Connect with us

Culture

College Football Playoff at-large contenders: Cases for, against and fatal flaws

Published

on

College Football Playoff at-large contenders: Cases for, against and fatal flaws

As the season approaches its final two weeks, jostling for at-large bids continues for teams in the upper echelon of College Football Playoff competition.

At this point, there are teams with CFP hopes both as a conference champion and as an at-large. There are others, such as Big 12 contenders BYU and Colorado, which need to win their conference to reach the Playoff. The same scenario exists for Group of 5 squads Boise State and Tulane.

For the teams strictly in at-large contention, what are the cases for their inclusion and what are the flaws that could keep them from the 12-team tournament? Below we examine 16 teams with at-large hopes — not just the 16 highest-ranked teams — and examine why they are worthy of at-large consideration while breaking down their flaws.

No. 1 Oregon (11-0)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS (strength of schedule): 52; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 4-0; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 6-0; Points for: 33.9; Points against: 15.7.

Case for: The Ducks are the nation’s only unbeaten team, have ranked wins against Ohio State, Boise State and Illinois and compete in a coast-to-coast conference. At this stage, Oregon deserves the No. 1 ranking without debate.

Advertisement

Fatal flaw: This is more of a concern moving forward. Had Ohio State quarterback Will Howard slid a second earlier and called a timeout against Oregon, the Buckeyes might have kicked a game-winning field goal in Eugene. The teams are likely to meet in Indianapolis for the Big Ten championship. Should Oregon fall, the Ducks could face Boise State again in the CFP, and they won that game on a last-second field goal. Rematches against motivated opponents could pose challenges.

No. 2 Ohio State (10-1)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 58; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 5-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 5-0; Points for: 37.8; Points against: 10.7.

Case for: The Buckeyes have the talent at every position to compete with any team in the country. They boast two NFL-caliber running backs and the nation’s top defense. Howard has completed 80 percent of his passes in six different games, and receivers Emeka Egbuka, Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate are an electrifying trio. On a neutral field, this team could win it all.

Fatal flaw: There are times the Buckeyes look ordinary, like in a 21-17 home win against Nebraska. Injuries to Ohio State’s top two offensive linemen could have consequences against a physical, athletic front. Howard has competed at a high level this year, but can he make the game-winning plays in a close contest against similar talent?

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

Predicting College Football Playoff rankings after Week 13: How far will Indiana fall?

No. 3 Texas (10-1)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 39; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 7-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 3-0; Points for: 37.8; Points against: 12.1.

Case for: Texas can match up with anyone player-for-player. The Longhorns have the SEC’s top scoring defense and rank second nationally in total defense. They have an experienced quarterback in Quinn Ewers, elite players at every position and showed their grit by losing only one game so far in their first SEC season.

Fatal flaw: The Longhorns don’t own a victory over a current Top 25 team. They avoided Alabama, Ole Miss, Tennessee and South Carolina and they lost decisively to Georgia. That doesn’t take away their intent; the Longhorns traveled to defending national champion Michigan and won 31-19. But questions persist about how Texas will perform against fellow elite programs because they haven’t faced more than one entering this week’s showdown against Texas A&M.

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 37; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 6-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 4-0; Points for: 32.4; Points against: 14.6.

Advertisement

Case for: The Nittany Lions have handled their business in fine fashion. They survived at tough road venues like USC, Minnesota, Wisconsin and West Virginia with big plays in critical moments. Penn State has an underrated quarterback in Drew Allar, the nation’s best tight end in Tyler Warren and a top-five NFL Draft pick in edge rusher Abdul Carter. The Nittany Lions can adapt to different styles and weather won’t be a factor.

Fatal flaw: There are two big questions facing Penn State. One, can their wide receivers gain enough separation against an equally talented opponent? Two, can coach James Franklin string together multiple wins against top-10 competition? In Franklin’s 11 years, the Nittany Lions are 3-17 against top-10 opponents with only one victory in the last eight seasons.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

‘On our terms’: Inside Penn State’s season-saving drive with 3 fourth-down conversions

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 65; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 6-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 4-0; Points for: 39.0; Points against: 11.6.

Case for: Few, if any, teams have looked more impressive than Notre Dame in the last two months. Only once have the Irish allowed more than 16 points in a game, and they’ve scored at least 31 points in each of their last seven games. Quarterback Riley Leonard has become an elite playmaker and Notre Dame’s line of scrimmage play can hang with any opponent.

Advertisement

Fatal flaw: The Irish have ranked wins against Texas A&M and Army away from home, but their overall schedule was light. Notre Dame’s 16-14 loss to Northern Illinois has served as a lightning rod for criticism. For the Irish the scenario is simple: beat USC and pick up a home CFP game. Lose to the Trojans and probably fall from CFP consideration.

No. 6 Miami (10-1)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 61; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 5-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 4-0; Points for: 44.7; Points against: 22.3.

Case for: The Hurricanes average more points than any team in CFP contention. With quarterback Cam Ward, Miami can fill it up. In five different games, the Hurricanes have scored at least 50 points.

Fatal flaw: No at-large contender allows more points per game than Miami at 22.3. The Hurricanes frequently have been involved in one-score games against unranked opponents and have needed late rallies to win. Miami has yet to play a Top 25 team, let alone beat one.


Miami will finish the regular season on the road against Syracuse on Saturday. (Sam Navarro / Imagn Images)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 4; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 4-2; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 4-0; Points for: 33.2; Points against: 14.6.

Advertisement

Case for: Nobody has more quality wins than Georgia, which beat CFP contenders Clemson, Texas and Tennessee. When operating at a high level, the Bulldogs look like an eventual champion. They have a veteran quarterback and talent that jumps off the roster. Despite a loss at Alabama, their furious comeback attempt will scare any future opponent.

Fatal flaw: Which version of Carson Beck will take the field in the CFP? He’s thrown 12 interceptions and three picks in three different games, including in a loss to Alabama and a win against Texas. In a game between equally matched opponents, how Beck performs could enhance – or harm – Georgia’s performance.

No. 8 Tennessee (9-2)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 57; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 3-2; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 5-0; Points for: 37.4; Points against: 13.1.

Case for: The Vols can play any style of football and compete. They rank second in the SEC in both points scored and points allowed. Running back Dylan Sampson is one of the nation’s three best running backs and sophomore quarterback Nico Iamaleava displays some dynamic qualities.

Fatal flaw: Outside of beating Alabama, the Vols have an ordinary resume. None of their nonconference opponents are bowl eligible, and they lost to 6-5 Arkansas at home. It’s why Tennessee hovered outside the CFP before Ole Miss and Alabama suffered losses last weekend.

Advertisement

No. 9 SMU (10-1)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 59; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 5-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 4-0; Points for: 39.3; Points against: 21.0.

Case for: SMU’s ACC debut has been flawless with nary a loss despite a reduced revenue share. The Mustangs are one victory shy of running the table and advancing to the ACC title game. All-everything running back Brashard Smith was critical in wins against Duke and Pittsburgh.

Fatal flaw: An early loss to BYU lingers but not in the way most people expected back in September. With SEC teams slipping after their third loss, heightened scrutiny awaits SMU this weekend against Cal and in a potential ACC title game. It’s worth watching SMU’s defense, which has allowed at least 25 points to every bowl-eligible opponent since its BYU loss.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

How SMU has developed the nastiest defense in the ACC

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 68; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 3-1; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 6-0; Points for: 41.3; Points against: 16.0.

Advertisement

Case for: The eye test and statistics favor Indiana. The Hoosiers have an electrifying offense led by quarterback Kurtis Rourke and five receivers with at least 24 catches, 280 yards and three touchdowns. Indiana also plays high-level defense, which is unusual for a portal-based team.

Fatal flaw: As of today, Indiana has beaten three FBS teams with winning records but that could fall to zero by Saturday. Its strength of schedule is by far the lowest of any power conference team vying for an at-large bid. In the Hoosiers’ only game against a ranked opponent, they lost 38-15 to Ohio State.

No. 12 Clemson (9-2)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 62; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 1-2; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 7-0; Points for: 37.6; Points against: 22.0.

Case for: In all but one of its victories, Clemson won by double figures. It has a potent offense guided by quarterback Cade Klubnik, who has 29 touchdowns and four interceptions. The Tigers are third in the ACC in both scoring offense and scoring defense.

Fatal flaw: Clemson has the most pedestrian resume of any potential at-large squad. It has played just three FBS teams with winning records and won just once, and that was last week against 7-4 Pittsburgh. The Tigers give up nearly 23 points a game, the second-most of any team in the CFP Top 25.

Advertisement

No. 13 Alabama (8-3)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 7; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 6-3; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 1-0; Points for: 36.2; Points against: 17.5.

Case for: In the first half against Georgia or throughout its victories against LSU and Missouri, Alabama looked like not only a CFP team but a title contender. Nine of its 11 FBS opponents have winning records, including seven of eight SEC opponents.

Fatal flaw: It really starts and ends with the win-loss record. Losing three games would end CFP hopes for nearly every other program save for Alabama. The Tide dropped games to Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, both of which are 6-5. It’s not impossible to build a case for Alabama’s inclusion, but it involves losses by multiple teams this weekend rather than for the Tide to simply beat Auburn.

No. 14 Ole Miss (8-3)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 31; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 5-2; Record vs. FBS non-winning teams: 2-1; Points for: 38.5; Points against: 13.9.

Case for: Just watch the Rebels in action. It’s a potent offense led by Jaxson Dart and Tre Harris, capable of putting up points on everyone. Ole Miss crushed Georgia 28-10 and scored 63 points on Arkansas, which held Tennessee to 14. The defense has NFL-caliber performers, especially along the line.

Advertisement

Fatal flaw: Not only do Mississippi’s three losses make it difficult to climb into the CFP, but it’s also who beat the Rebels. None of the three teams are ranked by the committee with LSU (7-4) posting the best record. Losing at home to Kentucky (4-7) is probably the kill shot.


Ole Miss’ loss to Florida last week dropped the Rebels’ Playoff chances to 9 percent, per The Athletic’s model. (Matt Pendleton / Imagn Images)

No. 15 South Carolina (8-3)

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 18; Record vs. FBS winning teams: 4-3; Record vs. non-winning FBS teams: 3-0; Points for: 32.9; Points against: 18.2.

Case for: Of the 8-3 teams hovering in the SEC’s second tier, the Gamecocks won the important head-to-head battles against Texas A&M and Missouri. South Carolina has one of college football’s most dominant defensive lines with 39 sacks. Its offensive efficiency is impressive.

Fatal flaw: This is the season of “almosts” for South Carolina. Two touchdowns were called back against LSU because of penalties and a failed two-point conversion cost the Gamecocks an overtime opportunity against Alabama. Barring a chaotic scenario rivaling 2007, South Carolina “almost” will get into the CFP.

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 33; Record vs. winning teams: 3-1; Record vs. non-winning teams: 6-1; Points for: 30.5; Points against: 22.8.

Advertisement

Case for: Arizona State has posted its two most impressive wins in the last two weeks, beating Kansas State 24-14 on the road before toppling BYU 28-23 at home. The Sun Devils, who are led by versatile running back Cam Skattebo, have churned out five wins by a touchdown or less.

Fatal flaw: The Sun Devils have a 7.7-point differential, which is by far the lowest of any potential at-large team. Their losses came against 7-4 Texas Tech and 5-6 Cincinnati, and they’ve played only four teams with winning records.

By the numbers – Sagarin SOS: 40; Record vs. winning teams: 4-1; Record vs. non-winning teams: 4-1; Points for: 31.4; Points against: 19.5.

Case for: The Cyclones are resilient, as demonstrated by three come-from-behind victories in the closing seconds. Iowa State has the Big 12’s best pass defense, which ranks third overall. Their receiving combination of Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel has compiled nearly 2,000 yards and 13 touchdowns.

Fatal flaw: Iowa State steadily climbed the rankings until losing two straight to Texas Tech and Kansas (5-6). The Cyclones don’t own any Top 25 wins, and their depleted defense has given up more than 230 rushing yards in three of their last five games.

Advertisement

(Top photo: Johnnie Izquierdo / Getty Images))

Culture

Chargers’ loss to Ravens shows just how much work Jim Harbaugh still has to do

Published

on

Chargers’ loss to Ravens shows just how much work Jim Harbaugh still has to do

INGLEWOOD, Calif. — The Los Angeles Chargers are an improved team. But Monday night’s 30-23 loss to the Baltimore Ravens showed just how far they have still to go.

That is not an indictment of what coach Jim Harbaugh and general manager Joe Hortiz are building. It is still Year 1 of an organizational overhaul. The Chargers are 7-4. They have a really good chance of making the playoffs. The mere fact that the Chargers will play meaningful December games, starting next week in Atlanta, is evidence of an upward trajectory.

The roster just has limitations at this stage of the process. The Ravens are bona fide contenders. The Chargers are not yet at that level. In the NFL, quality opponents will exploit weaknesses and reveal the truth.

“They played better football than we did tonight,” Harbaugh said.

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

Henry powers Ravens past Chargers 30-23 in ‘Harbaugh Bowl’: Takeaways

This loss is going to sting for Harbaugh, as he falls to 0-3 against his big brother, John. This loss is going to sting for Hortiz, who spent 26 years working for the Ravens. It will sting for offensive coordinator Greg Roman, who was let go by the Ravens following the 2022 season after six years in Baltimore. It will sting for all the former Ravens now with the Chargers, from assistant general manager Chad Alexander, to offensive line coach Mike Devlin, to tight ends coach and run game coordinator Andy Bischoff.

Good coaching and sound roster construction can lead to rapid and immediate progress. We have seen that this season with the Chargers.

Building a team capable of hoisting the Lombardi Trophy takes time.

“You can say there’s a lot of fight and all those different things,” edge rusher Khalil Mack said. “But there’s no moral victories at this point in the season. You got to go out and play winning football when it matters the most.”

Advertisement

The Chargers did not have the physicality to match up with Ravens running back Derrick Henry, who finished with 140 rushing yards on 24 carries.

Coordinator Jesse Minter’s unit started fast. The Chargers forced punts on the first two possessions of the game. But the Ravens leaned into Henry on the next drive. Henry broke off a 19-yard run on the opening play. He followed that up with a 14-yard run. He totaled 44 rushing yards on the drive, which quarterback Lamar Jackson capped off with a 10-yard touchdown run.

Scoop City Newsletter
Scoop City Newsletter

Free, daily NFL updates direct to your inbox.

Free, daily NFL updates direct to your inbox.

Advertisement

Sign UpBuy Scoop City Newsletter

Henry is a freight train, and the Chargers did not have an emergency brake to pull. Once Henry got rolling, there was no stopping him.

The Chargers lost at the line of scrimmage. They did not tackle well at any level.

“We need better block destruction just across the board,” Harbaugh said.

Henry averaged 7.1 yards per carry on first down. The Ravens had an average distance to gain of 6.4 yards on second, third and fourth downs, according to TruMedia.

“He’s going to be effective when they play that way,” safety Derwin James Jr. said.

Baltimore successfully converted three fourth-and-1s. Two of those came from Henry on a touchdown drive in the second half.

Mack said giving up 212 rushing yards is “the thing that pisses me off the most.”

The Chargers were not at full strength, and that mattered. Linebacker Denzel Perryman was inactive with a groin injury. This game was begging for one of Perryman’s trademark violent hits. Maybe if Perryman plays, he meets Henry in the hole in the first quarter and sets a different tone for the defense.

“He’s definitely one of the hearts and souls in the middle of our defense,” James said of Perryman.

Advertisement

Mack was also on a snap count in his first game back from two pulled groins. Mack, who was inactive last week against the Cincinnati Bengals, only played 27 of the defense’s 64 snaps Monday night.

The Chargers did not set consistent edges against Henry.

Mack said after the game he was “trying not to jump on the field in certain situations.”

“I didn’t want no setback,” Mack said, “so I kind of just stayed coachable in those moments.”

More snaps from Mack, perhaps the defense’s most consistently physical player, could have made a big difference.

Advertisement

“It’s not hard for me to play against that guy,” Mack said of Henry. “I love playing against the greats.”


The Chargers struggled all night to contain Ravens running back Derrick Henry. (Ronald Martinez / Getty Images)

The Chargers were also without cornerback Cam Hart, who has been good in run support this season. He aggravated his ankle injury in Saturday’s practice, according to Harbaugh, and was inactive for the game. Fellow rookie Tarheeb Still started in place of Hart at outside cornerback and ended up one-on-one with Henry multiple times.

At the same time, the Chargers had their full stable of interior defensive linemen. They had Tuli Tuipulotu and Joey Bosa on the edge. They had their best cornerback Kristian Fulton, who gave up a 40-yard touchdown from Jackson to receiver Rashod Bateman in the second quarter. They had linebacker Daiyan Henley, and they had all three of their starting safeties in James, Alohi Gilman and Elijah Molden.

The Ravens scored on five straight drives after their two early punts.

“We just got to get him on the ground,” James said of Henry.

Advertisement

Despite the defensive unraveling, the Chargers had a chance to tie the game in the fourth quarter, trailing 23-16. Quarterback Justin Herbert and the offense faced a third-and-6 from their 34-yard line.

Herbert dropped back after a shotgun snap. Receiver Quentin Johnston came wide open on a crossing route. Herbert delivered a perfect throw. Johnston dropped what would have been an easy conversion — and much more.

“I felt I had some space upfield,” said Johnston, who did not have a catch on five targets, “so I just turned my head before I’d seen the catch all the way in.”

Johnston struggled with drops as a rookie last season. He called the play a “complete lack of focus at the catch point.”

“He’s a fighter,” Herbert said of Johnston. “I’m going to keep throwing him the ball.”

Advertisement

Rookie Ladd McConkey is an emerging player. He led the Chargers with six catches on six targets for 83 yards.

But Monday night was a glaring example of how badly the Chargers need receiving help. It is a roster limitation after Harbaugh and Hortiz moved on from Keenan Allen and Mike Williams in the offseason.

The Ravens had given up at least three completions of 20-plus yards in every game this season.

The Chargers did not have a single completion of 20 yards in the game.

Receiver Joshua Palmer had three catches on eight targets.

Advertisement

Receiver DJ Chark, who the Chargers signed in free agency in March, was a healthy scratch for the game. He could potentially give the passing game a boost. Chark has played only one offensive snap all season. He was on injured reserve until early November. But the reality is that adding the type of difference-maker the Chargers need will have to wait until the offseason.

“We’re all going to have some things that we wish we would have played, coached better,” Harbaugh said.

The Chargers scored only three second-half points before a garbage-time touchdown made the final score look closer than the game actually was.

Running back J.K. Dobbins, another former Raven, left the game with a knee injury in the second quarter, and the Chargers struggled to run the ball after his departure. Gus Edwards had 11 rushing yards on nine carries.

“They executed,” Harbaugh said, “and they were the better team tonight.”

Advertisement

Monday night was a measuring stick. And now it is clear where the Chargers stand.

“We’ll regroup,” Harbaugh said.

(Top photo: Sean M. Haffey / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

The PWHL pulled off its inaugural season. Year 2 will decide the future of women’s pro hockey

Published

on

The PWHL pulled off its inaugural season. Year 2 will decide the future of women’s pro hockey

Marie-Philip Poulin stood on the blue line at the Bell Centre, fighting back tears.

She had just been introduced to a world record crowd in Montreal and the fans were giving her a deafening ovation. Poulin, the best women’s hockey player in the world for almost a decade, typically gets the loudest pregame cheer, especially in her home province of Quebec. But this applause — over 20 seconds long and delivered by 21,105 people — was different.

“Honestly, I didn’t know what to do, how to react, the emotions were so high,” Poulin said. “Having the Bell Centre packed for women’s hockey … it (felt like) we finally made it.”

That April 20 game broke the all-time attendance record for women’s hockey, one of many milestones for the inaugural Professional Women’s Hockey League season. Since its launch in January 2024, the long-awaited six-team league featuring the world’s best players has largely been heralded as a success. Millions of viewers tuned in for games; attendance records were repeatedly set and broken; and demand for tickets in some markets was so high that teams have already moved into bigger venues. Just last month, the league announced that it was preparing for expansion as soon as the 2025-26 season — sooner than anticipated.

But there were bumps along the way, and with the arrival of the PWHL’s second season, which begins on Saturday, big-picture questions loom. Now that the league is no longer sparkling brand new, can it maintain positive momentum? And what needs to happen to set the PWHL up for long-term success?

Advertisement

Five days into the PWHL’s inaugural season, Stan Kasten had seen enough.

Kasten was on a tour around the league, making stops at most teams’ home openers during the first week of the season. He visited Toronto for the first PWHL game on Jan. 1, attended a sell-out in Ottawa the next day, and watched games in New York and Boston.

Then Kasten got to Minnesota for the team’s home opener, which set a women’s pro hockey attendance record with over 13,000 fans at the Xcel Energy Center.

“That was the day I knew this was going to work,” Kasten said.

The longtime sports executive and president of the Los Angeles Dodgers became a central figure in women’s hockey after Dodgers majority owner Mark Walter and his wife, Kimbra, agreed to bankroll a new professional women’s hockey league.

Advertisement

The PWHL came together in a six-month sprint. Six markets and venues were chosen. A 72-game schedule was assembled. General managers and coaches and league staff were hired; players were signed and drafted. With so little time, teams played without traditional names, logos or jerseys.

“I will look back in amazement that we did it,” Kasten said. “We set the six months as our goal. … I was too dumb to know it wasn’t possible.”

The inaugural game on Jan. 1, between Toronto and New York, was sold out, albeit at Toronto’s 2,600-seat venue. Tennis legend Billie Jean King — who sits on the league’s advisory board — dropped the ceremonial puck alongside PWHL senior vice president of hockey operations Jayna Hefford. The game reached over 3 million views on Canadian television networks and the league’s YouTube stream.

“It was that moment where you’re like, ‘my childhood dream is coming true,’” said Toronto defender Jocelyne Larocque. “I had tears in my eyes because as a kid, my dream was to play pro hockey. And then, as you get a bit older, you think because I’m a woman, this isn’t going to happen for me.”

The next day, the league broke an attendance record for a women’s professional hockey game in Ottawa with over 8,000 fans at TD Place Arena. That was the record Minnesota smashed only four days later.

Advertisement

Fans packed the Tsongas Center in Lowell, Mass., for a Minnesota-Boston PWHL game during the first week of the league’s inaugural season. (Maddie Meyer / Getty Images)

The honeymoon phase didn’t end after the first few weeks of the season either. The league set a world record for attendance in Toronto (19,285) in February at Scotiabank Arena, which was broken two months later at the Bell Centre when Poulin received the ovation.

Overall, the league beat its own modest attendance projections for the inaugural year. According to Kasten, the internal projection was around 1,000 fans per game. The actual figure — over 5,000 — is a major accomplishment considering that previous women’s hockey leagues mostly struggled at the gate.

“Going into this season, no one really knew what to expect. We knew that we had a product that was worth watching and that we were going to do the best we could to showcase women’s hockey,” said Toronto goalie Kristen Campbell. “The fan support (exceeded) my expectations.”

Games throughout the season were uptempo, highly skilled and surprisingly physical. They were also easy to watch, since every game was available on YouTube for free — with high-quality broadcast production paid for by the league.

“I just don’t think a lot of people understood the skill level and the athleticism of these players,” said Ottawa GM Mike Hirshfeld. “And I think once they saw that, it became really attractive.”

Advertisement

The league landed several partnerships with major brands — such as Air Canada, Scotiabank, Bauer and Barbie — and worked with the NHL, going to All-Star Weekend and playing two neutral-site games at NHL venues in Pittsburgh and Detroit.

But the inaugural season was far from perfect.

PWHL merchandise flew off the shelves despite a lack of team names or logos, but the rollout was criticized because of supply issues and the limited size ranges.

The New York franchise played in three different rinks and struggled to draw fans, finishing with the worst attendance in the league. One game in Bridgeport, Conn., had only 728 fans — the league’s only game with fewer than 1,000 all season.

And just nine days after Minnesota won the first-ever Walter Cup, the league announced it was parting ways with the team’s general manager, Natalie Darwitz, “effective immediately.”

Advertisement

Some reports suggested there was a rift between Darwitz — a legend of Minnesota hockey and now a Hockey Hall of Fame inductee — and head coach Ken Klee, with some influential players siding with Klee. However, the league maintained the decision came after a review of the team’s operations that found “there wasn’t a path forward with the current personnel in place.”

Still, when the PWHL hosted the 2024 draft and awards in St. Paul, Minn., four days after Darwitz departed, fans were dispirited. Klee, who was responsible for the team’s draft picks, was booed at points during the night. He was also heavily criticized for selecting Britta Curl, who stirred controversy in the weeks leading up to the draft for her social media activity.

When asked about Darwitz’s departure this month, Minnesota captain Kendall Coyne Schofield said it was a league decision. Klee, meanwhile, said the team was focused on moving on.

“It’s pro hockey. Things happen,” he said. “We’re excited to get the season going.”


Kendall Coyne Schofield raised the Walter Cup after Minnesota won the PWHL’s inaugural league championship. (Troy Parla / Getty Images)

If the PWHL’s first season was about celebrating the league’s existence, its sophomore year, just days away, will focus on maintaining momentum while remaining in startup mode.

Advertisement

“We are far from a finished product,” said Kasten.

The league has taken several positive steps in its first real offseason.

In September, it unveiled team names and logos; jerseys were released earlier this month. The coinciding merchandise offerings have included more design options and size ranges.

New York has moved into a single primary venue — the Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., where the team played in front of its biggest crowd (5,132) last season — while Toronto and Montreal have moved into bigger venues full-time.

“We always hoped and planned to be in bigger buildings, but I don’t think we expected it so quickly,” said Hefford. “But that demand was real and it wasn’t just a blip. It wasn’t just inaugural-year excitement. And we’re seeing that in the response from fans this year in terms of ticket sales and memberships.”

Advertisement

Even with an 8,150 capacity at Coca-Cola Coliseum, Toronto’s season-ticket memberships sold out for a second year in a row. And Kasten said the league expects average attendance to increase.

The PWHL will also play nine neutral-site games, mostly in NHL buildings including Seattle, Vancouver, Denver and St. Louis.

“It’s a reinforcement of what we perceive as widespread and growing interest around our sport,” he said of the neutral-site games. “I can’t say it enough times, these women, these world-class athletes who have been overlooked for so long, are finally seeing the recognition they should have been receiving for years and years.”

Perhaps the biggest development of the offseason is that the league is already looking to add up to two teams as soon as 2025-26. Last season, league leadership often tried to head off questions about expansion but Kasten said the success of Year 1 convinced league leaders to start the process sooner.

“I don’t know if we do it,” he said. “But we’re looking at it because the interest is really there.”

Advertisement

The league has sent out over 20 requests for proposals to interested potential expansion partners, said Amy Scheer, the PWHL’s senior vice president of business operations.

A major driver of PWHL expansion is the influx of international players. In June, over a dozen international players — from Finland, Sweden, Russia, Czechia and more — were drafted, alongside dozens more players from the NCAA. That so many players have decided to make the jump to North America is an encouraging sign. Most top players elected to stay in Europe last season and track the new league’s progress from afar.

“It became more clear what the league is going to look like and so now, I feel like everybody is trying to get a spot here,” said Team Germany forward Laura Kluge, who was invited to Toronto’s training camp after going undrafted in June. “The goal is to come here and play because (it’s) the most professional league out there.”

One of the major critiques of the PWHL last season was that — with the seven-team Premier Hockey Federation shutting down in June 2023 — the ecosystem for women’s hockey in North America became too small, with very few roster spots and development opportunities. Expansion would fix that without diluting the product, given how much talent should be coming from Europe and the NCAA over the next two years.

How expansion might work still remains to be seen. All six current PWHL teams, as well as the league itself, are owned by the Walters.

Advertisement

The single-entity ownership model was critical, Kasten said, to the league getting up and running as quickly as it did. But the question remains: Will the business eventually outgrow unilateral control?

Women’s hockey has attempted individual ownership in the past. The original National Women’s Hockey League folded, in part, because owners stopped seeing the value in investing. The PHF sold some teams, but the league’s main financial backers — John and Johanna Boynton — still owned four of the league’s seven teams.

“I love how it has worked for us so far. I don’t know when that model stops being the most efficient, if ever,” Kasten said. “Could that change in the future? I suppose it could, but we don’t have any plans to change it now.”

For all the progress made during this offseason, there are some longer-term benchmarks left.

The PWHL does not have the kind of media rights deals that are traditional in men’s pro sports, and those more recently signed in women’s professional basketball and soccer.

Advertisement

“Let’s face it, until we get a mature media plan and media revenue we won’t really be a full-fledged league,” said Kasten.

Last season, every game was broadcast on the league’s YouTube channel. This season, however, Canadian audiences won’t have access to the PWHL’s YouTube stream. Those streaming rights are now exclusive to the league’s Canadian broadcast partners, which include TSN, CBC and Amazon Prime. U.S. broadcast rights have not been announced. Pulling games off YouTube in Canadian markets is a hit to access and visibility, but the league is expected to make more money from an increase in rights fees.

“The change is positive for the league because it helps us grow in terms of stability,” Scheer said. “It helps us grow to ensure that the league is on the path to long term health and that women’s hockey will be here for good.”

The biggest challenge for the league is going to be the wage gap that exists between top players and those who make up the majority of each team’s roster, due to how the collective-bargaining agreement set player compensation and roster construction.

In Year 1, the top six players on each team were required to make at least $80,000 on guaranteed three-year contracts, per the CBA. Meanwhile, the league minimum was set at $35,000, which will increase by 3 percent to $36,050 in 2024-25. Many players’ salaries are closer to league minimum on non-guaranteed contracts. And given how much of the salary cap has already been allotted to top players, incoming players — or free agents deserving of raises — will be feeling the squeeze until those contracts expire after the 2025-26 season.

Advertisement

It’s a trickier problem to fix with the CBA locked in until July 31, 2031. But it’s something the league will inevitably be judged on if the business continues to grow.

Despite all these questions, perhaps the biggest change in Year 2 will be a focus not so much on milestones and records but more on the game itself.

“There were a lot of firsts last year and a lot of emotional moments — moments that were bigger than hockey,” said Poulin. “This year is about making it normal that we play in bigger buildings that sell out, that people are excited (to be there). And now we’re just going to play hockey because that’s our job.”

(Illustration: Meech Robinson / The Athletic. Photos: Mark Blinch, Minas Panagiotakis, Bruce Bennett / Getty Images; Kevin Sousa / NHLI via Getty Images; M. Anthony Nesmith / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

Ranking 134 college football teams after Week 13: Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M re-learn an old lesson

Published

on

Ranking 134 college football teams after Week 13: Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M re-learn an old lesson

Editor’s note: The Athletic 134 is a weekly ranking of all FBS college football teams.

Winning games is hard.

That’s a press conference cliché you’ll hear from every coach, but it’s true, especially for coaches dealing with college athletes. How else can you explain what happened on Saturday?

For two weeks, SEC fans beat the narrative drum that Indiana hadn’t played anyone. On Saturday, Indiana played Ohio State and got manhandled 38-15. Vindication! Well, until a few minutes later when Ole Miss lost to a previously 5-5 Florida team. Then Alabama lost to a 5-5 Oklahoma team (by a 24-3 score). Then Texas A&M lost to a 4-6 Auburn team. Suddenly, three SEC teams that entered the day with two losses and a clear path to the College Football Playoff had a third loss.

It turns out, winning is hard. That’s not to say all 10-1 records are created equally, or that more wins should equal a higher ranking. They don’t. Beating good teams matters. But there has to be an appreciation for winning games, even against average or above-average teams.

Advertisement

At one point Friday, the SEC appeared to have a path to send five teams into the 12-team College Football Playoff. By the end of the weekend, three SEC teams are in the CFP field based on this week’s Athletic 134 rankings.

Every week this season has given us an upset that has upended the CFP. I wouldn’t pencil anything in heading into the final weekend either. It’s why we love college football.

But college football is more than strength of schedule rankings, betting lines and hypotheticals. You have to play games. That’s what sports are about. You never know what can happen. So when you get a win, no matter what kind of win it is, make sure you enjoy it.

Here is this week’s edition of The Athletic 134.

1-10

Rank Team Record Prev

1

Advertisement

11-0

1

2

10-1

2

Advertisement

3

10-1

3

4

10-1

Advertisement

4

5

10-1

9

6

Advertisement

9-2

8

7

9-2

10

Advertisement

8

10-1

12

9

10-1

Advertisement

5

10

10-1

13

Notre Dame fans, I told you I’d put you into the top five once you beat Army, and you did, so here you are. Beat USC, and the Irish will host a Playoff game in South Bend. I nearly put Notre Dame over Penn State, considering the Nittany Lions’ close calls against USC and Minnesota. But Penn State’s win against Illinois is now a top-25 win, and the Irish’s loss to Northern Illinois continues to be a drag. If they handle a USC team that took Penn State to overtime, there’s reason to jump the Nittany Lions.

Advertisement

Indiana drops to No. 9 after its loss to Ohio State, thanks to those aforementioned SEC losses. But the Hoosiers also have a good amount of solid blowout wins, and their strength of schedule in ESPN’s metric jumped up to No. 51, higher than Oregon, Miami, SMU, Notre Dame or Boise State, for what it’s worth. SMU is up to No. 8 in my rankings. The Mustangs are rolling and have that quality loss to BYU. I still don’t understand why Miami is higher than SMU in the polls and CFP rankings.

Boise State moves up to No. 10 after escaping a bad Wyoming team, but the Broncos are teetering with some recent close calls. Still, the UNLV win and Week 2’s close Oregon loss keep them around here for now. But with a rematch against No. 24 UNLV now likely in the Mountain West championship game, that Group of 5 spot in the Playoff is far from wrapped up.

Also, Georgia and Tennessee had better not overlook Georgia Tech and Vanderbilt, respectively, this week.

11-25

Rank Team Record Prev

11

Advertisement

10-1

14

12

8-3

6

Advertisement

13

9-2

20

14

8-3

Advertisement

7

15

8-3

17

16

Advertisement

9-2

11

17

9-2

19

Advertisement

18

8-3

15

19

8-3

Advertisement

21

20

8-3

16

21

Advertisement

9-2

22

22

9-2

23

Advertisement

23

8-3

24

24

9-2

Advertisement

25

25

8-3

28

Miami is up to No. 11, even if it took a surprising amount of time to pull away from Wake Forest. But along with Indiana, the biggest winner from the SEC losses could be the ACC, which now has a strong case to get two Playoff bids, presuming SMU and Miami win this week. I have Miami in my CFP field as an at-large team.

Advertisement

Alabama and Ole Miss fall to Nos. 12 and 14, respectively. I don’t think the Tide are out of the CFP mix yet, but they’ll need help. Arizona State moves up to No. 13 after the win against BYU to take the top spot in the Big 12, while BYU falls to No. 16. The Cougars still have wins against SMU and Kansas State, so they don’t fall too far.

Clemson moves up to No. 17, and I don’t understand why the Tigers are No. 12 in both polls. They don’t have any good wins, and they shouldn’t be behind two SEC teams that beat Georgia, since Georgia whipped Clemson. If Clemson beats South Carolina, then we can start a CFP at-large conversation, but the Tigers shouldn’t be near there right now, and it’s going to be hard to convince me a second ACC spot shouldn’t go to SMU or Miami. I’m very curious where the committee puts Clemson. Anything close to No. 12 opens the possibility the Tigers jump the loser of the potential SMU-Miami matchup.

Kansas State is up to No. 19, back ahead of No. 20 Colorado and still ahead of No. 21 Tulane because the Wildcats beat both. Iowa State is at No. 22 and has a path to the Big 12 Championship Game after all.

26-50

Rank Team Record Prev

26

7-4

Advertisement

26

27

9-1

18

28

Advertisement

8-3

30

29

7-4

32

Advertisement

30

7-4

33

31

9-2

Advertisement

34

32

7-4

29

33

Advertisement

6-5

43

34

7-4

35

Advertisement

35

6-5

31

36

7-4

Advertisement

36

37

8-3

39

38

Advertisement

6-5

37

39

6-5

38

Advertisement

40

7-4

40

41

7-4

Advertisement

42

42

6-5

41

43

Advertisement

8-3

27

44

6-5

44

Advertisement

45

6-5

45

46

6-5

Advertisement

53

47

5-6

58

48

Advertisement

9-2

47

49

6-5

50

Advertisement

50

6-5

54

Army drops out of the top 25 to No. 27 after a 49-14 loss to Notre Dame. No. 28 Syracuse is quietly an impressive 8-3 in Fran Brown’s first season, including a win against UNLV. Florida climbs all the way up to No. 33 after beating Ole Miss, one week after the win against LSU. The Gators are the highest-ranked 6-5 team, with all five losses coming to top-25 teams.

Washington State tumbles to No. 43 after losing to Oregon State, which came after a loss to New Mexico. Oklahoma jumps up to No. 46 after beating Alabama, its first win since September. No. 47 Kansas is the best 5-6 team in the country. The Jayhawks are the first team in history to beat three consecutive top-25 teams while a sub-.500 team, the latest a dominant performance against Colorado. West Virginia beat UCF to get bowl-eligible and climb up to No. 50.

Advertisement

51-75

Boston College planted North Carolina and moves up to No. 52. James Madison drops to No. 55 after losing to Appalachian State in the snow, and the Tar Heels fall to No. 56.

Cal came back to beat Stanford, get bowl-eligible and move up to No. 54, still ahead of Auburn, which climbs after beating Texas A&M. Cal’s win against Auburn keeps the Golden Bears ahead.

Marshall jumps up to No. 65 after beating Coastal Carolina and remaining atop the Sun Belt East division. No. 73 Jacksonville State has won eight consecutive games after an 0-3 start and clinched a spot in the Conference USA Championship Game. Liberty’s win against Western Kentucky puts those two plus Sam Houston in the mix for the other CUSA spot.

76-100

Colorado State got bit, losing at Fresno State to significantly damage the Rams’ Mountain West championship hopes. They now need UNLV to lose to Nevada. Miami (Ohio), Ohio and Bowling Green are all 6-1 in MAC play heading into the final weekend, and all three move up after wins. No. 84 East Carolina is now 4-0 under interim head coach Blake Harrell, who is putting himself into the conversation to get the full-time job.

Oregon State moves up to No. 88 after beating Washington State but stays behind San Jose State due to the head-to-head result. Texas State tumbles to No. 91 after losing to Georgia State. Oklahoma State finally showed a pulse but lost 56-48 to Texas Tech to make it eight consecutive losses and an 0-8 record in Big 12 play.

Advertisement

101-134

No. 103 Florida State finally got a second win, against FCS Charleston Southern. No. 112 Charlotte beat FAU in a battle of interim coaches. No. 113 Central Michigan beat Western Michigan, and then coach Jim McElwain retired.

No. 134 Kent State missed its last best chance at a win in a 38-17 loss to No. 128 Akron. The Golden Flashes must win at Buffalo to avoid an 0-12 season.

The Athletic 134 series is part of a partnership with Allstate. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.

(Photo:  James Gilbert / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending