Connect with us

Business

Stephen King testified against publishing’s biggest merger. What you need to know about the antitrust trial

Published

on

Stephen King testified against publishing’s biggest merger. What you need to know about the antitrust trial

The largest antitrust trial to hit the publishing business in current reminiscence kicked off this week, and right this moment the King of horror had his day in court docket.

On Monday, Penguin Random Home, the biggest writer within the nation, entered a federal courthouse in Washington to defend its deal to amass Simon & Schuster, the fourth largest, in opposition to a Division of Justice emboldened beneath President Biden to implement antitrust legal guidelines aggressively.

If Decide Florence Y. Pan guidelines within the writer’s favor, the merger would drastically change the publishing world, whittling down the variety of main publishing homes, often called the Huge 5, to 4. The query Pan is deciding is whether or not, because the DOJ argues, this may curtail competitors and suppress e book advances for high-earning authors.

Testifying for the federal government on Tuesday was Stephen King, some of the profitable and outstanding novelists on the planet. Creator of bestsellers together with “The Shining’’ and “The Stand,” King has been publicly important of the deal and overtly objected to the involvement of his longtime writer, Simon & Schuster.

How did it come to this move? All of it started in November 2020, when Paramount World (previously often called ViacomCBS) introduced it had agreed to promote Simon & Schuster to Bertelsmann’s Penguin Random Home for $2.18 billion. Final fall, the Division of Justice sued to dam the deal on the grounds that an excessive amount of consolidation was unhealthy for authors and, in the end, for readers.

Advertisement

Different witnesses within the trial, anticipated to final roughly three weeks and be determined in November, embody Simon & Schuster’s Chief Govt Jonathan Karp, Penguin Random Home Chief Govt Markus Dohle and different authors, brokers and executives from different publishing homes.

Right here’s what King stated right this moment and what it’s essential to learn about publishing’s unprecedented antitrust lawsuit.

What did Stephen King need to say?

“I got here as a result of I believe that consolidation is unhealthy for competitors,” King stated Tuesday in entrance of a full courtroom (and an overflow room close by). “That’s my understanding of the e book enterprise. The extra corporations there are, the higher it’s.”

Throughout 45 minutes of testimony, King laid out the modifications he’s witnessed over a half-century profession in collaboration with quite a lot of completely different publishers. He described impartial publishers changing into more and more “squeezed” by conglomerates. “The explanation they’re being squeezed is as a result of they don’t get the shelf house that they used to as a result of the majors take a number of that shelf house.”

Advertisement

He described his early years with indie publishers because the glory days, recalling his telephone ringing nonstop throughout auctions as his agent fielded provides from smaller publishers. However he finally migrated to what’s now turn into the Huge 5 due to their wider distribution networks and deeper pockets.

Bertelsmann’s Penguin Random Home desires to purchase Simon & Schuster, however the Division of Justice is attempting to dam the deal.

(Michael Sohn/ Related Press)

“I used to be in a position to pay the mortgage and I used to be in a position to put cash away for the children’ schooling,” stated King. “I didn’t need to finance the automotive. So far as I used to be involved, I used to be dwelling the dream: I used to be writing full time. I loved what I used to be doing. That was an enormous deal…. There comes some extent the place when you’re very, very lucky, you’re in a position to cease following your checking account and begin following your coronary heart. And that’s what I did. It was fantastic and it was nice.”

Advertisement

However most writers right this moment aren’t so lucky. The typical writer solely makes round $20,300, which is under the poverty line, stated King, citing a 2018 Authors Guild survey. He put the blame for shrinking advances squarely on business consolidation.

“There have been actually a whole lot of imprints and a few of them had been run by individuals who had extraordinarily idiosyncratic tastes,” he added. “These companies, one after the other, had been both subsumed by different publishers or they went out of enterprise.”

The dynamics, he argued, have reversed; massive enterprise isn’t serving to the subsequent era of Stephen Kings. “I believe that it turns into more durable and more durable for writers to seek out sufficient cash to stay on.”

Why is the merger such an enormous deal?

The New York-based Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random Home are among the many largest publishing homes within the nation, recognized within the publishing world because the Huge 5. (The opposite three are Hachette, HarperCollins and Macmillan).

Advertisement

Penguin Random Home is the results of one other megamerger, between Random Home and Penguin, in 2013 (at which level the Huge Six grew to become the Huge 5). Penguin’s roster of blockbuster authors, who generate monumental gross sales of “backlist” titles, consists of John Grisham, Toni Morrison, Dan Brown and former White Home occupants Invoice Clinton and Barack and Michelle Obama — all of whom have offered hundreds of thousands of copies worldwide.

Simon & Schuster has leaned in recent times towards massive nonfiction, publishing heavyweight writers akin to Bob Woodward and Hillary Clinton. If the merger goes by, the Huge 5 would shrink to the Huge 4 — one in every of them considerably bigger than the remaining.

Why is the Biden administration combating it?

The federal government argues that the merger would cut back market competitors and in the end hurt writers. If the deal goes by, the merged firm would management practically 50% of the bestseller market, which might in the end consequence, the DOJ contends, in authors receiving smaller advances and worse contract offers. “[F]ewer authors will have the ability to earn a dwelling from writing,” the DOJ argued in a pretrial temporary.

Collectively, the Huge 5 make up 90% of the marketplace for bestselling books within the U.S., in accordance with the federal government’s court docket submitting.

Advertisement

“The proposed merger would additional improve consolidation on this concentrated business, make the most important participant even larger, and certain improve coordination in an business with a historical past of coordination among the many main publishers,” the submitting stated.

The DOJ additionally argues that readers will inevitably be harmed. “[B]y lowering writer compensation, the amount and number of books revealed will fall as effectively… lowering writer compensation will doubtless cut back the output of books revealed and restrict shopper selection by limiting what tales readers hear.”

How are the publishers defending the deal?

Penguin and Simon & Schuster say, on the contrary, that the merger would bolster competitors within the publishing business and permit them to pay authors extra. “[B]y making the mixed entity a stronger bookselling competitor, the merger will incentivize different publishers to compete even tougher for shopper consideration,” the publishers stated of their pretrial briefing.

This argument depends on a typical piece of logic in publishing — that the rising dominance of Amazon in bookselling makes it much more crucial for publishers to consolidate, the higher to set phrases with the web retail behemoth from a place of power.

Advertisement

In addition they contend {that a} bigger, extra environment friendly firm would cut back e book costs, in the end benefiting readers, booksellers and authors.

The publishers criticized the federal government’s deal with anticipated bestselling books — the 1,200 or so books bought yearly for writer advances of a minimum of $250,000. At 2%, they make up a tiny piece of all of the books revealed by industrial corporations.

Furthermore, the publishers say they may proceed to function independently and be allowed to bid in opposition to one another for books, sustaining competitors among the many imprints throughout the conglomerate.

On Tuesday, Karp, Simon & Schuster’s CEO, pushed again in opposition to the federal government’s emphasis on auctions between his firm and Penguin Random Home that had raised advances, noting the various auctions he’d misplaced to different publishers as effectively.

Requested whether or not the Huge 5 had an insurmountable advertising and marketing benefit, Karp stated, “I believe that that could be a prevailing piece of typical knowledge and I’m not going to disagree,” earlier than including, “I do assume that a number of us consider {that a} good editor, a great publicist, and a gross sales rep is sufficient.”

Advertisement
Jonathan Karp, President and CEO of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Jonathan Karp, President and CEO of Simon & Schuster, Inc., testified Tuesday in protection of the merger between his firm and Penguin Random Home.

(Michael Benabib / Simon & Schuster / AP)

What’s at stake, in accordance with a lawyer

Many market-watchers are taking a look at this trial as a take a look at of the Biden administration’s resolve in opposition to company consolidation.

“There was a number of criticism through the years concerning the authorities being too prepared to take settlements in merger instances and never stopping mergers absolutely,” stated Harry First, a legislation professor at New York College.

Advertisement

“It’s one factor to provide speeches about insurance policies, it’s one other factor to enter court docket and really litigate and win instances,” he added.

The federal government’s focus right here on the labor market slightly than customers can be an fascinating one, he stated — one which’s in step with the Biden administration’s emphasis on enhancing situations for staff.

“[A]ntitrust enforcement is one facet of that,” stated First. “This isn’t fairly the primary take a look at of this, nevertheless it’s the primary take a look at of this in a merger setting for this administration, in order that additionally makes this an essential case to look at.”

So what’s at stake for the publishers? Some huge cash. When the deal was introduced in 2020, Simon & Schuster proprietor ViacomCBS advised The Occasions that German conglomerate Bertelsmann, which owns Penguin, agreed to pay a termination price if the deal was blocked, however wouldn’t disclose its measurement. If the merger doesn’t undergo, Simon & Schuster should discover an alternate purchaser.

How uncommon is the lawsuit?

Advertisement

Though the publishing business has steadily consolidated through the years, the pattern has accelerated in recent times. There was the Penguin-Random Home merger in 2013, and simply final 12 months, two publishing homes made main acquisitions: HarperCollins bought Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s commerce e book department for $349 million, and Hachette Ebook Group purchased Workman Publishing for $240 million, in accordance with a court docket submitting.

Earlier main mergers have sailed previous regulators with comparatively little resistance. A change within the climate on the DOJ portends a panorama during which consolidation could not all the time be a given.

Dorany Pineda reported from Los Angeles. Freddy Brewster from Washington D.C.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Albania Gives Jared Kushner Hotel Project a Nod as Trump Returns

Published

on

Albania Gives Jared Kushner Hotel Project a Nod as Trump Returns

The government of Albania has given preliminary approval to a plan proposed by Jared Kushner, Donald J. Trump’s son-in-law, to build a $1.4 billion luxury hotel complex on a small abandoned military base off the coast of Albania.

The project is one of several involving Mr. Trump and his extended family that directly involve foreign government entities that will be moving ahead even while Mr. Trump will be in charge of foreign policy related to these same nations.

The approval by Albania’s Strategic Investment Committee — which is led by Prime Minister Edi Rama — gives Mr. Kushner and his business partners the right to move ahead with accelerated negotiations to build the luxury resort on a 111-acre section of the 2.2-square-mile island of Sazan that will be connected by ferry to the mainland.

Mr. Kushner and the Albanian government did not respond Wednesday to requests for comment. But when previously asked about this project, both have said that the evaluation is not being influenced by Mr. Kushner’s ties to Mr. Trump or any effort to try to seek favors from the U.S. government.

“The fact that such a renowned American entrepreneur shows his interest on investing in Albania makes us very proud and happy,” a spokesman for Mr. Rama said last year in a statement to The New York Times when asked about the projects.

Advertisement

Mr. Kushner’s Affinity Partners, a private equity company backed with about $4.6 billion in money mostly from Saudi Arabia and other Middle East sovereign wealth funds, is pursuing the Albania project along with Asher Abehsera, a real-estate executive that Mr. Kushner has previously teamed up with to build projects in Brooklyn, N.Y.

The Albanian government, according to an official document recently posted online, will now work with their American partners to clear the proposed hotel site of any potential buried munitions and to examine any other environmental or legal concerns that need to be resolved before the project can move ahead.

The document, dated Dec. 30, notes that the government “has the right to revoke the decision,” depending on the final project negotiations.

Mr. Kushner’s firm has said the plan is to build a five-star “eco-resort community” on the island by turning a “former military base into a vibrant international destination for hospitality and wellness.”

Ivanka Trump, Mr. Trump’s daughter, has said she is helping with the project as well. “We will execute on it,” she said about the project, during a podcast last year.

Advertisement

This project is just one of two major real-estate deals that Mr. Kushner is pursuing along with Mr. Abehsera that involve foreign governments.

Separately, the partnership received preliminary approval last year to build a luxury hotel complex in Belgrade, Serbia, in the former ministry of defense building, which has sat empty for decades after it was bombed by NATO in 1999 during a war there.

Serbia and Albania have foreign policy matters pending with the United States, as both countries seek continued U.S. support for their long-stalled efforts to join the European Union, and officials in Washington are trying to convince Serbia to tighten ties with the United States, instead of Russia.

Virginia Canter, who served as White House ethics lawyer during the Obama and Clinton administrations and also an ethics adviser to the International Monetary Fund, said even if there was no attempt to gain influence with Mr. Trump, any government deal involving his family creates that impression.

“It all looks like favoritism, like they are providing access to Kushner because they want to be on the good side of Trump,” Ms. Canter said, now with State Democracy Defenders Fund, a group that tracks federal government corruption and ethics issues.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Craft supplies retailer Joann declares bankruptcy for the second time in a year

Published

on

Craft supplies retailer Joann declares bankruptcy for the second time in a year

The craft supplies and fabric retailer Joann filed for bankruptcy for the second time in less than a year, as the chain wrestles with declining sales and inventory shortages, the company said Wednesday.

The retailer emerged from a previous Chapter 11 bankruptcy process last April after eliminating $505 million in debt. Now, with $615 million in liabilities, the company will begin a court-supervised sale of its assets to repay creditors. The company owes an additional $133 million to its suppliers.

“We hope that this process enables us to find a path that would allow Joann to continue operating,” said interim Chief Executive Michael Prendergast in a statement. “The last several years have presented significant and lasting challenges in the retail environment, which, coupled with our current financial position and constrained inventory levels, forced us to take this step.”

Joann’s more than 800 stores and websites will remain open throughout the bankruptcy process, the company said, and employees will continue to receive pay and benefits. The Hudson, Ohio-based company was founded in 1943 and has stores in 49 states, including several in Southern California.

Advertisement

According to court documents, Joann began receiving unpredictable and inconsistent deliveries of yarn and sewing items from its suppliers, making it difficult to keep its shelves stocked. Joann’s suppliers also discontinued certain items the retailer relied on.

Along with the “unanticipated inventory challenges,” Joann and other retailers face pressure from inflation-wary consumers and interest rates that were for a time the highest in decades. The crafts supplier has also been hindered by competition from others in the space, including Michael’s, Etsy and Hobby Lobby, said Retail Wire Chief Executive Dominick Miserandino.

“It did not necessarily learn to evolve like its nearby competitors,” Miserandino said of Joann. “Not many people have heard of Joann in the way they’ve heard of Michael’s.”

Joann is not the first retailer to continue to struggle after going through bankruptcy. The party supply chain Party City announced last month it would be shutting down operations, after filing for and emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2023.

Over the last two years, more than 60 companies have filed for bankruptcy for a second or third time, Bloomberg reported, based on information from BankruptcyData. That’s the most over a comparable period since 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic kept shoppers home.

Advertisement

Discount chain Big Lots filed for bankruptcy last September, and the Container Store, a retailer offering storage and organization products, declared bankruptcy last month. Companies that rely heavily on brick-and-mortar locations are scrambling to keep up with online retailers and big-box chains. Fast-casual restaurants such as Red Lobster and Rubio’s Coastal Grill have also struggled.

High prices have prompted consumers to pull back on discretionary spending, while rising operating and labor costs put additional pressure on businesses, experts said. The U.S. annual inflation rate for 2024 was 2.9%, down from 3.4% in 2023. But inflation has been on the rise since September and remains above the Federal Reserve’s goal of 2%.

If a sale process for Joann is approved, Gordon Brothers Retail Partners would serve as the stalking-horse bidder and set the floor for the auction.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

U.S. Sues Southwest Airlines Over Chronic Delays

Published

on

U.S. Sues Southwest Airlines Over Chronic Delays

The federal government sued Southwest Airlines on Wednesday, accusing the airline of harming passengers who flew on two routes that were plagued by consistent delays in 2022.

In a lawsuit, the Transportation Department said it was seeking more than $2.1 million in civil penalties over the flights between airports in Chicago and Oakland, Calif., as well as Baltimore and Cleveland, that were chronically delayed over five months that year.

“Airlines have a legal obligation to ensure that their flight schedules provide travelers with realistic departure and arrival times,” the transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, said in a statement. “Today’s action sends a message to all airlines that the department is prepared to go to court in order to enforce passenger protections.”

Carriers are barred from operating unrealistic flight schedules, which the Transportation Department considers an unfair, deceptive and anticompetitive practice. A “chronically delayed” flight is defined as one that operates at least 10 times a month and is late by at least 30 minutes more than half the time.

In a statement, Southwest said it was “disappointed” that the department chose to sue over the flights that took place more than two years ago. The airline said it had operated 20 million flights since the Transportation Department enacted its policy against chronically delayed flights more than a decade ago, with no other violations.

Advertisement

“Any claim that these two flights represent an unrealistic schedule is simply not credible when compared with our performance over the past 15 years,” Southwest said.

Last year, Southwest canceled fewer than 1 percent of its flights, but more than 22 percent arrived at least 15 minutes later than scheduled, according to Cirium, an aviation data provider. Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, Alaska Airlines and American Airlines all had fewer such delays.

The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In it, the government said that a Southwest flight from Chicago to Oakland arrived late 19 out of 25 trips in April 2022, with delays averaging more than an hour. The consistent delays continued through August of that year, averaging an hour or more. On another flight, between Baltimore and Cleveland, average delay times reached as high as 96 minutes per month during the same period. In a statement, the department said that Southwest, rather than poor weather or air traffic control, was responsible for more than 90 percent of the delays.

“Holding out these chronically delayed flights disregarded consumers’ need to have reliable information about the real arrival time of a flight and harmed thousands of passengers traveling on these Southwest flights by causing disruptions to travel plans or other plans,” the department said in the lawsuit.

The government said Southwest had violated federal rules 58 times in August 2022 after four months of consistent delays. Each violation faces a civil penalty of up to $37,377, or more than $2.1 million in total, according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Transportation Department on Wednesday also said that it had penalized Frontier Airlines for chronically delayed flights, fining the airline $650,000. Half that amount was paid to the Treasury and the rest is slated to be forgiven if the airline has no more chronically delayed flights over the next three years.

This month, the department ordered JetBlue Airways to pay a $2 million fine for failing to address similarly delayed flights over a span of more than a year ending in November 2023, with half the money going to passengers affected by the delays.

Continue Reading

Trending