Connect with us

Indiana

IU basketball: Indiana at Illinois — The report card

Published

on

IU basketball:  Indiana at Illinois — The report card


Indiana was reminded it’s a notch below the nation’s best on the road.

The Hoosiers kept the margin within single digits throughout the entirety of the first half, and were down just five on multiple occasions in the final four minutes before the break.  But an 11-0 second half Illinois run gave the Illini a 54-36 lead with 12:33 left.  And that was all she wrote.

Let’s take a deeper look at how Indiana lost 71-51 in Champaign with our latest edition of The Report Card.

The Hoosiers (17-9, 8-7) will travel to Purdue on Friday.

Advertisement

—————————————-

OFFENSE (D)

At 51 points, Indiana was held to its lowest scoring output of the season.  At .90 points per possession, the Hoosiers were held to their second least efficient game of the season.

This was a game where troubles on one end bled into the other.  Indiana felt its best chance to score in this game would be broken floor opportunities in transition off Illinois misses and turnovers.  But Illinois’ ability to get offensive rebounds and limit turnovers meant more often than not the Hoosiers were taking the ball out of the basket and forced to run half court offense.

IU coach Darian DeVries liked his team’s shot selection from 3-point range, but the results left much to be desired.  The Hoosiers made their fourth-fewest threes in a game on the season, tied for their second-fewest attempts, and shot their fourth-worst percentage.

Advertisement

Not making shots was fatal, because IU wasn’t scrambling in other ways to accumulate scoring opportunities.

Indiana didn’t get to the free throw line.  At 12.2%, their free throw rate (FTA/FGA) was the second-lowest of the year.  They took just six free throws for the game.  At with just four offensive rebounds, their 14.8% offensive rebounding rate was their third-lowest of the year.

DEFENSE (C+)

Indiana probably would have taken the deal if you offered them 43.9% shooting overall from Illinois, including just 22.6% from three.  IU actually held Illinois to its second-lowest point total of the season.

Like IU, the Illini missed plenty of good looks from long range.  But the plus side of their 24 misses from beyond the arc was long rebounds they were able to track down.

Advertisement

“They come off long and they’ve got 6-10, 7-foot everywhere where they can just grab it over the top of you,” IU coach Darian DeVries said.

Illinois grabbed 15 offensive rebounds and scored 17 second chance points.  That in large part explains why the Illini scored 1.26 points per possession, the third-most allowed by IU all season, despite their relatively poor shooting percentages.

That, and IU only forced two Illinois turnovers, for a season-low turnover percentage of 3.5%.  So Illinois got a shot on the rim on virtually every possession, and they got offensive rebounds on 41.7% of their misses.  Indiana never went to a bigger lineup to attempt to combat Illinois’ size, and the staff never attempted to increase the defensive pressure in order to create more takeaways. Eventually, it was just too much to overcome.

SEE ALSO:

THE PLAYERS (*starters)

Advertisement

*Tucker DeVries (C+) DeVries shot the ball reasonably well but wasn’t as much of a factor on the glass as he’d been recently, and he wasn’t able to facilitate the offense like he has on several occasions.  And early foul trouble helped Illinois grow its first half margin.

*Lamar Wilkerson (B) Indiana was only able to get Wilkerson five shots in the second half.  And he wasn’t able to connect on the limited open looks.  He was solid in the first half, making of 6 of 9 from the field.  He only scored two points in the final 16 minutes of the game and didn’t make a three in the final 28, but that was probably more on the staff than Wilkerson.

*Sam Alexis (B-) Alexis once again provided an inside scoring option for IU, and he competed on the glass.  The effort is there, but he wasn’t going to be able to contain Illinois on the glass on his own.

*Conor Enright (C) This just wasn’t a game where you felt Enright’s fingerprints all over it.  He was still a solid facilitator with six assists against two turnovers.  And he probably lost a bunch of assists as IU missed open looks.  But like most of his teammates, Enright struggled to contain dribble drives.

Advertisement

*Nick Dorn (D) Dorn’s shooting struggles are a concern.  He went 0 of 4 from three, and he’s 4 of 26 from deep over his last four games.  But just as concerning, Dorn had just two rebounds in 32 minutes.  It’s hard to point to a significant pattern of positive contributions.

Jasai Miles (C-) Miles made a three and competed on the glass, but was otherwise mistake and foul prone.  It’s interesting how he has taken minutes from Trent Sisley, because the results haven’t always seemed to justify that move.

Reed Bailey (C) Bailey had a nice drive for a score and had some moments as a facilitator.  He did grab some rebounds in his limited minutes. But not at the rate of Alexis. This was probably a game to try him and Alexis together to see if they could slow Illinois on the glass.

Trent Sisley, Tayton Conerway and Aleksa Ristic saw limited action.

————————

Advertisement

Andrej Acimovic did not play — coaches decision.

Jason Drake and Josh Harris were out with injuries.


For complete coverage of IU basketball, GO HERE. 

The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”

Advertisement



Source link

Indiana

Indiana’s Curt Cignetti cashes in on title run with 8-year extension worth $13.2 million per year

Published

on

Indiana’s Curt Cignetti cashes in on title run with 8-year extension worth .2 million per year


Indiana coach Curt Cignetti is cashing in on his first national championship run — even more than initially expected.

Athletic department officials announced Monday that the two-time national coach of the year has signed a memorandum of understanding on an eight-year contract extension, paying him an annual average of $13.2 million — or an increase of about $1.6 million per year from what school officials said Cignetti would earn when he first agreed to the extension in October.

School officials released the document Cignetti signed Feb. 4.

He joins Georgia coach Kirby Smart and LSU coach Lane Kiffin as the only active Football Bowl Subdivision coaches to receive paychecks of $13 million or more. The payouts could be even higher if Cignetti earns bonuses for winning Big Ten or national coach of the year honors in addition to playoff appearances and conference titles. The 64-year-old Cignetti already has said he hopes to retire at Indiana.

Advertisement

The new deal calls for a base salary of $500,000 per year through the 2033 season and a $1 million retention bonus on Nov. 30 of each year, starting this fall. The remaining portion of the $105.6 million will be collected from outside, promotional and marketing income.

Cignetti initially agreed to an eight-year extension worth $92.8 million — an annual average of $11.6 million — but university officials agreed to modify the deal as the Hoosiers remained undefeated and pursued the first football national championship in school history.

It’s the third time Cignetti has received a raise since he took over the losingest program in FBS history in November 2024. All he’s done since arriving is produce the two best seasons in school history while becoming one of college football’s fan favorites for his quick quips and unique facial expressions. Players have embraced him, too, telling many of their favorite Cignetti tales.

Just ask tight end Riley Nowakowski, who recounted his favorite Cignetti story during the recent NFL scouting combine in Indianapolis.

“I think (Alberto Mendoza) was in the game, and he pulled like four runs in a row,” Nowakowski said, referring to last season’s victory over Illinois. “He kept pulling it, kept pulling it, kept pulling it, and then after the fourth time, it was a terrible read. So in the middle of the game, (Cignetti) tells our coach, ‘Get (Alberto) over here.’ Bert’s like, ‘What, it’s the middle of a game, what are you doing?’ And (Cignetti) goes, ‘We’re not paying you to run the ball, hand the ball off, right? We’re up like 70 points, but he’s pissed off, yelling at Bert, and (Cignetti) just turned back at me and gave me one of his little smiles, and he was just like, ’You like that now?’”

Advertisement

Cignetti wasted no time delivering on his promise to win after leading James Madison to the most successful transition from the Football Championship Subdivision to the FBS.

The son of Hall of Fame coach Frank Cignetti and a former Alabama assistant led Indiana to a school record 11 wins and its first College Football Playoff appearance in his first season with the Hoosiers.

Last season, he outdid that mark by producing the first 16-0 mark in major college football since the 1890s. The Hoosiers also won their first outright Big Ten crown since 1945, beat Miami on its home field to claim the national title and shed the label of having the most all-time losses in FBS history.

Mendoza’s older brother, Fernando, also became the first Indiana player to win the Heisman Trophy and is expected to be the No. 1 overall pick in April’s NFL draft.

The reward: A record nine players, including Mendoza and Nowakowski, attended the recent combine in Indianapolis while Cignetti got another pay raise and school officials continued to invest heavily in keeping the coach’s staff together.

Advertisement

Offensive coordinator Mike Shanahan and defensive coordinator Bryant Haines each agreed to three-year contract extensions worth about $3 million per year in December, making them two of the highest-paid assistants in the FBS. Haines won this year’s Broyles Award, which goes to the nation’s top assistant coach.

Indiana will begin next season with the longest winning streak (16) and longest home winning streak (15) in the FBS. Cignetti has never lost a home game with the Hoosiers, who open defense of their league and national titles at home against North Texas on Sept. 5.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

What Tom Izzo said after Michigan State’s win over Indiana

Published

on

What Tom Izzo said after Michigan State’s win over Indiana


Michigan State basketball went into Assembly Hall on Sunday afternoon and controlled the Hoosiers from start to finish, earning a 77-64 victory. The win goes a long way in almost virtually confirming that the Spartans will have a triple-bye in the Big Ten Tournament, while also bolstering the Spartans case to get a No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament.

For the second straight outing in the state of Indiana, MSU head coach Tom Izzo came away pleased with his group, and expressed that to the media:

  • “Well, to be honest with you, for once, we got off to a good start. We haven’t been doing that. We decided to try to go inside, Kohler (had) been struggling, we thought we’d try to get him going. We get that 10-point lead and it kind of stayed that way.
  • “We did not do a great job of building on it, it’s because they’re a good team. Everybody asks me, ‘Are they good enough to be in the tournament?’ Read my lips: hell yes. It’s just that somebody’s got to lose some of these games. The league is so good.”
  • “I’m proud of my guys, because coming back from that Thursday-Sunday deal, both on the road, I thought they showed a lot of character. I’m proud of my staff, those preps are not easy at this time of year. Kur came off the bench and really sparked us after making more than a few mistakes.”
  • “What I appreciated about the game is I thought Jeremy took over. Everything we asked him to run early, to go into Jaxon, he did a great job of. I thought Kur, who’s a sophomore now, took a big step forward after not playing very well the 5 minutes he was in there early and falling down and giving up 3s, and then he bounced back. That’s kind of what you’ve gotta do.”
  • “We did it a little different way. We said this will be kind of like the NCAA Tournament where you’ve got a one- or two-day prep, one-day prep, so I think it was good for us. I’m really proud of them, but I don’t want to be proud of them until I’m done playing.”
  • “All in all, guys, we’re in spring break, which means you can practice like 100 times, and nobody arrests you or anything. But our guys deserve some time off and we’ll get some things done tomorrow. “

Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Cory Linsner on X @Rex_Linzy





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Coast Guard investigates death of mariner working barge in Jeffersonville

Published

on

Coast Guard investigates death of mariner working barge in Jeffersonville


play

U.S. Coast Guard officials are investigating March 1 after a mariner died while working on a barge in Jeffersonville, Indiana.

An incident involving the mariner occurred the afternoon of Feb. 27 at mile marker 597 of the Ohio River, said Lt. Cmdr. Steve Leighty, public affairs officer for the U.S. Coast Guard Ohio Valley Sector. Leighty declined to provide further details about the mariner and the circumstances of their death, citing the ongoing investigation.

Advertisement

Officials with the Clark County Sheriff’s Office are also investigating the incident, Leighty said.

Reach reporter Leo Bertucci at lbertucci@usatodayco.com or @leober2chee on X, formerly known as Twitter



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending