South Dakota
In annual dual at Humboldt, Iowa State wrestling handles SDSU
VIDEO: Iowa State wrestling’s Kevin Dresser discusses year ahead
VIDEO: Iowa State’s Kevin Dresser discusses year ahead, team’s growth as postseason nears
No. 3 Iowa State wrestling handled No. 15 South Dakota State 29-7 on Jan. 25 in Cyclone coach Kevin Dresser’s hometown.
The Cyclones won eight of 10 bouts at Humboldt High School despite being down a pair of starters at 141 and 157 pounds. Iowa State got bonus-point wins at 133, 149 and 285 pounds.
The Cyclones opened with a nice win for Stevo Poulin at 125 pounds, who had a textbook standing-single takedown to defeat No. 21 Brady Roark in a 5-2 decision. Evan Frost followed with a dominant 20-4 technical fall vs. Iowa City high graduate and former two-time state champion Cale Seaton to give the Cyclones a 8-0 lead.
Southeast Polk graduate Carter Pearson filled in for Anthony Echemnedia at 141 pounds, but lost a 14-3 major decision to No. 23 Julian Tagg. Iowa State bounced back with Jacob Frost at 149 pounds, who wrestled a similar style to his twin brother with a late flurry of takedowns and substantial riding time to secure a 17-4 major decision over Colin Dupill. Before intermission, Iowa State had another backup get some time in Linn-Mar graduate Kane Naaktgeborn vs. No. 20 Cael Swenson. While he wrestled admirably in relief of Vinny Zerban, Naaktgeborn dropped a 3-0 decision after a third-period ride out from Swenson.
Leading 12-7 out of the break, Iowa State rolled the rest of the way. Connor Euton had three takedowns vs. No. 26 Marcus Espinoza-Owens at 165 on his way to an 11-4 decision. MJ Gaitan followed strong with a takedown and rideout in the third period vs. No. 18 Moses Espinoza-Owens to win 5-1. Isaac Dean trailed early vs. Brock Fettig at 184 after conceding a first-period takedown but went on to win 8-5 in sudden victory with a single-leg takedown.
In the marquee matchup of the dual between Iowa State’s No. 2 Rocky Elam vs. SDSU’s No. 6 Bennett Berge, Elam won soundly. His takedown in the first 10 seconds of the match was the difference, including his rideout for the rest of the first period to help get his 5-1 decision win. Yonger Bastida closed the dual with a 25-9 technical fall over No. 24 Luke Rasmussen. Bastida conceded the first takedown but recorded seven of his own after that plus a reversal.
The Cyclones have a big week ahead, with a road trip out to the Sooner State to face Oklahoma on Jan. 30 and Oklahoma State on Feb. 1.
Iowa State wrestling vs. South Dakota State results
- 125: Stevo Poulin (ISU) over Brady Roark (SDSU) (Dec 5-2)
- 133: Evan Frost (ISU) over Cale Seaton (SDSU) (TF 20-4 6:39)
- 141: Julian Tagg (SDSU) over Carter Pearson (ISU) (MD 14-3)
- 149: Jacob Frost (ISU) over Colin Dupill (SDSU) (MD 17-4)
- 157: Cael Swensen (SDSU) over Kane Naaktgeboren (ISU) (Dec 3-0)
- 165: Connor Euton (ISU) over Marcus Espinoza-Owens (SDSU) (Dec 11-4)
- 174: MJ Gaitan (ISU) over Moses Espinoza-Owens (SDSU) (Dec 5-1)
- 184: Isaac Dean (ISU) over Brock Fettig (SDSU) (SV-1 8-5)
- 197: Rocky Elam (ISU) over Bennett Berge (SDSU) (Dec 5-1)
- 285: Yonger Bastida (ISU) over Luke Rasmussen (SDSU) (TF 25-9 6:33)
Eli McKown covers high school sports and wrestling for the Des Moines Register. Contact him at Emckown@gannett.com. Follow him on Twitter at @EMcKown23.
South Dakota
Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota
South Dakota
Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats
(SOUTH DAKOTA SEARCHLIGHT) – Democrats are running for 46 of South Dakota’s 105 legislative seats — leaving 56% of seats without a Democratic candidate.
That doesn’t bode well for the party ahead of November, said Michael Card, professor emeritus of political science at the University of South Dakota.
“It doesn’t put them in a position to actually put forward their ideological policy preferences and have much of a success at getting those enacted,” Card said.
In the state Senate alone, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 22 seats, which is nearly two-thirds of the chamber. In the House, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 38 seats, which is 54% of the chamber.
There is only one Democratic legislative primary in the state: a state Senate race in District 26, which includes the Rosebud Reservation.
There are no statewide Democratic primaries, after announced candidates for governor and U.S. House dropped out or failed to gather enough petition signatures to make the ballot, leaving one Democrat in each of those races.
Statewide candidates will have less name recognition than Republican candidates ahead of the general election, since they didn’t have primaries, Card said. In the Legislature, Card said Democrats “are guaranteeing they won’t get a majority.”
In contrast, Republicans have primary races for governor, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. Five legislative districts do not have Republican primaries, but do have Republican candidates. There is a Republican candidate running for every legislative seat, except for one House seat in District 27, which includes the Pine Ridge Reservation.
Card said there are several factors leading to poor candidate turnout among Democrats, including a self-fulfilling cycle of failure.
“A lack of winning makes fewer people willing to take a chance on running for office,” Card said. “Why run if I think I’m going to lose?”
Democrats haven’t held a statewide office since 2015, and they haven’t held a majority of either legislative chamber since 1994.
Joe Zweifel, deputy executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, said the organization worked “really, really hard” to convince Democrats to run for office.
“But you can’t force people to run for office,” said Zweifel, of Sioux Falls, who’s running for a legislative seat himself in District 12.
He’s heard the open seats called a “failure.” But he disagrees, choosing to focus on the Democrats who did step forward.
“We’re running quality, good candidates in those races,” Zweifel said.
The South Dakota Democratic Party hopes to build on legislative successes, such as a new law from Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, that commits state funding to cover the family portion of reduced-price school meals.
“That specifically is a return on investment for our donors, and it shows that Democrats are doing good things for the people of South Dakota,” Zweifel said.
Wittman’s success helped inspire Democratic District 13 House of Representatives candidate Ali Rae Horsted, of Sioux Falls, to take a second run at the Legislature. Horsted ran unsuccessfully for the Senate against Sen. Sue Peterson in 2024, garnering 42% of the vote.
Horsted plans to build on that success and the name recognition she already has in the district. She hopes she’ll have “better odds” in this election, since there are two House seats for every district.
Horsted said it would better serve South Dakota if the state had a more balanced Legislature. While the latest Legislature was 92% Republican, 52% of voters in South Dakota are Republican. South Dakota has the lowest percentage of Democrats, 7.6%, in the Legislature nationwide.
“I think it’s important that people have options on the ballot,” Horsted said, “and people are able to vote for candidates that represent their values and their vision for the future of South Dakota.”
Makenzie Huber is a lifelong South Dakotan who regularly reports on the intersection of politics and policy with health, education, social services and Indigenous affairs. Her work with South Dakota Searchlight earned her the title of South Dakota’s Outstanding Young Journalist in 2024, and she was a 2024 finalist for the national Livingston Awards.
South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota
From East River to West River, South Dakota communities share a common goal: creating places where people of all ages can live, work and thrive. AARP’s Domains of Livability provide a framework to help communities do just that. Through the AARP Community Challenge grant program—designed to spark quick, impactful local projects—South Dakota communities are turning big ideas into visible, people-centered improvements.
Read the South Dakota Community Challenge Grant Report, which showcases grant-funded projects across the state designed to build more livable communities.
What Are AARP’s Domains of Livability?
AARP’s approach to livable communities is rooted in eight interconnected domains that together support quality of life at every age:
- Outdoor Spaces and Buildings – Safe, accessible parks, streets and public buildings
- Transportation – Affordable, accessible options for getting around
- Housing – A range of choices that support independence
- Social Participation – Opportunities to connect, learn and have fun
- Respect and Social Inclusion – Communities that value people of all backgrounds and ages
- Civic Participation and Employment – Meaningful ways to engage and contribute
- Communication and Information – Clear, accessible ways to stay informed
- Community Support and Health Services – Access to services that support well-being
These domains work best when addressed together—something South Dakota communities are embracing.
Turning Vision into Action with Community Challenge Grants
AARP Community Challenge grants fund short-term, “quick-action” projects that can ignite long-term change. Across South Dakota, these grants have helped communities pilot ideas, build momentum and demonstrate what’s possible when residents put people first.
Here’s how local projects are bringing the Domains of Livability to life:
- Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Communities have used grants to enhance parks, create pop-up public spaces, add benches and shade and install wayfinding signs. These improvements invite people to linger, gather, and enjoy shared spaces—supporting both physical activity and social connection.
- Transportation: Small, thoughtful transportation projects can make a big difference. Community Challenge grants have supported safer crossings, improved walkability and bikeability around key destinations and the planning or installation of transit amenities like shelters and seating—especially important for older adults and people with mobility challenges.
- Housing and Community Support: Some projects focus on helping residents age in place by improving access to information about home modification resources or by testing neighborhood-level solutions that connect people to services. These efforts strengthen independence and peace of mind.
- Social Participation and Inclusion: Murals, community events and creative placemaking projects funded by AARP grants have sparked community pride and social connection. By involving residents in design and implementation, these projects foster respect, inclusion and a strong sense of belonging across generations.
- Communication, Civic Participation and Opportunity: From hosting community conversations to creating new tools for sharing local information, South Dakota communities are using grants to engage residents in shaping their future. These efforts elevate local voices and encourage ongoing civic participation.
-
Ohio3 minutes agoBonnie Sue Reed-Tilton-Hetzel, East Liverpool, Ohio
-
Oklahoma9 minutes agoIowa State wrestling adds Brayden Thompson from transfer portal
-
Oregon15 minutes agoOregon Ducks Recruiting Target Darius Johnson Announces Finalists
-
Pennsylvania21 minutes agoPennsylvania utilities appreciate market signals — but not market prices
-
Rhode Island27 minutes agoPulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.
-
South-Carolina33 minutes agoMid-amateur from South Carolina wins Terra Cotta Invitational in Florida
-
South Dakota39 minutes agoNature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota
-
Tennessee45 minutes agoTennessee baseball vs Ole Miss score, live updates, start time, Game 3