Connect with us

Crypto

FIT21 Act Aims to Streamline Cryptocurrency Regulations in the U.S.

Published

on

FIT21 Act Aims to Streamline Cryptocurrency Regulations in the U.S.

This month marks a potential turning point for the cryptocurrency industry as the House of Representatives gears up to vote on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21).

The FIT21 bill, formally designated as HR 4763, seeks to streamline cryptocurrency regulation across the United States. It aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for digital assets, addressing their unique characteristics and ensuring consumer protections.

Regulatory Roles and Classifications

A primary objective of the bill is to delineate the regulatory roles of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This distinction is critical because it determines whether digital assets are classified as securities or commodities, thereby affecting their regulation.

Under the proposed legislation, the CFTC would regulate digital assets if the associated blockchain or digital ledger is both functional and decentralized. Conversely, the SEC would oversee assets as securities if the blockchain is functional but not decentralized. Decentralization, as defined by the bill, means that no single entity controls more than 20% of the digital asset or its voting power. 

Support and Criticism Over The FIT21 

The bill has garnered bipartisan support but also faced criticism, particularly from the crypto community. Some stakeholders are concerned about the bill’s strict decentralization requirements, fearing it grants the SEC excessive power to withdraw support from tokens or projects that shift towards centralization. Additionally, there are worries that the bill does not clearly delineate the boundaries between the SEC and the CFTC’s authorities, potentially leading to regulatory confusion.

Advertisement

Despite these concerns, proponents of FIT21 argue that the bill will provide the regulatory clarity the crypto industry needs to thrive in the U.S. They believe that clear rules will help crypto businesses gain public trust, innovate with confidence, and ensure accountability for bad actors. As the House of Representatives prepares to vote, the entire crypto industry is watching closely, hopeful that FIT21 will usher in a new era of clear and effective regulation.

Comparison with the EU’s Approach 

This development is particularly significant considering that the European Union (EU) has made substantial strides in creating a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, leaving the United States trailing with a fragmented and uncertain regulatory landscape.

The EU has taken a proactive approach to cryptocurrency regulation with the introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. MiCA aims to establish a clear and harmonized set of rules across all EU member states, providing legal certainty for both cryptocurrency businesses and investors. 

This regulation covers a wide range of crypto assets, including utility tokens, stablecoins, and other digital assets, ensuring they are subject to robust consumer protection, transparency, and anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. MiCA’s comprehensive nature and its focus on consumer protection and market integrity make it a pioneering piece of legislation in the crypto space.

In contrast, the regulatory approach in the United States has been piecemeal and inconsistent. Multiple regulatory bodies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have jurisdiction over different aspects of the cryptocurrency market.

Advertisement

This fragmented regulatory environment has created uncertainty for crypto businesses and investors, as they must navigate a complex web of regulations that can vary significantly from one state to another. Additionally, the lack of clear guidance on the classification of certain crypto assets has led to legal disputes and enforcement actions that further complicate the regulatory landscape.

The U.S. Regulatory Landscape

One of the key areas where the EU has outpaced the U.S. is in the regulation of stablecoins. MiCA includes specific provisions for stablecoins, recognizing their potential to facilitate payments and enhance financial inclusion while also addressing the risks they pose to financial stability and monetary policy. In the U.S., however, stablecoin regulation remains largely undeveloped, with various proposals and reports yet to culminate in a cohesive regulatory framework.

Moreover, the EU’s regulatory approach reflects a more collaborative and forward-looking stance. European regulators have engaged with industry stakeholders to develop regulations that foster innovation while ensuring robust oversight. This approach contrasts with the U.S., where regulatory actions have often been reactive and enforcement-focused, potentially stifling innovation and driving crypto businesses to more favorable jurisdictions. 

As the House of Representatives prepares to vote on FIT21, the outcome could significantly influence the future trajectory of the cryptocurrency industry in the United States, potentially aligning it more closely with the comprehensive and proactive regulatory framework established by the EU. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Robert Kiyosaki Says Spiritual Mission Led Him to Financial Education

Published

on

Robert Kiyosaki Says Spiritual Mission Led Him to Financial Education

Key Takeaways

The Question That Changed Robert Kiyosaki’s Path

Robert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling personal finance book Rich Dad Poor Dad, said the turning point began years ago while listening to an Indian guru. The guru told him, “Your body’s mission is to fulfill your spirit’s mission,” Kiyosaki wrote on X on July 1. He added that the sentence forced him to examine whether his work matched a deeper purpose.

“His words shook me. At the time my body was busy making money,” Kiyosaki said. That conflict became the central issue in his reflection: whether financial success alone could define a life’s work.

Why Teaching Became the Mission

Kiyosaki said the answer took years to understand. “It finally came to me that my spirit’s mission was to teach what my body was to do was to be a teacher… which was the last thing I thought I would ever become… just because I failed in school and hated school.”

He said the realization prompted him to leave manufacturing more than 50 years ago and begin teaching lessons he learned from his “rich dad,” shifting his career from manufacturing to financial education. Instead of focusing on producing goods, he redirected his energy toward sharing financial principles he believed were missing from traditional education.

The acclaimed author said he was ridiculed for years for teaching ideas such as “Savers are losers” and “Debt can make you rich.” Despite the criticism, he said he continued teaching because he believed traditional schools failed to educate people about money.

“My life changed.”

What Question Does Kiyosaki Leave Open

Kiyosaki said one way to find purpose is to ask, “What does my heart want to do to serve humanity?” He said he began teaching for free before the work became commercial.

Advertisement

“That free education turned into a multimillion-dollar business and expanded throughout the world,” he wrote. He closes by encouraging readers to reflect on their own purpose, asking:

“What is your spirit’s mission?”

Beyond discussing purpose, Kiyosaki’s recent posts have continued to focus on economic risks. He has warned of a possible market downturn, advocated owning assets such as gold, silver, bitcoin, and ethereum, and said he is waiting for lower prices before making additional purchases.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Webinar: Crypto and public pensions—risks, rewards, and fiduciary duties

Published

on

Webinar: Crypto and public pensions—risks, rewards, and fiduciary duties

As digital assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies become increasingly integrated into financial markets, public pension systems face important questions about whether and how to incorporate them into investment portfolios.

On June 23, a Reason Foundation webinar with leading experts explored how public pension systems should evaluate cryptocurrency investments; how to assess and manage the risk and volatility for public workers, retirees, and taxpayers; and how to provide the public with transparency into these investments.

You can watch the webinar here:

The panelists and moderator of this webinar:

Brad Briner

Advertisement

Brad Briner is the treasurer of North Carolina. Before taking office, he served as co-chief investment officer for Willett Advisors, which manages the philanthropic and personal investment assets of Mike Bloomberg. His prior experience includes roles at Morgan Creek Capital, UNC Management Company, ArcLight Capital, and Goldman Sachs. Briner graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as a Morehead Scholar with a degree in economics with distinction and earned an MBA with distinction from Harvard Business School.

Todd D. Kanaster

Todd D. Kanaster is a director at S&P Global Ratings specializing in municipal pensions and retiree medical benefits. His work includes analyzing issuers, training analysts, and serving as a nationwide specialist on public pension and retiree health care issues within S&P’s local government credit analysis. He is an Associate of the Society of Actuaries, a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries, and a Fellow of the Conference of Consulting Actuaries.

Mariana Trujillo

Mariana Trujillo is managing director of government finance at Reason Foundation. Her research focuses on the fiscal health of federal, state, and local governments, with particular attention to the impact of pension liabilities on government finances and the effect of retirement benefits on public-employee recruitment and retention.

Advertisement

Leonard Gilroy (moderator)

Leonard Gilroy is vice president of government reform at Reason Foundation and senior managing director of Reason’s Pension Integrity Project. Under his leadership, the Pension Integrity Project assists policymakers and other stakeholders in designing, analyzing and implementing public sector pension reforms.

Related policy study:
U.S. public pension and trust fund investment in digital assets
Frequently asked questions about public pensions investing in Bitcoin and other digital assets





Advertisement

Continue Reading

Crypto

Bank of Thailand Backs 1:1 Baht Stablecoin While Tightening Cross-Border Payment Rules

Published

on

Bank of Thailand Backs 1:1 Baht Stablecoin While Tightening Cross-Border Payment Rules

Key Takeaways

Baht-Pegged Stablecoin Framework

The Bank of Thailand plans to introduce a stablecoin pegged to the national currency as part of an initiative to support financial innovation, central bank Governor Vitai Ratanakorn announced June 30. Speaking at a financial conference hosted by efinanceThai, Ratanakorn said the central bank will hold a public hearing on the proposal by the end of the year.

Under the initial framework, any operating stablecoin must be fully backed on a 1-to-1 basis by Thai baht reserves. The central bank will limit the first phase of the rollout to financial institutions for settlement purposes only, with broader use cases to be evaluated later.

According to a local report, the central bank is also tightening enforcement on cross-border mobile payment platforms. Ratanakorn reiterated that all personal QR code payments in Thailand must be conducted exclusively in baht.

Regulators have suspended approximately 5,000 accounts used for peer-to-peer yuan transfers via Alipay and Wechat Pay between February 2025 and May 2026. The central bank is currently coordinating with those platforms to review transactions and identify regulatory violations.

Payment service providers that process transactions in unauthorized currencies face corrective measures, fines, suspensions, or the revocation of their licenses, Ratanakorn warned. Additionally, the governor clarified that the central bank will not grant licenses for retail foreign-exchange operations intended for speculative trading.

Facilitating transfers to settle speculative forex transactions may violate the Exchange Control Act of 1942, which carries penalties of up to 3 years’ imprisonment and a $6,012 (200,000 baht) fine. Furthermore, individuals who advertise or promote speculative currency trading could face fraud charges under a 1984 emergency decree, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and significant daily fines.

Advertisement

Ratanakorn said the central bank’s dual objective is to foster financial technology while maintaining strict control over consumer protection and domestic currency flows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending