Connect with us

Crypto

The rise of consumer cryptocurrency

Published

on

The rise of consumer cryptocurrency
An image created shows a symbol of the cryptocurrency Ethereum next to non-fungible tokens (NFTs) from the Yuga Labs ‘Bored Ape Yacht Club’ collection displayed on its website. REUTERS

Since its inception with the launch of Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain technology has gone through numerous cycles of public attention. Over time, growing interest and investment in the best-known cryptocurrencies has led to greater acceptance, as highlighted by the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF (exchange-traded fund) in January. While blockchains and their associated “crypto” assets have yet to be adopted by a truly broad base of consumers, that is starting to change, owing to a shift in how these technologies are being used.

Contrary to what mainstream media coverage often suggests, for many people, the value of these innovations lies not so much in cryptocurrencies as in blockchain-based digital goods such as virtual sneakers, gaming assets, and membership passes — all managed by way of non-fungible tokens. As we explain in our new book, The Everything Token: How NFTs and Web3 Will Transform the Way We Buy, Sell, and Create, NFTs — often misunderstood and even derided — are a general and flexible solution for establishing and tracking ownership across all manner of digital assets. (We both personally hold NFTs and other digital assets and advise companies with interests in this sector.)

NFTs are already being used in a wide range of contexts — from course credentials to coffee rewards — and they are poised to reshape the management of everything from concert tickets to health-care data. Since these are business contexts that affect consumers’ everyday experiences, NFTs may start to drive widespread consumer adoption on a scale that previous crypto applications have not.

The Early Years

A big reason for crypto’s lack of mainstream adoption has been its inaccessibility. These are early days, and many crypto applications still require users to interface near the technological rails that run the system. There are few protections against user error or having one’s account compromised, and the necessary technical knowledge makes everything difficult to navigate. But lest we forget, the early internet also was not user-friendly.

Advertisement

Much of the existing crypto infrastructure also lacks the capacity to manage transactions at a global scale, resulting in high transaction costs that frequently fall on the user. Years of regulatory uncertainty have not helped. Both in the United States and globally, there has been a general lack of clarity about which types of digital-asset transactions are permitted, how those assets are assessed for tax purposes, and whether that treatment may change in the future.

But market immaturity and mismatches between available applications have also been significant challenges. As with any novel, general-purpose technology, many early crypto applications were poorly conceived, unsustainable as businesses, or — in some cases — entirely fraudulent.

On top of that, much of the media and regulatory attention has focused on financial and monetary applications. In fact, crypto is hard to use as a medium of exchange until there is broad adoption. Meanwhile, because some early adopters were interested in crypto as a potential investment, financialisation bled over into other applications. When domain addresses were introduced on the Ethereum blockchain, for example, the result was a massive speculative market in what amounted to URL-squatting (when someone registers an address in hopes of later reselling it at a premium), which was supercharged by highly liquid crypto trading.

In short, the parallels to the early internet are manifold: the early crypto market has faced technical barriers that limit adoption, early experiments that didn’t always make the best use of the technology, and significant speculation. But, as with the internet, we are witnessing a shift toward better designed, more productive applications as the technology matures. To understand the new-generation applications, it helps to examine more precisely what blockchains are good for.

What Blockchain Can Do for You

Blockchains are massive global ledgers that use decentralised cryptographic protocols to record information in a way that is publicly verifiable, secure, and immutable. Today’s blockchains can run complex software that makes it possible to define, allocate, and track ownership, on a public ledger, of all manner of digital assets — from units of account (cryptocurrency) to domain addresses, user profiles, and even music tracks and web games. Individual accounts on blockchain-based systems, often referred to as digital wallets, give users direct ownership of whatever is recorded as “theirs” in the ledger. The owner of a given digital asset holds a unique key with which to verify herself as the owner and control which applications interact with her assets (and in what ways).

Advertisement

This is very different from most of the web and social-media experiences that we are accustomed to. Instead of a user having an account on a specific site like Facebook or Amazon — where that user’s data, profile, and other information are stored and controlled by the platform — blockchains allow users to retain complete control over their own account and associated data.

Moreover, users can connect that account to whatever platform they want and switch seamlessly between platforms. By contrast, although you can quit Facebook if you don’t like its policies, you cannot take your content, audience, and reputation with you.

NFTs are digital records that can be held in an individual digital wallet. They act similarly to property deeds. By associating an NFT with another asset — for instance, a piece of digital art, an item in a game, or even a physical asset like a book or a piece of clothing — it becomes easy to define and identify ownership in the digital realm. Some NFTs are transferable and can be bought and sold just like physical goods. Others are non-transferable and tied to a specific account, just like a driver’s licence or diploma.

Perhaps the simplest case for NFTs is in contexts where ownership is otherwise difficult to verify, such as with digital event tickets. In this case, NFTs provide a far better solution than the existing technology. A well-known market failure in this area stems from the difficulty of identifying whether a ticket (say, to a Taylor Swift concert) has been resold to multiple people at once on the secondary market — hardly an unimaginable scenario. When a ticket is just a QR code in an email, there’s no way to verify whether a prospective seller has “sold” it to multiple people, or even used it themselves.

NFTs address this by making each ticket a unique digital asset, which only one person — or more precisely, one digital wallet — can own at a time. Once a seller has transferred a ticket NFT to a buyer, the buyer has direct control of it and can verify that she is now the unique owner. Moreover, blockchain software can integrate the ticket transfer and exchange of payment into a single transaction, thus executing a secure transaction without the need for a third-party intermediary.

Advertisement

Good for Business

These uses explain why NFTs have grown so popular as a means of defining and exchanging ownership of digital images and other media files. Before NFTs, these markets were especially difficult to establish, because sharing a copy of a media file with a prospective buyer was often tantamount to giving it away. (That is why image databases have historically posted only low-resolution or watermarked files, and why online music marketplaces often allow only short previews of a given song.) Looking ahead, it is easy to see how the same uses will extend to digital trading cards, in-game items, and even library books.

Non-transferable NFTs, meanwhile, allow for secure digital credentialing without the need of a third party. A “digital diploma” NFT certifying completion of a course or academic programme could be freely read and verified by any platform to which the holder connects his digital wallet. (For example, LinkedIn could seamlessly verify whether you really did complete an “exec ed” programme at Harvard Business School.)

Similarly, NFTs can implement cross-platform subscriptions or memberships. Instead of needing an account with a given publication, simply holding a subscription NFT in your digital wallet could unlock access. Moreover, NFTs can be used to give people direct control of personal data such as health-care records, allowing patients to transfer their data seamlessly to new providers without all the hassle this currently entails.

And, of course, in a world where concern about AI fakes and impersonation is growing, there is a lot of value in being able to create interoperable, platform-agnostic, securely verifiable identity records that a person can use to prove they are who they say they are. These sorts of “proof of personhood” NFTs leverage offline identity verification to produce an on-chain digital asset that can be used to certify identity in contexts such as personal finance, e-commerce, and social media.

Finally, in all these cases — at least with public blockchains — it is easy for digital-asset owners and third parties to create value on top of NFTs beyond simple ownership. These functional utilities range widely in character and scope, from enforcing access to private chat rooms to offering free merchandise and even shared intellectual-property rights. An event sponsor could leverage ticket NFTs as the digital keys to an online fan community. Or a publication like The Economist could give free access to anyone holding a Project Syndicate subscription NFT without needing to interact with PS’s own database.

Advertisement

All of this makes NFTs an ideal technology for fostering consumer engagement. Unlike previous incarnations of digital goods, NFTs are truly owned by their holders, and we know that a greater sense of ownership can enhance brand attachment. If you truly own a valuable item in a popular video game, for example, you will have an incentive to help that game continue and attract new players. At the same time, NFTs’ interoperability makes them easy to showcase and use as part of one’s online identity throughout the digital domain.

Blockchain Branding

Here, the decentralised value creation that NFTs enable also can help. NFTs publicly surface a brand’s fans and connect them to one another within a mutually reinforcing network. By building community among an initial group of holders, NFT brands cultivate superfans who share their enthusiasm online and draw in others. We are seeing the makings of a new, powerful model of digital brand-building.

New and established brands alike are using this strategy. NFT-native brands like the Bored Ape Yacht Club, Pudgy Penguins, and VeeFriends started with NFT collections and leveraged their communities of early adopters — that is, their NFT holders — as they offered products to a broader consumer market. Similarly, established companies like Nike, Porsche, The Hundreds, and even Time magazine have released NFT collections that encourage their fans and followers to express enthusiasm for their respective brands online.

For example, members of Starbucks’s Odyssey NFT reward programme (where one of us serves as community lead) can collect NFTs representing the classic Starbucks siren and the popular pumpkin spice latte. Many then display these digital assets online. Because of the way the underlying software works, nearly any NFT can take on this role. An NFT that starts as just a ticket to a baseball game or ballet performance can become an anchor for a rewards programme, unlocking a community of shared interest and giving high-value customers unique and valuable perks (like time on the field or an opportunity to meet their favourite prima ballerina).

Of course, NFTs are open to the same kind of speculative financialisation that we have seen elsewhere in the crypto market. But the most compelling business uses will centre on ubiquitous consumer applications. Even in the context of digital collectibles — which will likely remain a key use — NFTs are likely to become far more broadly accessible, and more focused on identity and community formation than on financial value. For example, we expect to see collectible NFT stamps for national parks, pop concerts, and maybe even for airport security dogs. (Yes, K9 units have trading cards. Ask for one the next time you travel!)

Advertisement

From Novel to Natural

Unlike with cryptocurrency, for which some people don’t see a reason to own the asset unless they are interested in conducting crypto transactions, consumers will see direct value in these types of NFT uses. Someone might receive her first NFT in the context of an ordinary ticket or coffee purchase, or when she completes an online course. As this happens more frequently, people will enter the blockchain ecosystem, establishing digital wallets and then connecting to more third-party applications.

Because a single digital wallet can be used flexibly across many different platforms, there will be a positive feedback loop whereby consumers who adopt crypto in this way can also more easily acquire and use other types of digital assets. As consumers become acclimated to owning their own digital assets and using them flexibly across the internet, they may even start to demand the same experience from other brands and web platforms.

Thus, even the simplest consumer NFT uses have the potential to become a major driver of crypto adoption, linking fans to the brands and ideas they love, and driving businesses to create more opportunities for them to do so.  ©2024 Project Syndicate

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Crypto ATM Count Falls to 38,928 as 597 Machines Exit the Market in Q1 2026

Published

on

Crypto ATM Count Falls to 38,928 as 597 Machines Exit the Market in Q1 2026

Crypto ATM Data 2026: 597 Net Removals

Recent figures show the global count of crypto ATMs edged close to the 40,000 mark this month, yet data recorded on March 29, 2026, reveals a net reduction of 769 machines. The year opened with a drop of 139 crypto ATMs, followed by the addition of 231 new installations in February.

An additional 80 units were installed at the beginning of March, according to Coin ATM Radar’s net growth logs, though the removal of 769 machines ultimately pushed the year’s total to a net loss of 597. As of this weekend, the global tally of crypto ATMs sits at 38,928 machines. Geographic data from Coin ATM Radar shows the U.S. holds 30,247 of those units, representing 77.7% of the total.

Image source: coinatmradar.com

Canada follows with 3,839 crypto ATMs, accounting for 9.9% of the worldwide figure. Europe maintains 1,727 machines, or roughly 4.4% of the overall count of 38,928. Taken together, the U.S., Europe, and Canada host 35,813 machines, comprising 92% of the global share. The remaining 8% is distributed across Asia, Oceania, and other regions.

The crypto ATM tracking site further indicates that the top ten global operators collectively oversee 30,450 machines, representing 78.2% of the total. The industry’s leading provider is Bitcoin Depot, which runs a commanding 9,246 machines (23.8% market share). It is followed by Coinflip with 5,493 machines (14.1%) and Athena Bitcoin with 4,045 machines (10.4%).

Rockitcoin holds a solid footprint with 2,757 machines (7.1%), while Bitstop and Margo operate 2,372 (6.1%) and 2,138 (5.5%) machines, respectively. Stats further show that bitcoin ( BTC) remains the most widely supported asset, available across nearly all machines tracked worldwide by Coin ATM Radar.

Advertisement

Following bitcoin, altcoins as a collective category are supported by 38,910 machines, suggesting that nearly every ATM offering bitcoin also includes at least one alternative asset. Among individual altcoins, ethereum ( ETH) leads with support at 22,200 locations, closely followed by litecoin ( LTC) at 21,292 and tether ( USDT) at 19,894.

Roughly 91.6% of crypto ATMs are configured to facilitate cryptocurrency purchases, while the remaining machines support both buying and selling of digital assets. Logs from Coin ATM Radar offer a revealing snapshot of recent crypto ATM reductions in 2026, showing that the 40,000 threshold remains just out of reach for the industry at present.

Whether the crypto ATM count clears 40,000 this year depends largely on whether operators expand or continue pulling machines. The numbers show a market sorting itself out; large providers like Bitcoin Depot, Coinflip, and Athena hold the majority of installations, while smaller operators account for the gap. With North America controlling over three-quarters of the global count, the industry’s direction remains tied closely to conditions in a single market.

FAQ 🔎

  • How many crypto ATMs are there in the world in 2026? As of March 29, 2026, Coin ATM Radar tracks 38,928 active crypto ATMs globally.
  • Which country has the most Bitcoin ATMs? The United States leads with 30,247 machines, representing 77.7% of the worldwide total.
  • Who is the largest crypto ATM operator in 2026? Bitcoin Depot operates 9,246 machines, giving it a 23.8% share of the global market.
  • What cryptocurrencies do crypto ATMs support? Bitcoin is available at nearly all machines, with ethereum supported at 22,200 locations and litecoin at 21,292.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Is Crypto Legal in Norway? EY Explains the Regulations

Published

on

Global Legal Insight publishes a yearly print-and-digital series that investigates urgent themes in business and law with contributions from legal experts worldwide. In the 2025 volume on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, Ernst & Young Tax and Law Norway wrote the country chapter, which addresses whether cryptocurrency is lawful in Norway and surveys how cryptoassets are positioned domestically under Norwegian regulation.

Norway generally permits cryptoasset ownership and trading, while placing the strongest compliance expectations on intermediaries that exchange, safeguard, or facilitate transfers for others.

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Norway: Institutions and Policy Signals

The chapter presents perspectives from the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, the Ministry of Finance, and the Norwegian Central Bank on current market conditions and responsible approaches to a fast‑moving sector. It also distills the operative legal framework and key tax rules for digital assets. In practice, the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway is the primary supervisory body for many compliance questions that arise when a business provides crypto-related services (for example, exchange services or custody-like safeguarding for clients), while tax reporting and assessment are handled by the Norwegian Tax Administration.

For crypto businesses, the most relevant requirements typically relate to anti-money laundering compliance, including customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and internal controls. Businesses that provide exchange services between cryptoassets and fiat currency, or that provide services for holding or administering cryptoassets on behalf of others, may need to register with the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway before offering services, and should be prepared to document ownership and management, governance arrangements, risk assessments, routines for customer checks, and recordkeeping. If you are looking for a “crypto license” in Norway, the practical path is usually a registration-based process tied to anti-money laundering obligations rather than a single, universal license for all crypto activity.

Legal Status and Compliance Overview

This piece is a practical reference for readers seeking clarity on how Norway governs crypto asset activity. It delivers a concise, trustworthy roundup of regulation in Norway, touching on consumer protection and practical themes for participants in digital finance. For individuals, that often means understanding which activities are permitted, how to document transactions, and which authorities oversee intermediaries versus taxation.

From a consumer-use perspective, self-custody wallets such as Trust Wallet are generally available in Norway through standard app distribution channels, and individuals commonly use them as they do in other markets. Using a self-custody wallet does not typically require registration by the individual, but it does not remove tax obligations or documentation expectations; users should keep clear records of purchases, transfers, swaps, and disposals so gains, losses, and income can be reported correctly. Some banks and payment providers may apply their own risk controls around transfers to and from crypto platforms, so users may encounter practical friction even when the underlying activity is lawful.

Advertisement

PayPal availability for purchasing Bitcoin in Norway depends on the specific service route. Some crypto platforms may support PayPal-funded purchases or deposits in certain cases, but many do not due to chargeback and fraud-risk controls, and availability can vary by provider and user verification status. Where PayPal is supported, users should expect identity checks, potentially higher fees, and limits that depend on the platform’s compliance and risk settings.

To buy Tether in Norway, individuals typically use a crypto exchange or broker that lists the stablecoin and supports onboarding for Norwegian residents. The usual flow is to complete identity verification on the platform, fund the account using the supported payment method (commonly bank transfer or card, depending on the provider), and then place an order for the stablecoin. Practical banking considerations can matter, including a bank’s willingness to process payments to particular platforms and the platform’s own requirements for source-of-funds information.

Bitcoin mining is generally lawful in Norway, but it can trigger ordinary business, tax, and local compliance considerations depending on scale (for example, zoning, noise, and commercial electricity arrangements). Norway’s electricity pricing is market-based and can be attractive in some regions, but miners should not assume dedicated government subsidies specific to crypto mining; any favorable power costs typically come from standard industrial contracts, local grid conditions, or general schemes that are not exclusive to mining and may change based on policy and eligibility criteria.

On taxation, cryptoassets are generally treated as taxable assets in Norway, and taxpayers are expected to report disposals and income tied to crypto activity. As a rule of thumb, gains and losses on sales, exchanges between cryptoassets, and spending crypto can be taxable events, while income-like receipts (such as rewards that function like compensation or yield) may be taxed when received, with later disposal potentially creating an additional gain or loss based on value changes. The applicable tax rate will typically follow the ordinary income tax rate for individuals, and accurate recordkeeping is essential for cost basis, acquisition dates, fees, and fair value at the time of each taxable event.

Legal ways to reduce crypto-related taxes in Norway tend to be documentation- and planning-driven rather than loophole-driven. Common approaches include ensuring all allowable losses are captured and reported, deducting eligible transaction costs where permitted, maintaining consistent cost-basis tracking so gains are not overstated, and planning disposals with an eye to offsetting gains with realized losses when that matches the taxpayer’s broader financial situation. For higher-activity traders or mining operations, it can also be important to assess whether the activity resembles a business in substance, since that can affect how income, expenses, and reporting are treated under Norwegian rules.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Bitcoin ETFs Cap Week With $225 Million Outflow as Ether Hits 8-Day Slide

Published

on

Bitcoin ETFs Cap Week With 5 Million Outflow as Ether Hits 8-Day Slide

Bitcoin, Ether ETFs Deepen Losses as Weekly Selling Peaks

The week did not end quietly. Instead, it closed with conviction, and not the kind bulls would have hoped for.

Bitcoin ETFs recorded a steep $225.48 million in net outflows, marking one of the largest single-day withdrawals of the week. The selling was concentrated, but decisive. Blackrock’s IBIT accounted for the overwhelming majority, shedding $201.53 million alone. Bitwise’s BITB followed with $18.60 million in outflows, while Ark & 21Shares’ ARKB posted a smaller $5.35 million exit.

There were no inflows to soften the blow. Trading activity remained robust at $3.39 billion, yet net assets fell sharply to $84.77 billion, underscoring the weight of sustained redemptions.

Ether ETFs extended their losing streak to eight consecutive days, with total outflows reaching $48.54 million. Once again, Blackrock’s ETHA led the decline, posting a $70.80 million withdrawal. Fidelity’s FETH followed with $8.92 million in outflows, while Grayscale’s Ether Mini Trust lost $8.68 million.

Advertisement

Still, one fund continued to defy the trend. Blackrock’s ETHB attracted $39.86 million in inflows, reinforcing its growing appeal among investors. Its staking component appears to be drawing attention, even as broader sentiment around ether remains weak. Trading volume stood at $1.16 billion, with net assets closing at $11.52 billion.

Elsewhere, the picture was quieter but no less telling. XRP ETFs saw no trading activity, with net assets slipping to $933.33 million. Solana ETFs faced heavier pressure, recording a $7.84 million outflow entirely from Bitwise’s BSOL. Trading volume reached $45.21 million, while net assets declined to $809.62 million.

The pattern is hard to ignore. Capital is leaving the space at a steady pace, particularly from flagship bitcoin and ether products. Even isolated inflows are no longer enough to change the broader direction.

In summary, Friday capped a difficult stretch for crypto ETFs. Bitcoin led with a sharp outflow, ether extended its losing streak despite selective interest, solana weakened further, and XRP remained sidelined. The market closes the week on uncertain footing, with sentiment clearly under strain.

FAQ 📊

  • Why did Bitcoin ETFs see such a large outflow on Friday?
    The sharp outflow was largely driven by a significant withdrawal from Blackrock’s IBIT, reflecting continued institutional selling pressure.
  • What is causing Ether ETFs’ extended outflow streak?
    Ether ETFs are experiencing persistent redemptions, mainly from Blackrock’s ETHA, indicating weaker investor confidence than bitcoin’s.
  • Why is Blackrock’s ETHB still attracting inflows?
    ETHB’s staking feature is likely appealing to investors seeking yield, making it stand out even during broader market outflows.
  • What does continued inactivity in XRP ETFs suggest?
    It indicates limited investor engagement and a wait-and-see approach, with capital focusing elsewhere in the crypto ETF market.
Continue Reading

Trending