Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Asteroid City’ Movie Review – Signals AZ

Published

on

‘Asteroid City’ Movie Review – Signals AZ
Article audio is made possible by CAST11 Prescott Podcast Network. A Talking Glass Media production.

Wes Anderson is a director with a distinct style: visual symmetry, off-beat characters, fast-paced-yet-monotone dialogue, and a quirky, child-like presentation that sometimes borders on surreal. His films are not without meaning, yet typically focus on his trademark aesthetic and lighthearted presentation over deeper meaning. That is not the case with Asteroid City, a film that may have as many interpretations as it has viewers.

YouTube playerYouTube player

Release Date: 05/23/2023

Director: Wes Anderson

Rotten Tomatoes: 75%

iMBD: 6.5/10

Where to Watch: Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV, Vudu, Google Play Movies, YouTube

admit one, movie review, asteroid city, wes anderson, film reviews, isaac frankeladmit one, movie review, asteroid city, wes anderson, film reviews, isaac frankel

Many theories have been put forward since the film’s release: Is it about coming to terms with death? Fear of artificial intelligence? The COVID pandemic? Our place in a vast and limitless universe?

If Asteroid City’s theme could be boiled down to a single word, that word would be uncertainty

Presented as a story-nested-within-a-story, the film begins as a live 1950s television production (hosted by Bryan Cranston) documenting the tale of fictional writer Conrad Earp (Edward Norton) as he first writes, and then brings to the stage, his story of a small desert town bordering an atomic testing site, named for its defining feature: a crater housing an ancient asteroid. It is to this town that recently-widowed Augie Steenbeck (Jason Schwartzman) brings his four children after their automobile experiences an unexplained breakdown, possibly involving a robotic lifeform.

As the film moves along, we bounce back and forth from the television production—in black and white—to a full-color recreation of the play, often without any adherence to conventional narrative structure

The actors likewise maintain little consistency between their stage characters and their television counterparts, often breaking character mid-scene to remind us that what we’re watching is a recreation-within-a-recreation.

There’s also an alien, whose appearance sends the already disjointed cast of characters into a confusing frenzy of vignettes with little coherency and narrative connection.

Sound confusing? It absolutely is, and that disorientation seems to be the very point Wes Anderson is trying to make

Characters frequently ask—and are asked—why events are taking place, why they do the things they do, and what the point of it all is. Jeff Goldblum, who makes a brief appearance as the actor ‘playing’ the alien, delivers this line of dialogue shortly after Schwartzman walks out of a particularly nonsensical scene:

Advertisement

“I don’t play him as an alien, actually. I play him as a metaphor. That’s my interpretation.”

“Metaphor for what?” Schwartzman asks.

“I don’t know yet,” Goldblum responds, “we don’t pin it down.”

It is the fact that no answer is given, that the film deliberately provides little resolution and leaves viewers hanging on that question of why—what’s the point?—that is the key to unraveling this disjointed mystery of a film.

While definitely not for everyone, Wes Anderson’s latest flick provides a fun comedy for casual viewers, and an enticing enigma to be unraveled by those seeking deeper meaning in the art they consume.

Advertisement

About our Admit One Author

Isaac Albert FrankelIsaac Albert Frankel

Isaac Frankel is a freelance writer and content creator specializing in reviews and analysis of cinema, interactive media, and mythological storytelling. He was raised in Prescott, AZ, wrote his first non-fiction book in 2013 after graduating from Tribeca Flashpoint College with a degree in Game & Interactive Media Design, and currently produces content for the YouTube channel: Off Screen.

More of his work and current projects can be found at www.isaacafrankel.com.

 

Read more stories from Dining, Entertainment, Recreation, & Travel on Signals A Z.com!

be the first to know, events,be the first to know, events,

Don’t Miss Another Event!

Sign up and be the first to know about all your local events.

If you like this story, consider subscribing to Signals Updates,
Entertainment Events & News!

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | Sentimental Value

Published

on

Movie Review | Sentimental Value

A man and a woman facing each other

Sentimental Value (Photo – Neon)

Full of clear northern light and personal crisis, Sentimental Value felt almost like a throwback film for me. It explores emotions not as an adjunct to the main, action-driven plot but as the very subject of the movie itself.

Sentimental Value
Directed by Joachim Trier – 2025
Reviewed by Garrett Rowlan

The film stars Stellan Skarsgård as Gustav Borg, a 70-year-old director who returns to Oslo to stir up interest in a film he wants to make, while health and financing in an era dominated by bean counters still allow it. He hopes to film at the family house and cast his daughter Nora, a renowned stage actress in her own right, as the lead. However, Nora struggles with intense stage fright and other personal issues. She rejects the role, disdaining the father who abandoned the family when he left her and her sister Agnes as children. In response, Gustav lures a “name” American actress, Rachel Keys (Elle Fanning), to play the part.

Sentimental Value, written by director Joachim Trier and Eskil Vogt, delves into sibling dynamics, the healing power of art, and how family trauma can be passed down through generations. Yet the film also has moments of sly humor, such as when the often oblivious Gustav gives his nine-year-old grandson a birthday DVD copy of Gaspar Noé’s dreaded Irreversible, something intense and highly inappropriate.

For me, the film harkens back to the works of Ingmar Bergman. The three sisters (with Elle Fanning playing a kind of surrogate sister) reminded me of the three siblings in Bergman’s 1972 Cries and Whispers. In another sequence, the shot composition of Gustav and his two daughters, their faces blending, recalls the iconic fusion of Liv Ullmann and Bibi Andersson’s faces in Persona.

Advertisement

It’s the acting that truly carries the film. Special mention goes to Renate Reinsve, who portrays the troubled yet talented Nora, and Stellan Skarsgård as Gustav, an actor unafraid to take on unlikable characters (I still remember him shooting a dog in the original Insomnia). In both cases, the subtle play of emotions—especially when those emotions are constrained—across the actors’ faces is a joy to watch. Elle Fanning and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas (who plays Agnes, the other sister with her own set of issues) are both excellent.

It’s hardly a Christmas movie, but more deeply, it’s a winter film, full of emotions set in a cold climate.

> Playing at Landmark Pasadena Playhouse, Laemmle Glendale, and AMC The Americana at Brand 18.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

No More Time – Review | Pandemic Indie Thriller | Heaven of Horror

Published

on

No More Time – Review | Pandemic Indie Thriller | Heaven of Horror

Where is the dog?

You can call me one-track-minded or say that I focus on the wrong things, but do not include an element that I am then expected to forget. Especially if that “element” is an animal – and a dog, even.

In No More Time, we meet a couple, and it takes quite some time before we suddenly see that they have a dog with them. It appears in a scene suddenly, because their sweet little dog has a purpose: A “meet-cute” with a girl who wants to pet their dog.

After that, the dog is rarely in the movie or mentioned. Sure, we see it in the background once or twice, but when something strange (or noisy) happens, it’s never around. This completely ruins the illusion for me. Part of the brilliance of having an animal with you during an apocalyptic event is that it can help you.

And yet, in No More Time, this is never truly utilized. It feels like a strange afterthought for that one scene with the girl to work, but as a dog lover, I am now invested in the dog. Not unlike in I Am Legend or Darryl’s dog in The Walking Dead. As such, this completely ruined the overall experience for me.

If it were just me, I could (sort of) live with it. But there’s a reason why an entire website is named after people demanding to know whether the dog dies, before they’ll decide if they’ll watch a movie.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

‘Marty Supreme’

Directed by Josh Safdie (R)

★★★★

Continue Reading

Trending