Connect with us

Culture

Are NHL goalie unicorns gone forever? The changing nature of a once-premier position

Published

on

Are NHL goalie unicorns gone forever? The changing nature of a once-premier position

Once upon a time, NHL goaltenders were among the singular stars of the game, and you could tell who they were with just a glance.

Ken Dryden, at 6-feet-4, towered above his contemporaries, a statue when the puck was in the opposite end of the rink, cool and collected when the action was right at his crease. Tony Esposito, a lefty with a butterfly style, quick and smooth, flashed his leather glove to spear pucks as they were headed to the top corner. Dominik Hasek, Gumby on skates, a lithe human Slinky, made acrobatic lunges and contorted his body every which way to make a save. Mike Vernon and Mike Palmateer, part of a generation of Mighty Mite goalies, relied on reflexes, athleticism and an ability to read and anticipate the play, to become generational fixtures.

They were distinctive in playing style. Their objective may have been the same — to stop the puck — but their methods varied wildly.

That was then, in the before times.

Now? The vast majority of NHL goalies play a similar style that revolves around blocking, not actively stopping, the puck. It’s a small, but nuanced difference. The change can be traced primarily to evolutions made in goaltending equipment and the explosion of goalie coaching. The net result: There’s little unique to separate the current generation of goaltenders, who try to use their size and the bulky gear they wear to cover as much net as possible and dare shooters to hit open spots.

Advertisement

The lack of stylistic variety doesn’t mean goaltending has gotten worse. Quite the opposite, actually. Goalies have never been harder to beat one-on-one, and getting good goaltending is as vital as ever to winning. But the emergence of goalie coaches — especially from a young age — has streamlined the position, closing the gap between the best and the rest, making it increasingly difficult to project which goalies will play at an elite level.

Adin Hill was third on the San Jose Sharks’ goalie depth chart less than a year before he finished third in Conn Smythe Trophy voting as playoff MVP, as he backstopped Vegas to a Stanley Cup. Jordan Binnington began the 2018-19 season in the American Hockey League, then led the St. Louis Blues to a title. Stories like this are becoming more commonplace, and the days of a goalie like Hasek leading the league in save percentage for six straight seasons while racking up five Vezina trophies seem long gone.


Is it a problem? Has goaltending lost its mystique, its allure, some of what made NHL netminders such popular figures with fans? Former NHL goalie and longtime scout Tim Bernhardt thinks so and he thinks he knows why, too.

“Goaltending, for me, is just so boring to watch,” Bernhardt said. “Blocking the puck is all they do. … It’s not the goalie that’s blocking the puck, it’s the equipment, and it doesn’t look like any fun to me and that’s why kids aren’t drawn to the position anymore.”

Bernhardt was picked in the third round of the 1978 NHL Draft by the Atlanta Flames. He was a standout goalie for three years with the OHL’s Cornwall Royals and went on to play 12 seasons of professional hockey, divided mostly between the Flames and the Toronto Maple Leafs organizations. He then spent 28 years as a scout for the NHL’s Central Scouting Bureau, then with the Dallas Stars and Arizona Coyotes.

Advertisement

After four decades of watching goaltending evolve, he isn’t a fan of where things stand today.

“The comparison I’d make is to football,” Bernhardt said. “The top athletes all go to football. Patrick Mahomes was a baseball player who switched to football. Josh Allen was a baseball player who switched to football. They all want to play quarterback because quarterback looks like a lot of fun.

“My feeling is the opposite occurred with goaltending.”

Bernhardt believes the root of the problem can be traced to the innovation in playing style made by long-time goalie coach Francois Allaire, who had among his disciples future Hockey Hall of Famer Patrick Roy. Allaire’s influence created a wave of goaltenders who emerged from Quebec and followed Roy’s lead. By the time Jean-Sebastien Giguere led the Anaheim Ducks to the 2003 Stanley Cup Final, where they lost to Martin Brodeur and the New Jersey Devils, the goaltenders all looked like the Incredible Hulk.


Patrick Roy’s success influenced many goalies of the next generation. (Denis Brodeur / NHLI via Getty Images)

Allaire was the goalie coach who brought in the style of getting into position, dropping into the butterfly and getting the puck to hit you. The dimensions of the equipment grew, and so did the goalies.

Advertisement

Half a century ago, in 1973-74, the average height of the top five goalies in save percentage was 5 feet, 10.5 inches. Last season, the top five goalies were an average height of 6-feet-4. (Over that same period, the average skater’s height went up 1.6 inches.) Only one goalie shorter than 6-feet has finished inside the top five in save percentage in the past 11 years (Nashville’s Juuse Saros in 2020-21).


When he played, Dryden was part of a generation of players who didn’t have a goalie coach, which meant “we had to figure out stuff ourselves.”
Now? Everyone who reaches the NHL level has generally had a goalie coach from the time they first strapped on the pads.

Former Dallas Stars goalie coach Mike Valley, who now instructs at Elite Goalies — a training program that works with amateur and professional netminders — believes a major hurdle for today’s generation of goaltenders is that they rely too much on technique and not enough on instinct.

“This over-thinking of the position is almost paralyzing at times,” Valley said. “The best goalies, or the best athletes in general, are the ones who have trained really hard, understand the technique, but haven’t lost sight of being able to have your own style and form.

Advertisement

“Now you have a bunch of athletes who don’t know how to manage their own games, and they’re so over-coached. You need to take responsibility for your own game, and when the puck drops and the pressure is on, you know how to manage emotions. You know how to thrive under chaos. I think a lot of that disappears with too much coaching.”

But according to Adam Francilia, a former San Jose Sharks goalie consultant who now works privately with many NHL goaltenders, there is a positive to emerge from Dryden’s before-and-after shift in netminding: It is attracting a different breed of athlete to the position, one that enjoys the problem-solving that goaltending in the modern era requires.

“It’s a much more difficult position, cognitively and neurologically, to play because there are so many more aspects that you have to be really good at,” said Francilia. “I think in order to be successful in that capacity, you need to have a pretty high neurological IQ.

“Goalies are such interesting athletes. They’re quirky and they’re goofy. … I love the fact that goaltending is where it is, because I love having to have the neurological intelligence to go with the athleticism it takes to be a goalie. It is definitely creating a very specific type of person that can be good.”

Francilia used Winnipeg Jets star Connor Hellebuyck as an example. He’s not the most physically gifted goalie, but he’s cognitively quick.

Advertisement

According to Francilia, the cookie-cutter nature of goaltending has taken a bit of the personality out of the position.


Connor Hellebuyck is one of the NHL’s top current goalies, but is he a big name? (Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

“It’s not that there wasn’t technique. Dominik Hasek had great technique, he just did it in a way that was unique,” Francilia said. “Grant Fuhr had rhyme and reason to his play. It was just so different.”

These days, goalies navigate the crease and make saves in a similar fashion because it’s the most effective way to keep the puck out of the net. Unnecessary movement makes a goalie less efficient. However, technique can’t stop every puck. With all of the speed and skill on the ice, goalies will inevitably need to make stops outside of their structure and technique. That’s where many believe modern goalies are falling short.

In Valley’s mind, young goalies should be taught the fundamentals but from there, also be held accountable for what they do and don’t do on the ice. Forcing young goalies to think for themselves makes them better problem solvers.

“When a kid has that, they don’t start … putting blame elsewhere,” said Valley. “They look internally.”

Advertisement

Modern goaltending requires plenty of athleticism, sure, but at the highest level, differences can be minute. What separates the best from the rest is an ability to process the action in front of them, diagnose the problem — a scoring threat — and solve it.

“If you always have a teacher standing next to you telling you what the answer was, then you don’t develop that skill of trying to figure it out yourself,” Valley said. “That’s where creativity comes from. That’s where being able to connect the dots on the ice comes from.”

According to Dave King, a three-time coach of Canada’s Olympic team, who also coached the Calgary Flames and the Columbus Blue Jackets, there are two distinct problems in the current goalie development system. The first is that young players become specialists far too early. The second is that they are overcoached.

“When kids come up in the game playing different positions, their thought processes suddenly get broader,” King said. “They get a wider appreciation for the game.”

In 2005, King became the first Canadian to coach in what then was known as Russia’s SuperLeague and returned in 2014 to coach Lokomotiv Yaroslavl in the KHL. King said he went to Russia originally to observe the Russian development system. In his second stint, he started to see changes in the way Russian goalies were being developed.

Advertisement

“I really believe one of the reasons their goalies are so good is they’re allowed to be more athletic when they’re young,” King said. “They’re not as rigid in positioning. They don’t start teaching a disciplined style until a certain age. They want the kids to become good athletes — mobile, agile. They want them to learn to read the game so they don’t over position them and make them robotic.”


One result of all the coaching and preparation, according to Bernhardt, is the gap between top-tier goalies and the rest has shrunk.

“Before, those top five or six guys were just so much better than everyone else,” Bernhardt said. “Now? Even the 25th or 30th goalies are all pretty good. The equipment and the style of play has closed the gap.”

As is the case in all sports, analytics are playing a larger role. With precise data on exactly how goals are scored, goalie coaching has improved at teaching techniques to stop them. In decades past, the best goalies largely taught themselves, giving those who developed effective techniques a distinct edge. The streamlining of the position through coaching has closed the gap, and it’s showing in the salaries of the top goalies.

In 2000, 10 of the top 50 salaries in the NHL were paid to goalies. Roy, Brodeur, Curtis Joseph, Fuhr, Tom Barrasso and Vernon were all among the highest-paid players. This season, there are only three goalies in the top-50 salaries. Carey Price — who hasn’t played in over two years — is one of them, so there are only two active goalies (Sergei Bobrovsky and Andrei Vasilevskiy) with top-50 salaries in 2023-24.

Advertisement

They’re also the only two inside the top-100 salaries. As recently as 2015-16, there were 16 goalies in the top 100 league-wide. As the position has become more difficult to predict due to parity, many general managers have shied away from giving goalies mega contracts.

There’s no better recent example than Hellebuyck, who was set to hit unrestricted free agency this summer. He has been the model of consistency, finishing in the top eight in goals saved above expected in five straight seasons, and leading the league three times in that span. He’s only 30 years old, and yet last offseason, the trade market for Hellebuyck was cold because of teams’ hesitancy to sign him long-term.

Hellebuyck ended up signing a seven-year extension with Winnipeg in October, but with an average annual value of only $8.5 million. That isn’t chump change, but in a professional sports landscape in which salaries continue to rise across the board, it’s notable one of the best goalies of his generation signed for far less than Price, Bobrovsky and Vasilevskiy did before him, and only $1 million more than Roy made in 2001.

It’s not hard to see why. General managers look at what Hill did in Vegas, and Binnington did in St. Louis, and hope they can replicate it. There are more goalies playing in the NHL than ever before. Last season, 77 goalies started at least 10 games. That’s the highest total ever, and up 19 goalies from just nine years ago in 2011-12, when only 58 goalies saw that amount of action.

Advertisement

In some ways goaltending is in a good place. The technical evolution of the position has led to more goalies than ever playing at a high level. And yet, has the position become less fun to play and less of a marquee position because goalies can be schooled into competence with angles and blocking positions?

The ultimate goal is to stop as many pucks as possible, but if the position becomes too robotic with less to separate the greats from the rest, does it make goaltending less interesting to watch and give team executives fewer reasons to pay them handsomely?

Excellent goaltending is still required to win, and the winning netminder will always be bathed in glory. That hasn’t changed. Teams are just trying different strategies to find it, leaning into platoons of netminders in hopes that they find something that excels. What does it mean for the future of the position?

Dryden is optimistic. He now has grandchildren who play, and even if the modern goalie has become reliant on equipment and technique, Dryden believes the motivation to become a goaltender remains.

“You have this incredible equipment. You have this gladiator look. There’s something heroic about what you do,” Dryden said. “Those who want to be goalies still have good reasons to be goalies and still love to be goalies.”

Advertisement

Ken Dryden, a goalie icon of the past, remains optimistic about the future of the position. (Denis Brodeur / NHLI via Getty Images)

To choose to be a goaltender still requires a mix of valor and zaniness, just for different reasons than it did in the past. Goalies are no longer braving slap shots with questionable protection, risking life and limb in the name of saves. They are, however, facing the possibility that they’ll be cut loose for someone cheaper.

Skaters can blend in when they’re having an off night, or even manufacture success with effort alone. Skate hard and land a few big hits, all is forgiven. Goalies can’t outwork their bad nights, and there’s nowhere to hide in the crease.

No position plays a bigger role in wins and losses. The cost of every mistake is magnified, which makes success that much more difficult to sustain.

“Goaltending is not about whether you’re boring or not,” Dryden said. “It’s not whether you do it with flair. It’s about being effective. You can think of — and I can think of — lots of goalies who played with lots of flair who were absolutely not boring, but were mediocre and lasted a few years and that was it.

“It’s in the nature of the position that you’ve got to be dependable, reliable. You’ve got to find a way of stopping what needs to be stopped in the moment that it needs to be stopped. You’re always looking for the most effective goalie — and that’s true, whether it was 50 years ago, or whether it’s now.”

Advertisement

(Illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic. Photos: Candice Ward, Doug Griffin / Getty Images)

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Culture

When athletes win Olympic gold medals in Paris, they'll get a piece of the Eiffel Tower

Published

on

When athletes win Olympic gold medals in Paris, they'll get a piece of the Eiffel Tower

Winning an Olympic gold medal is considered a crowning achievement for an athlete, so it’s only fitting that the physical medal represents the significance.

What’s on each gold medal is special for every Olympic Games, but Paris 2024 is particularly notable because, when athletes win gold, they will take home a piece of the Eiffel Tower, an iconic landmark of the host city.

The Eiffel Tower played a major role in the Paris 2024 opening ceremony. From beaming lights and the Olympic rings to the comeback performance of Celine Dion, “La Tour Eiffel” showcased its grandeur to the world. And now, it will be part of the athletes’ medal collections.

What else is unique about these gold medals and how are they connected to the Eiffel Tower? Here’s what to know.

How many Olympic medals are created?

Around 5,084 medals were developed for Paris 2024, per multiple reports, which note that approximately 2,600 medals have been created for the Olympics and 2,400 for the Paralympics.

Advertisement

How much do the Olympic gold medals weigh?

The gold medal weighs 1.17 pounds. The silver medal, by comparison, weighs 1.16 pounds while the bronze is one pound.

Who designed the Olympic gold medals?

Chaumet, the French luxury jewelry and watch brand, designed the Olympic medals. Founded in 1780, Chaumet is owned by LVMH (Moët Hennessey Louis Vuitton).

What features are on the Olympic gold medals?

The Olympic gold medal consists of three features: the hexagon, radiance and setting.

In the middle of the medal is a hexagon. It pays homage to France’s nickname “L’hexagone” given the country’s roughly six-sided shape.

The hexagon is surrounded by several strand-like shapes. This symbolizes the radiant light, as Paris is often referred to as the “city of light.”

Advertisement

On the six edges of the hexagon are claw settings. The shape is similar to those found in the rivets on the Eiffel Tower.


Olympic rings were illuminated on the Eiffel Tower during the opening ceremony of 2024 Games in Paris. (Photo: Ludovic Marin – Pool / Getty)

What is the Eiffel Tower connection?

The Eiffel Tower was the defining fixture of the 1889 World Fair. The original tower was made with wrought iron.

When the Eiffel Tower underwent renovations in the 20th century, they preserved pieces of the original iron and kept them in storage. Those chunks make up the hexagon figure in the middle of the Olympic gold medal.

According to multiple reports, 0.04 pounds of iron renovation pieces from the Eiffel Tower are included in each medal.

Gold, silver and bronze medals began at the 1904 St. Louis Olympic Games. It’s estimated that 1,011 medals — in terms of the Games’ medal count — will be handed out at Paris 2024 (more medals were developed to account for team events). This is the first time a piece of a city’s historic landmark is included in an Olympic medal.

Advertisement

How much is an Olympic gold medal worth?

According to Forbes, a Paris 2024 Olympic gold medal is worth approximately $950.

What happens at the medal ceremony?

The gold medal is placed around the winning athlete’s neck atop the podium. The athlete also receives a stuffed souvenir of the Paris 2024 mascot. Then, the national anthem of the winning athlete’s country plays — a tradition that began for gold medalists at medal ceremonies in 1932.

Required reading

More on the 2024 Paris Olympics from The Athletic

(Photo: Thomas Samson / AFP via Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

Hall of Famers on Hall of Famers: Baseball's greats in awe of fellow Cooperstown legends

Published

on

Hall of Famers on Hall of Famers: Baseball's greats in awe of fellow Cooperstown legends

COOPERSTOWN, N.Y. — It’s the biggest event of Induction Weekend that no one on the outside ever gets to see. It arrives on that Sunday night, far from the induction stage …

When all the living Hall of Famers come to dinner.

And so often, when that moment arrives, the questions these men ask is not: What’s for dinner? It’s more like: What the heck am I even doing here?

“I’m going to say this,” new Hall of Famer Adrián Beltré admitted the next day, at the annual Hall of Fame roundtable. “I don’t think I belong here, because I idolized so many players here that I could not believe I was in the room that night, having dinner with those guys.

“We walked in, and you can see all those guys,” Beltré went on. “It’s like you’re in heaven, right?”

Advertisement

The awe he felt is still a thing, but not just for him. And that should tell us something, because the two legends who have spent the last four decades inspiring the most awe in that room are no longer with us.

Willie Mays first attended that dinner in 1979, when men like Earl Averill and Cool Papa Bell were sitting at those tables. Hank Aaron first joined him in 1982, at a time when he was still surrounded by a group that included Luke Appling and Bill Dickey.

From then on, at least one of those two icons was in attendance for nearly every one of those gatherings, from the late ’70s until the pandemic. And let’s just say that when Mays and Aaron were present, there was never any question about who in that room was considered true baseball royalty. Nearly everyone else was just a baseball player.

But now that they’re both gone, I found myself wondering about a fascinating question. When all the living Hall of Famers assemble now, who else in the room makes them feel the way Mays and Aaron once made them feel?

So I spent this Induction Weekend asking seven of them that question. Their answers ranged from names you would expect (Sandy Koufax, Johnny Bench, Mike Schmidt) to names I bet you’d never expect (stay tuned for those). Now I’ll let them tell you why some of their fellow Hall of Famers are not like all the others.

Advertisement

Mays and Aaron reign forever


Willie Mays and Hank Aaron, baseball royalty. (Bettmann / Getty Images)

Willie Mays and Henry Aaron will never walk through the doors of the grand Otesaga Hotel again. But memories of them are still so vivid, and they’re still the names that some of these men mentioned first.

Aaron — “Mr. Aaron. I mean, he was my guy,” Craig Biggio said. “He was the guy. Like when I got inducted (in 2015) — his last year here, I think, was that year. And the picture on my computer is still him and my family. And I don’t call him Hank. I call him Mr. Aaron.

“Even with all the things that he’s been through and everything like that,” Biggio said, “that man was as classy and as great and as amazing, on the field and off the field, as anyone I’ve ever known.”

(Author’s note: Aaron’s last Induction Weekend was actually 2019, not 2015.)

Advertisement

Mays — “If Mays were to walk in this room right now,” said Ted Simmons, a 2020 inductee who never got to dine in Cooperstown with Mays or Aaron, “I’d back up, because let me tell you. I’d want to have a good look.”

Simmons then spun a tale that took him back a half century. This was 1973, when Mays was hanging on in his final season, as a Met, and Simmons was beginning to establish himself as a young All-Star catcher in St. Louis. Then there he was, crouching behind the plate — and up stepped Willie Mays.

“I remember going over him in a pregame meeting,” Simmons reminisced. “And then, when he came up the first time and I got ready to put the signals down … I looked him up and down, and I said to myself — I’m not lying — I said, ‘That’s Mays. That’s Mays, right?’

“Then I put the signals down, and off we went. But if you think I didn’t acknowledge that, you’re mistaken, because this was Mays. And there he was. And I just said: This is a long way from the 28705 (zip code) where I grew up.”

Sandy Koufax, movie star


“The class act just oozes out of his pores,” Ryne Sandberg said of Sandy Koufax, with his wife, Jane Purucker Clarke, at a statue unveiling in 2022. (Kirby Lee / Associated Press)

Sandy Koufax is 88 years old now. He hasn’t delivered a pitch since 1966, when he was still only 30. So he has been a Hall of Famer for an incredible 52 years. Koufax hasn’t attended an Induction Weekend since 2019. But that only adds to the mystique of a man viewed by the other Hall of Famers with astonishing reverence.

Advertisement

“I almost forgot about Sandy because I hadn’t seen him in a while,” said Dennis Eckersley, a 2004 inductee. “But I used to get lunch with him because I got friendly with him here. … So I got to know him a little bit, and I was in awe of him.”

And why, Eckersley was asked, did he feel those goosebumps? What was it about that man that inspired the word “awe”?

“He’s Sandy Koufax,” Eckersley replied, with a look that said it all. “It’s hard to explain it. He’s Sandy Koufax.”

This is where the conversation took a hard turn away from the question many people have been asking since Mays’ death — the who’s the best living player now question. It’s hard to make the argument that the answer to that question is Sandy Koufax, since, despite his unhittable peak, he finished his career with “only” 165 victories, fewer than Derek Lowe or Kevin Millwood.

But if the question is more like who has That Aura about him, then that’s different. Who has that aura? Oh, Sandy Koufax has it, all right — unmistakably.

Advertisement

“Oh, yeah. His name. His aura. The Dodgers back in the day,” said 2005 inductee Ryne Sandberg. “He has a movie-star look about him. He’s a very handsome guy, even as he got older. But just talking to him, the class. The class act just oozes out of his pores. You get that feeling that you don’t know if you’re with the best left-handed pitcher ever or if you’re with a top-notch movie star, or somewhere in between.”

Juan Marichal, last link to the pre-expansion era


Juan Marichal, 86, was the oldest Hall of Famer at Sunday’s dinner. (Gregory Fisher / USA Today)

Let’s think more about The Aura — and why certain people have it. If the only vision we have of a player seems like it came out of an old, grainy black-and-white newsreel, that alone makes him feel like a figure from a different time and place. Doesn’t it?

Does that add to the mythology of Koufax? Of course, it does. And Juan Marichal, the oldest Hall of Famer at that dinner Sunday night (at 86 years old), is in that same class.

Marichal’s first game with the Giants was on July 19, 1960, when there were still only eight teams in each league. Mays and Orlando Cepeda were in his lineup that day. Marichal took a no-hittter into the eighth and punched out 12.

It wasn’t merely a huge day in San Francisco. It was one of the most important baseball moments ever in the Dominican Republic, where Adrian Beltré grew up, hearing about the legend of Marichal.

Advertisement

“He definitely has that aura,” Beltré told me. “And not just with me. With the whole group. You can tell how all the guys are respectful of him. He’s so grateful to everybody. And the way he acts with everybody and talks to anybody, I mean, he has That Thing, that thing that you can tell. He was a really good player, but he has that humanity in him. And he’s got that humbleness to him that people just gravitate to him as a person.”

Cal Ripken Jr., the modern-day Lou Gehrig


Scott Rolen reminisced about watching Cal Ripken Jr. break Lou Gehrig’s consecutive games played record when he was in the minor leagues. (Denis Paquin / Associated Press)

Sometimes, it’s not simply about what you’ve done. It’s what you represent. Do we really have to explain what Cal Ripken Jr. represents? He’s this group’s Tony Stark — the Iron Man of baseball.

He broke one of those Records That Could Never Be Broken, the consecutive games streak of the great Lou Gehrig. And he did that in a time (1995) when every one of these Hall of Famers was alive to see it, to feel it, to remember its impact. So of course, his name came up.

There’s an easy argument that he’s the greatest living shortstop, and the greatest of the last 100 years. So Ripken belongs in two discussions: Who has That Aura … and Who’s the greatest living player now that Mays is gone?

“The pretty cool answer, for me,” said 2023 inductee Scott Rolen, “has got to be Ripken. I can still remember being in Double A, watching him take that victory lap around the field at Camden Yards, breaking the all-time record. That’s pretty iconic.”

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Could any baseball feat today match the power of Cal Ripken Jr.’s streak? Here are 7 to consider

Mike Schmidt, the gold standard at third base


“He is, for me, in my opinion, the pinnacle,” Adrian Beltré said of fellow third baseman Mike Schmidt. (Gregory Fisher / USA Today)

To enter the Greatest Living Player debateyou don’t need to buy a ticket if you’re The Best Ever at your position. So that’s Mike Schmidt, widely acknowledged these days as the best all-around third baseman of his time … or any time.

It was no surprise that Schmidt’s name was mentioned a lot, especially from the men who entered the Hall in the past couple of years.

Of course, Rolen mentioned Schmidt, the third-base giant who preceded him in Philadelphia. But Schmidt’s peak came before Rolen was quite old enough to remember it. Then his arrival in Philadelphia prompted so many comparisons that Rolen was reluctant to wade into that discussion, even now, despite his immense respect for Schmidt and all he represents.

The 2024 inductees, on the other hand, had none of those reservations.

Advertisement

“Michael Jack Schmidt,” said Todd Helton. “That was my guy. So it was cool seeing him.”

Then there was the newest Hall of Fame third baseman. It made perfect sense that Mike Schmidt was the very first name to roll off Adrián Beltré’s tongue when this conversation took off.

“I think mainly, for me, that guy is really Mike Schmidt,” Beltré said. “He is … in my opinion, the pinnacle. Even though I never saw him play, I understood what he meant to the game, what he did at third base.”

Johnny Bench, the best there ever was


“You get here, and he runs the show.” Scot Rolen said of Johnny Bench at Induction Weekend. (Jim McIsaac / Getty Images)

There’s a case for Yogi Berra as the best catcher ever. If you’d like to argue for Bill Dickey or Pudge Rodriguez, Mike Piazza or Gary Carter, go right ahead. But the correct answer is Johnny Bench. So Bench holds a special place in the Cooperstown pantheon — for that and many other reasons.

More than 50 Hall of Famers attended that dinner Sunday night. But when those legends assemble, there is never any doubt about which of them will arise to take charge of every big occasion, from beginning to end of Induction Weekend.

Advertisement

Johnny Bench is that guy. For years, he has taken on the responsibility to represent the group, lead the group and speak for the group. So his fellow Hall of Famers can’t help but pay back that respect, for a man willing to act as the spokesman for the greatest players walking around our planet.

“Johnny’s presence is huge,” Rolen said. “Cal was kind of leading the charge in Major League Baseball when I was trying to get there. And Johnny came before that. But I know what he carries and what presence he has. You get here, and he runs the show.”

Ryne Sandberg grew up riveted by the magnetism of the Big Red Machine, even from 2,000 miles away in Washington state. So no one needs to explain to him why you can’t have any of these conversations without tipping a cap to Johnny Bench.

“His name is just synonymous with baseball,” Sandberg said. “And (loving him) as a kid, and the Big Red Machine, and the catcher, and being that guy and that hitter. … He’s the full package as well. He has the charisma. He’s the character (in the group).

“He has the ability to work a room. He has the ability to stand up there and give a speech and have everybody rolling, and it would be top-notch. He just has that about him. When you say he presides over the group, he does. That’s just what he does.”

Advertisement

Reggie Jackson, captain of the Nickname Hall of Fame


“Mr. October, man, is not a name that everybody gets.” (Thomas B. Shea / USA Today)

When you’re talking about aura, isn’t that what the mythological status of Reginald M. Jackson is all about?

You just have to watch Reggie walk by, and the highlights begin to roll in the minds of folks of a certain age: the three-homer eruption in a World Series clincher … the All-Star Game home run that nearly soared out of Tiger Stadium … and so many more.

Jackson has missed the last two Induction Weekends. But before that, he was a constant for three decades. So even when he’s in the presence of fellow Hall of Famers, he’s larger than life — not to mention louder than life.

“I remember walking down one of these steps (at the Otesaga), I think last year,” said Ted Simmons. “And coming up in the other direction was Reggie Jackson. And think what you want about him. But Reggie Jackson is pretty close to that stratosphere we’re talking about.

“Mr. October, man, is not a name that everybody gets. I mean, there’s something going on there. So if there’s a guy who was on that kind of projectile, he was on it. And I don’t care what you think about Reggie Jackson. He was a superstar. There’s a lot of nicknames. I’m real proud of mine, in fact. I’m proud of being Simba. But they don’t call me Mr. October. And they don’t call anybody else Mr. October. There’s only one: Reggie Jackson.”

Advertisement

George Brett, the Yankee killer

The 41st anniversary of the fabled Pine Tar Game was this week. If it’s not the most famous home run of George Brett’s career, it at least goes down as the most famous overturned home run of anybody’s career.

Does it matter anymore, to the living Hall of Famers, that American League president Lee MacPhail eventually ruled that it counted after all? It does not. It just adds to the legacy of one of the greatest third basemen in history, the greatest Kansas City Royal in history and a man who has spent the past 25 years as one of the most beloved Hall of Famers in this group.

“I always loved George Brett,” Craig Biggio said. “You know, growing up as an East Coast kid and watching him beating up on the Yankees and the whole Pine Tar deal, I loved all that. I was never really a Yankees fan or a Mets fan growing up. So watching him do his magic and then being up here and eating dinner with him, that type of stuff is kind of amazing to me.”

Rod Carew and Jim Kaat, connections to another time


Todd Helton has a special connection to Jim Kaat, who was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2022. (Gregory Fisher / USA Today)

One of the beauties of Cooperstown is that it’s a reminder that baseball is more than just a game. It’s one of those forces in life that connects generations — especially fathers and sons.

So when Todd Helton gazed around the room at his fellow Hall of Famers at dinner Sunday night, part of the emotion that swept over him was the powerful personal connection that two of the players in that room convey.

Advertisement

To him, Rod Carew and Jim Kaat were more than baseball players whose long, distinguished careers led them to this place. They were links to the short-lived baseball career of his late father, Jerry.

In his speech Sunday, Helton explained that link, saying: “My dad had a brief history in the minor leagues with the Minnesota Twins. After that, he poured that passion for baseball into me. I will never forget being in the backyard, pretending I was Jim Kaat, the first baseball player I ever knew of.”

Helton also spoke in that speech of the first VCR his family ever owned — “for the sole purpose of me watching this 15-minute video of Rod Carew on ‘The Baseball Bunch.’ He was talking about hitting the ball the other way. It was literally the only video we owned, and I must have watched it a million times.”

As he delivered those words, Carew and Kaat sat behind Helton on the stage. Then at dinner Sunday night, Helton was overcome one more time by the sight of those two living links to his father, who died in 2015.

“Obviously, there was the Jim Kaat story,” Helton said the day after that dinner. “As I said, my dad played for the Twins. And he caught him one year in spring training. So that’s who we talked about, was Jim Kaat. Both left-handers. So that’s who I pretended to be. So that was just so cool to see him. And obviously, Rod Carew too, because as I also said, I’ve watched his video a million times.”

Advertisement

But this time, when Helton’s count rose to a million and one visions of Rod Carew — this was different. This was real. This was the magic of Cooperstown.

Other names that came up

THE STARS NO LONGER WITH US: Mays and Aaron weren’t the only missing heroes whose names were dropped in these conversations. Tom Seaver came up. Al Kaline came up. Bob Gibson came up.

“The last few years,” Eckersley said, “we had all those guys leaving. We lost Gibson and (Joe) Morgan, (Don) Sutton and (Lou) Brock, and on and on and on. So the whole room has changed.”

But when Eckersley walks into that room, the men he is most in awe of are still “all the guys I watched when I was 10.”

“They stand out,” he said. “And they always will. Because you were 10. You didn’t have the perspective then, at all. Right? But then again, when I was 10, they didn’t have the spotlight like they do now. You could be a good player. And you might think he’s a superstar if he played for the right teams. But there’s not very many of them.”

Advertisement

THE STARS OF THE LAST QUARTER-CENTURY: Here’s another thought. Do we only have to confine this conversation to the best players of the 20th century?

At first, I was surprised when I began hearing the names of men who played in the 2000s. But why not? There were no rules or time limits to this discussion. So why wouldn’t those names be part of this?

Jim Thome’s name came up — because “there are the guys I played against — the Jim Thomes,” Helton said. “Jim is a great guy and a great person … and there’s certainly an aura factor with him.”

And if we’re talking aura … “I think about the guys who came after me,” said Eckersley. “Griffey Jr. would be a guy to think about in that Greatest Living Player thing.

“In some ways, I’m more in awe of the guys who just came in (to the Hall), like the (Derek) Jeters,” Eckersley went on. “I mean, look at all the publicity they have, guys like Mariano (Rivera) and Jeter and (David) Ortiz. Those guys, they’re bigger than life. Wow. But as great as they are, you can’t put them in Mays’ category.”

Advertisement

So here we are, right back where we began. It was special to talk about every one of these men — living, breathing Hall of Famers with a force field of greatness that surrounds them. We can talk about their aura. We can debate where they stand in the Greatest Living Player discussion. Heck, we just did.

But does that mean it’s safe to drop their names in the same sentence as the late, great Willie Mays? Even for the Hall of Famers who were part of this conversation, that was too big a leap.

“You can maybe try to do it position-by-position,” said Ted Simmons. “But it’s really hard to do. You can’t do it safely.

“But with Mays, you could do it. He played in the right place (New York in the 1950s). He was a way-above-everybody-else type star. And with that kind of focus in that kind of place, with that kind of player, you could jump to that stratosphere. That’s not to say there couldn’t have been others who could do that, but it doesn’t matter — because they could. But Mays did.”


go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Beltré, Mauer, Helton, Leyland inducted into Baseball Hall of Fame

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Baseball Hall of Fame tiers: Which active players are on course for Cooperstown?

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Hall of Fame haul: On Main Street in Cooperstown, a treasure trove of trinkets for $100

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Stark: 5 things we learned from the Baseball Hall of Fame election

(Top photo: From left, Hank Aaron, Johnny Bench, Sandy Koufax and Willie Mays are introduced at the 2015 All-Star Game: Icon Sportswire via Associated Press)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

NFL defensive coaches are focused on stopping these trends this season

Published

on

NFL defensive coaches are focused on stopping these trends this season

The NFL’s offensive masterminds continue to innovate and find new advantages, and the cyclical nature of scheme means defensive coaches will find a counter. It’s a chess match that continues every offseason.

For example, the popularity of outside schemes was met with more odd fronts with defensive linemen playing more patiently to cause indecision for runners. So last year, we began to see more old-school gap scheme runs from offenses. Defensive coaches are very good at what they do, so the new, shiny trends on offense typically lose their potency fast. What are those pesky defensive coaches thinking about heading into the 2024 season? I asked defensive coaches around the league what offensive trends, plays or concepts they’ve spent time coming up with answers for.

The Dolphins’ cheat motion

The most common answer I got was the “cheat” motion popularized by the Dolphins and Tyreek Hill. Dolphins head coach Mike McDaniel unveiled it in Week 1, and it seems like every team has added it to their playbook. The motion is simple. A receiver with a tight split sprints outside to get a running start and the quarterback quickly snaps the ball as the receiver is still running, before the defense can properly react.

(Drew Jordan / The Athletic)

Cheat motion helps get receivers to full speed before the snap similar to how Canadian Football Players do, except NFL players have to do it moving horizontally. Cheat motion can be used to create rubs that are hard for the defense to adjust to because of how quickly the ball gets snapped.

Offensive coordinators got creative with their usage of cheat motion last season. They used it to get receivers both inside and outside, to get receivers open deep or open up space underneath, and combined it with run/pass options (RPOs). It’s been a pain to defend.

Advertisement

Week 3, 11:56 remaining in the second quarter, first-and-10

Rams coach Sean McVay was one of the best at using motion to create advantages in the passing game last year. Here, he called an inside variation of cheat motion to free up Tutu Atwell. Atwell initially was lined up outside against Bengals corner Chidobe Awuzie.

As Atwell motioned inside, nickel Mike Hilton had to switch onto him to avoid a possible rub.

However, because of the quick switch, Hilton played a step or two too far outside of Atwell, giving him too much space to work with inside. Hilton was supposed to have inside help, but the inside defenders were frozen by play action.

Advertisement

Hilton couldn’t recover and Atwell was open for an explosive pass play.

“A pro personnel executive for a team who was not authorized to speak publicly said that even his coaches, who did not face the Dolphins in 2023, put ‘cheat’ on their scout-team cards because they knew it would eventually come up from an opponent who was on their schedule,” The Athletic’s Jourdan Rodrigue wrote in her report on the motion.

Defenses will definitely be more prepared for the motion this season. They’ll have quick checks and adjustments they can get to that will help them deal with it better, using all offseason to work with them.

One coach I talked to wasn’t as worried about the motion. He feels it is already overexposed and is more about the player who gets put in motion. Not every receiver can run a diverse route tree off of the motion.

“You have to have guys running routes running out of this thing. How many guys can actually run routes that involve a downfield break off of a full-speed motion? And how often are those guys targeted? It’s not quite as high as you people would think,” the defensive coach said. “There’s probably 10 guys in the league that can really run that route fast enough, clean enough, time it with another receiver off of the motion.”

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

New NFL kickoff rules could bring excitement … and chaos: ‘It’s going to be a s— show’

Pace of motion

Cheat motion isn’t the only way teams are getting creative with motion. The pace of the motion and at which point they snap the ball also can be problematic.

If teams aren’t varying the pace of their motions and snap points, the plays they run off of motion can become predictable. The best motion teams are conscious of all of this and weaponize it to make life hard on defenses.

“When a guy jogs across the formation slow and then boom, the ball gets snapped and he takes off, that’s a son of a bitch to defend and there’s no way to chart those other than just watching all the plays,” an NFL defensive coach said. “Also, if you have a guy that sprints across the formation that forces a defensive check then he gets set and then the ball gets snapped. That’s like that’s a big-time problem because it’s just creating a healthy dose of pre-snap conflict where defenders in the second level are unsure.”

Advertisement

NFC divisional round, 8:31 remaining in the third quarter, second-and-5

Here, the Rams started with three eligible receivers to Matthew Stafford’s right. This side was the passing strength of the formation, so the Lions lined up their nickel Brian Branch there.

Cooper Kupp then sprinted to the other side and got set. Because of the pace of the motion, the defense bumped linebacker Alex Anzalone outside instead of having Branch follow Kupp across the formation. As Kupp got set, they had some time to possibly adjust but chose not to because the Rams could have snapped the ball at any time.

Instead of snapping the ball, the Rams had receiver Puka Nacua also motion across the formation. Still, the Lions kept Branch to the right even though the passing strength of the formation had completely flipped.

After the snap, Anzalone had to run with Nacua on a wheel route. Kupp also ran a route across the formation, holding the defenders on that side. No one was left in the flats to defend the running back screen, which was perfectly set up.

Advertisement

In the last five-plus seasons, coaches from the Kyle Shanahan/Sean McVay tree have effectively used motion to create advantages in the running game and to dress up their play-action concepts. Now they are getting extremely creative with using motion to create advantages in the passing game. Forward-thinking defensive coaches should have spent the offseason adding counters and tools to their playbooks for their secondary to use on the field against these different types of motions.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Sean McVay on improving as a coach, Puka’s breakout, work-life balance

Four-strong concepts

Overloading one side of the formation before the snap is difficult for a defense to handle. Especially with so many defenses playing more match coverages in which defenders look at receivers and try to match with them based on their route stems. Four-strong means the offense is either lining up four eligible receivers to one side or getting four receivers with their routes after the snap.

One concept mentioned a lot by the defensive coaches I talked to was popularized by Shanahan and the 49ers. They would flood one side of the field with four routes but have fullback Kyle Juszczyk lead block for the running back on a swing route.

Several teams have copied this concept, but the Packers’ Matt LaFleur has his own version that is particularly hard to stop. The 49ers run their four-strong concept out of 21 personnel (two backs, one tight end, two receivers) and they’ll run it out of 1-back. This is a little easier for the defense because all the eligible receivers are compressed initially.

Advertisement

LaFleur runs his variation out of faster personnel groupings. Also, he’ll combine the swing with an escort with a downfield concept.

NFC divisional round, 1:19 left in the first quarter, second-and-11

Here, the Packers are running their four-strong concept with an escort out of 12 personnel (one back, two tight ends, two receivers). Tight end Tucker Kraft is the escort (lead blocker) for the running back swing out of the backfield. Instead of shorter routes like the 49ers’ version, the Packers had a dagger concept called.

The 49ers defenders dropped deep to defend the downfield pass combination, leaving the swing open underneath.

Kraft took out the flat defender, giving the running back space to run down the sideline.

Advertisement

Counter

As defenses have moved to play more light boxes and odd fronts, offenses have swung back to using more gap scheme plays. The most popular gap scheme play is counter, in which the front side of the offensive line down blocks while two pullers come from the back side — usually a guard and either a tackle, tight end or fullback.

The popular Vic Fangio/Brandon Staley system deploys two deep safeties with a focus on stopping explosive pass plays while conceding the run, and the extra defender who has to come up to play the extra blockers created by counter comes from the secondary. That’s asking a lot of the safety.

Week 14, 14:13 remaining in the second quarter, second-and-11

On this play, the Giants ran counter as a run/pass option (RPO). They were in a spread formation and had a glance concept to the counter side (left). Quarterback Tommy DeVito was reading the safety.

The safety stepped down to defend the counter, leaving the glance wide-open behind him.

Advertisement

One defensive coach said he was thinking about ways to defend QB counter options, which he believes he sees more of in his division than traditional zone read. Even with an extra defender in the box, a QB counter is very difficult to stop if the quarterback is a legitimate running threat.

Week 14, 13:00 remaining in the second quarter, first-and-10

Here, the Giants ran QB counter with running back Saquon Barkley taking the snap. Barkley had two options: hand off to receiver Wan’Dale Robinson running left with a lead block or keep the ball and follow the counter blocking with two pulling offensive linemen to the right.

Barkley read the defensive end to the right. If he stayed outside, he would have kept the ball, but because he stepped inside, Barkley made the right read and handed the ball off.

If the end stayed outside, the Giants would have a numbers advantage and excellent blocking to the right for Barkley.

Advertisement

Counter is an old-school concept, but as coaches prioritize defending the pass, they’ll have to think of ways to limit physical runs like the counter with lighter boxes.

(Top photo of Tyreek Hill in motion: Miami Dolphins via Associated Press)

Continue Reading

Trending