World
How badly has the Iran war hit the global economy? The tell-tale signs
The United States-Israeli war on Iran and Tehran’s retaliatory strikes across the Gulf region have upended global financial and energy markets, raising concerns of a global economic crisis – and even of a recession.
Here’s a look at tell-tale signs that reveal the global economic fallout from this war:
list of 3 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
Energy prices
Since the US-Israeli strikes on Iran began on February 28, Tehran has launched a wave of ballistic missiles targeting Israel, US military bases, oil depots and other infrastructure across the Gulf region.
Iranian attacks on several vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz have also dramatically reduced traffic in the narrow channel, through which about 20 percent of global oil and gas supplies transit. On Thursday, Iran also attacked fuel tankers in Iraqi waters.
All of this has combined to send oil prices soaring. As of Monday morning, Brent crude, the industry benchmark, was priced at $106 per barrel, up more than 40 percent from $72 per barrel on February 27.
According to Muyu Xu, a senior crude oil analyst at Kpler, liquified natural gas (LNG) prices have risen even more sharply – by almost 60 percent – since the start of the war.
On March 2, QatarEnergy suspended its LNG production after an Iranian drone attack, straining the global LNG market. Qatar supplies 20 percent of the world’s LNG.
Prices of refined products from petrol and gas oil to jet kerosene and fuel oil have also seen significant increases, and that trend is expected to continue if energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz remain largely shut, Muyu added.
“As crude oil and refined products from the Middle East Gulf are unable to reach buyers, countries, particularly in Asia, are scrambling to secure alternative supplies at higher prices and adopt emergency measures to manage inventories and demand,” she told Al Jazeera.
About 84 percent of the crude oil and 83 percent of the LNG that passed through the strait in 2024 was bound for Asia, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration.
China, India, Japan and South Korea accounted for nearly 70 percent of those oil shipments with about 15 percent bound for the rest of Asia, according to the agency.
According to a March 9 report by Neil Shearing and his team of economists at the global macroeconomic firm Capital Economics, if the conflict is short-lived and Iranian attacks on the Gulf countries and in the Strait of Hormuz cease, “oil and LNG prices would fall back sharply with the price of Brent crude reaching $65pb [per barrel] by the end of the year.”
But in case of a longer war, the report noted: “Oil prices would rise further during the conflict to around $130pb in Q2 [second quarter]. … Shipments through the Strait of Hormuz would resume in Q2 although prices remain higher than in the first scenario by year end.”
“Even if the conflict is contained to three months, we think Brent crude oil prices could rise to an average of $150pb over the next six months or so,” the economists forecasted.
Lower productivity
As import costs for energy-guzzling economies are rising, their economic productivity is also beginning to decline.
According to data analysed from Global Petrol Prices, a data platform that tracks and publishes retail energy prices across about 150 countries, at least 85 countries have reported increases in petrol prices since February 28. Some nations announce price changes only at the end of each month, so higher prices are expected for many others in April.
So far, Cambodia has recorded the highest petrol price increase of nearly 68 percent, rising from $1.11 per litre (a quarter of a gallon) of 95 octane on February 23 to $1.32 on Wednesday. Vietnam follows with a 50 percent increase, then Nigeria at 35 percent, Laos at 33 percent and Canada at 28 percent.
These price increases at the pump have led governments to take drastic steps to conserve fuel.
Pakistan has introduced a four-day workweek for government employees with 50 percent of the staff working from home on rotation. Government offices in the Philippines have moved to a four-day workweek too. Thailand has made work from home mandatory for government officials.
Myanmar’s government has imposed a rule under which cars may drive only on alternate days. In Sri Lanka, vehicle owners must register online to buy fuel, then use a QR code at the pump to purchase petrol or diesel. The move is aimed at regulating how much each individual consumer buys.
All of this, economists said, impacts the productivity of economies. They manufacture less and deliver fewer services, further deepening the economic crisis.
And this is just the start.
Muyu noted that shipowners are also hesitating to take new orders as bunkering prices hit new highs every day. “They worry that the freight rates they receive may not be sufficient to cover rising fuel costs,” she said.
“The economic impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure is only beginning to emerge. In the coming weeks, we are expecting to see further evidence of rising fuel prices, restrained demand [such as less driving or rationing] and eventually the effects filtering through to macroeconomic indicators such as inflation,” she warned.
Stock markets
According to a report on Sunday from Bloomberg News, global stocks have fallen 5.5 percent since the war began with Asian stock markets being the worst hit.
Here’s how the 10 biggest stock exchanges have performed since February 28:
- New York Stock Exchange (NYSE): As of Monday morning, the NYSE Composite Index had fallen by 6 percent compared with the close on February 27.
- Nasdaq Stock Market: Shares trading on this barometer of tech stocks had fallen by 2.4 percent in the same timeframe.
- Shanghai Stock Exchange: As of Monday, the Shanghai Composite Index has fallen by 1.86 percent since February 28.
- Tokyo Stock Exchange: Also as of Monday, the Japan Nikkei 225 index has fallen by 11 percent since February 28.
- National Stock Exchange of India: The Nifty50, the benchmark index of India’s largest stock exchange, has fallen by 7 percent since February 28.
- Hong Kong Stock Exchange: As of Monday, the Hang Seng Index has fallen by about 4 per cent since the start of the war.
- London Stock Exchange: London’s FTSE 100 has fallen by 5.3 percent since the war began.
- Saudi Exchange (Tadawul): The Tadawul All-Share Index has been down by 9.6 percent since February 28.
- Euronext: Europe’s STOXX 600 has fallen by 6 percent since the war began.
- Australian Stock Exchange: As of mid-March, the ASX has fallen more than 6 percent due to the war.
Frederic Schneider, a nonresident senior fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, said Asian and other stock markets falling more than the US reflects their larger exposure to the energy crisis. It is also reflective of the fact that the US remains a global anchor market and many of the corporate winners of the war, including defence and oil corporations, are based in the US.
Russian stocks, meanwhile, have trended upwards as “Russia is a major non-Gulf hydrocarbon supplier standing to benefit from the war,” he added.
Inflation and stagflation fears
Last week, the International Monetary Fund’s managing director, Kristalina Georgieva, warned that if the war is prolonged, it poses an inflationary risk on the global economy.
“We are seeing resilience tested again by the new conflict in the Middle East,” Georgieva said on March 9 at a symposium hosted by Japan’s Ministry of Finance while warning policymakers to be prepared for it.
Oil price shocks have also historically summoned stagflation – increasing inflation coupled with rising unemployment. Economists pointed to the crises of 1973, 1978 and 2008 as evidence that every significant spike in oil prices has been followed in some form by a global recession.
Schneider at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs warned that debt-ridden Global South countries may face a debt crisis if interest rates are hiked in the Global North to combat inflation.
But Schneider highlighted that China is more insulated against the economic fallout of this war because it has overseen a large-scale energy diversification campaign over recent years, making enormous investments in renewables, nuclear power and coal; diversifying its hydrocarbon suppliers; and amassing a huge strategic reserve.
“China has also largely internalised supply networks, minimising disruptions. But as an export nation, China’s economic health will suffer from a global economic downturn,” he added.
In the West, Schneider said Europe is feeling the economic impact of the war because the continent had already been cut off from Russian hydrocarbons through attacks on the Nord Stream gas pipelines and sanctions on Russia.
“Europe’s industries are already strained by high energy costs, and this war is definitely putting another stressor on top in an economy that has been suffering from long-term declining growth,” he said.
As for the US, he said, the country is energy self-sufficient, but petrol prices are a flashpoint of public discontent.
“Just as with food prices, they hit disadvantaged parts of the population harder. Farmers, a vocal constituency in the US, are also hit by energy and fertiliser prices, which are large cost factors, after already having suffered from Trump’s trade wars. Furthermore, the US energy grid has already been strained by the AI boom. All of this combines during a midterm election year,” he added.
GDP growth rate
Shearing and his team of economists at Capital Economics have forecasted in their report that if the war ends in a few weeks, “outside the Gulf economies, the impact on GDP (Gross Domestic Product), inflation and monetary policy will be limited.”
“Economies in Asia and Europe are most exposed, but we would not envisage making major changes to forecasts. The only central banks to hike interest rates in response to the crisis are likely to be those in EMs (emerging markets) with fragile balance sheets (example: Turkey, Pakistan).”
In case the war continues for several months, however, the economists predicted that the macroeconomic consequences would be more significant.
“GDP growth in the euro-zone is likely to slow to just 0.5 percent y/y (year on year)” in the second half of the year while “economic growth in China is likely to fall below 3 percent y/y (year on year).”
The economists predicted the US would outperform other economies by growing by 2.25 percent in 2026.
“Inflation peaks at over 4 percent year on year in the euro-zone, 3 percent year on year in the US and 2.5 percent year on year in Japan,” they forecasted and added that this would lead to the European Central Bank raising interest rates and the Bank of Japan tightening its policy.
Travel and aviation impacts
The war has not only sent oil prices surging but has also upended global travel, pushing airline ticket costs on some routes sky-high.
More than two weeks into the conflict, the Gulf’s biggest carriers are still struggling to return to pre-war flight volumes with airspaces either shut or operating under major restrictions with a persistent threat of missiles and drones.
But it isn’t just these airlines that have been affected.
Australia’s Qantas Airways, Scandinavia’s SAS, Air New Zealand and India’s two biggest carriers, IndiGo and Air India, have all announced airfare hikes, blaming an abrupt spike in the cost of fuel on the war.
Jet fuel prices, which were about $85 to $90 per barrel before the attacks on Iran, have soared to $150 to $200 a barrel, New Zealand’s flag carrier said last week.
Several Asian and European airlines, including Lufthansa and Ryanair, have oil hedging in place, securing a part of their fuel supplies at fixed prices. Oil hedging is the process of locking in the price of oil to buy or sell the commodity in the future.
Flights from Asia and Australia towards Europe and the US have also been taking longer flights to avoid the Gulf due to airspace closures in the region. This has further bumped up airline ticket prices.
Schneider noted that the airline rerouting is not good news for European airlines, which are already shut off from Russian airspace, making flights to Asia even longer and costlier.
“This crisis could also spill over into the rest of the year with a dampened tourism outlook and a potential cost-of-living crisis,” he said.
World
US tells ASML it is concerned China may have top chip tool, Bloomberg News reports
World
Iran hardliner behind US deal warns Tehran won’t honor agreement if Trump fails to deliver
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Iran’s hardline parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that Tehran would not honor its commitments under a newly signed memorandum with the U.S. if Washington fails to uphold its side of the deal, according to the media arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
“If the United States does not honor its commitments, there is no way Iran will honor its own commitments,” Ghalibaf said.
Ghalibaf’s warning was echoed Thursday by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani, who threatened the U.S. in remarks translated by MEMRI TV, saying, “Americans should know their place and avoid confronting the Muslims.”
Qaani added that “Trump is trembling” and warned that the U.S. “should fear not only Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb, but many other locations as well.”
MEET IRAN’S HARDLINE SPEAKER WHO THREATENED TO BURN US FORCES — REPORTEDLY TEHRAN’S POINT MAN FOR TALKS
The warnings came after President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Wednesday digitally signed a copy of the memorandum aimed at ending the war and resuming the flow of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s hardline parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that Tehran would not honor its commitments under a newly signed memorandum with the U.S. if Washington fails to uphold its side of the deal. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA)
The memorandum gives Iran major economic relief while leaving some of the most difficult nuclear questions for a final agreement to be negotiated throughout the next 60 days. Under the 14-point plan read by a senior U.S. official, Washington agreed to begin lifting its naval blockade, work with regional partners on a $300 billion reconstruction and development plan for Iran and terminate U.S., U.N. and other sanctions on an agreed schedule as part of a final deal.
The memorandum also says all licenses, waivers and permissions needed for related financial transactions would be granted by the United States.
In return, Iran reaffirmed that it “shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons,” and the sides agreed to resolve the fate of Iran’s stockpiled enriched material under a future mechanism, with the minimum method being on-site down-blending under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision.
The agreement defers many of the hardest questions — including how to wind down Iran’s nuclear program — until the 60-day negotiation period for a final deal.
But the Iranian figure at the center of the deal is not a diplomat known for moderation.
Ghalibaf, a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander and longtime regime insider, has threatened American forces, vowed Trump would “pay the price” and built his career through loyalty to Iran’s security establishment.
The new warning underscored what experts say is the central risk of the agreement. Washington may be entering a deal with officials who can enforce Iran’s commitments but who have shown little sign of changing the regime’s long-term posture toward the U.S., Israel or the region.
Ghalibaf, 64, is a product of Iran’s security establishment. He rose through the ranks of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps during the Iran-Iraq War, eventually becoming commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps air force.
He later served as Iran’s national police chief, overseeing internal security forces responsible for suppressing protests, including the 1999 student uprising, alongside Qassem Soleimani.
After transitioning into politics, Ghalibaf attempted to run for president multiple times but failed. He instead built his career through loyalty to the system, serving as Tehran’s mayor for more than a decade before becoming speaker of parliament in 2020.
FAMILIES OF IRAN’S ELITE LIVE LAVISHLY ABROAD WHILE ORDINARY CITIZENS SUFFER AT HOME
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf looks on as parliament members wearing military uniforms chant in support of the IRGC in Tehran, Iran, on Feb. 1, 2026. (Hamed Malekpour/Islamic consultative assembly news agency/WANA/Handout via Reuters)
“Ghalibaf doesn’t have an independent line. His strength is that he is a ‘yes man,’” Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at the Institute for National Security Studies, previously told Fox News Digital. “If he is told to shake hands with special envoy Steve Witkoff, he will do it. If he is told to escalate, he will. It is not about moderation, it is about who gives the orders.”
“His name has also been linked to multiple corruption allegations, including misuse of oil revenues and sanctions evasion networks involving his family. His sons have reportedly been involved and are under sanctions,” Sabti said.
“There have also been public scandals involving family members traveling abroad and making luxury purchases, including widely circulated images of them arriving with numerous high-end Gucci suitcases.”
Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said the image of Ghalibaf at a signing ceremony with a senior U.S. official would be a propaganda victory for the regime.
“There was a time when the Islamic Republic would have been terrified to be seen signing such a thing,” Ben Taleblu told Fox News Digital. “Postwar, this is a sign of the regime’s opportunism, and no one identifies that opportunism better than someone like Ghalibaf, who comes from the IRGC, who is a corrupt politician and is a wheeler and dealer.”
But Taleblu warned that Washington should not confuse Ghalibaf’s opportunism with moderation.
“The mirage is the myth of Iranian military moderation and the myth that, with time, this regime will integrate and put aside all the things that have kept it on the sidelines for so long,” he said. “Transforming Iran via a deal — that is a huge lift.”
Ghalibaf’s wartime statements reflect the hardline posture inside Iran’s leadership. In remarks aired on Iranian television Jan. 12 and translated by MEMRI, he warned that U.S. forces would face catastrophic consequences if they confronted Iran.
“Come, so you can see what catastrophe befalls American bases, ships and forces,” he said, adding that American troops would be “burned by the fire of Iran’s defenders.”
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNVEILS SWEEPING TERMS OF PROPOSED IRAN AGREEMENT
A man lights a cigarette with fire from a burning picture of Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf as Israelis rally in support of nationwide protests in Iran in Holon, Israel, on Jan. 14, 2026. (Ammar Awad/Reuters)
More recently, he warned that “the blood of American soldiers is the personal responsibility of Trump” and vowed Iran would “settle accounts with the Americans and Israelis,” adding that “Trump and Netanyahu crossed our red lines and will pay the price.”
John Hannah, a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America and a former national security advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney, said Ghalibaf’s expected role reflects the reality of who holds power inside Iran.
“If you’re going to sign an agreement with Iran, those are the forces in charge and calling the shots, presumably with the approval of the new supreme leader,” Hannah told Fox News Digital. “If the U.S. harbors hope that Iran will ever implement any of their obligations under the MOU, these are the people — odious as they are — capable of making it happen.”
But Hannah said the central question is whether Iran’s leadership sees compliance as useful or whether the agreement is simply a tactical pause.
“The big question is whether they see it in their interest to do so, or are they only buying time, rebuilding their power and preparing for the next round of conflict,” he said.
Ben Taleblu was even more blunt, warning that even a seemingly favorable agreement would not change the nature of the regime.
“Even if you’ve got the perfect deal, with this kind of regime, with this kind of mentality, they will escalate,” he said. “I thought we would have learned by now what the regime did after the JCPOA. It built a vast missile arsenal. It literally built an empire of terror proxies that took Israel years of blood, effort and money to dismantle, backed by American support.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf speaks during a press conference in Tehran, Iran, Nov. 27, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA via Reuters)
“If we engage in pay-to-play with these guys,” he added, “I’m sorry to sound the alarm bell like this — but something tells me this is bad either way.”
Responding to questions about the threats from Ghalibaf and IRGC Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani, the White House defended Trump’s approach and warned Iran would face consequences if it failed to reach a final deal.
“President Trump has a great track record of good deals for the American people, and the President has been clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a good, final deal,” White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital.
“What the president has achieved on the battlefield and at the negotiating table is nothing short of remarkable and will strengthen American security for many years to come.”
World
US-Iran talks postponed as Israel attacks Lebanon
Tehran holds back from talks to cement ceasefire due to ongoing Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon.
Published On 19 Jun 2026
Planned talks in Switzerland between the United States and Iran to discuss the technical terms of their ceasefire deal have been postponed.
The Swiss Foreign Ministry confirmed early on Friday that the talks, which were scheduled to take place in Burgenstock, would now not go ahead.
list of 4 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
Reports suggest that Iran has delayed sending its delegation to discuss the technical issues linked to the ceasefire deal – digitally signed by the two countries on Wednesday – due to Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.
Israeli strikes overnight and into Friday have reportedly killed at least 16 people in southern Lebanon, with Iran-linked Hezbollah reporting intense fighting.
Talks postponed
A ceremony followed by talks was expected to be held at the Burgenstock Resort in Stansstad, near Lucerne in central Switzerland.
It is owned by Katara Hospitality, part of Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, which helped mediate peace in the conflict.
On Friday, in a message to media outlet AFP, the Swiss foreign ministry said: “The planned talks between the US, Iran, Qatar and Pakistan have been postponed”.
“Switzerland remains ready to facilitate these talks. The relevant preparatory work at Burgenstock is continuing,” it added, without providing a new date for the talks.
The announcement followed a report from media outlet Al-Mayadeen that Iran was delaying sending its delegation to Switzerland over Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel’s military will stay in a “security zone” of southern Lebanon as long as “Israel’s security needs require it.”
Israel and Hezbollah are not parties to the agreement, but Iran has insisted Israel must withdraw from the large swath of southern Lebanon it is occupying.
Logistics have never been ‘simple or predictable’
The US push to quickly begin high-stakes talks with Iran hit a snag just two days after the signing of a 14-point memorandum of understanding with the US that sets out a framework for talks during a 60-day negotiation period.
Vice President JD Vance had been prepared to make an overnight flight to meet with his Iranian counterparts at the mountainside resort in the tiny Swiss village of Obburgen.
His staff and a small pack of journalists had even gathered at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington in anticipation of the trip.
Meanwhile, dozens of White House officials, advance staffers and more media gathered in Switzerland to prepare for Vance’s anticipated arrival.
But then, abruptly on Thursday evening, the trip was called off.
The White House issued a statement explaining Vance – who has been tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the negotiations – and his delegation were prepared for talks, but they were unable to finalise plans and the vice president would remain in Washington.
“The logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable,” the statement noted.
Also on Thursday, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif cancelled his trip to Switzerland, his spokesperson told AFP.
-
South Dakota2 minutes agoSouth Dakota sends poetry to the America250 time capsule
-
Tennessee9 minutes agoInside Tennessee 4×100 relay’s NCAA title, outlasting four botched exchanges
-
Texas11 minutes agoFlu sickens some 160 troops at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas
-
Utah17 minutes agoSan Juan County assessor resigns after allegations of being ‘unfit’ for office
-
Vermont24 minutes agoNorman Rockwell finally gets his day in new Shelburne Museum exhibit
-
Virginia27 minutes agoMotorcoach failed to slow for traffic in Virginia work zone before crash that killed 5 from Western Mass., NTSB says – The Boston Globe
-
Washington32 minutes agoStorm Team4 Forecast: Much-needed morning rain before sunny afternoon
-
Wisconsin39 minutes agoThese Wisconsin swing voters say Trump’s war in Iran wasn’t worth it