Connect with us

World

Britain to make refugee status temporary under asylum overhaul

Published

on

Britain to make refugee status temporary under asylum overhaul
  • Labour seeks to counter rise of populist Reform UK party
  • Refugee wait for settlement to quadruple to 20 years
  • Crackdown, inspired by Denmark’s policy, draws criticism from charities, rights groups
  • Immigration has overtaken economy as voters’ top concern

LONDON, Nov 15 (Reuters) – Britain said it would make refugee status temporary and the wait for permanent settlement would be quadrupled to 20 years under the country’s most sweeping overhaul of policy on asylum seekers in modern times.

The Labour government has been hardening its immigration policies, above all on illegal small-boat crossings from France, in efforts to stem the soaring popularity of the populist Reform UK party, which has driven the immigration agenda.

Sign up here.

The government said it would take inspiration from Denmark’s approach, one of the toughest in Europe – where growing anti-immigrant sentiment has led to increased restrictions in many countries – and widely criticised by rights groups.

TEMPORARY STATUS SUBJECT TO REVIEW

As part of the changes, the statutory duty to provide support to certain asylum seekers, including housing and weekly allowances, will be revoked, the Home Office (interior ministry) said in a statement issued late on Saturday.

The department, led by Shabana Mahmood, said the measures would apply to asylum seekers who can work but choose not to, and to those who break the law. It said that taxpayer-funded support would be prioritised for those contributing to the economy and local communities.

The Home Office also said that protection for refugees would “now be temporary, regularly reviewed and revoked” if the home country was deemed safe.

Advertisement

“Our system is particularly generous compared to other countries in Europe, where, after five years, you’re effectively automatically settled in this country. We will change that,” Mahmood told Sky News on Sunday.

She added that under the changes, a refugee’s status would be reviewed every two-and-a-half years, during “a much longer path to permanent settlement in this country of 20 years”.

Mahmood said she would provide further details of the changes on Monday, including an announcement on Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

The government has said it wants to stay in the ECHR but change how the Article 8 provision, covering the right to a family life, is interpreted.

Migrants walk along the beach before trying to board an inflatable dinghy leaving the coast of northern France in an attempt to cross the English Channel to reach Britain, from the beach of Petit-Fort-Philippe in Gravelines, near Calais, France, September 27, 2025. REUTERS/Abdul Saboor Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

Mahmood said it was being “applied in a way that is designed to frustrate the removal of those that, under our immigration rules, would not have the right to be in this country.”

Advertisement

The government’s tougher approach has drawn criticism. More than 100 British charities wrote to Mahmood urging her to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm”, saying such steps are fuelling racism and violence.

Polls suggest immigration has overtaken the economy as British voters’ top concern. Over the summer, protests took place outside hotels housing asylum seekers at public expense.

A total of 109,343 people claimed asylum in the UK in the year ending March 2025, a 17% rise on the previous year and 6% above the 2002 peak of 103,081.

Mahmood said the government would look to open more “safe and legal” routes for asylum seekers, as she believed Britain should play its part in helping those fleeing danger.

UK GOVERNMENT INSPIRED BY DENMARK, OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

The Home Office said its reforms would look to “match and in some areas exceed” the standards of Denmark and other European countries, where refugee status is temporary, support is conditional and integration in society is expected.

Asylum seekers are granted temporary residence permits under Denmark’s approach, usually for two years, and they must reapply when these expire. They can be repatriated if their home country is deemed safe, and the path to citizenship has also been lengthened.

The Home Office said Denmark’s more restrictive immigration policies had reduced asylum claims to a 40-year low and resulted in the deportation of 95% of rejected applicants.

Advertisement

Denmark’s reforms, implemented while it remains a signatory to the ECHR, have drawn sharp criticism. Rights groups say the measures foster a hostile climate for migrants, undermine protection and leave asylum seekers in prolonged limbo.

Britain’s Refugee Council said on X that refugees do not compare asylum systems while fleeing danger, and that they come to the UK because of family ties, some knowledge of English, or existing connections that help them start anew safely.

Reporting by Catarina Demony and Alistair Smout; editing by Mark Heinrich

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Advertisement

World

Video: Landslide in Sicily Leaves Homes Teetering on Edge

Published

on

Video: Landslide in Sicily Leaves Homes Teetering on Edge

new video loaded: Landslide in Sicily Leaves Homes Teetering on Edge

A town in Sicily was left teetering on the edge after a landslide, triggered by a violent storm which battered southern Italy last week. More than 1,500 people have been evacuated.

By Monika Cvorak and Meg Felling

January 28, 2026

Continue Reading

World

Spain legalizes up to 500,000 undocumented migrants, sparking backlash

Published

on

Spain legalizes up to 500,000 undocumented migrants, sparking backlash

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the United States experiences negative net migration due to President Donald Trump policies, Spain is heading in the opposite direction, announcing plans to grant legal status for up to half a million illegal migrants.

Spain’s Socialist-led government approved a royal decree on Tuesday, allowing unauthorized immigrants who entered the country before the end of 2025 and who have lived there for at least five months and have no criminal record to obtain one-year residency and work permits with possible pathways to citizenship.

While many European governments have moved to tighten immigration policies — some encouraged by the Trump administration’s hardline approach — Spain has taken a different path. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and his ministers have repeatedly highlighted what they describe as the economic benefits of legal migration, particularly for the country’s aging workforce.

WHITE HOUSE ROADMAP SAYS EUROPE MAY BE ‘UNRECOGNIZABLE’ IN 20 YEARS AS MIGRATION RAISES DOUBTS ABOUT US ALLIES

Advertisement

Spain’s Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance María Jesús Montero and second Deputy Prime Minister and Labor Minister Yolanda Díaz at the Spanish Parliament in Madrid, Spain, March 14, 2024.  (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

Spain “will not look the other way,” Migration Minister Elma Saiz told reporters at a news conference, saying the government is “dignifying and recognizing people who are already in our country.”

The plan has sparked a fierce political battle, as conservatives and the populist Vox party have condemned what they describe as an amnesty that could fuel irregular migration.

Vox leader Santiago Abascal wrote on social media that the measure “harms all Spaniards,” arguing critics of his party are motivated by fear of Vox’s growing influence. 

“They are not worried about the consequences of Sánchez’s criminal policies,” Abascal wrote. “They are worried that Vox will gain more strength.”

Advertisement

Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital that “Spain’s decision appears calculated to increase the lure of Europe as a destination for illegal migrants in general, causing problems for all of its neighbors. 

“If Spain wishes to become a repository for such people, then I’m sure other European countries would appreciate signing agreements to transfer their own illegal migrants there. Absent this, we will all be paying the price for Spanish largesse.”

TRUMP SAYS HUNGARY’S BORDER STANCE KEEPS CRIME DOWN, SAYS EUROPE ‘FLOODING’ WITH MIGRANTS

A migrant walks by a makeshift settlement where migrants evicted from a former high school were camping outdoors in the middle of winter in Badalona, Spain, Dec. 26, 2025.  (Bruna Casas/Reuters)

Ricard Zapata-Barrero, a political science professor at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona, told Fox News Digital, “This is not a symbolic gesture. It is a direct challenge to the dominant European approach, which treats irregular migration primarily as a policing issue. Spain, instead, frames it as a governance problem, one that requires institutional capacity, legal pathways and administrative realism rather than more detention centers and externalized borders.”

Advertisement

Migrants in Madrid, Spain, April 9, 2024.  (Francesco Militello Mirto/Nur Photo via Getty Images)

He said Spain’s immigration system had been showing signs of strain for years.

“When hundreds of thousands of people live in irregularity for years, the issue stops being an individual failure and becomes a structural one,” Zapata-Barrero said. “In this context, regularization is not leniency — it is governability.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Migrants wait to disembark at the Port of Arguineguin after being rescued by a Spanish Coast Guard vessel on the island of Gran Canaria, Spain, Nov. 14, 2025. (Borja Suarez/Reuters)

Advertisement

“In a Europe closing in on itself, Spain has taken a step that sets it apart — not because it is ‘softer,’ but because it is more pragmatic,” he added. “Whether this becomes a model or a counter-model inside the EU remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: Spain has launched a political experiment that Europe will watch closely.”

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Free trade or fair play? MEPs go head-to-head on Mercosur in The Ring

Published

on

Free trade or fair play? MEPs go head-to-head on Mercosur in The Ring

Published on

What are the pros and cons of the EU-Mercosur trade deal? Why did the European Parliament send the text to the Court of Justice for clarification? Why did the EU sign an EU-India trade deal this week, and how will it impact you?

Some of the questions we pose on our latest episode of The Ring – Euronews’ weekly debating show, brought to you from the European Parliament studio in Brussels.

Irish MEP Ciaran Mullooly from Renew Europe and Swedish MEP Jörgen Warborn from the European People’s Party have a heated debate about their interpretation of the deal that was signed in Paraguay recently, after over two decades of negotiations.

Advertisement

Supporters of the deal say it shows the EU is open for business and can act decisively in a world of turmoil and geopolitical competition. Jörgen Warborn argues new trade deals are essential for growth, diversification, and global influence.

Critics of the pact fear low standards in food safety and inadequate support for European farmers. Ciaran Mullooly worries about farmers being undermined, environmental standards and public trust being eroded.

This episode of The Ring is anchored by Méabh Mc Mahon, produced by Luis Albertos and Amaia Echevarria, and edited by Zacharia Vigneron.

Watch The Ring on Euronews TV or in the player above and send us your views by writing to thering@euronews.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending