Connect with us

Crypto

From fringe to policy: Cryptocurrency as a strategic financial tool | Policy Circle

Published

on

From fringe to policy: Cryptocurrency as a strategic financial tool | Policy Circle
The Trump administration’s move to integrate digital assets into national policy is redefining the future of finance.

The cryptocurrency industry is experiencing a historic shift, driven by the US government’s unexpected embrace of digital assets. President Donald Trump has announced the creation of a US Crypto Strategic Reserve, consisting of five cryptocurrencies — Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano. This announcement sent shockwaves through the global financial ecosystem, raising critical questions about the future of digital assets, their implications for investors, and the broader impact on economic stability.

For years, cryptocurrencies have remained on the fringes of mainstream finance, often viewed with scepticism by governments and regulators. Concerns over volatility, illicit activity, and regulatory uncertainty have kept digital assets at arm’s length from institutional adoption. However, the establishment of a national crypto reserve by the US marks a definitive departure from this cautious stance, signalling that digital currencies are not only here to stay but may become integral to economic policy.

READ | From statesmen to strongmen: The global transformation of leadership

Bitcoin, long considered ‘digital gold’, has been widely regarded as a hedge against inflation, while Ethereum’s blockchain underpins much of the burgeoning decentralised finance (DeFi) industry. The inclusion of XRP and Cardano in the reserve suggests a broader strategy aimed at leveraging blockchain technology for cross-border transactions and scalable financial applications.

Investor windfall or systemic risk

Markets reacted immediately to the announcement, with Bitcoin surging past $93,000 and other reserve-listed tokens witnessing significant price spikes. This rally reveals investor confidence in cryptocurrencies gaining government backing, lending legitimacy to an industry that has often faced regulatory roadblocks.

Advertisement

Yet, the decision raises significant concerns. Investing taxpayer funds in volatile digital assets is a high-stakes gamble. While supporters argue that a national reserve could generate substantial returns for the government, critics warn of the risks involved in holding inherently unstable assets. The speculative nature of crypto markets means that price surges today could be followed by devastating crashes, potentially putting public funds at risk.

Furthermore, the inclusion of relatively lesser-known assets like Solana and Cardano raises eyebrows. While these tokens have strong technological foundations, they are far less established than Bitcoin or Ethereum. Some critics argue that their selection may have been influenced by political and personal ties rather than pure economic rationale, sparking concerns about favouritism and conflicts of interest.

End of the crypto crackdown

Beyond the reserve itself, the Trump administration has swiftly dismantled regulatory actions that previously sought to rein in crypto firms. Investigations and lawsuits against major crypto exchanges and industry executives have been dropped or paused. The Securities and Exchange Commission has abandoned its legal pursuit of Coinbase and other crypto giants, reversing years of regulatory efforts aimed at treating digital assets as securities.

While crypto enthusiasts hail these developments as a victory, the regulatory retreat raises serious questions. Many crypto projects have been plagued by fraud, price manipulation, and lack of consumer protections. The abrupt about-face from regulators risks emboldening bad actors, further eroding trust in an industry already marred by high-profile collapses, such as FTX and Terra Luna.

Additionally, the SEC’s decision not to regulate memecoins—often highly speculative, celebrity-driven tokens—has drawn sharp criticism. Trump himself launched a memecoin, $Trump, before taking office, generating tens of millions in profits. The lack of oversight on such assets raises ethical concerns and fuels perceptions that the administration’s crypto policy is as much about personal financial gain as it is about innovation.

Advertisement

Geopolitical and economic implications

The US Crypto Strategic Reserve has far-reaching implications beyond domestic policy. Internationally, it places the United States in direct competition with nations experimenting with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), such as China’s digital yuan. While China has taken a state-controlled approach to digital assets, the US is effectively integrating decentralised cryptocurrencies into its economic framework. This divergence in strategy could influence global financial dynamics and trade relationships.

The decision could also impact the US dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency. If cryptocurrencies become a more widely accepted means of exchange, traditional fiat dominance could be challenged. While some see this as a necessary evolution, others warn that it could destabilise global financial markets, creating new vulnerabilities.

Trump’s move to integrate cryptocurrencies into national reserves introduces fresh uncertainties about the future dominance of the dollar. Traditionally, the dollar has served as the world’s primary reserve currency, backed by trust in US economic stability and government policies. However, by embracing decentralised digital assets, the administration signals a shift that could weaken the dollar’s long-standing supremacy.

If major economies begin holding Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies as reserve assets, global reliance on the dollar could erode, challenging its status in international trade and finance. This policy shift may also accelerate the push for alternative financial systems, with rivals like China further advancing their own state-backed digital currencies to compete with both the dollar and decentralised crypto assets.

Cryptocurrency: Regulation, adoption, and uncertainty

As the dust settles, key questions remain. How will the crypto reserve be managed? Will the government impose new regulations to mitigate risk, or will the industry be given free rein? And most importantly, is this a calculated step toward financial modernisation, or a reckless policy experiment that could end in disaster?

Advertisement

For investors, the short-term outlook appears bullish, with crypto assets gaining mainstream acceptance. However, the long-term picture remains uncertain. Increased government involvement could bring stability and institutional trust, but it may also invite greater scrutiny, taxation, and potential restrictions.

For the global economy, this move represents both an opportunity and a risk. If executed wisely, it could propel the US to the forefront of financial innovation. If mismanaged, it could trigger economic instability and undermine confidence in both digital and traditional financial systems.

One thing is clear — the era of crypto as an unregulated frontier is over. Whether this marks the beginning of a new financial revolution or a costly misstep will depend on how policymakers tackle the challenges ahead. Investors, policymakers, and the global financial community must tread carefully, as the future of money itself is being rewritten in real time.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Terror groups receive $1.7b. from Iran through Binance | The Jerusalem Post

Published

on

Terror groups receive .7b. from Iran through Binance | The Jerusalem Post

Iranians were able to access more than 1,500 Binance accounts last year, and $1.7 billion was transferred from two of them to terrorist proxies, The New York Times reported Monday.

That was a potential violation of global sanctions, the report said, citing company records and documents collected by internal investigators.

The cryptocurrency exchange site reportedly fired or suspended at least four employees cited in the internal investigation. The company blamed “violations of company protocol” relating to its clients’ data, the Times reported.

The report came days after The Jerusalem Post spoke with experts from blockchain intelligence platform NOMINIS.io about how the Iranian regime was evading Western sanctions through cryptocurrencies.

The regime maintains a steady income using cryptocurrency through oil sales to Russia and China, NOMINIS CEO Snir Levi said at the time.

Advertisement
Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, who pleaded guilty to failing to implement a program to prevent money laundering, arrives for his sentencing in federal district court in Seattle, Washington. (credit: REUTERS/Deborah Bloom)

Regarding the latest scandal, he told the Post this week: “The latest allegations about Binance come months after the lawsuit by the victims’ families of October 7 – the ongoing Balva [versus] Binance case.

The majority of the allegations can be easily confirmed by on-chain data. There are thousands of cases where money has been sent and received to and from wallets that have clear connections to Iran.”

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao is being sued by the families of American victims and hostages of the October 7 massacre. He has been accused of knowingly enabling Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to transfer more than $1b. through its platform, including more than $50 million after the October 7 massacre.

Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering violations in connection with Binance in 2023. US President Donald Trump pardoned him last October.

“They say what he did was not even a crime,” Trump told reporters last October. “It wasn’t a crime. That he was persecuted by the Biden administration, and so I gave him a pardon at the request of a lot of very good people.”

Advertisement

Binance representative Rachel Conlan said the accounts linked to the $1.7b. in Iranian transactions have been removed and the relevant authorities were informed.

“Any suggestion that Binance knowingly allowed sanctionable activity to continue unchecked is incorrect and defamatory,” she said, despite Zhao’s earlier admission of anti-money-laundering violations.

More than half a dozen compliance officials have left Binance, including a sanctions manager and the leader of the enterprise compliance team, over the past few months, the Times reported. 

“No investigator was dismissed for raising compliance concerns or for reporting potential sanctions issues,” Conlan said in a statement to The Guardian.

Democrat senator opens inquiry into cryptocurrency company

While Conlan insisted there was no wrongdoing, US Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) opened an inquiry into Binance on Tuesday, seeking records of the company’s dealings in Hong Kong , where funds have previously been transferred in a network against sanctions.

Advertisement

“Binance appears to have ignored warnings and recommendations to prevent Iranian money-laundering schemes on its cryptocurrency exchange,” Blumenthal wrote in a letter to Binance co-chief executive Richard Teng.

“According to documents obtained by the Times and the Journal, Binance was even warned that Hexa Whale was financing terrorist organizations such as the Yemeni Houthis, and internal investigators found cryptocurrency transfers to wallets associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and payments to crew members of Russia’s sanctions-evading shadow fleet of oil tankers,” he wrote.

“Instead of actually preventing illicit use, Binance has sought to evade accountability and influence the White House through lobbying and a financial partnership with World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the cryptocurrency firm owned by the sons of President Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff… This influence campaign has worked: In May 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was dismissing a lawsuit against Binance for lying to regulators and mishandling funds, followed in October by the stunning Presidential pardon of founder Changpeng Zhao.”

“The scale of the newly revealed illicit transfers – uncaught until nearly $2 billion flowed to sanctioned entities – and the unexplained firing of internal investigators call into question Binance’s compliance with American sanctions and banking laws, and its 2023 agreement to resolve the previous federal investigation,” Blumenthal wrote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending