Connect with us

Business

How the California and U.S. economies may suffer from Russia’s attack on Ukraine

Published

on

Russia’s assault on Ukraine comes at a weak time for economies all over the world. Inflation is already at a worrisome degree, customers are paying extra for fundamental items throughout the board, and the worldwide provide chain continues to be recovering from pandemic disruptions.

The invasion, which has upended geopolitics and threatens a humanitarian disaster in Ukraine, put shares on a curler coaster and despatched the worth of wheat, oil and different commodities larger Thursday. Right here, we reply some questions on how this may proceed to play out for the economic system and what this implies for customers within the U.S. and California.

Will meals and gasoline costs within the U.S. rise?

Russia and Ukraine are main producers of a spread of commodities — oil, pure gasoline, grains, metals — whose costs rise throughout massive international occasions comparable to warfare. These larger costs ultimately ripple to grocery shops and the gasoline pump, and this battle isn’t any completely different.

“It’s the American center and dealing lessons that can bear the burden of adjustment attributable to one other European warfare,” mentioned Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist on the accounting agency RSM.

Advertisement

The U.S. imports comparatively little from Russia straight, however what occurs there and in Europe has large knock-on results.

Russia is the world’s second-biggest pure gasoline producer, behind the U.S., and it’s among the many high three in oil manufacturing, together with the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, supplying about 10% of what’s consumed worldwide. (Increased oil costs in international markets translate on to larger costs at your gasoline station — gasoline is one among many merchandise comprised of crude oil.)

Russia can be a serious producer of wheat, palladium — utilized in catalytic converters to wash automotive exhaust fumes — and nickel. Ukraine is a serious exporter of corn and wheat, and a key route for the circulate of Russian pure gasoline to Europe.

Broadly, two situations may contribute to sending costs on this vary of commodities even larger:

  1. Extra supply-chain disruptions, affecting the distribution of gasoline and wheat throughout Europe, for instance. Russian cyberattacks, which some consultants predict might now grow to be extra frequent, may additionally worsen issues with international provide chains. That may drive meals costs up.
  2. Sanctions on Russia by the U.S. and allies, primarily these on Russian oil exports, may squeeze markets much more and drive oil costs larger. The Biden administration has not moved to sanction Russian oil. President Biden on Thursday introduced new sanctions in opposition to Russian banks and mentioned the U.S. would block high-tech exports to Russia.

Europe is a a lot greater shopper of Russian oil than the U.S., however sanctions on Russia’s output would ripple by means of the worldwide market, mentioned Dean Foreman, chief economist on the American Petroleum Institute. Already, oil costs are excessive partly as a result of there may be not sufficient provide to satisfy international demand.
“Any vital disruption to that must be made up someplace else,” he mentioned, including that the tight market would have hassle discovering a substitute.

Oil costs on each side of the Atlantic jumped towards or above $100 a barrel — their highest ranges since 2014 — earlier Thursday. They then gave again a lot of the positive factors after Biden made clear sanctions have been designed to not disrupt power markets, and the steps he introduced have been much less sweeping than some anticipated.

Advertisement

The worth of U.S. oil settled at $92.81 on Thursday, up 71 cents for the day. The spot value for pure gasoline in Europe, which depends on Russia for the gasoline, jumped greater than 50%.

Wholesale costs shot up for heating oil, wheat, corn and different commodities.

What else may get dearer?

Your COVID-19 take a look at kits, your Amazon order, your lip balm — and extra.

Petrochemicals derived from crude oil and pure gasoline are used to make a spread of medical and private care merchandise in addition to packaging supplies. Enormous demand for these merchandise is among the elements that drove oil costs larger within the pandemic to begin with: tens of millions of COVID take a look at kits, a surge in on-line procuring and all of the packaging and supply truck gasoline related to that.

The demand for petrochemicals utilized in medical merchandise and packaging rose to the very best degree since 1965, in keeping with the petroleum institute. The demand for truck gasoline was considerably larger than its pre-pandemic degree as nicely.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Plastics Trade Assn. famous that Russian exports present only a fraction of the oil and pure gasoline used to create the feedstock for U.S. plastics and different merchandise. However the warfare in Ukraine and international sanctions on Russia may have an effect on costs for these items by shifting accessible provides; for instance, exports of U.S. liquid pure gasoline — used to make some plastic merchandise — to Europe have elevated considerably to offset the lack of Russian pure gasoline, the spokesperson wrote in an e-mail.

What can we count on to see in California?

Californians may really feel the chunk of upper crude costs much more. Fuel costs listed here are nicely above these in the remainder of the nation — the present common value within the state, about $4.77 a gallon, is about $1.20 greater than Thursday’s U.S. common, in keeping with AAA.

California doesn’t import any oil from Russia. As of 2020, the state introduced in 24% of its oil from Ecuador, 23% from Saudi Arabia and 20% from Iraq, in keeping with the California Vitality Fee.

Nonetheless, the absence of a serious exporter comparable to Russia would enhance international demand for oil from different nations, which may have an effect on the retail value in California. The state has grow to be more and more depending on oil imports because it makes an attempt to maneuver away from fracking, making it more and more weak to exterior value swings.

Increased power prices usually additionally have an effect on agricultural manufacturing, a giant a part of the state economic system, by crimping crop yields and elevating costs on produce which can be handed on to clients. Economists mentioned it was too quickly to see these results on California farms, although one other issue looms: a fertilizer scarcity.

Advertisement

Russia is a serious international producer of fertilizers, that are already at record-high costs, and turbulence within the area will threaten their provide and lift costs much more.

One other space of specific vulnerability: cybersecurity, particularly in Silicon Valley, Hollywood and on the ports.

“Between Los Angeles’ content material, and Silicon Valley and Seattle which management software program, these are locations of vulnerability,” mentioned Jonathan Aronson, a professor of worldwide relations and communication on the USC Annenberg College for Communication and Journalism. “Individuals get paranoid about who’s watching you and when. That’s a spot the place some hassle may get away.”

The Port of Los Angeles has already been making ready for larger cybersecurity threats, Govt Director Gene Seroka mentioned.

“We’re ready for extra exercise within the cyberthreatscape, and that’s why we’re working with each skilled we have now,” Seroka mentioned. “These instances are extraordinarily unsure, and we have to be overprepared.”

Advertisement

The L.A. port sees greater than 40 million cyberintrusion makes an attempt a month, greater than double the variety of makes an attempt earlier than the pandemic, he mentioned. Officers there have been working intently with native, state and federal legislation enforcement companies to protect in opposition to some of these threats, notably people who may disrupt the circulate of cargo.

Will sanctions on Russia have an effect on California commerce?

Russia will not be amongst California’s high export markets, and it’s too quickly to say how commerce flows shall be affected, native officers and consultants mentioned. The U.S. Commerce Division introduced export controls meant to limit Russia’s entry to know-how, primarily within the protection, aerospace and maritime sectors.

“It feels a bit untimely,” mentioned Susanne T. Stirling, vp of worldwide affairs on the California Chamber of Commerce. However California’s commerce with Russia may give clues.

Out of about $175 billion in California exports to overseas markets, roughly $400 million price of products are bought to Russia annually. 1 / 4 of exports to Russia are laptop and digital merchandise. Chemical substances, manufactured commodities and equipment are different giant exports to Russia.

What does this all imply for inflation?

Economists fear that larger meals and power costs may push inflation into double digits. U.S. inflation final month hit its highest degree in a few generations, and better shopper costs now may elevate expectations of excessive costs for months and years to return.

Advertisement

The patron inflation charge in January surged to 7.5% in contrast with a yr earlier, nicely above the 5.7% common wage achieve for many employees in the identical 12-month interval.

Even earlier than the most recent disaster, the Federal Reserve was poised to lift rates of interest to fight surging inflation that, by some measures, has helped make customers really feel as gloomy as they did throughout the Nice Recession of 2008-09.

What worries some economists isn’t just the potential for larger oil and gasoline costs, however that this typically portends a boom-and-bust cycle that’s unhealthy general for the economic system.

“All through the historical past of the oil world, you’ve the geopolitical battle,” mentioned Amy Myers Jaffe, analysis professor on the Fletcher College at Tufts College. “It brings an unbelievable top to the worth of oil over and over, and it’s at all times adopted by an financial disaster that brings a collapse within the value of oil.”

What in regards to the inventory market?

Shares initially tumbled all over the world Thursday, as fears of a wider battle and better inflation rattled buyers. U.S. markets then ended the day larger, with tech shares making a very sturdy rebound.

Advertisement

The tech-focused Nasdaq composite closed the day up 3.3%, and the Commonplace & Poor’s 500 rose 1.5%.

The rebound got here after Biden mentioned he needs to restrict the financial ripple results on Individuals and introduced new sanctions in opposition to Russia that didn’t go so far as some anticipated.

Some analysts had anticipated the battle to push buyers out of many tech shares, except for the cybersecurity sector.

Concern is rising that “huge cyberwarfare may very well be on the near-term horizon, which would definitely catalyze a rise in spending round stopping refined Russian-based cyberattacks,” analysts with Wedbush Securities wrote in a word to shoppers.

The Related Press and Bloomberg contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Supreme Court upsets $10-billion opioid settlement because it shields the Sacklers

Published

on

Supreme Court upsets $10-billion opioid settlement because it shields the Sacklers

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a mass settlement related to the nation’s opioid crisis that would have paid an estimated $10 billion to victims, hospitals, states and others, and shielded the Sackler family from further liability.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled that a bankruptcy judge does not have broad power to arrange a mass settlement of thousands of claims that includes protections for people who are not bankrupt.

The justices were split in an unusual way. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch spoke for the majority, while Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Brett M. Kavanaugh dissented.

“We hold only that the bankruptcy code does not authorize a release and injunction that, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11, effectively seeks to discharge claims against a nondebtor without the consent of affected claimants,” Gorsuch said.

Advertisement

“Today’s decision is wrong on the law and devastating for more than 100,000 opioid victims and their families,” Kavanaugh said in dissent. “The court’s decision rewrites the text of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and restricts the long-established authority of bankruptcy courts to fashion fair and equitable relief for mass-tort victims.”

The Sacklers, owners of the Purdue Pharma company, had denied wrongdoing but agreed to contribute $6 billion to the settlement fund if they would be protected from future lawsuits.

The case has been closely followed not just because of the opioid settlement but also because of the use of bankruptcy laws to settle other mass lawsuits involving the Boy Scouts of America and some Catholic dioceses.

Purdue Pharma filed for bankruptcy in 2019 facing thousands of lawsuits alleging its marketing of OxyContin as a nonaddictive pain relief pill had triggered an opioid epidemic that led to more than a half-million deaths since the mid-1990s. In the decade prior to the bankruptcy, the company had distributed about $11 billion to members of the Sackler family and their offshore accounts.

Their lawyers maintained that more than half of this amount was paid in taxes.

Advertisement

But the scale of the damage and the liability for OxyContin was extraordinary. A bankruptcy court later put a hold on new lawsuits, while the pending claims against Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers were estimated to seek in total more than $40 trillion.

A coalition of creditors, including victims, hospitals, local and state governments and tribal nations, negotiated a settlement that was that expected to pay out about $10 billion. Most of the funding — about $6 billion — came from the Sacklers.

In 2021, a bankruptcy judge approved the settlement and described it as the “only reasonably conceivable” way to fairly resolve the mass of lawsuits. Without the money from the Sacklers, he said the company would be liquidated, leaving most of the creditors with nothing.

While more than 95% of the creditors said they approved the deal, including all 50 states, the Biden administration’s bankruptcy trustee opposed it. He did so because the settlement shielded the Sacklers from any further or future liability.

In Harrington vs. Purdue Pharma, the trustee argued that the Sacklers were not bankrupt and therefore, cannot take advantage of the shield provided by a bankruptcy settlement.

Advertisement

Last year, the Supreme Court put the settlement on hold to consider that argument.

Continue Reading

Business

Inflation’s Wild Ride

Published

on

Inflation’s Wild Ride

“The signal that we’re taking is that it’s likely to take longer for us to gain confidence that we are on a sustainable path down to 2 percent inflation,” Mr. Powell said in May, after price increases had stalled for months. Inflation has recently cooled again, and policymakers are waiting to see if the trend lasts.

The question now is just how much continued progress on lowering inflation Fed officials will need to see to feel comfortable lowering interest rates.

Investors still think it is possible that the central bank will cut rates in September, based on market pricing. Fed officials themselves predicted one reduction this year and four in 2025, as of their June economic forecasts.

For politicians, that means that the November election will almost certainly happen against a backdrop of high interest rates that are making car leases, credit card borrowing and new mortgages pricey for consumers.

After years of elevated inflation, Americans are also still seeing much higher price levels at the grocery store, on car repair bills and at hotels than before the pandemic.

Advertisement

Price increases have slowed, but getting used to new price levels could take time for consumers.

Continue Reading

Business

Irvine-based EV maker Rivian gets $5-billion lifeline from Volkswagen

Published

on

Irvine-based EV maker Rivian gets $5-billion lifeline from Volkswagen

Irvine-based Rivian Automotive got a big financial boost on Tuesday, as Volkswagen agreed to invest up to $5 billion in a joint venture with the struggling manufacturer of electric trucks.

Under a partnership announced by the companies, the German automaker will provide $1 billion initially and as much as $4 billion more over time.

The infusion will give VW the ability to tap the company’s technology to develop “next generation” battery-powered vehicles and software.

The surprise investment comes during a tough time for the electric vehicle market, which has posed economic headwinds for Rivian and other EV makers.

Advertisement

With their sleek design, Rivian trucks and sport utility vehicles initially drew plenty of interest among investors, fueling a massively successful initial public offering of stock in 2021; the company ended its first day of trading valued at nearly $88 billion. Amazon.com is Rivian’s largest shareholder.

But analysts said some car buyers were put off by the high price of Rivian’s latest offering of vehicles — the company’s R1T electric pickup truck starts at nearly $70,000, while its R1S SUV starts at almost $75,000.

Rivian reported a net loss of $1.52 billion for the three-month period that ended Dec. 31, compared with $1.72 billion during the same period a year earlier.

Signs of stress mounted. In March, Rivian postponed plans to build a new $5-billion manufacturing plant in Georgia to save money amid heavy losses.

A month earlier, Rivian announced a 10% cut to its workforce and lower production expectations.

Advertisement

Last week another local EV manufacturer — Fisker Group Inc. of Manhattan Beach — filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after it failed to secure financing from undisclosed automakers.

Early this year, Apple pulled the plug on its self-driving electric vehicle program, reportedly after spending $10 billion over a decade.

And Lucid Motors, a maker of luxury electric vehicles in the Bay Area city of Newark, received a $1-billion infusion last month from an affiliate of the Saudi sovereign wealth fund — the kind of big backer that Fisker didn’t have.

Rivian’s shares, which were pummeled earlier this year, jumped 30% in extended trading on Tuesday. The shares closed at $11.96.

Tesla Inc., the biggest player in the business, also has been squeezed by weak sales and declining profits. The company said in April that it would lay off more than 10% of its workforce.

Advertisement

Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending