Connect with us

Movie Reviews

10 Times Movie Critics Were Horribly Wrong: Even Brendan Fraser's The Mummy Was Not Safe From Awful Reviews

Published

on

10 Times Movie Critics Were Horribly Wrong: Even Brendan Fraser's The Mummy Was Not Safe From Awful Reviews

Movies like Brendan Fraser’s The Mummy have proved that the harsh opinions of critics cannot be entirely trusted. The difference in opinion between critics and audiences may occur due to different factors. Some themes in films would pique the interest of movie lovers no matter what the critics say about its lack of originality. In other cases, performances deemed bad by the critics can turn out to be entertaining for audiences.

Branden Fraser and Rachel Weisz in The Mummy franchise

While critics score has the power to sway the box office results of a movie, here are 10 instances where the audiences did not pay attention to such critical opinions of movies.

10. Uncharted (2022)

Tom Holland as Nathan Drake in a still from Uncharted
Tom Holland as Nathan Drake in a still from Uncharted

Tom Holland and Mark Wahlberg led the action-adventure film Uncharted. Critics were not impressed with the video game adaptation, which echoed other superior adventure films. Owen Gleiberman of Variety best described the film as “Raiders of the Lost National Treasure of the Fast & Furious Caribbean”.

However, audiences found the film largely enjoyable. According to Box Office Mojo, the film grossed $407.1 million at the worldwide box office. A sequel is likely to happen in the franchise if Holland and Wahlberg return to their roles.

The film’s 40% rotten Tomatometer score and 90% audience score clearly indicate the difference of opinion among critics and audiences. Uncharted is now available for streaming on Hulu.

9. Bullet Train (2022)

Brad Pitt in Bullet Train
Brad Pitt in Bullet Train

Bullet Train went off the rails for several critics, who couldn’t help but notice the deeply derivative themes presented in style. THR‘s David Rooney called the film “soulless” and shared that the multitude of characters in the film gets “real tedious real fast”. The film also received criticism for the race-swapping of characters from the original novel Maria Beetle.

However, audiences seemed to enjoy the 2-hour ride, especially when it started streaming on Netflix. The film got decent returns from the box office with a gross collection of $239.3 million (via Box Office Mojo).

Advertisement

Brad Pitt‘s film received a 54% critics score and a 76% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. Bullet Train is now available for streaming on Netflix.

8. Saw (2004)

Cary Elwes in Saw
Cary Elwes in Saw

James Wan‘s Saw has since gone on to become a successful media franchise, but the genre was not a critic’s favorite at the time. The 50% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes was accompanied by the website’s consensus statement that read:

“Its lofty ambitions are undercut by a nihilistic streak that feels more mean than profound.”

The small-budget production however struck the right chords with its target audience. It grossed $103.9 million at the box office (via Box Office Mojo) and spawned several sequels.

Saw is now available for streaming on Starz.

7. Mamma Mia! (2008)

Amanda Seyfried in Mamma Mia!
Amanda Seyfried in Mamma Mia!

Mamma Mia! was dismissed by critics as being too campy, however, the musical managed to hook its target audience. The film’s inexperienced singers had some pretty catchy musical numbers to work with, which paid off with the audience eventually.

According to Box Office Mojo, the film collected $694.6 million at the box office. The film has a Tomatometer score of 55% and an audience score of 66% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Mamma Mia! is now available for streaming on Netflix.

Advertisement

6. Step Up (2006)

Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum in Step Up (2006)
Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum in Step Up (2006)

Audiences loved to watch ex-couple Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum dance in Step Up. However, nothing except the dance worked for critics in this film. Critics had some harsh words for the film that kick-started a dance movie franchise. Empire wrote in their review:

“It’s the usual case of great dancing, bad acting and even worse dialogue in this very guilty pleasure for fans of the genre.”

The film has a pretty low critics score on Rotten Tomatoes with 21%, but the audience score stood at an impressive 83%. The film spawned four sequel films and a television series. The film, made on a budget of $12 million, grossed $114.2 million at the box office (via Box Office Mojo).

Step Up is available for rent on AppleTV+.

5. Empire Records (1995)

Empire Records
Empire Records

Empire Records was largely dismissed as a silly and predictable teen drama. Starring the likes of Liv Tyler and Renée Zellweger, the film explored the lives of a group of record store employees. The critics weren’t the only ones who failed the film.

Audiences ignored the film completely in theaters, as it faced major box office losses after grossing just $303,841 at the box office (via The Numbers). However, the film became a cult hit and the lead stars went on to build successful Hollywood careers.

The rotten 31% critics score was a stark contrast from the impressive 83% audience score (via Rotten Tomatoes). Empire Records is now available for streaming on Paramount+.

4. National Treasure (2004)

Nicolas Cage in National Treasure
Nicolas Cage in National Treasure

Nicolas Cage plays historian Ben Gates who unveils clues buried in the history of the United States to find a treasure. Cage’s adventure was satisfactory for the audience, though the same could not be said for critics. One of the harshest comments for the movie read (via BBC):

“This movie couldn’t be more stale if it’d been dug up by archaeologists”

The film has a 46% critics score and a 76% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. It became a box office success, garnering $347 million (via Box Office Mojo) and spawning a sequel film and a Disney+ series.

Advertisement

National Treasure is now available for streaming on Disney+.

3. Constantine (2005)

Keanu Reeves in Constantine
Keanu Reeves in Constantine

Keanu Reeves as John Constantine was a nightmare for critics at the time. The DC Hellblazer was a blonde-haired British guy in the comics, but Reeves played a black-haired American version of the supernatural exorcist.

The critics gave a 46% rotten score for the film on Rotten Tomatoes, with the website consensus sharing that the film lacked focus despite its solid production values. However, the audience score for the film stood at 72%.

Box Office Mojo reported that the film collected $230.9 million worldwide against a budget of just under $100 million. The film achieved cult status in the years following its release and a sequel is currently in development.

Constantine is now available for rent on AppleTV+.

2. Venom (2018)

Tom Hardy as Eddie Brock in Venom
Tom Hardy as Eddie Brock in Venom

When Sony announced that Tom Hardy was playing the anti-hero Venom in a standalone movie, fans had no big expectations from the film. Topher Grace had already set the bar too low for the character with his performance in Spider-Man 3. However, Hardy managed to make the interaction between Eddie Brock and Venom more fun.

Critics were generally not happy with the half-decent attempt, with a major point of contention being the badly rushed second half. Variety‘s Owen Gleiberman criticized the film to be “unexciting in its ho-hum competence.”

Advertisement

The film grossed a massive $856.1 million according to Box Office Mojo. The critics score for the film was 30% and the audience score stood at 80% (via Rotten Tomatoes). Venom is now available for streaming on Disney+.

1. The Mummy (1999)

Brendan Fraser as Rick O'Connell in The Mummy
Brendan Fraser as Rick O’Connell in The Mummy

Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy was not exactly a great movie. But the Indiana Jones-style filmmaking, the charming Brendan Fraser, and the chemistry between Fraser and Rachel Weisz made it one of the iconic films. The critics definitely rolled their eyes at the film, but Roger Ebert’s review perfectly summed up the film’s fate:

“I cannot argue for the script, the direction, the acting or even the mummy, but I can say that I was not bored and sometimes I was unreasonably pleased.”

The film was a commercial hit and grossed over $416.4 million at the box office (via The Numbers). The film spawned multiple sequels and spinoff films. According to Rotten Tomatoes, the critics score stood at a low 61% while the audience score stood at an impressive 75%.

The Mummy is now available for rent on AppleTV+.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – As America’s Catholic bishops prepare to mark the semiquincentennial by consecrating the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, a French docudrama that can aid viewers in understanding the full significance of such an action makes its timely appearance.

A Fathom Entertainment presentation, “Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End” will have a limited theatrical run June 9-11 and June 14. The version screening on June 10 will be dubbed in Spanish.

Following its initial release in France last fall, the film proved to be phenomenally popular, with ticket sales reaching the half-million mark in a country usually regarded as deeply secular. This unusual development clearly indicates that the movie resonated with audiences in a way that even its creators may not have expected.

Filmmakers Sabrina and Steven J. Gunnell examine the origins, meaning and enduring relevance of devotion to the Sacred Heart. They begin their exploration even before the landmark revelations received in the 1670s by St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, a Burgundian Visitation nun, showing that earlier saints had focused on the subject in medieval times.

Using reenactments, interviews and archival images, the Gunnells also highlight the theological connection between the Sacred Heart and the Eucharist. This is done, in part, by recounting a few of the many Eucharistic miracles granted to the Church over the centuries.

Advertisement

By profiling contemporary devotees of the Sacred Heart, including formerly inactive Catholics, the picture demonstrates the impact the insights given to St. Margaret Mary continue to have on the lives of people around the world. Locations visited range from the gang-infested streets of a Parisian suburb to the once war-torn Central American country of El Salvador.

An excellent and enjoyable catechetical resource, the feature is also both moving and uplifting. It can be recommended for all but the youngest kids.

For theater locations and showtimes, go to: sacredheartfilm.us

Dubbed into English.

The film contains gory images of the Crucifixion. The OSV News classification is A-II — adults and adolescents. Not rated by the Motion Picture Association.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & Television Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Masters of the Universe (2026) | Movie Review | Deep Focus Review

Published

on

Masters of the Universe (2026) | Movie Review | Deep Focus Review

There’s a photo of me (below) from the mid-1980s, when I was around age 5, standing on the hood of an old Plymouth in the overgrown field behind my childhood home. I’m holding He-Man’s shield in one hand and his sword, made of yellow plastic, in the other. (Unrelatedly, I’m also wearing an Incredible Hulk shirt in the picture.) And I’m grinning with pride because I have thoroughly conquered the jalopy. The vehicle never ran again, probably because I fucking destroyed it with my sword and shield. Around that time, I also had a He-Man birthday cake and a sizable collection of Mattel’s Masters of the Universe action figures. They were my first foray into toys of this kind, later replaced by G.I. Joe, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and X-Men. However, my nostalgia for He-Man remains almost nonexistent today, perhaps because, looking back at the material, the mythology remains at once weird and unmemorable, and neither the popular animated series nor the 1987 film, Masters of the Universe, starring Dolph Lundgren and Frank Langella, holds up well. 

Over the years, Mattel has tried to revive the toy line and cartoon, but the company’s biggest effort thus far is the new feature from Amazon MGM Studios, which reportedly spent upwards of $200 million on a blockbuster-sized Masters of the Universe. If the 1980s versions of this franchise unabashedly targeted the preadolescent boy demographic, the new iteration has been reconfigured (by a sausage fest of credited screenwriters: Chris Butler, Aaron Nee, Adam Nee, and David Callaham) to adopt a more conventional mold. The movie also incorporates the last three decades of ironic reassessment: the series’ very 1980s obsession with bulging muscles; the loincloth-centric costumes, all of which look like rejected designs from Zardoz (1974); the vague eroticism between He-Man and several characters, including his nemesis, Skeletor; and the eccentricities of the cartoon, from the many heads thrown back in laughter to the bizarre characters—all of which started first as action figures (Stinkor, Mantenna, etc.), around which the writers built a lame storyline.

Despite its origins, Masters of the Universe sets out to become a four-quadrant feature, appealing to everyone, and in that, no one in particular. The story is too bloated for little children, with a 142-minute runtime that challenged the attention spans of the kids in my prescreening, who became restless after an hour. Admittedly, so did I. The material’s self-awareness and humor aren’t memorable enough to distinguish it from other, better examples in this genre, such as Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves (2023)—a movie that I enjoy more with each subsequent viewing. And director Travis Knight can’t decide whether the audience should take these characters seriously or laugh at their inherent silliness. He attempts both and does neither very well. The result did not rekindle my nostalgia for this chapter of my childhood; it didn’t create an exciting new take for audiences of all ages, either.

A protracted opening establishes the distant realm called Eternia, where sword-and-sandal heroes stand alongside robots and flying ships with laser guns. Eternia’s resident baddie, Skeletor (voiced by Jared Leto, doing an R-rolling master-thespian thing), wants the Sword of Power, which imbues its wielder with, as you might guess, power. But it’s kept in Castle Grayskull, home of King Randor (James Purefoy), who’s disappointed by his son, Adam (Artie Wilkinson-Hunt), a young boy more interested in goofing around than learning to fight. When Skeletor attacks the castle and proves victorious, the Enchantress (Morena Baccarin), the magically inclined protector of Grayskull, sends Adam away to Earth along with the coveted sword. What happens then? Did a couple of farmers adopt him à la Superman? Or did he grow up in the foster system? The writers ignore such practical questions, picking up the story years later, when the adult Adam (now a hulking Nicholas Galitzine) works in corporate human resources. After Adam finally locates his sword, which was lost when he was transported from Eternia to Earth, he eventually finds his way home with the help of his childhood friend, Teela (Camila Mendes), to retake Grayskull from Skeletor. 

Advertisement

Knight’s main source of inspiration, besides the cartoon and earlier movie, seems to be the similarly themed cult classic Flash Gordon (1980). Masters of the Universe’s music features identical-sounding Howard Blake-style guitar riffs and, to echo the original songs Queen wrote for Flash Gordon, the production uses Queen’s “Princes of the Universe” on the soundtrack. In other areas, Knight directs a conventional franchise movie with choppily edited and CGI-heavy battle scenes full of anonymous violence, lifeless chase sequences, digital backdrops resembling video-game environments, and shameless product placements for Coca-Cola and Amazon. The VFX sometimes look impressive; at other times, they look cheap and generic. Fortunately, Knight’s production also offers practical effects and prosthetics for some characters, most memorably the cyborg Trap Jaw. Knight’s secret weapon is costume designer Richard Sale, who visualizes the inherently absurd look of these characters, for better or worse, in tangible garb. The actors inhabiting the excellent costumes don’t have much to do, though. Ask yourself why they hired Kristen Wiig to voice Roboto, a bland robot character whose dialogue could have easily been performed by anyone else, or even just replaced with the beeps and boops of a Star Wars droid. When you have Kristen Wiig, use her.

Masters of the Universe movie still 2

Elsewhere, Masters of the Universe attempts to be self-aware in its irony and sexually suggestive underpinnings. There’s a running gag about how practically everyone can’t keep their eyes off Adam after he becomes his heroic alter-ego, He-Man, given his oiled-up muscles and blonde locks. But under Adam’s pink shirt, he still looks buff, making his eventual Hulk-like transformation into a muscle-bound barbarian unremarkable. Elsewhere, I liked the detail of Adam growing up on Earth and forgetting everyone’s names on Eternia, so he makes up their names based on their physical characteristics. A man with a big metal hand becomes Fisto (Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson), and another with a metal head-butting helmet becomes Ram-Man (Jon Xue Zhang). The writers take advantage of this with veiled dirty jokes about fisting and Ram-Man “giving head” to Skeletor’s goons. That’s about as clever as the movie gets. As for character development, there’s almost none. Skeletor, for instance, wants to be bad for the sake of being bad. His motivations are nonexistent, resulting in an obvious, uninteresting, and one-dimensional villain.  

A key series in the conservative, Reagan-era 1980s, the Masters of the Universe cartoon and previous movie valued strength and power, muscles and might. Today, that message has negative, regressive associations with the political right, which often looks at this period from a fond standpoint. To avoid alienating any part of their audience, the filmmakers desperately try to please everyone with a mild progressive commentary to counter the franchise’s original themes. Adam’s character must learn to “be a man” to please his father, King Randor, and his makeshift father figure, Man-at-Arms (Idris Elba, in a chummy reformed drunk role). But there’s also a half-hearted message that Adam, having worked in human resources, knows the value of empathy and emotional intelligence. For a while there, the movie even claims you can’t solve every problem with muscles—that is, until He-Man resolves the conflict by pummeling Skeletor with his fists. The movie’s message is ultimately nonexistent. The committee making this movie has carefully avoided any line-in-the-sand worldview, all in an attempt to manufacture a box-office hit that will please everyone and offend no one. 

That’s exactly the problem with Masters of the Universe. It’s so afraid to have a perspective or be about something that nothing onscreen has an impact. This is not to say every movie must have a substantive message. Sometimes, a mindless adventure is enough. However, even on those terms, there’s no tension or danger here because Skeletor is never all that menacing, and Adam alternates between self-parody and earnest heroism. None of the emotional beats land, not the many father-son dynamics nor the hero’s journey. And the production’s competing tones, from its intentional camp to its sword-swinging adventure, lack the balance of wit and scope that Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves so delightfully captured. For much of the runtime, I felt bored and, aside from a few chuckles at the childish humor, disengaged from everything happening. Perhaps Roboto describes the movie best when referring to life as “a series of absurdities leading to infinite nothingness.”

Photo: Brian the Barbarian

Advertisement

Masters of the Universe movie still 4

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Masters of the Universe’: What Critics Are Saying About the He-Man Movie Starring Nicholas Galitzine and Jared Leto

Published

on

‘Masters of the Universe’: What Critics Are Saying About the He-Man Movie Starring Nicholas Galitzine and Jared Leto

He-Man lands in theaters Friday, and reviews for Masters of the Universe are now in.

The film, a live-action adaptation of the Mattel franchise from director Travis Knight, follows Prince Adam of Eternia, who crash-lands on Earth as a child and is separated from his Sword of Power. Raised as an ordinary man named Adam Glenn, he eventually recovers the sword and returns to save his homeland, where he faces off against Skeletor.

Nicholas Galitzine stars as He-Man/Prince Adam/Adam Glenn, while Jared Leto plays the villain Skeletor. The cast also includes Idris Elba as Man-at-Arms, Camila Mendes as Teela, Alison Brie as Evil-Lyn, Morena Baccarin as Sorceress and Kristen Wiig as Roboto.

Masters of the Universe celebrated its Los Angeles premiere last month, where the original He-Man from the 1987 film, Dolph Lundgren, praised Galitzine’s performance while speaking with The Hollywood Reporter: “You need a guy who is a leading-man type, and the muscles and the strength are secondary. You can always create that, and I think Nicholas did that. He built himself up. When I did it, it was a little more like I had the physique and had to access my boyish side to find the character.”

As of Tuesday, the movie holds a 74 percent score on Rotten Tomatoes. To find out what critics are saying, read on.

Advertisement

THR’s Frank Scheck wrote, “The film winds up feeling so much like one of those fringe festival musical theater parodies that you find yourself waiting for the characters to burst into song … Masters of the Universe touches all the fan-serving bases, with a fun cameo by a certain star of a previous film incarnation and enough post-credit sequences to guarantee several sequels. But it all comes off as terribly forced, as if everyone involved was already trying to figure out exactly how much they’ll earn signing autographs at future Comic-Cons.”

IGN’s Clint Gage wrote, “Masters of the Universe is so much funnier than I expected, and the fight scenes are choreographed and photographed in a way that gives the sequences just enough flair to make them stand out (even if they’re not revolutionizing superhero style fisticuffs on screen). While Nicholas Galitzine and Idris Elba provide the thematic structure to the film, Jared Leto’s Skeletor gives a delightfully weird and cartoonish energy to every scene he’s in.”

YouTube critic Jeremy Jahns also highlighted Leto’s performance in his review, “Standout performance and character in Masters of the Universe: Jared Leto’s Skeletor,” Jahns said. “He was the most fun happening on screen at any given time.” He also added, “It does feel like a few different movies crushed into one. A few different ideas of what a Masters of the Universe movie should or would be. And most importantly, it had these moments of heart and life lessons that I actually liked that didn’t always land because sometimes the comedy is just there to eclipse it.” 

Inverse’s Ryan Britt wrote, “The idea of navigating your childhood hopes and fears, and incorporating those things into your adult life, is — somewhat appropriately for a movie based on an old cartoon — at the heart of the film. Not everyone who goes to see Masters of the Universe will have grown up with He-Man, but this film will make you wish that you did. And, at the same time, it’ll make you feel grateful that he’s back and quite literally, better than ever.”

The Guardian’s Benjamin Lee had a less favorable take on the film, writing in his review, “Amazon’s head-scratching $200m-budgeted misfire fails to explain why so much time, money and effort has been wasted on a movie based on a toy that kids just don’t play with any more … There’s just too much distracting confusion here — from Galitzine’s unsure performance to the script’s swirl of competing tones to the very question of why this needed to exist — for it to transport us as we both hope and expect.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending