Virginia
What did Virginia Giuffre say about Donald Trump
Virginia Giuffre repeatedly refuted allegations that President Donald Trump was involved in the crimes of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in sworn testimony and her memoir.
One of Epstein’s most prominent accusers said she did not believe Trump was involved in any of Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors.
Although she has made no allegations against Trump, she has described meeting him in contexts unrelated to Epstein’s crimes.
Why It Matters
Newly disclosed emails and court documents from investigations into Epstein, released by the House Oversight Committee, have renewed scrutiny on Trump’s relationship with both Epstein and Giuffre.
With both political parties invoking the scandal in ongoing debates, the precise nature of Trump’s interactions with Epstein and whether he was alleged to have participated in Epstein’s criminal activities remain central questions.
Trump has also faced internal pressure from within his own MAGA base to disclose the full details of his relationship with the disgraced financier.
As divisions persist over whether the scandal implicates more Democrats or Republicans, the factual accounts of those directly involved, including Giuffre, are central to understanding any political or legal implications.
The inclusion of Trump and former President Bill Clinton in the newly released correspondence underscores the scandal’s bipartisan reach and the ongoing public demand for transparency regarding Epstein’s network of associates and political friends.
Both Trump and Clinton deny any wrongdoing and have never been charged with criminal activity.
Trump also said earlier this year that he declined an invitation to go to Epstein’s private island. “I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn’t want to go to his island,” he said.
Newsweek reached out to the Clinton Foundation and the White House outside of normal working hours via the contact forms on their websites for further comment.
What To Know
The House Oversight Committee on Wednesday released more than 20,000 pages related to Jeffrey Epstein, including emails referencing Trump, as part of ongoing inquiries into Epstein’s criminal activities and relationships.
Among the released correspondence is a 2011 email from Epstein to his convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, in which Epstein stated: “I want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is Trump.. [VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him.”
The emails released by the House Oversight Committee included the name “Virginia,” which the White House asserted referred to Virginia Giuffre.
Names of victims were redacted initially in accordance with their families’ wishes, according to Representative Robert Garcia, the leading Democrat on the US House Oversight Committee, as per BBC News.
While an email released by the committee quoted Epstein as saying, “Trump knew about the girls,” Giuffre’s account and those of other key witnesses—including Maxwell’s recorded testimony—do not corroborate any allegation against Trump.
Maxwell herself reportedly stated to the Justice Department that “Trump acted as a gentleman” and denied observing any inappropriate behavior by him.
What Giuffre Has Said About Trump
Giuffre’s own account, both in sworn depositions and her posthumously published memoir Nobody’s Girl, provides a consistent narrative regarding Trump.
While Trump and other high-profile individuals are mentioned, no new accusations or suggestions of any inappropriate behavior by him have emerged from Giuffre’s previous statements, and the record remains consistent with her longstanding position: she did not witness or allege any misconduct by Trump related to Epstein’s crimes.
In a November 2016 deposition, unsealed as part of the so-called “Epstein document dump,” Giuffre said: “I don’t think Donald Trump participated in anything. That would have to be another assumption. I never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Jeffrey Epstein? I’ve heard he has been, but I haven’t seen him myself, so I don’t know”.
Although Giuffre further testified that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, she did say they were good friends. But she only encountered Trump at Mar-a-Lago during her employment, and that Trump “never flirted with me.”
In her memoir, Giuffre alleged an initial meeting with Trump when her father, employed at Mar-a-Lago, introduced her for a locker-room attendant job.
She said: “Trump couldn’t have been friendlier, telling me it was fantastic that I was there. ‘Do you like kids?’ he asked. ‘Do you babysit at all?’”
She also recalled attending a lavish Halloween gathering in October 2000 at the Hudson Hotel in New York City, writing in her memoir: “On Halloween, along with other guests that included Donald and Melania Trump, Maxwell and Prince Andrew attended a party hosted by German supermodel Heidi Klum at The Hudson, a swank hotel.”
What People Are Saying Now
Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: “The Democrats are using the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax to try and deflect from their massive failures, in particular, their most recent one — THE SHUTDOWN!”
He added: “The Democrats cost our Country $1.5 Trillion Dollars with their recent antics of viciously closing our Country, while at the same time putting many at risk—and they should pay a fair price. There should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our Country, and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats!”
In a statement following the disclosure of new emails, a White House spokesperson said Giuffre “repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions.”
Addressing the renewed focus brought by the document releases, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the emails were “selectively leaked” by House Democrats to “liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump.”
“The more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover. These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the President,” Representative Robert Garcia, the leading Democrat on the US House Oversight Committee, said in a statement.
Annie Farmer, a key Epstein accuser and witness in Maxwell’s sex trafficking trial, called for “the full release” of the so-called Epstein files: “The estimated one thousand women and girls who were harmed by Epstein and his associates deserve full transparency.”
What Happens Next
The release of the emails and thousands of pages of Epstein-related correspondence has further fueled demands for greater transparency and a comprehensive investigation into the extent of Epstein’s associations and possible abuses.
Survivors and advocacy groups are pressing Congress and law enforcement for the full public release of all related documents.
Lawmakers have indicated potential additional disclosures in the coming months.
Virginia
Virginia voters to vote on measure that could determine control of Congress
ARLINGTON, Va. (7News) — After months of television ads, mailings, and debates, Virginia voters head to the polls Tuesday to vote on whether to approve a redistricting measure that would radically change Congressional maps in order to favor Democrats.
The measure has the potential to determine which party controls Congress after the midterm elections this fall.
ALSO READ | Virginia redistricting vote draws national attention
Virginia polling locations will be open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. The election is unusual in that there are no names of candidates on the ballot. Instead, there is just one question to vote yes or no on:
“Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?”
A yes vote would likely lead to a new map that would be expected to give Democrats a 10 to one edge in Virginia’s Congressional delegation. Under the current map, Democrats have six seats and Republicans have five.
Supporters of voting yes said the measure is in response to states like Texas that have gerrymandered in favor of Republicans winning House seats. But opponents who urge a no vote point out the measure would make Virginia one of the most gerrymandered states in the nation, and would create districts in which many voters don’t share common interests with each other.
The vote is expected to be close.
“It seems to me that a strong turnout effort on election day can give either side a win,” said Stephen Farnsworth, a political science professor at the University of Mary Washington. “The big challenge for both the yes and the no side is to get people who will support them if they turn out to actually do soI think anybody who is not strongly committed one side or the other is likely to stay home.”
ALSO READ | Virginia voters to decide redistricting that could flip 4 GOP seats
Advertisements and messaging from both sides have left some voters confused. For example, both supporters and opponents of the measure have referenced Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger. She supports the measure to counterbalance Republican actions elsewhere, but in the past she has made strong statements against the type of gerrymandering the ballot measure would allow.
“Usually when people are confused, they don’t vote. Some of them do, but most of them don’t,” said Larry Sabato, the director of The Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.
Sabato said it’s tough to predict which side will win. Even though the limited polling that’s been done has given a narrow edge to the yes vote, data related to early voting may tell a different story.
“Normally, you would think given Virginia’s pretty strong Democratic lean, that this very partisan referendum would be enough to generate Democratic turnout for Democrats to win,” he said. “But I’ll tell you why people are hesitant – they’ve seen large turnouts in conservative, Republican areas. Because [voters in those areas] are mad. Their representatives are being eliminated through this process.”
“This is going to be tied very closely to how one feels about President Trump,” Farnsworth said. “The people who don’t like President Trump will vote in favor of this amendment. The people who do like President Trump will vote against it.”
It’s not clear how many people will actually show up at the polls on election day Tuesday.
“People who were very interested in this, who were knowledgeable about the subject, probably voted early for the most part,” Sabato said.
Mail-in ballots can still be dropped off at official drop boxes until 7 p.m. on Tuesday, and if they are mailed they need to be postmarked by Tuesday and received by noon on Friday.
Virginia
Virginia Sen. Mark Warner’s daughter has died: ‘Heartbroken beyond words’
WASHINGTON — Virginia Senator Mark Warner and Lisa Collis are mourning the loss of their daughter Madison.
The 36-year-old died after a “decades-long battle with juvenile diabetes,” the couple said in a statement
“We are heartbroken beyond words by the passing of our beloved daughter,” the statement read. “She filled our lives with love and laughter, and her absence leaves an immeasurable void.”
Warner and Collis said they were are grateful for the loving support of friends and family and asked for privacy as they grieve.
📲: CONNECT WITH US
Blue Sky | Facebook | Instagram | X | Threads | TikTok | YouTube
This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy. To learn more about how we use AI in our newsroom, click here.
Virginia
Virginia’s special election redistricting battle is next week and has national impacts
Virginians are heading to the polls to vote “yes” or “no” on a ballot initiative in a high-stakes special election that could upend this year’s midterm elections.
Voters on Tuesday will decide if they want to move forward with Democrats’ redistricting plan which would significantly change the state’s congressional map, giving Democrats a 10-1 advantage instead of the current 6-5 Democratic to Republican split.
Virginia is one of many states that took a look at their congressional maps this year after President Donald Trump encouraged Republican-led states to redraw their maps ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Both parties in Virginia are pushing get out the vote efforts as early voting lags behind previous years and a huge amount of cash is flowing into the mid-decade redistricting effort.
Here’s what to know:
Democrats try to eliminate several GOP seats
In February, Virginia Democrats finalized an agreement over how to redraw the state’s congressional map. It would lead to eight safely Democratic districts, two districts that lean Democratic and one safe Republican district.
As it currently stands, Virginia has six Democrats and five Republicans in the House.
The amendment passed by Democrats in February would temporarily bypass the state’s typical redistricting process. If voters approve the amendment through the referendum on April 21, Democrats would be able to move forward with their map.
The amendment would put in place a temporary process. After the 2030 census, the state’s standard redistricting process would resume with maps to be decided by a bipartisan commission.
The lead-up to the election has seen an influx of spending, and The Washington Post noted that due to state election records, 95% of the total $93 million raised as of Monday came from nonprofit groups that are not required to disclose their donors.
The leading group, Virginians for Fair Elections, reported raising $64 million in favor of the referendum. About $40 million of that came from House Majority Forward, which is led by House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the Post reported using data from tracking firm AdImpact. The Fairness Project added $11.7 million to the effort. It’s backed by new Gov. Abigail Spanberger.
Virginians for Fair Elections secured a television advertisement for voting “yes” on the ballot initiative featuring former President Barack Obama. He said voting the measure through was the “responsible” thing to do.
The group that wants Virginians to vote “no” on the measure is made up of several smaller groups, including Virginians for Fair Maps. That group took in $22 million and another $7 million was raised by Justice for Democracy PAC, an anti-redistricting group, Cardinal News, a southern Virginia outlet, reported.
According to Cardinal News, the $7 million donation to the PAC was given by a nonprofit, which didn’t have to disclose its donors. However, that same nonprofit was used by billionaire Peter Thiel in support of Vice President JD Vance’s 2022 Senate campaign.
Even if Virginians pass the measure, the process putting in place the new map is still under judicial review, with the state Supreme Court hearing a challenge later this month.
The Deseret News has reached out to both Virginians for Fair Maps and the Fairness Project for comment.
How did we get here?
Trump kick-started the redistricting battle last year with the Texas Republican congressional delegation and told them the state should seek five new seats that the Republican Party could win through redistricting.
It was a sign that Trump was looking to not have a repeat of his first presidency, when Democrats flipped the House two years into his term.
In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared “game on” and instructed the California state Legislature to redraw the state’s maps to find five additional seats for the Democrats.
Californians overwhelmingly passed Proposition 50 in a special election last year.
Missouri followed, calling a special session to redraw its state map, looking to gain one GOP seat. North Carolina was next, announcing new plans for a redistricting session last October.
Several other states have joined the nationwide fight, wotj varying outcomes, including Ohio, New York, Maryland, Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Colorado and Kansas.
What does it mean?
Historically, the party that controls the White House almost always loses ground with voters in the midterm elections. In the last 20 out of 22 midterms dating back to 1938, the president’s party has lost ground in the House; the only exceptions were due to unusual circumstances like the 9/11 terror attacks and former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment.
Upon returning to the White House, Trump has had the benefit of a slim Republican majority in both the House and Senate. In the House, there are currently 217 Republicans, 213 Democrats, one independent that caucuses with the GOP and four vacancies.
While the GOP looks to gain about 15 new seats through redistricting, Democrats may come out on top. According to RealClearPolitics’ polling averages for generic 2026 congressional voting, Democrats have a 5.6 percentage point advantage, up 2.9 percentage points from last October.
It’s a trend that may change over the next several months, particularly as the Trump administration aims to make its case with voters that the Iran war was necessary and consumers see gas prices stabilize.
However, it is something that has Republicans concerned. They’ve shown enough concern that Democrats could flip the House and even the Senate — where the GOP has a 53-45 majority — that they are preparing for a Supreme Court justice retirement in the coming months. They know that if Democrats control the upper chamber and a retirement happens, there’s no way one of Trump’s appointees would be voted through.
-
Technology5 minutes agoThe Vergecast Vergecast, 2026 edition
-
World11 minutes agoMexico pyramid shooter who took hostages and killed 1 is identified
-
Politics17 minutes agoByron Donalds cracks down on persistent border blind spot leaving US vulnerable to overstays
-
Health23 minutes agoHealthy diets spark lung cancer risk in non-smokers as pesticides loom
-
Sports30 minutes agoPGA Tour signals new era with axing of Hawaii events from schedule
-
Technology35 minutes agoAlexa+ lets you order food like a real conversation
-
Business41 minutes agoNew lawsuit alleges Uber is violating drivers’ rights. Here’s how
-
Entertainment47 minutes agoReview: Trigger warning? ‘For Want of a Horse’ gives new meaning to the term ‘animal lover’