Movie Reviews
10 Great Movies Panned Upon Release, From ‘The Thing’ to ‘Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me’
Nowadays, it seems almost any movie released to positive reviews gets some buzz as an “instant classic.” But a lot of classics aren’t dubbed as such upon release — quite the opposite, actually. Sometimes, the movies that go on to endure the longest and find the most devoted of followings are the ones completely dismissed upon their premiere.
Hindsight is a fickle, fickle beast, and nowhere is it more powerful than in the world of film criticism, where the instant reactions of a movie don’t always measure up to what the movie’s legacy will be years and decades down the line. There are plenty of well-reviewed, commercially successful, and even Oscar-winning films that have, from the passage of time, lost their luster in some way or another — whether it’s just because of taste changing (see: “Out of Africa”) or some broader backlash and controversy (see: “American Beauty.”)
Then, there are times where the exact opposite has happened. If a film is ahead of its time, sometimes it’s difficult for those looking at it then to see its virtues. Across film history there have been movies that have bombed at the box office, gone ignored by the Oscars, and — most dispiriting of all — gotten savaged by film critics, that have since received major reappraisals in their legacies. Sometimes, those reevaluations are led by filmmakers, others by future critics digging up an underrated gem. Regardless, it’s a phenomenon that happens often enough to remind one that a film’s reputation isn’t set in stone, but a living thing that can undergo a metamorphosis, degrading or growing with the years.
Oftentimes, these films are on the stranger or less conventional side, with singular aesthetics or styles that audiences can’t really appreciate because they’re so new — pioneering works like “The Night of the Hunter” and “Metropolis” fit into this category. Others are panned by critics who find their actual content objectionable; it’s no surprise a decent amount of these films are in the horror genre, which often stirs controversy and criticism for its violence, sex, and explicit content. Whatever the reason, these 10 films got, at best, mixed reactions from professional critics in their day — but today? They’ve secured reputations as some of the most acclaimed movies ever. Read on for 10 great films that were panned by critics upon release.
-
“Metropolis” (1927)
Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection Today, Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis” is regarded as one of the greatest achievements of the silent film period, and a pioneering science fiction work with themes of class warfare and human nature that would influence many works to come. But, while German expressionist work received some positive reviews, reception was mixed at best upon release. Variety wrote that “so much really artistic work was wasted on this manufactured story” in their dispatch at the time. Mordaunt Hall of The New York Times called it a “Technical marvel with feet of clay.” The most damning pan came from English science fiction writer H.G. Wells, who accused the film of “foolishness, cliché, platitude, and muddlement about mechanical progress and progress in general,” and compared it unfavorably to other science fiction works, most notably Mary Shelley’s original “Frankenstein” novel.
-
“The Night of the Hunter” (1955)
Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection Based on a novel of the same name, Charles Laughton’s “The Night of the Hunter” is a stark black and white fairy tale starring Robert Mitchum in his most iconic role as a serial killer who poses as a preacher to manipulate and torment a widowed woman and her two children. At the time of its release in 1955, reviews had some nice things to say, but largely considered the film a failure. Bosley Crowther of the New York Times called the movie a “weird and intriguing endeavor,” but criticized Laughton’s direction and the allegorical elements of the film. Gene Arneel of Variety said the film was “bewitching at times,” but “loses sustained drive via too many offbeat touches that have a misty effect.”
Laughton took the failure of the film hard, and never made a movie again. However, by the ’70s — as a result of TV screenings, art house showings, and reappraisals from critics like Roger Ebert — it had been reevaluated as a masterpiece, and one of the greatest thrillers ever made.
-
“Vertigo” (1958)
Image Credit: Everett Collection / Everett Collection Alfred Hitchcock was a director who enjoyed plenty of critical acclaim during his career as a filmmaker. But upon its release, “Vertigo” — his 1958 film starring James Stewart as a private detective with acrophobia who becomes obsessed with the woman (Kim Novak) he’s assigned to trail — wasn’t one of them. The film received some positive reviews, but most were tepid at best. Variety called the movie “only a psychological murder mystery” and criticized its length and pacing. Bosley Crowther of the New York Times gave the movie some qualified praise, but called the twist “devilishly far-fetched,” while John McCarten of The New Yorker was extremely critical, writing that Hitchcock had “never before indulged in such farfetched nonsense.” In the years following its initial release, “Vertigo” quickly rose in reputation, and now it’s commonly considered Hitchcock’s masterwork, and even topped the Sight & Sound Greatest Films of All Time poll.
-
“Bonnie and Clyde” (1967)
Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection Arthur Penn’s “Bonnie and Clyde,” a romantic account of the notorious 1930s outlaws, was very controversial at its time for its graphic violence and perceived glorification of its subjects, and the reviews of the day were appropriately divided. Roger Ebert was highly positive, giving the film one of its major raves. Other critics were less kind. Dave Kaufman of Variety criticized Penn’s direction as uneven, while Joe Morgenstern of Newsweek called the film a “squalid shoot-’em-up,” but later reevaluated it upon a second watch. The most notorious pan, however, came from Bosley Crowther of The New York Times, who wrote in his review that the film was “a cheap piece of bald-faced slapstick comedy that treats the hideous depredations of that sleazy, moronic pair as though they were as full of fun and frolic as the jazz-age cutups in ‘Thoroughly Modern Millie.’” Even as the film became a financial success and eventually attracted more positive criticism, Crowther remained vehemently opposed to it, and was replaced as the Times’ chief critic a year later at least partially because of the controversy. The film would ultimately receive 10 Oscar nominations, and is nowadays credited with ushering in the New Hollywood revolution of the late ’60s and ’70s.
-
“The Rocky Horror Picture Show” (1975)
Image Credit: ©20thCentFox/Courtesy Everett Collection Early reviews of “The Rocky Horror Picture Show,” a film version of Richard O’Brien and Jim Sharman’s cult classic British musical, were largely negative. Reviewers from Variety called it “labored,” the San Francisco Chronicle said it lacked “charm and dramatic impact,” while Newsweek wrote that it was “tasteless, plotless, and pointless.” The movie also flopped upon its initial release, but slowly picked up an audience through midnight movie screenings. That audience only grew through the years, and the film is now a beloved queer cult film, one that continues to be screened year round to this day.
-
“Sorcerer” (1977)
Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection A remake of the 1953 French film “The Wages of Fear,” William Friedkin’s “Sorcerer” stars Roy Scheider, Bruno Cremer, Francisco Rabal, and Amidou as four men living in Central America who get hired to transport two trucks loaded with dynamite 200 miles to an oil well. Made under grueling conditions that escalated its budget, the film was a massive box office bomb upon release, and reviews weren’t much better. Although a few critics like Roger Ebert and Vincent Canby gave the movie decent notices, many other reviewers unfavorably compared it to “The Wages of Fear” and criticized Friedkin for perceived poor craftsmanship. In a review for The Village Voice, Andrew Sarris went as far as to call it “a visual and aural textbook on everything that is wrong with current movies.” In the years since, however, the film has largely been reevaluated, and is regularly seen as one of Friedkin’s best projects and one of the best movies of the ’70s.
-
“The Shining” (1980)
Image Credit: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection At the time of its release, Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining” was largely received very negatively by both audiences (earning a “C+” Cinemascore) and critics. Many reviewers criticized the film’s slow pacing, its deviations from the original Stephen King novel it was based upon, and its perceived lack of emotional impact. Janet Maslin of the New York Times said “even the film’s most startling horrific images seem overbearing and perhaps even irrelevant,” while Pauline Kael wrote “Again and again, the movie leads us to expect something – almost promises it – and then disappoints us.” Both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert were negative in their reviews of the film, with Siskel calling it a “a crashing disappointment” that “contains effectively no thrills” while Ebert wrote in his review that it was impossible to connect with the film’s characters. At the first Golden Raspberry Awards, Kubrick was nominated for Worst Director. In the long run, though, “The Shining” was criticially appraised as one of the best horror films ever — and, in contrast to what critics said at the time, one of the absolute scariest.
-
“Possession” (1981)
Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection Another horror film that critics didn’t know what to make of upon its release, “Possession” — Andrzej Żuławski’s oblique film about the deteriorating marriage between a spy (Sam Neill) and his unraveling wife (Isabelle Adjani) — was received with lukewarm response upon its U.S. release, in part due to edits made from the original cut. Harry Haun of the New York Daily News wrote that the film was “outlandishly unhinged” and a “mess,” while Leonard Maltin called it a “confusing drama of murder, horror, intrigue.” In his review, New York Times critic Vincent Canby wrote that “New York audiences might be reduced to helpless laughter” by the film. Thanks to the original cut coming to America, and some critical appraisal, the fiendish marital drama is now largely regarded today as one of the best horror movies ever made.
-
“The Thing” (1982)
Image Credit: ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection A commercial failure upon release, John Carpenter’s “The Thing” was also widely negatively received by critics, with many responding poorly to the film’s cynical, anti-authoritarian themes. In a brutal pan, Vincent Canby referred to the film as a “foolish, depressing, overproduced movie that mixes horror with science fiction to make something that is fun as neither one thing or the other,” calling it a “moron movie” and “instant junk.” Other critics such as Linda Gross wrote that the film was “bereft, despairing, and nihilistic,” claiming that the tone prevented the deaths of the characters from having any impact. The visual effects were largely praised, but many critics also had a problem with their gore and excess. Home video helped the movie pick up a cult audience, and by the ’90s, the film had been reevaluated as a classic.
-
“Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me” (1992)
Image Credit: ©New Line Cinema/Courtesy Everett Collection Premiering a year after the original TV run of “Twin Peaks” endedthe story of Dale Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan) on a massive cliffhanger, “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me” was greeted with revulsion from both fans and critics, at least partially because it was instead a prequel about the final days of haunted prom queen Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee). At its premiere at the Cannes Film Festival, Lynch recalled the film getting booed by audiences, while critics referred to the film as “shockingly bad” (Roger Ebert) and “pathologically unpleasant” (Janet Maslin). Reviews upon its American release were just as negative: Vincent Canby wrote “It’s not the worst movie ever made; it just seems to be” while Owen Gleiberman called it “a true folly” in which “almost nothing adds up.”
Through the ’90s and 2000s, as Lynch repaired his reputation through masterpieces like “Mulholland Drive” and “Twin Peaks” was evaluated as a canonical, defining TV show, more defenders of “Fire Walk With Me” have emerged, with critics praising Lee’s performance as Laura Palmer and the film’s unvarnished depiction of abuse. By 2017, when the sequel series to “Twin Peaks” “The Return” premiered to massive critical acclaim, the film’s reputation had been restored completely, and it’s now viewed as a classic.
Movie Reviews
‘Night Nurse’ Review: A Caretaker Explores Her Kink for Elder Abuse in the Year’s Strangest Erotic Thriller
There are any number of erotic thrillers in which rich old men are robbed blind and/or left for dead, but Georgia Bernstein’s admirably bizarre “Night Nurse” might be the first movie of its kind where elder abuse is the source — and possible subject— of its erotic thrills. If there are others, I’m not sure I want to know.
But this woozy debut feature doesn’t rely on its audience being turned on by the relationship between a nubile caretaker and her dementia-addled patient. Their psychosexual bond, meanwhile, hinges on cold-calling vulnerable old people under the guise of a grandchild in financial distress. (“I’m in trouble, nana, send me $10,000 or I’ll be left to rot in jail!” That sort of thing). With its slim wisp of a premise stretched into a Strickland-esque dreamscape that substitutes kink for conflict, the film itself hardly seems convinced by its own wrinkled lust — all desperate kisses and non-touching poses of subservience. More important to Bernstein is what that lust reveals about her characters’ deepest needs, specifically how their need to care and be cared for can be as easily perverted as any other form of desire.
As moody and weightless as the noir-accented score that blows through the movie like a curlicue gust of wind in an old cartoon (credit to musicians Sam Clapp and Steven Jackson), “Night Nurse” lacks the pulse required for its stray feelings to come alive. Still, the film ambiently taps into the latent eroticism of teasing out the distance between how you see yourself and who you really are. Bernstein plays with that distance like a telephone cord wrapped around her fingers, and Eleni — played by the excellent newcomer Cemre Paksoy, powerfully helpless — only frays even more as the receiver is brought near the hook. “Everything I did before today wasn’t me,” the nurse tells co-worker Mona (Eleonore Hendricks) after starting a new job at an Illinois retirement home. “It was somebody else.”
What she did before today remains unexplored (specifically, what she did to get herself fired from her last gig), but I’m guessing she’s probably changed less than she thought. There’s a faraway flicker in her eyes the moment she catches the vibe between Mona and Douglas (a ribald and elusive Bruce McKenzie), a white-haired seventysomething who shows early signs of dementia but still commands an undiminished sexual energy. “I’m not an invalid,” he coos as Mona bathes him in the tub, to which she replies, “yes, you are,” in a supplicant tone that hints at a rich history of power games between them.
Later that same night, Douglas will force Eleni to call a stranger, pretend that she’s their granddaughter, and ask for money — he’ll wrap the phone cord around the nurse’s body as she talks and shove her against the wall as they kiss. She’s into it. So into it that he has to clarify the terms of his whole deal: “If you’re looking for a pogo stick, I’m really not your guy.” But Eleni isn’t looking for anything to bounce on. She just wants to be needed, and maybe to need someone in return. Someone who will see her for who she really is and allow her the fantasy of pretending she isn’t being herself when she cons vulnerable strangers out of their money — when she exploits how enthralled those strangers are by the care they have for their loved ones.
“Night Nurse” doesn’t belabor the psychology, as Bernstein prefers to express her story through heavy-lidded suggestion. Somnambulating from the moment it starts, the film moves through a series of beautifully arranged poses that stretch their latent meaning thin across the surface (Lidia Nikonova’s cinematography lacquers every shot with a seductive dreaminess). We see Douglas smoking in a lawn chair with Mona and Eleni curled around his feet. Eleni riding in the backseat of a convertible as the wind blows through her curls. The full staff of nurses — all of them under Douglas’ sway — stumbling around his condo in a state of zonked out bliss as they roll on the prescription drugs they’ve stolen from the residents.
Once you’ve seen one shot of this movie, you’ve practically seen them all, at least until things escalate during a rushed and unsatisfying third act that forces Eleni into an honest confrontation with herself. People will do just about anything to feel needed — they’ll give whatever degree of care allows them to receive it in return. “Night Nurse” understands that desire, but remains far too numb to treat it.
Grade: C+
The Independent Film Company will relase “Night Nurse” in theaters on Friday, July 10.
Movie Reviews
Movie review: Supergirl is a blast
Last year’s “Superman” ended with Iggy Pop singing “Because I’m a punk rocker, yes I am” — an ironic coda for a superlatively square hero. But it rings straightforwardly true for Superman’s cousin.
Milly Alcock’s Kara Zor-El, or Supergirl, sports not a spandex suit but a Blondie T-shirt. When we meet her in Craig Gillespie’s “Supergirl,” she’s been on an interstellar bender for days. She’s more Courtney Love than Clark Kent.
Nonchalant and sarcastic, Kara is also a little Han Solo-ish, you might say, given that she moves capriciously through the galaxy in her junky spaceship while getting in fights in extraterrestrial bars. She’s a welcome, jagged riff on more buttoned-up superheroes, and Alcock is terrific in the role. If only “Supergirl” was as good as she is.
While the latest DC release, and second under James Gunn’s stewardship, has its moments, “Supergirl” struggles to match Kara’s punk-rock energy with an equally spirited supporting cast and story.
Skepticism seems to have gathered for “Supergirl” ahead of its release. Many fans have argued it wasn’t the right next step for DC Universe. But I’m not so sure. Alcock’s breezy cameo in “Superman” was one of that movie’s highlights. Handing the follow-up to her, and her faithful floating dog Krypto, strikes me as an extremely natural next step. When in doubt, follow the dog.
And much of “Supergirl” is winning. It resides almost entirely in space, touching down only momentarily on Earth. In its consistently creative production design, clever needle drops and underdog story arc, “Supergirl” resides a little closer to Gunn’s “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies than other DC entries. Its outer space is filled with cosmic detritus, mean characters and cute critters. Seth Rogen as the voice of a tiny alien co-piloting a space bus is an inspired concoction, as is a shabbier sci-fi realm with rest stops along the intergalactic highway.
Movie Reviews
‘The Guest’ Review: Trine Dyrholm Gives a Scorcher of a Performance in a Gutsy Danish Party-Gone-Wrong Drama
A family and friends gather for a naming-day ceremony at a Danish seaside hotel, but an unexpected appearance by one uninvited attendee (Trine Dyrholm) ruptures the veil of bland, happy-clappy familial unity in director Mads Mengel’s gutsy, well-wrought debut feature, The Guest.
The most audacious move here may be Mengel and co-screenwriter Christian Bengtson’s choice to write something that will inevitably invite comparisons with Festen (The Celebration), arguably the most notorious Danish-language film of the last 30 years, which similarly revolved around a bougie gathering disrupted by angry revelations. But there’s a savvy 2026 vibe about the way the film refuses to create florid melodrama out of quotidian crisis, and instead observes with generosity as the characters grope awkwardly toward emotional détente and mutual forgiveness.
The Guest
The Bottom Line When wetting the baby’s head goes too far.
Venue: Karlovy Vary Film Festival
Cast: Simon Bennebjerg, Trine Dyrholm, Josephine Park, Peter Gantzler, Petrine Agger, Mette Klakstein Wiberg, Kristine Kujath Thorp, Buster Lund Luscher
Director: Mads Mengel
Screenwriter: Christian Bengtson, Mads Mengel
1 hour 40 minutes
Festen-alumnus Dyrholm, having a bit of a career moment with outstanding performances both here and in the recent The Girl With the Needle among others, leads a uniformly excellent cast in a work that deserves celebration on the festival circuit and beyond.
Dyrholm’s Vibeke is technically the first person we meet, although she’s seen only in shadow at first as she smokes and drives while her unattached seatbelt, caught outside by a closed door, clatters on the road. This is the kind of unsafe driving her son Karl (Simon Bennebjerg) so deplores, a point of contention later on in the story when he will steal her car keys in interest of her own safety and that of others.
But well before we get to that flashpoint, the film introduces Karl, effectively the film’s protagonist, as he arrives at the swanky resort with his wife Emilie (Mette Klakstein Wiberg) and their infant son Elliot (Buster Lund Luscher). The young family, who’ve chosen this new, secular tradition instead of a christening to welcome their child to the world, are there a day before the ceremony to meet up with core family members.
As this advance party settles down for dinner, a table that includes Karl’s sister Rikke (Josephine Park) and Emilie’s parents Frank (Peter Gantzler) and Kirsten (Petrine Agger), there’s a surprise: Vibeke is coming, courtesy of Rikke’s invitation. Karl is quietly furious and seems determined to turn her away, even when she shows up minutes later. Poor Frank and Kirsten look on confused, determinedly polite in their insistence that all family members should be welcome.
Bengtson and Mengel’s economical script carefully dripfeeds backstory as the film unfolds to explain that Karl hasn’t spoken to his mother in years, that Rikke has taken over all the daily mom management and that she’s very worn out by it. Even so, she insists Vibeke is regularly taking her medication and isn’t a problem these days, although to Karl every weird anecdote and moment of emotional intensity is an augur of impending chaos. Rikke counters that their mother is just “big, that’s her personality not her condition.”
Interestingly, that specific condition is never named throughout, although armchair diagnosticians might spot many of the signs of bipolar disorder. But the film’s emotional focus on the person and her actions rather than the label is also very contemporary, reflecting a more holistic, inclusive mindset and approach to dealing with mental health issues.
Which is all fine and dandy, until Vibeke duly does skip a dosage and starts getting manic. One of the first signs of chemical imbalance arrives during the ceremony on the beach, when Vibeke carries little Elliot much further away from the shore than anyone wants, creating a panic. From there it just gets worse as Vibeke picks up on the censorious feeling emerging from the other party guests, who had found her so charming the night before when she’d led everyone to the casino to play roulette and diverted a bunch of partying teenagers from the room next to Karl and Emilie so they could get some sleep. When the toasts at the formal dinner begin, Vibeke’s mood darkens much further, and if we’ve all learned one thing from Festen, it’s be very afraid when a Dane gets up to make a toast.
Cinematographer David Bauer’s nimble-footed lensing and use of natural light does indeed hark back considerably to the look of those Dogme 95 movies back in the day, as does the naturalistic editing style deployed by Louis Emil Ramm Seeberg. But there are plenty of sins against the rules of cinematic chastity that marked that movement, such as the ample space made for Lasse Aagaard’s affecting, low-key score that amps up the anxiety as Vibeke starts to spiral.
That said, Mengel keeps things simple in sonic terms when it really counts, letting the musicality of Dyrholm’s deep, sonorous voice ring out on its own in the big monologue scenes. She is, as ever, utterly mesmerizing but the performance is made even more powerful by the muted, expressive reactions of the rest of the cast as they look on, frozen like deer in the headlights of the car crash of pseudo-christening. Moments of levity puncture the gloom, but the final feeling is one of numbed sorrow and pity for all these kind, fallible people, just trying to do their best.
-
Massachusetts34 seconds agoHealey administration vows to appeal as Trump rejects Massachusetts blizzard aid request – The Boston Globe
-
Minnesota3 minutes agoMinnesota Looks to Add 1,100 Child Care Slots, With Melrose Among the 11 Funded Communities
-
Mississippi9 minutes agoDeath of Mississippi teen Nolan Wells under investigation
-
Missouri16 minutes agoMissouri realtors hold statewide rally to vote no on Amendments 4 & 5
-
Montana18 minutes agoDistrict court judge blocks new Montana GOP bylaws – WTOP News
-
Nebraska24 minutes agoNebraska ag experts say early detection for livestock parasites, illnesses will be important during summer show season
-
Nevada31 minutes agoLocal artists on Northern Nevada stages, now through Labor Day weekend
-
New Hampshire33 minutes agoTrans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling









