Connect with us

Crypto

A compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency

Published

on

A compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency is accessible anywhere. It feels smart and sophisticated. It is built to be technologically secure. It can be an asset as well as, in some parts of the world, a means of payment. It can be converted into fiat (cash) at a moment’s notice. And, unlike conventional financial instruments, it offers no barriers to adoption. With as little as a hundred rupees, an aspiring youngster in the hinterlands of India can buy a fraction of cryptocurrency and feel like a grand investor.

Mitali Mukherjee’s book Crypto Crimes deals with this alluring asset class that has the potential to exist beyond the reaches of governments and conventional financial institutions or at least dodge easy scrutiny by governments. This is why crypto is so popular among scamsters, kidnappers, extortionists, drug peddlers, hawala operators, terrorism financiers, and ransomware invaders. Mukherjee successfully depicts this web of nefarious activities. She describes the world of crypto as one without guardrails, lethal to many, and potentially dangerous to all. Like a good journalist, she does this by expertly piling fact-filled passages upon each other.

Crypto Crimes: Inside India’s Best-Kept Secret 

By Mitali Mukherjee

HarperCollins India
Pages: ‎336
Price: Rs.499

Two chapters dedicated to the threat posed by ransomware attacks offer us details about how a cross section of Indian organisations—both public and private—were affected. The list includes JNPT, SpiceJet, Oil India Limited, Dr Reddy’s, BSNL, Mobikwik, Paytm Mall, BigBasket, and AIIMS. In this model, the invaders have the option to not only extract ransom but also earn through the sale of sensitive personal information of the customers of these companies. The author highlights the inadequacies of security frameworks in many Indian corporates and also how some companies under attack resort to denials or react irrationally against whistle-blowers or those offering a helping hand. 

Even more revealing is the existence of “Ransomware-as-a-Service” groups that lease technologies to other groups that actually carry out the attack. But what is crypto’s role in ransomware? Well, it brings scalability to this grimly innovative industry by offering convenience and anonymity and, therefore, the promise of an untraceable escape.

Advertisement

Need for regulations

The book helps one understand the dire need for standardised regulations, protocols, and practices for this porous currency, which has as much disregard for national borders as greenhouse gases. However, with world leaders unable to build a consensus to combat greater existential threats such as climate change and AI, the only hope is that the global crypto market offers sufficient financial incentive for such a consensus to be reached.

As things stand, three different entities of the Indian government itself—the RBI, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, and the Ministry of Finance—are unable to agree upon the approach to cryptocurrency. Whereas the RBI has been sounding the warning bugle since 2013, the ministry has been inconsistent in its response. It has pondered over banning cryptocurrency altogether, created committees at various points that made different recommendations, and mulled over the introduction of its own virtual currency (Central Bank Digital Currency) and, after all these years, still has not formulated regulations for the domain. However, in 2022, it did announce heavy taxation of gains made in cryptocurrency, which affected the industry. Without a trace of irony, the Finance Minister denied that this move offered legitimacy to crypto and instead claimed “a sovereign right to tax”.

The book captures a sole, sane voice from within the corridors of power: former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg, who recommends that policy-making precede legislation, which can then lead to well-framed and implementable regulations.

Highlights
  • Eshwar Sundaresan reviews Crypto Crimes: Inside India’s Best-Kept Secret by Mitali Mukherjee.
  • The book makes a compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency that may be longer-lasting than its detractors believe
  • Two chapters on ransomware attacks offer us details about how a cross section of Indian organisations were affected by these.
  • However the book suffers from poor storytelling and repetitiveness.

Tedious and repetitive

Now for the flaws of the book. The author often overloads the reader with information while resorting to poor storytelling, except in the last few chapters, which are more free-flowing. In some chapters, the same point is repeated in a loop, with a new source offering a similar or slightly differing perspective of the same point. In the process, the drama, emotions, and imagery surrounding poignant human moments are left untapped. Can a serious book not also be evocative?

Had the organisation of information been better, this would have been a much smaller book. It does not help that key points are repeated ad nauseum. These include the specific vulnerabilities of India to crypto crimes, the speed with which the technology penetrated rural and semi-rural landscapes in the country, market fluctuations vis-a-vis the pandemic, and the involvement of Russian and Chinese entities in ransomware attacks and extortions respectively. Sometimes, the same study is cited twice in a span of a few pages, such as the mention of Maharashtra being the target of 42 per cent of ransomware attacks in India. One wonders whether each chapter was written like an isolated article and, therefore, the author felt compelled to set contexts and data points all over again.

For a book that relies extensively on surveys and statistics, it seems astonishing that the author has made no attempt to leverage infographics. These could have made the points more memorable, while offering the beginnings of analysis. Forget a grand diorama of stakeholders, issues, and interactions, the book does not include even a timeline of events or a simple table or graph that would help one absorb comparative data.

Advertisement

Also Read | ‘Only the tip of the iceberg’: Dr Jayant Mahadevan on online gambling in India

Although the book has the viscous storytelling of a scholarly study, it lacks the rigour to make it one. A great deal of the book relies on secondary research; while citing these external sources of information, the author hardly ever offers more than rudimentary analysis of her own. And the primary research itself is unsatisfactory. The author has interviewed technocrats, the odd retail investor, some insiders, and a few crypto entrepreneurs. She walks on eggshells with the latter category, making no attempt to provoke or even challenge their self-serving opinions. For instance, when BuyUCoin co-founder Shivam Thakral laments the lack of financial literacy among Indians, the author does not ask whether this puts a greater onus on the government to protect such a target audience from harm. Perhaps just making an observation in this regard would have sufficed. Similarly, while interviewing Nischal Shetty, the co-founder of WazirX—a company that was slapped with a show-cause notice for allegedly contravening regulations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act to the tune of Rs.2,790.74 crore—who refuses to look within and states that people will always choose freedom (as opposed to regulations), she does not ask if all people, including the honest retail investor, would object to regulations that protect them. Finally, in a book based on hard research, the citations provided are not substantiated either in the back pages of the book or in the publisher’s website URL linked to a QR code that promises “Detailed Notes” on both the front and back sides of the book.

Overall, Mukherjee makes a compelling case for regulating this new asset class that may be longer-lasting than its detractors believe while also highlighting its potential for positive transformation. This makes the book a ready reckoner for those who want to delve into and dwell on the world of crypto. Others are likely to find it tedious and mediocre.

Eshwar Sundaresan is an author, freelance journalist, counsellor, life skills trainer, and bestselling ghostwriter.

More stories from this issue

Advertisement

Crypto

Steak ’n Shake Says Bitcoin Helps Beef Up Sales | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Steak ’n Shake Says Bitcoin Helps Beef Up Sales | PYMNTS.com

Fast food chain Steak ’n Shake is crediting cryptocurrency for a boost in sales.

“Nine months ago today, Steak n Shake launched its burger-to-Bitcoin transformation when we started accepting bitcoin payments,” the company wrote in a post on X Monday (Feb. 17). “Our same-store sales have risen dramatically ever since.”

Under this system, the post added, bitcoin payments for Steak ’n Shake burgers are placed in a reserve fund used for “Bitcoin bonus pay” for its workers.

The news was flagged in a report by Coindesk, which noted that Steak ’n Shake had earlier this year announced it had added $10 million worth of bitcoin to its corporate treasury, as part of a “self-reinforcing” cycle in which diners pay in bitcoin, sales increase, and crypto revenue is added to the reserve.

The company began accepting bitcoin payments in May of 2025 and initially enjoyed a 10% increase in sales, the report added. Dan Edwards, the company’s chief operating officer, has said the chain saves around 50% when customers pay with crypto.

Advertisement

Coindesk said that the chain in October introduced a bitcoin-themed burger to its menu, donating part of each Bitcoin Meal to open-source bitcoin development.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

Advertisement

The program is an example of the growing use of cryptocurrency as a payment method for everyday purchases.

“The range of goods and services purchasable with cryptocurrency has expanded far beyond the early days of novelty transactions,” PYMNTS wrote last week.

“Today, consumers can use digital assets to book travel, purchase consumer electronics, pay for cloud services, acquire luxury goods, and even settle recurring bills through intermediaries that convert crypto into local currency at the point of sale.”

However, the most important shift might not involve consumers making the decision to pay with crypto, but might come from stablecoin cards that let users hold value outside banks while spending within the card ecosystem.

Advertisement

“The competition around these products is less about retail payments themselves and more about which institutions will control the monetary layer beneath them, as they, in effect, represent a structural decoupling of deposit capture from payment activity,” PYMNTS added.

This situation has placed card networks like Visa and Mastercard, stablecoin issuers such as Circle and Paxos, and FinTechs, exchanges and wallets in a “three-sided race.”

Card companies are scrambling to weave stablecoins into their rails “before disintermediation risk materializes,” the report said, while the stablecoin issuers are seeking “to become the monetary layer those networks must carry.”

FinTechs, exchanges and wallets, meanwhile, are battling for customer ownership and program issuance.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Three people arrested for siphoning cryptocurrency worth Rs 19 crore from Hyderabad trader | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Published

on

Three people arrested for siphoning cryptocurrency worth Rs 19 crore from Hyderabad trader | Hyderabad News – The Times of India
Hyderabad: Cybercrime police arrested three people for allegedly siphoning off cryptocurrency worth over Rs 19 crore from a city-based crypto trader, through a phishing website.Police said that two of the accused — Srikanth Bairoju from Shamshabad and Sushim Sripati Gaikwad from Pune — posed as crypto buyers and approached the victim, a 44-year-old from Kalyan Nagar in Madhura Nagar, in the last week of Jan. They convinced him to log on to a website, Trontag.org, under the pretext of completing KYC verification for his crypto wallet.“Once the victim complied with the process, a malicious smart contract got triggered allowing cryptocurrency transfer from his wallet to that of the fraudsters. Subsequently, the victim transferred 2,104,089 USDT (worth over Rs 19 crore approx.) from his wallet to that of the accused,” said S Naresh, cybercrime inspector.The victim realised that he was cheated when the fraudsters went incommunicado after the transfer was complete. Following a complaint, police registered a case on Feb 3 under relevant sections of the BNS and the IT Act, and launched a probe.They traced the digital footprints of the gang that led them to the main accused. Police arrested Bairoju and Gaikwad from Hyderabad and Pune respectively, on Feb 15. A third accused, Lucky Choudhary, who was the duo’s associate and allegedly created the fraudulent website, was arrested from Jaipur. Police seized four mobile phones and two laptops, used in the fraud, from the accused.“A few more accused involved in the crime are on the run. Our team has launched a manhunt to nab them. We are also contacting the cryptocurrency companies linked to the fraud to try and recover the defrauded amount,” said V Aravind Babu, DCP, cybercrime. Police, meanwhile, advised crypto traders to avoid unverified links, enable two-factor authentication and independently confirm KYC requirements with official platforms.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Where Will the Cryptocurrency XRP Be in 5 Years? | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Where Will the Cryptocurrency XRP Be in 5 Years? | The Motley Fool

Here’s why Ripple’s success might not translate to XRP gains over the next five years.

XRP (XRP 1.55%), now hovering just below $1.50, deserves credit for having genuine utility in a market filled with meme coins and outright frauds. Created by Ripple, the token was designed to enable faster, cheaper transactions between financial institutions, especially across borders.

Partnerships with major banks, like Bank of America and Santander, show Ripple is doing something right.

So, where will XRP be in five years?

Image source: Getty Images.

Advertisement

There’s a key difference in Ripple’s products

The bull case has always been simple: The banking system’s adoption of Ripple’s technology will drive XRP demand. But in my view, this misunderstands how banks actually use — or don’t use — Ripple’s products.

Ripple offers two core products. Though they’ve been recently unified as features under the umbrella of “Ripple Payments,” I’ll use their former names for clarity.

RippleNet is a settlement system that allows for faster and cheaper transactions, improving on legacy systems. But it is essentially a messaging service, and banks typically use it without ever touching XRP. This is the service the big-name banks like Bank of America have experimented with or adopted.

On-Demand Liquidity (ODL), on the other hand, actually uses XRP as a “bridge asset” for cross-border transactions. When, say, sending funds from a bank in the U.S. to a bank in France, ODL converts the dollars to XRP and then into euros.

Bulls argue that growing ODL adoption will drive demand for XRP, but this doesn’t hold up — at least enough to move the needle — for two reasons:

Advertisement
  1. ODL serves smaller institutions facing liquidity constraints like fintechs and remittance providers, not major banks. It’s a relatively niche product that caps transaction volume growth.
  2. Institutions immediately convert in and out of XRP. Each buy order is instantly matched with a sell order, meaning the bulk of global volume doesn’t create any sustained demand.

Stablecoins could pose a threat

And there’s another wrinkle: Stablecoins have quickly found a footing within traditional finance and banking systems, making them more efficient while providing more stability than XRP. And with recent legislation, their role within the system is only likely to grow.

Ripple recognizes this. That’s why Ripple has undergone a rebranding and made several key acquisitions, including the $200 purchase of RAIL. It’s clear Ripple wants its own stablecoin, RLUSD, to be a major player in the industry. Ripple’s own website now prominently features “integrate stablecoin payments into your business.”

That’s a problem for XRP’s value. RLUSD can function as an alternative bridge asset in ODL transactions and erode its already limited demand pressure.

Is XRP a buy going forward?

In five years, Ripple will likely be a thriving payments infrastructure company, even more so than today. RLUSD will probably have gained meaningful traction as a bridge asset for cross-border transfers.

But even if Ripple’s products genuinely transform cross-border banking, I don’t think XRP holders will benefit from it. In five years, I see it having struggled to keep up with the rest of the market — or worse.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending