Ohio
Ohio’s squirrel tax of 1807 relevant to today’s property tax debate
Voters sound off on proposed property tax reform (1)
Franklin County voters sound off on proposed property tax reform with Dispatch reporter Sheridan Hendrix
Ohio once had a squirrel tax. No kidding.
The legislature made a quota for every property owner. To reduce the out of control squirrel population in 1807, Ohio would exempt your property tax bill for every squirrel skin one provided as proof of squirrel population reduction.
Ohio has an agricultural value reduction program to reduce property tax on land used for agriculture. Manufacturing equipment is automatically exempt from sales and use tax.
Thus, the pattern has been clear for 220 years: Tax what you don’t want. Exempt what you do.
Taxes can be both counterproductive and counter intuitive.
ONE THOUGHT: Tax what you don’t want
Taxes on alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis are “sin” taxes designed to generate revenue on things that government wishes to discourage.
Ohio’s 1807 squirrel tax is a shining example. Bring us your squirrel skins or pay more tax.
Arguably, some local places in Ohio have purposely taxed themselves more in order to keep certain real estate investments out.
SECOND THOUGHT: Exempt what you do want
Exemptions for job-creating globally-competitive capital investment just makes sense.
Ohio automatically reduces property taxes on agriculture land and has for decades. It’s called CAUV. Tax farmland more? You’ll get less farmland.
Trade this year’s revenue for a longer-term future of more revenue is the biggest point with local property tax exemption authority.
Trade incremental property tax one year for greater income tax now and in the future.
THIRD THOUGHT: Watching the great tax debate in Ohio
Though action has been taken from the Ohio General Assembly, there could be more to come in the debate sparked by rising property taxes. And it’s not just property taxes in play. Talk about redirecting local income taxes, removing sales tax exemptions, and curbing real estate tax diversions are among the items open for debate. Should an over $20 billion hole emerge in Ohio’s collective state and local tax portfolio from a possible statewide referendum, there’s nothing off the table.
That’s why the principle from 1807 is key to remember.
Tax what you don’t want. Exempt what you do.
By the way, that Ohio squirrel tax had to be repealed in 1808, because it worked. The squirrel population was decimated and taxpayers were afraid they couldn’t gather enough squirrel skins to avoid the tax.
Rick Platt is President and CEO of the Heath-Newark-Licking County Port Authority with over three decades of experience in Ohio industrial development. He is a board member of JobsOhio.
MIDDLEFIELD, Ohio (WKBN) — The Ohio State Highway Patrol’s Chardon Post is investigating a fatal plane crash that killed three people around 3:30 p.m. Saturday.
According to a press release, about one mile east of the Geauga County Airport, a Piper Comanche 250 crashed into a field.
The plane sustained major damage — killing three Ohioans who were identified as Thomas A. Cunningham, 76, of Rome, John W. Taipale, 71, and Alexander C. Taipale, 40, both from Geneva.
OSHP was assisted by the Geauga County Sheriff’s Office, Geauga County Coroner’s Office, Geauga County Emergency Management Agency, Middlefield Fire Department and Community Care Ambulance.
The Western Reserve Port Authority, Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport’s executive director, Anthony Trevena, reached out to our team with a statement regarding the crash.
“We were heartbroken to learn that members of our extended YNG and Youngstown aviation family, were victims in today’s crash in Geagua County. Our deepest condolences go out the Cunningham and Taipale families. We ask that their privacy please be respected during this difficult time. The FAA and NTSB are leading the investigation to determine the cause and will provide any updates as information becomes available.,” Trevena said.
The Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board were notified of the crash.
The crash remains under investigation.
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WSYX) — As concerns have grown over the impact of social media on young people, lawmakers are pushing to keep protections in tact to keep children safe online.
This week the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Ohio’s law, the Social Media Parental Notification Act, requiring parental consent for children under the age of 16 to use social media must be restored. Gov. Mike DeWine signed the act into law in July 2023.
Netchoice, the trade group that represents Tik Tok, Snapchat, Meta and other tech companies contested Ohio’s law in 2024, arguing that it was overly broad, vague and represented an unconstitutional impediment to free speech.
“An unconstitutional law protects no one, and we remain focused on ensuring the First Amendment rights of Ohioans are protected,” Paul Taske, NetChoice Litigation Center Director said.
Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit’s panel does not agree with this view point, determined that the law is not unconstitutional and had the block on the law’s enforcement vacated.
“At bottom, the Act imposes a parental consent requirement,” Judge Eric Clay wrote. “That requirement constitutes a marginal burden that precisely targets the multi-faceted problem that Ohio has identified: Children’s unsupervised assent to terms and conditions for use of platforms that take advantage of and harm them.”
The Social Media Parental Notification Act is a way to protect children’s mental health against the “intentionally addictive” nature of social media, according to U.S. senator Jon Husted.
The law requires companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.
Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson says the ruling is “a win for Ohio families.”
“The court agreed that parents –- not social media companies –- should get a say in what kids see online,” he said in a statement. “We have an obligation to keep our children safe, and today, the most dangerous place for our kids is the internet. This decision gives parents the tools to be involved and provide oversight.”
LICKING COUNTY, Ohio (WCMH) — When you think of wild animals in central Ohio, a black bear likely isn’t the first thing that comes to mind. That’s why one Licking County family said they couldn’t believe their eyes.
It was an average afternoon drive home for father and son, Justin and Aaron Rhodes, when something walked into the road in front of them.
“I didn’t even think it was real at first, so that’s why I had to do the double take,” Justin said.
Aaron said he thought it was “just a weird looking dog”.
To their disbelief, it was a bear. The sighting comes just one year after the animal was spotted in Licking County for the first time in more than two decades.
“It’s kind of hard to believe that they’re even around this area,” Justin said. “I’ve lived in this area for about 24 years now, so it’s been quite a while, and I’ve never seen one before.”
These sightings are becoming more common. The Ohio Division of Wildlife said the black bear population is growing in the state, and they expect those trends to continue. Ohio saw a record number of confirmed sightings in 2025.
Lindsey Krusling, a wildlife communications specialist with the Ohio Division of Wildlife, said they are seeing more breeding females establish homes in the state, signaling the species is returning. Experts said the work restoring natural forest land is a big reason why.
“We’re starting to get some black bears coming in from neighboring states like Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky,” Krusling said. “They’re naturally crossing those state borders and coming back to Ohio because we have more of that habitat available to them, especially those forested areas.”
As the black bear population grows, the Division of Wildlife is expanding its research. They are putting radio collars on some bears they find in the state to help track data, such as if the bears are staying here, how far they’ve traveled and if they’re successfully having cubs.
“We’re trying to get quite a bit of data from these bears, and we’re super excited to see where this takes us,” Krusling said.
The research is in the beginning stages, but they expect population growth to continue, Krusling said.
Sighting reports can be submitted here to help the Division of Wildlife track black bear populations throughout the state.
-
Lifestyle10 minutes ago‘Wait Wait’ for June 20, 2026: With Not My Job guest Caro Claire Burke
-
Technology18 minutes agoSony’s Xperia 1 VIII is still a phone for the fans
-
World25 minutes agoTrump-backed ‘El Tigre’ looks to crush cartels, end Colombia’s socialist era in pivotal election
-
Politics28 minutes agoObama Center visitors say project symbolic of ‘Black excellence,’ claim scandal-free legacy while Trump ripped
-
Health33 minutes agoPoison centers link growing Benadryl abuse among teens to dangerous social media trends
-
Sports40 minutes agoBryce Harper hits for cycle, Kyle Schwarber blasts three homers in Phillies blowout win over Mets
-
Technology43 minutes agoMeta offers paid training for AI data center jobs
-
Business48 minutes ago‘I got crushed’: AI giants are funding ad wars in races across the country
