Education
Affirmative Action Ruling Shakes Universities Over More Than Race
The Supreme Court’s decision to effectively end race-conscious admissions in higher education last month was historic in its own right, removing a tool that the nation’s colleges have used for decades to increase racial diversity on their campuses.
But what started with affirmative action has morphed into a far broader reconsideration of fairness and privilege in college admissions and what it means for American higher education.
On Tuesday, the Education Department announced that it had opened a civil rights investigation into Harvard University’s admissions preferences for the relatives of alumni and wealthy donors. And at what the department billed as a “National Summit on Equal Opportunity in Higher Education” in Washington on Wednesday, more than 100 academics, government officials and education administrators focused on how much is now up for grabs well beyond affirmative action.
“We come together today at a turning point in higher education — perhaps in all of education,” the education secretary, Miguel Cardona, said in his keynote address. “We didn’t ask for this moment, but as leaders we must answer.”
Already, especially at elite colleges, there is widespread discussion of the role of legacy admissions, preferences for family members of donors, and of who benefits from athletic scholarships.
Given the court’s ruling on affirmative action, officials at the conference discussed the importance of developing and expanding other tools to achieve diversity. Those include: recruiting through academic enrichment programs for talented low-income students; improving financial aid; initiating so-called direct admissions, which means automatically admitting students who have met certain threshold requirements; bringing disadvantaged students to campus to generate interest; and making it easier for community college students to transfer to four-year colleges.
Even how the Supreme Court’s ruling will be interpreted is in flux.
On July 12, Students for Fair Admissions, the plaintiff in the Supreme Court cases, sent a letter to 150 public and private colleges essentially warning that the organization would be watching them for signs that they were skirting or violating the court’s decision.
But at Wednesday’s summit, two federal officials and interpreters of the court’s decision fired back, saying that they, not a private group, were the enforcers.
“I have heard about groups who are not the Department of Education or the Department of Justice sending schools notifications about what they say the law is and what they want you to do,” Catherine E. Lhamon, assistant secretary in the department’s Office for Civil Rights, declared to the audience.
“I offer you this: You will know when you hear from us,” she said. She did not name Students for Fair Admissions, but everyone in the audience seemed to know what she was alluding to and responded with clapping and laughter.
Ms. Lhamon said that the court did not rule that working to achieve diversity was unlawful, and that her office would be “ready to help you, including through technical assistance,” in determining how to comply with the ruling.
Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for civil rights in the Justice Department, said that it was working on a “resource document,” publicly available next month, that analyzes the court decision for colleges. Discussion of race was not flatly forbidden, she said. A Black student might want to write an essay about becoming interested in civil rights law after a field trip to the courthouse, or about learning to cook Jamaican dishes from her mother — both experiences that she had, Ms. Clarke added.
As successful as race-conscious admissions have been in creating a pipeline for Black and Hispanic Americans to leadership positions, some social scientists suggested that it also allowed colleges to shirk a broader responsibility to facilitate social mobility.
Racial preferences “kind of let these schools off the hook for a while,” Mitchell L. Stevens, an education and sociology professor at Stanford University, said.
Still, doing away with racial preferences, without some major innovations to replace them, will have enormous impacts on diversity, experts said.
Economists who examined admissions data from Harvard and the University of North Carolina found that, under a policy where Harvard were to remove preferences based on race without changing other aspects of its admissions process, the proportion of admitted Black students would fall by about two-thirds. The proportion of admitted Hispanic students would fall to 7 percent of the total, from about 13 percent. The estimated decline was similar for the University of North Carolina.
Zachary Bleemer, an economist at Princeton who has studied alternatives to race-conscious admissions, said that he saw little reason to retain legacy preferences, but that doing away with them would affect “a relatively small number of students across the Ivy-plus system” and was unlikely to have a democratizing effect at the national scale.
At selective public universities, “top percent’’ policies that guarantee admissions to high-performing students at all public high schools in a state had helped increase racial diversity, Dr. Bleemer said. He suggested that private universities, especially those in urban areas, could similarly provide large and transparent admissions advantages to top students at local lower-income schools.
The Biden administration’s investigation of Harvard’s legacy preferences comes in response to a complaint by civil rights advocacy groups that the system favors white applicants.
There is no indication that a similar investigation is scheduled for other schools.
Richard Kahlenberg, an education consultant who is a proponent of class-based rather than race-based admissions, said that there had always been a symbiotic relationship between racial preferences and legacy preferences.
“Supporters of racial affirmative action liked that they could point to legacies as evidence that college admissions was not about meritocracy,” he said in an email. “And supporters (and beneficiaries) of legacy preferences liked racial affirmative action because the racial diversity it produced gave the superficial appearance that the system was fair and open to all.”
The court’s decision, he said, meant that “the grand bargain has collapsed,” and that legacy policies are suddenly more vulnerable than before.
But, for the most part, college officials focused on practical issues more than on theoretical ones.
Christina Paxson, the president of Brown University, talked about how important it was to support disadvantaged students once they got to campus. For instance, she said, opportunities like research and internships had to be advertised, because they were often “invisible” to first-generation students.
Uma M. Jayakumar, an associate professor of education at the University of California, Riverside, who did not attend the conference, said that for Ivy League colleges — where as many as 30 percent of students are children of alumni, donors and faculty, or are recruited athletes — changing the system of preferences could be meaningful in changing the demographics of the college. But doing so could be costly, too.
“Harvard has gone to court and fought for diversity,” Prof. Jayakumar said. “I would say, let’s see what they’re really willing to do.”
Education
Video: Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children
new video loaded: Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children
transcript
transcript
Biden Apologizes for U.S. Mistreatment of Native American Children
President Biden offered a formal apology on Friday on behalf of the U.S. government for the abuse of Native American children from the early 1800s to the late 1960s.
-
The Federal government has never, never formally apologized for what happened until today. I formally apologize. It’s long, long, long overdue. Quite frankly, there’s no excuse that this apology took 50 years to make. I know no apology can or will make up for what was lost during the darkness of the federal boarding school policy. But today, we’re finally moving forward into the light.
Recent episodes in Politics
Education
Video: Los Angeles Bus Hijacked at Gunpoint
new video loaded: Los Angeles Bus Hijacked at Gunpoint
transcript
transcript
Los Angeles Bus Hijacked at Gunpoint
The person suspected of hijacking a bus which killed one person, was taken into custody after an hourlong pursuit by the Los Angeles Police Department early Wednesday morning.
-
“Get him.”
Recent episodes in Guns & Gun Violence
Education
The Youngest Pandemic Children Are Now in School, and Struggling
The pandemic’s babies, toddlers and preschoolers are now school-age, and the impact on them is becoming increasingly clear: Many are showing signs of being academically and developmentally behind.
Interviews with more than two dozen teachers, pediatricians and early childhood experts depicted a generation less likely to have age-appropriate skills — to be able to hold a pencil, communicate their needs, identify shapes and letters, manage their emotions or solve problems with peers.
A variety of scientific evidence has also found that the pandemic seems to have affected some young children’s early development. Boys were more affected than girls, studies have found.
“I definitely think children born then have had developmental challenges compared to prior years,” said Dr. Jaime Peterson, a pediatrician at Oregon Health and Science University, whose research is on kindergarten readiness. “We asked them to wear masks, not see adults, not play with kids. We really severed those interactions, and you don’t get that time back for kids.”
The pandemic’s effect on older children — who were sent home during school closures, and lost significant ground in math and reading — has been well documented. But the impact on the youngest children is in some ways surprising: They were not in formal school when the pandemic began, and at an age when children spend a lot of time at home anyway.
The early years, though, are most critical for brain development. Researchers said several aspects of the pandemic affected young children — parental stress, less exposure to people, lower preschool attendance, more time on screens and less time playing.
Yet because their brains are developing so rapidly, they are also well positioned to catch up, experts said.
The youngest children represent “a pandemic tsunami” headed for the American education system, said Joel Ryan, who works with a network of Head Start and state preschool centers in Washington State, where he has seen an increase in speech delays and behavioral problems.
Not every young child is showing delays. Children at schools that are mostly Black or Hispanic or where most families have lower incomes are the most behind, according to data released Monday by Curriculum Associates, whose tests are given in thousands of U.S. schools. Students from higher-income families are more on pace with historical trends.
But “most, if not all, young students were impacted academically to some degree,” said Kristen Huff, vice president for assessment and research at Curriculum Associates.
Recovery is possible, experts said, though young children have not been a main focus of $122 billion in federal aid distributed to school districts to help students recover.
“We 100 percent have the tools to help kids and families recover,” said Catherine Monk, a clinical psychologist and professor at Columbia, and a chair of a research project on mothers and babies in the pandemic. “But do we know how to distribute, in a fair way, access to the services they need?”
What’s different now?
“I spent a long time just teaching kids to sit still on the carpet for one book. That’s something I didn’t need to do before.”
David Feldman, kindergarten teacher, St. Petersburg, Fla.
“We are talking 4- and 5-year-olds who are throwing chairs, biting, hitting, without the self-regulation.”
Tommy Sheridan, deputy director, National Head Start Association
Brook Allen, in Martin, Tenn., has taught kindergarten for 11 years. This year, for the first time, she said, several students could barely speak, several were not toilet trained, and several did not have the fine motor skills to hold a pencil.
Children don’t engage in imaginative play or seek out other children the way they used to, said Michaela Frederick, a pre-K teacher for students with learning delays in Sharon, Tenn. She’s had to replace small building materials in her classroom with big soft blocks because students’ fine motor skills weren’t developed enough to manipulate them.
Perhaps the biggest difference Lissa O’Rourke has noticed among her preschoolers in St. Augustine, Fla., has been their inability to regulate their emotions: “It was knocking over chairs, it was throwing things, it was hitting their peers, hitting their teachers.”
Data from schools underscores what early childhood professionals have noticed.
Children who just finished second grade, who were as young as 3 or 4 when the pandemic began, remain behind children the same age prepandemic, particularly in math, according to the new Curriculum Associates data. Of particular concern, the students who are the furthest behind are making the least progress catching up.
The youngest students’ performance is “in stark contrast” to older elementary school children, who have caught up much more, the researchers said. The new analysis examined testing data from about four million children, with cohorts before and after the pandemic.
Data from Cincinnati Public Schools is another example: Just 28 percent of kindergarten students began this school year prepared, down from 36 percent before the pandemic, according to research from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.
How did this happen?
“They don’t have the muscle strength because everything they are doing at home is screen time. They are just swiping.”
Sarrah Hovis, preschool teacher, Roseville, Mich.
“I have more kids in kindergarten who have never been in school.”
Terrance Anfield, kindergarten teacher, Indianapolis
One explanation for young children’s struggles, childhood development experts say, is parental stress during the pandemic.
A baby who is exposed to more stress will show more activation on brain imaging scans in “the parts of that baby’s brain that focus on fear and focus on aggression,” said Rahil D. Briggs, a child psychologist with Zero to Three, a nonprofit that focuses on early childhood. That leaves less energy for parts of the brain focused on language, exploration and learning, she said.
During lockdowns, children also spent less time overhearing adult interactions that exposed them to new language, like at the grocery store or the library. And they spent less time playing with other children.
Kelsey Schnur, 32, of Sharpsville, Pa., pulled her daughter, Finley, from child care during the pandemic. Finley, then a toddler, colored, did puzzles and read books at home.
But when she finally enrolled in preschool, she struggled to adjust, her mother said. She was diagnosed with separation anxiety and selective mutism.
“It was very eye-opening to see,” said Ms. Schnur, who works in early childhood education. “They can have all of the education experiences and knowledge, but that socialization is so key.”
Preschool attendance can significantly boost kindergarten preparedness, research has found. But in many states, preschool attendance is still below prepandemic levels. Survey data suggests low-income families have not returned at the same rate as higher-income families.
“I have never had such a small class,” said Analilia Sanchez, who had nine children in her preschool class in El Paso this year. She typically has at least 16. “I think they got used to having them at home — that fear of being around the other kids, the germs.”
Time on screens also spiked during the pandemic — as parents juggled work and children cooped up at home — and screen time stayed up after lockdowns ended. Many teachers and early childhood experts believe this affected children’s attention spans and fine motor skills. Long periods of screen time have been associated with developmental delays.
Heidi Tringali, a pediatric occupational therapist in Charlotte, N.C., said she and her colleagues are seeing many more families contact them with children who don’t fit into typical diagnoses.
She is seeing “visual problems, core strength, social skills, attention — all the deficits,” she said. “We really see the difference in them not being out playing.”
Can children catch up?
“I’m actually happy with the majority of their growth.”
Michael LoMedico, second-grade teacher, Yonkers, N.Y.
“They just crave consistency that they didn’t get.”
Emily Sampley, substitute teacher, Sioux Falls, S.D.
It’s too early to know whether young children will experience long-term effects from the pandemic, but researchers say there are reasons to be optimistic.
“It is absolutely possible to catch up, if we catch things early,” said Dr. Dani Dumitriu, a pediatrician and neuroscientist at Columbia and chair of the study on pandemic newborns. “There is nothing deterministic about a brain at six months.”
There may also have been benefits to being young in the pandemic, she and others said, like increased resiliency and more time with family.
Some places have invested in programs to support young children, like a Tennessee district that is doubling the number of teaching assistants in kindergarten classrooms next school year and adding a preschool class for students needing extra support.
Oregon used some federal pandemic aid money to start a program to help prepare children and parents for kindergarten the summer before.
For many students, simply being in school is the first step.
Sarrah Hovis, a preschool teacher in Roseville, Mich., has seen plenty of the pandemic’s impact in her classroom. Some children can’t open a bag of chips, because they lack finger strength. More of her students are missing many days of school, a national problem since the pandemic.
But she has also seen great progress. By the end of this year, some of her students were counting to 100, and even adding and subtracting.
“If the kids come to school,” she said, “they do learn.”
-
News1 week ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business5 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics4 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Science2 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Technology3 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI