay” Tim (a phenomenal turn from Billy Crudup), and a final-reel encounter with his ball-busting father (Stacy Keach). These are the times when Kelly becomes Clooney, intentionally blurring that line, grounding the character in reality, and that’s when the film lands, when you feel for him, because on-the-whole Jay’s an unlikeable and empty presence. But then that’s the whole idea.

Advertisement

The same can’t be said for Sandler, whose beat-down agent is to some extent the audience projection, especially during the more exasperating parts of the film. Better when he’s afforded quieter asides than being part of a broadly painted family that includes the most Jonathan Lipnicki kid since Jonathan Lipnicki, his nice-guy turn will surely land him plenty of nominations come awards season.

In the end Baumbach, who co-wrote the script with Emily Mortimer, can’t decide whether he wants to admonish his star or celebrate him, but by landing somewhere in the middle it dulls the impact of Jay Kelly. The final flourish is a perfect example of this, where Jay sits through a show reel of George Clooney’s finest moments, from The Peacemaker, through Syriana and The Thin Red Line, and it’s hard not to get swept up in the gravitas and emotion of it all, but come the dimming of the lights you begin to wonder whether you or the characters have learned anything at all.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film ★ ★ / Movie ★ ★

Matt Rodgers – Follow me on Twitter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Angammal Movie Review: Small story with layered, believable people

Published

on

Angammal Movie Review: Small story with layered, believable people
0

The Times of India

TNN, Dec 04, 2025, 4:44 PM IST

3.5

Angammal Movie Synopsis: A widow refuses to wear a blouse to please her son’s prospective in-laws, sparking quiet family conflict over conformity and dignity.Angammal Movie Review: The smallest acts of defiance can become the biggest battles. Angammal (Geetha Kailasam) has lived her entire life wearing traditional attire without a blouse, exposing one shoulder and her chest in a way she finds comfortable. Her younger son Pavalam (Saran), fresh from medical school and eager to introduce his girlfriend Jasmine (Mullaiyarasi) and her affluent family, asks his mother to change this one thing. Just wear a blouse, he says. Look sophisticated. Angammal refuses, and that refusal becomes the film’s entire engine.Director Vipin Radhakrishnan keeps the premise simple but pours effort into making these characters feel real. This is character-first filmmaking. Even Sudalai (Bharani), the aimless elder brother who idles away with his nadhaswaram, registers as an actual person rather than a rural type. His interactions with his wife Sharada (Thendral Raghunathan), his brother, and with Angammal carry genuine texture. You believe these people exist beyond what the script demands of them.Geetha Kailasam absolutely carries this film. Angammal’s wit, stubbornness, loneliness, and pride all come through in how she moves, reacts, and shifts her body language. She’s flawed and often unreasonable, which only makes her more compelling. This isn’t a performance that announces itself loudly. It works through small gestures and sharp line deliveries that accumulate into something memorable.The conflict itself is less about society actively oppressing Angammal and more about Pavalam’s insecurities. He’s projecting what he thinks others will judge, creating his own prison of expectations. That layer of introspection gives the film more weight than a straightforward tradition-versus-modernity reading would. The family’s attempts to convince Angammal reveal their own fears and compromises as much as hers.Saran handles Pavalam’s conflicted affection decently, though his persistence on this single issue occasionally feels mismatched with his otherwise mild personality. Anjoy Samuel’s cinematography captures the arid, windy terrain without overplaying it, letting the setting enhance rather than dominate.Runtime is the main limitation here. Two hours is a stretch for a premise this contained. A few scenes circle back to the same arguments without fresh angles, and the pacing sags when the film has already made its point. Tighter editing would have sharpened the emotional impact considerably.The film lands because it refuses to pick sides or wrap things neatly. These people are stubborn, flawed, and contradictory, and the script lets them stay that way through the end.Written By: Abhinav Subramanian

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending