Connect with us

Business

$600, free video game: How EA Sports got players to opt in to ‘College Football 25’

Published

on

0, free video game: How EA Sports got players to opt in to ‘College Football 25’

Fifteen years ago, former Nebraska and Arizona State quarterback Sam Keller filed a class-action lawsuit that in 2013 resulted in Electronic Arts Sports mothballing its popular “College Football” video game. Why? The game featured players that did not have real-life names, but resembled every player on every roster in almost every other way.

EA settled with Keller, et al., for $40 million, and the NCAA chipped in another $20 million. Sounds like a lot but payments to each player ranged from about $1,500 to $15,000.

Keller, for his part, was flogged in the public square of social media for “ruining the video game for us.”

“People looked at the situation and thought I’m going after the game because I couldn’t make it as an NFL player and needed to make a quick buck,” Keller told the Arizona Republic in 2019 when college players were granted the right to be paid for their name, image and likeness, or NIL.

Advertisement

“I understand all that, but that was never the intent. The case was more about what’s happening now [with NIL]. It was just the first of a lot of steps to change the norm to something that’s fair.”

Today college players are making significant sums through NIL deals. And what do you know, Redwood City-based EA Sports announced the return of the video game. “College Football 25” — the last version was CF 14 in 2013 — will be released this summer.

And, yes, players’ names will be used. Two weeks ago, EA offered $600 and a free copy of the game to any player who agreed to have their likeness featured, and more than 10,000 of the 11,390 FBS players already are on board, meaning EA will be paying players a total of $6 million to $7 million. Some players might make more than $600 by agreeing to promote the game.

Major awards won’t be included at the outset because EA couldn’t strike a deal with the National College Football Awards Assn. — a coalition of many of the sport’s individual awards — according to On3. Fans playing in Road to Glory or Dynasty modes no longer will be able to win real trophies that players are annually awarded — the Chuck Bednarik (top defensive player), Fred Biletnikoff (top receiver), Davey O’Brien (top quarterback), Doak Walker (top running back), Lou Groza (top placekicker), Jim Thorpe (top defensive back), Robert Maxwell (top player), John Outland (top interior lineman) and Ray Guy (top punter) awards.

The Heisman Trophy is operated independently by the Heisman Trust, and it is unclear whether it will be awarded in the game. The same is true for the Bronko Nagurski Trophy (top defensive player) and Dick Butkus Award (top linebacker).

Advertisement

Gamers will be blocked from manually adding players who decide not to accept the offer, the video game developer said. Among those who reportedly will opt out is Texas quarterback Arch Manning, the nephew of Peyton and Eli Manning. The quarterback Arch Manning played behind last season, Quinn Ewers, said on Instagram that he took the offer. So did fellow high-profile passers Dillon Gabriel of Oregon, Jalen Milroe of Alabama and Jaxson Dart of Mississippi.

Closer to home, UCLA quarterback Ethan Garbers and USC wide receiver and explosive kick returner Zachariah Branch opted in. So did most of their teammates.

“The response to the athlete opt-in opportunity for EA Sports College Football 25 has been phenomenal,” EA senior vice president Daryl Holt said in a statement. “We’re excited to welcome more athletes in the weeks ahead and to debut this first class of athletes in the game when it launches this summer.”

What else do we know about EA CF 25? All 85 FBS teams will be in the game with 2024 uniforms. The spate of recent conference realignments will be recognized. The new 12-team College Football Playoff is accommodated with the ability to customize. Every bowl game will be featured.

Also, the Dynasty and Road to Glory modes that 2013 gamers remember return with NIL components, and the game will run on the same engine as the Madden franchise.

Advertisement

Fifteen years ago, Keller’s lawsuit described EA’s attention to detail and revealed at least one way the video game company collected information on players to make the game as realistic as possible.

“EA attempts to match any unique, highly identifiable playing behaviors by sending detailed questionnaires to team equipment managers,” the lawsuit said. “Additionally, EA creates realistic virtual versions of actual stadiums; populates them with the virtual athletes, coaches, cheerleaders, and fans realistically rendered by EA’s graphic artists; and incorporates realistic sounds such as the crunch of the players’ pads and the roar of the crowd.

“EA’s game differs from reality in that EA omits the players’ names on their jerseys and assigns each player a home town that is different from the actual player’s home town.”

This time around, coaches were omitted, although Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin told Andy Staples of On3 he would give permission to appear in the game without any compensation.

“The kids like to play it,” he said. “My brain thinks about what would help in recruiting? If you did pay me for that, I wouldn’t want it. I’d want you to put it into our NIL.”

Advertisement

Business

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum named parks chief

Published

on

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum named parks chief

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum has been named chairman of Walt Disney Co.’s experiences division, the company said Tuesday.

Mazloum succeeds soon-to-be Disney Chief Executive Josh D’Amaro as the head of the Mouse House’s vital parks portfolio, which has become the economic engine for the Burbank media and entertainment giant. His purview includes Disney’s theme parks, famed Imagineering division, merchandise, cruise line, as well as the Aulani resort and spa in Hawaii.

Jill Estorino will become the head of Disneyland Resort in Anaheim. She previously served as president and managing director of Disney Parks International and oversaw the company’s theme parks and resorts in Europe and Asia.

Estorino and Mazloum will assume their new roles on March 18, the same day as D’Amaro and incoming Disney President and Chief Creative Officer Dana Walden.

“Thomas Mazloum is an exceptional leader with a genuine appreciation for our cast members and a proven track record of delivering growth,” D’Amaro said in a statement. “His focus on service excellence, broad international leadership and strong connection to the creativity that brings our stories to life make him the right leader to guide Disney Experiences into its next chapter.”

Advertisement

Mazloum had been about a year into his tenure at Disneyland. Before that, he was head of Disney Signature Experiences, which includes the cruise line. He was trained in hospitality in Europe.

In his time at Disneyland, Mazloum oversaw the park’s 70th anniversary celebration and recently pledged to eliminate time limitations for park-hopping, which are designed to manage foot traffic at Disneyland and California Adventure.

Mazloum will now oversee a 10-year, $60-billion investment plan for Disney’s overall experiences business, which includes new themed lands in Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World. At Disneyland, that expansion could result in at least $1.9 billion of development.

The size of that investment indicates how important the parks are to Disney’s bottom line. Last year, the experiences business brought in nearly 57% of the company’s operating income. Maintaining that momentum, as well as fending off competitors such as Universal Studios, is key to Disney’s continued growth.

In his new role, Mazloum will have to keep an eye on “international visitation headwinds” at its U.S.-based parks, which the company has said probably will factor into its earnings for its fiscal second quarter. At Disneyland Resort, that dip was mitigated by the park’s high percentage of California-based visitors.

Advertisement

Times staff writer Todd Martens contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

What soaring gas prices mean for California’s EV market

Published

on

What soaring gas prices mean for California’s EV market

It has been a bumpy road for the electric vehicle market as declining federal support and plateauing public interest have eaten away at sales.

But EV sellers could soon receive a boost from an unexpected source: The war in Iran is pushing up gas prices.

As Americans look to save money at the pump, more will consider switching to an electric or hybrid vehicle. Average gas prices in the U.S. have risen nearly 17% since Feb. 28 to reach $3.48 per gallon. In California, the average is $5.20 per gallon.

Electric vehicles are pricier than gasoline-powered cars and charging them isn’t cheap with current electricity prices, but sky-high gas prices can tip the scales for consumers deciding which kind of vehicle to buy next.

“We probably will see an uptick in EV adoption and particularly hybrid adoption” if gas prices stay high, said Sam Abuelsamid, an auto analyst at Telemetry Agency. “The last time we had oil prices top $100 per barrel was early 2022 and that’s when we saw EV sales really start to pick up in the U.S.”

Advertisement

In a 2022 AAA survey, 77% of respondents said saving money on gas was their primary motivator for purchasing an electric vehicle. That year, 25% of survey respondents said they were likely or very likely to purchase an EV.

As oil prices cooled, the number fell to16% in 2025.

In California, annual sales of new light-duty zero-emission vehicles jumped 43% in 2022, according to the state’s Energy Commission. The market share of zero-emission vehicles among all light-duty vehicles sold rose from 12% in 2021 to 19% in 2022.

“Prior to 2022, we didn’t really have EVs available when we had oil price shocks,” Abuelsamid said. “But every time we did, it coincided with a move toward more fuel-efficient vehicles.”

Dealers are anticipating a windfall.

Advertisement

Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Assn., predicted enthusiasm for EVs will rebound across California if oil prices don’t come down.

“If prior gasoline price spikes are any indication, you tend to see interest in more fuel-efficient vehicles,” he said.

Rising gas prices could be a lifeline for EV makers at a time when federal support for green cars has been declining.

Under President Trump, a federal $7,500 tax incentive for new electric vehicles was eliminated in September, along with a $4,000 incentive for used electric vehicles.

In California, the zero-emission vehicle share of the total new-vehicle market was 22% through the first 10 months of 2025, then dropped sharply to 12% in the last two months of the year, according to the California Auto Outlook.

Advertisement

Meanwhile Tesla, the most popular EV brand in the country, has grappled with an implosion of its reputation with some consumers after its chief executive, Elon Musk, became one of Trump’s most vocal supporters and helped run the controversial Department of Government Efficiency.

Over the last several months, Ford, General Motors and Stellantis have pared back EV ambitions.

Other automakers, including Nissan, announced plans to stop producing their more affordable electric models.

The Trump administration has moved to roll back federal fuel economy standards and revoked California’s permission to implement a ban on new gas-powered car sales by 2035.

David Reichmuth, a researcher with the Clean Transportation program in the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the shift in production plans will affect EV availability, even if demand surges.

Advertisement

That could keep people from switching to cleaner vehicles regardless of higher gas prices.

“This is a transition that we need to make for both public health and to try to slow the damage from global warming, whether or not the price of gasoline is $3 or $5 or $6 a gallon,” he said.

According to Cox Automotive, new EV sales nationally were down 41% in November from a year earlier. Used EV sales were down 14% year over year that month.

To be sure, oil prices can fluctuate wildly in times of uncertainty. It will take time for consumers to decide on new purchases.

Brian Kim, who manages used car sales at Ford of Downtown LA, said he has yet to see a jump in the number of people interested in EVs, hybrids or more fuel-efficient gas-powered engines.

Advertisement

Still, if the price at the pump stays stuck above its current level, it could happen soon.

“Once the gas prices hit six [dollars per gallon] or more and people feel it in their pocket, maybe things will start to change,” he said.

Continue Reading

Business

Nearly 60 gigawatts of U.S. clean power stalled, trade group finds

Published

on

Nearly 60 gigawatts of U.S. clean power stalled, trade group finds

A total of 59 gigawatts of U.S. clean energy projects are facing delays at a time when demand for power from AI data centers is surging, according to a trade group study.

Developers are seeing an average delay of 19 months over issues such as long interconnection times, supply constraints and regulatory barriers, the American Clean Power Assn. said in a quarterly market report.

The backlog is happening despite the growing need for power on grids that are being taxed by energy-hungry data centers and increased manufacturing. The Trump administration has implemented a slew of policies to slow the build-out of solar and wind projects, including delaying approvals on federal lands.

The potential energy generation facing delays is the equivalent of 59 traditional nuclear reactors, enough to power more than 44 million homes simultaneously.

“Current policy instability is beginning to impact investor confidence and negatively impact project timelines at a time when demand is surging,” American Clean Power Chief Policy Officer JC Sandberg said in a statement.

Advertisement

Despite the hurdles, developers were able to bring more than 50 gigawatts of wind, solar and batteries online in 2025, accounting for more than 90% of all new power capacity in the U.S., the report found. Clean power purchase agreements declined 36% in 2025 compared with 2024, signaling that the build-out of clean power in the U.S. could be lower in the 2028 to 2030 time period, according to the report.

Chediak writes for Bloomberg.

Continue Reading

Trending