Connect with us

Entertainment

Laura Dern will play journalist who investigated Jeffrey Epstein crimes in a new series

Published

on

Laura Dern will play journalist who investigated Jeffrey Epstein crimes in a new series

A dream team has assembled to bring a scripted series based on the book “Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story” from the drawing board to the small screen.

Oscar-winning actor Laura Dern has signed on to portray Miami Herald investigative journalist Julie K. Brown, whose tireless reporting on the Epstein sex-trafficking case exposed how federal prosecutors approved what many have referred to as a “sweetheart” plea deal for Epstein in 2008.

Per Variety, the official description of the series reads: “An explosive account of an investigative reporter exposing the secret plea deal between Epstein and federal prosecutors. Drawing from Brown’s experience as a groundbreaking reporter for the Miami Herald, the book and the limited series follow her relentless years-long investigation that identified 80 victims, persuaded key survivors to go on the record, and led to Epstein[‘s] and Ghislaine Maxwell’s arrests.”

In 2008, the financier was charged with luring underage girls to his Palm Beach, Fla., mansion for sex. Under the plea agreement with then-U.S. Atty. for the Southern District of Florida Alexander Acosta, Epstein avoided a federal trial — where, if convicted, he could have faced a potential sentence of life in prison — and pleaded guilty instead to two state felony solicitation charges.

Advertisement

He served 13 months in a county jail but was allowed to go to his office six days a week on a work-release program.

Co-showrunners for the project are Eileen Myers, known for “American Hostage,” and Sharon Hoffman, best known for her work on “House of Cards” and who is adapting Brown’s book for television. Dern will also executive produce, along with Adam McKay and Kevin Messick, known for “The Big Short,” “Don’t Look Up” and “Succession.” Brown is also executive producing.

Although Sony Pictures Television is still pitching the series to networks and streamers, industry insiders predict that, with Dern and McKay on board, a green light is on the horizon.

Last week, Brown joined veteran journalist Katie Couric live on Substack to discuss her reporting on Epstein, and how the disgraced financier and his camp underestimated her. “I don’t think he worried about the little old reporter from the Miami Herald,” she said.

“When you have a sex predator of children who is — at the time I wrote this story, he was out there, you know, he was free — and he was still, as we now know, harming children,” Brown told Couric. “And so my goal at the time was to look at how this happened.

Advertisement

“Where was the breakdown? Was there someone who … was powerful who let him off the hook, and I just thought it was a good time to take a new look at it like a cold case detective would.

“By the time I decided to reopen the case, these women, these victims who were 13, 14, 15 years old, were now in their late 20s and early 30s, and Donald Trump became president right around this time. And ironically, as I was already looking at this story, he nominated Alexander Acosta to be his Labor secretary, and I knew at the time that he was the very person who had let [Epstein] off the hook. And so that’s where I started looking at this case.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie reviews drop for Project Hail Mary, They Will Kill You as critics weigh in – Art Threat

Published

on

Show summary Hide summary

Movie Reviews are now pouring in for two wildly different films competing at the box office. Project Hail Mary is soaring with critical acclaim, while They Will Kill You faces a significantly rougher critical reception in the same weekend. Here’s what critics are saying about both.

🔥 Quick Facts

  • Project Hail Mary Rating: 95% on Rotten Tomatoes with 8.4/10 on IMDB
  • They Will Kill You Rating: 63% on Rotten Tomatoes with 6.5/10 on IMDB
  • Release Spread: Project Hail Mary debuted March 20, They Will Kill You March 27, 2026
  • Box Office Gap: Hail Mary earning $164.3 million domestically, Kill You debuted with only $5 million

Ryan Gosling’s Sci-Fi Adventure Dominates Critical Praise

Project Hail Mary, directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, has become the undisputed critical darling of late March. The 97%-rated film on major review aggregators showcases Ryan Gosling and Sandra Hüller in a space adventure that critics describe as heartfelt and visually stunning. According to reports, the film demonstrates how science fiction works best with emotional depth and character development at its core. Reviewers consistently praise its balance of action, humor, and genuine pathos.

The movie’s success extends beyond critical praise into audience reception. IMDB’s user score of 8.4/10 demonstrates strong viewer enthusiasm, while Metacritic’s 77 score signals broadly positive critical consensus. Rotten Tomatoes gives it 95% from critics, making it a rare achievement in blockbuster filmmaking for 2026. The film’s box office trajectory confirms this momentum, with earnings approaching $165 million domestically.

Zazie Beetz Leads Gore-Filled Horror That Misses With Critics

They Will Kill You, directed by Kirill Sokolov, takes a vastly different critical path. The horror-action-comedy film stars Zazie Beetz in a role critics acknowledge showcases her talent for intense performances, yet the film itself struggles with narrative and thematic depth. The movie features Patricia Arquette and Myha’la in supporting roles within a story about a woman working as a housekeeper in a New York high-rise filled with cult members.

Critics note that while the film excels in visual style and unbridled gore, it lacks substantive storytelling and character stakes. Rotten Tomatoes rates it 63%, signaling a mixed critical reception, while IMDB’s 6.5/10 score reflects audience disappointment. The film released March 27 to a disappointing $5 million opening weekend from Warner Bros., suggesting audiences may share critical hesitations about its derivative plot and tonal inconsistencies.

Critical Comparison and Reception Details

Movie Detail Project Hail Mary They Will Kill You
Rotten Tomatoes 95% Critics 63% Critics
IMDB Rating 8.4/10 6.5/10
Release Date March 20, 2026 March 27, 2026
Director Phil Lord, Christopher Miller Kirill Sokolov
Lead Actor Ryan Gosling Zazie Beetz

“Project Hail Mary is a smart, moving, and very satisfying sci-fi adventure with real heart. A film that reminds you that science fiction works best not when it prioritizes spectacle over substance.”

IMDB User Reviews, Consensus

Advertisement

Why Critics Embrace Heart Over Gore in 2026 Releases

The striking contrast between these two films reveals what critics value in contemporary cinema. Project Hail Mary succeeds by balancing ambitious science fiction concepts with genuine emotional storytelling and character development. The film trusts its audience to care about Ryan Gosling’s journey and the stakes involved in his space mission. Critics praise the cinematography, sound design, and the chemistry between leads as elevating the material beyond standard blockbuster fare.

Conversely, They Will Kill You emphasizes style, gore, and shock value without equal investment in narrative coherence or character motivation. While Zazie Beetz delivers an energetic performance, critics note the script fails to give her material worthy of her talent. The film’s Tarantino-influenced aesthetic and cartoonish violence entertain intermittently but don’t sustain engagement across its runtime. This disconnect explains why audiences stayed away in the opening weekend.

What Do These Reviews Mean for Future Box Office and Awards Season?

For Project Hail Mary, critical success likely signals continued audience interest and potential awards circuit momentum. The combination of 95% critical approval, strong audience reception, and proven box office legs suggests this film could maintain theater presence through April and beyond. Industry analysts expect it to continue collecting records previously held by other 2026 releases. Conversely, They Will Kill You faces an uphill battle with its modest opening and mixed reviews potentially limiting word-of-mouth expansion. The film may struggle to expand beyond its core horror audience during subsequent weekends.

These diverging critical receptions illustrate how modern audiences and critics increasingly reward substance over spectacle. Movie Reviews for both titles emphasize character, emotional investment, and thematic depth as determining factors in critical success. Whether audiences will sustain interest in both films throughout their theatrical runs remains to be seen, but early indicators suggest that the gap between them will only widen as release weekends progress forward.

Give your feedback

Advertisement

Be the first to rate this post
or leave a detailed review

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | Severin Films Releases Two Stunning 4Ks By Jess Franco – VAMPYROS LESBOS and SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY – Review

Published

on

Movie Review | Severin Films Releases Two Stunning 4Ks By Jess Franco – VAMPYROS LESBOS and SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY – Review

Film Feature by James Learoyd

Exciting news for horror fans everywhere! If you love Eurotrash, classic exploitation genre-films and a general ora of the bizarre, there’s a chance that you already love cinema’s greatest freak, Jesús (Jess) Franco: the controversial Spanish horror legend who produced almost (though perhaps over) 200 feature-length films in his career. These pictures were frequently defined by their musical experimentation; inclusion of erotic, almost pornographic, scenarios; as well as a flowing, stream-of-consciousness aesthetic formed through never-ending zooms, lack of concrete narrative, and reliance on the expressionistic language of editing.

I’m very happy to announce then that we’ve been blessed with two new 4Ks / blu-rays from Severin (a long-time supporter of Franco’s work) which are both lovingly put together with hours of phenomenal bonus features. The movies are Vampyros Lesbos (1971) – Franco’s most known and celebrated work – and She Killed in Ecstasy (1971), both starring the tragically departed Soledad Miranda in two of her six titles she produced with Franco over the span of a year. I was lucky enough to get early access to these discs and not only found myself falling in love with these movies again, but becoming truly inspired by the additional material provided. So, let’s dive into this provocative double-bill!

VAMPYROS LESBOS

On a rewatch, I can safely say that Vampyros Lesbos is a masterpiece, but in its own unusual way, and on its own unfathomable, formally stimulating terms. And part of what makes it a masterpiece might be because it requires more than one viewing, as well as a complete immersion in the larger contexts of Jess Franco’s filmic intentions. Franco’s love of older literature, especially horror, can be seen through much of his filmography, yet nowhere is it better crystalised as here, wherein he reinterprets the classical tale of Bram Stoker’s Dracula through a modern-day setting, queer characters and a sexually explicit presentation.

Advertisement

My main takeaway from the piece itself on my first rewatch is this: Franco is most skilled at immersing his audience in environments and feelings that are utterly intangible. For instance, the opening burlesque performance involving the use of reflection, the black background (which the film keeps returning to in snippets after the fact) completely exists within the deepest recesses of my psyche – despite, or because, it geographically lacks clarity, and doesn’t feel as if it has any real beginning or ending in terms of sequential beats. This is the kind of stuff this critic obsesses over.

(BONUS FEATURES)

I listened to one of the two featured audio-commentaries provided, that by Kat Ellinger, which is quite wonderful. At first, I found it overwhelming when it came to the focus on more academic discussion; but as soon as I settled in for her thought-provoking perspective, I became absorbed in how Ellinger framed what we were watching through the political and historic. I loved how she takes us through the relevance of literature as well as the contexts under which Franco made his films (frequently in exile due to the constraints imposed by dictator Generalissimo Franco of Spain and his regime, in addition to the authoritarian nature of the Catholic church at the time). Jess Franco was a real radical!

There is a featured interview with an old and grizzled Jess Franco, shortly before his passing in 2013, titled ‘Interlude in Lesbos’ which is quite interesting. Holding onto a cigarette which seemingly remains forever unlit, the man rests further and further back in his chair over the course of the footage, and the way the camera tracks his movements I found quite amusing.

‘Fever Dracula’ is then a featured interview with the incredibly articulate Stephen Thrower – the leading Franco academic whose writing and testimony has long been a bit of a staple of many physical releases of the director’s films. In this interview, he focuses on how Vampyros Lesbos announces a new and abstract form of cinematic language – one that would come to define the Franco style.

Advertisement

But maybe the biggest boast of these bonus features is titled ‘The Red Scarf Diaries’: an interview with Sean Baker regarding how the work of Soledad Miranda and Jess Franco influenced his Best-Picture-winning Anora. One can’t help but be charmed by how the Oscar-winning filmmaker expresses the journey all genre-fans embark on with Franco; one of perplexed beguilement, at first unimpressed by how “rough around the edges” the work is, yet eventually identifying the hallmarks of a real “auteur” with undiluted vision.

We then get an entry in an extended travel docuseries entitled ‘In the Land of Franco’ (this being Part 12). This is also presented by Stephen Thrower as he travels across Europe to now-iconic shooting locations, this part featuring hidden-away areas of Paris most prominently. It’s simple, informative and effective.

But arguably most significant on the disc is a feature which directly addresses the feeling of mourning which has hovered over every previous bit of testimony: the tragic car crash which lead to the death of Soledad Miranda at just age 27, while she was only partway through her planned collaborations with Franco. ‘Sublime Soledad’, presented by Amy Brown, serves as a poignant tribute. It’s tragic that Miranda never got to see any of these movies in the completed states which have become so beloved, but

Brown puts it nicely that it’s apparent that she found this kind of work creatively gratifying. Her performances will live on.

Finally, there’s a short and silly feature entitled ‘Jess is Yoda’ which I don’t want to spoil for everyone… but it’s hilarious, and quite enlightening.

Advertisement

SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY

SHE KILLED IN ECSTASY

What an insane film. Again, a rewatch for this critic, this picture is the far pricklier counter to the hypnotic tendencies of Vamyros Lesbos. She Killed in Ecstasy is a truly visceral watch, consisting of deeply disturbing sequences and genuine horror. It’s the strangest “revenge” movie out there.

A medical man is discovered to be conducting experiments on unborn foetuses (Thrower amusingly describes them as “pickled foetuses” since we’re shown the disruptive imagery of them stored in jars accompanied by the funky opening credits) and is then outcast from his profession, leading the character to commit suicide. His lover (played incredibly by Miranda) then takes it upon herself to brutally murder everyone on the board who voted for his dismissal. I love this movie.

Within the bonus features, it’s hilarious how conflicted Thrower is with the backwards moral implications of the film. His interview is ‘Ecstasy in Rage’ and is a great watch. It’s almost as if we are witnessing in real time Thrower attempt to make sense of what Jess was trying to say. He concludes that there’s a cognitive dissonance at play; Franco is depicting some of the most unsettling stuff but doing so in an almost glib and flippant manner, with suicide and murder being complemented by a fast-paced, comedic-sounding style of jazz.

My interpretation is that the presentation of the film – and just how unapologetically it places us in the perspective of a ‘bad person’ – makes the story feel even more disturbing, and Franco’s style and experimentation all the more ideologically provocative.

Other offerings on Disc 2 include another instalment of ‘In the Land of Franco’, another interview with Franco called ‘Jess Killed in Ecstasy’ (same setup as last time – in his old age, he’s still funny, horny and a genuine cinephile), as well as the same ‘Sublime Soledad’ video essay by Amy Brown. Also, on both this and the previous discs are the very entertaining German-language trailers.

Advertisement

But one more touching feature is an interview with actor Paul Muller in his old age, who was a frequent Franco collaborator. He provides some amusing anecdotes about the director and his fascinating persona. I especially enjoyed how he highlighted Franco’s ultra-relaxed style of direction. There was never any script, and Franco would just allow the performers to act whenever they either did or didn’t feel like it – often getting just partway through the day, Jess would break for lunch and say, “we’ll continue tomorrow” (there are many similarities to Franco’s idol Jean-Luc Godard in this respect).

To surmise, Severin has produced a comprehensive guide and appreciation of Franco’s work, with two of his most significant releases and creatively pure expressions. These discs were also far more emotionally involving and reflective than I was anticipating! And when reevaluating what Jess Franco did so well as a visual artist, one could argue that more cinema should be brave enough to offer a location or mood without the need for point B to follow on from point A.

Franco’s worlds grow in the mind over time, crafting a place that you can revisit, be hypnotised by, and yet still not fully comprehend the reasons for its resonance.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Global streaming revenue surged to $160 billion in 2025. Here’s why

Published

on

Global streaming revenue surged to 0 billion in 2025. Here’s why

Global streaming revenue surged to $150 billion last year, driven largely by an increase in prices by Netflix and other streamers, according to a new report.

In 2025, global streaming subscription revenue grew by 14%, reaching a total of over $157 billion, the report from Ampere Analysis found. In the last five years, revenue has tripled from the $50 billion seen in 2020.

Streamers continue to dominate the digital distribution market with rising monthly subscription fees, more consumers choosing subscriptions with ads, and platforms expanding their global reach.

“As the streaming market matures, the emphasis is no longer on pure subscriber growth but on extracting greater value from existing audiences,” said Lauren Liversedge, a senior analyst at Ampere Analysis. She noted that the growth is happening “particularly in the most competitive markets.”

Advertisement

Over the next five years, Ampere Analysis estimates subscription revenue will grow by another 29%, potentially reaching over $200 billion worldwide by 2030.

The U.S. is the largest driver of this revenue growth, as the country accounts for 50% of 2025’s global streaming subscription revenue, per Ampere Analysis. Netflix accounted for the largest revenue share in the U.S. at 14%. Last week, the company also announced a price hike, raising its its premium tier to $27 a month. This marks the second time in a little over a year that the streaming service raised its fees.

“Our approach remains the same: We continue offering a range of prices and plans to meet a variety of needs, and as we deliver more value to our members we are updating our prices to enable us to reinvest in quality entertainment and improve their experience by updating our prices,” said a Netflix spokesperson in a statement.

It’s not the only streaming service to increase its prices, as Disney+, HBO Max and Apple TV made similar moves last year.

Recent data from Deloitte highlights some of the price sensitivity U.S. streaming audiences are experiencing. More than two-thirds of streaming subscribers are now opting for ads, marking a 20% increase from 2024.

Advertisement

That cost-conscious sentiment expands beyond North America, reaching Western Europe, according to Ampere Analysis. The total revenue from ad tiers has risen rapidly across these markets over the last five years, up from less than 5% in 2020 to 28% in 2025.

But even as consumers demonstrate their willingness to pay less and watch ads, streaming platforms still benefit, making money from both subscription fees and advertising. When accounting for that ad revenue, streaming services generated closer to $177 billion in global revenue last year. Advertising is expected to become an even more important revenue stream for these companies, as ads alone could add $42 billion in annual revenue by 2030, per Ampere Analysis.

Continue Reading

Trending